A Human Rotavirus Vaccine Dr. Batrice De Vos GlaxoSmithKline - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a human rotavirus vaccine
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A Human Rotavirus Vaccine Dr. Batrice De Vos GlaxoSmithKline - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

7th International Rotavirus Symposium Lisbon, Portugal, 12-13 June 2006 A Human Rotavirus Vaccine Dr. Batrice De Vos GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals Rixensart, Belgium Rotarix is a trade mark of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies 1


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A Human Rotavirus Vaccine

  • Dr. Béatrice De Vos

GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals Rixensart, Belgium

Rotarix is a trade mark of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies

7th International Rotavirus Symposium

Lisbon, Portugal, 12-13 June 2006

slide-2
SLIDE 2

1

Biography of a Human Attenuated RV Vaccine Rix4414

Rotarix™ vaccine lot

Passaged in Primary African Green Monkey Kidney (AGMK) Further Passaged in AGMK Further Passaged in Vero Cell Line & Cloning steps RIX4414 master seed Further passaged in Vero cell line J Gamble Inst. Med. Research, Cincinnati AVANT Immunotherapeutics GSK Bio

89-12 strain isolated from stools

  • f a 15-month old boy in Cincinnati

Rotarix™ - rotavirus vaccine

slide-3
SLIDE 3

2

Why was HRV strain 89-12 a good vaccine candidate?

  • 1989 : Natural infection with 89-12 G1 RV strain from Cincinnati

provided excellent protection against RV disease during next RV season

  • Live vaccine was prepared by serial passage of 89-12 strain
  • 1997-98 : Placebo controlled study reported a VE against “any”

RV GE of 89% and 100% against “very severe” RVGE

  • 1998-99 : F/U showed protection in a 2nd year of 100% against

“very severe” RVGE

Ward et al, J. Infect. Dis. 1991,164: 277-283; Bernstein D et al, 1999. Lancet 354:287-290 Bernstein D, et al, 2000. Abstract IDSA 2000

Rotarix™ - rotavirus vaccine

slide-4
SLIDE 4

3

  • Live, attenuated, human RV (parent strain 89-12)1
  • G1P[8]2
  • Broad cross-protection2,3
  • Oral, 1mL
  • Two doses from 6 weeks of age, minimum 4 weeks apart4
  • Storage at 2–8°C 4
  • Co-administration with other vaccines: DTPw, DTPa, HBV, Hib, IPV,

OPV 4, Men C 5, Strep pneum6

1Bernstein et al, Lancet 1999 354 287–290; 2Offit, Sem Pediatr Infect Dis 2002 13 190–195; 3Ruiz-Palacios et al, WSPID 2002 4Rotarix™ Prescribing Information 5Tejedor JC T et al. ESPID, Basel, Switzerland

May 3-5, 2006 Abstract 456 6Schuster V T et al. ESPID, Basel, Switzerland May 3-5, 2006 Abstract 461

Rotarix™ - rotavirus vaccine

Vaccine Profile

slide-5
SLIDE 5

4

Mexico Panama Costa Rica Venezuela Brazil Honduras Nicaragua Dominican Rep. South Africa Malawi Singapore Bangladesh Hong Kong Taiwan Thailand Vietnam India Korea Colombia Peru Chile Argentina Canada Czech Republic France Spain Italy Belgium Germany Finland USA

Phase I – II – III Studies … a worldwide development

Rotarix™ - rotavirus vaccine

slide-6
SLIDE 6

5

Phase III Efficacy and Safety Study 023 Latin-America & Finland

Rotarix™ - rotavirus vaccine

slide-7
SLIDE 7

6

Phase III study in Latin America (023)

n=63,225 infants of 6-13 weeks of age enrolled and randomized (1:1)

RIX4414 Placebo month 0 n=31,552 Trial profile n=31,673

1st Dose 2nd Dose

Month 1-2

Ruiz-Palacios G. et al N. Engl. J. Med. 2006; 354: 11-22

Month 2-4 Safety analysis (N=63,225) Month 9-10 1yr Efficacy analysis (N=17,867)

Routine immunizations were co-administered according to local regulations Study conducted in 4Q 2003-2005 (2yr)

Pivotal Phase III Study 023

slide-8
SLIDE 8

7

Dominican Republic

4056 (6.4%)

Mexico

13245 (20.9%)

Brazil

3218 (5.1%)

Nicaragua

4057 (6.4%)

Honduras

4195 (6.6%)

Panama

4061 (6.4%)

Chile

3458 (5.5%)

Argentina

4671 (7.4%)

Venezuela

4250 (6.7%)

Colombia

3910 (6.2%)

Peru

12044 (19.0%)

Finland

2060 (3.3%)

Safety cohort (N=63,225) 18 sites in 12 countries

Pivotal Phase III Study 023

Ruiz-Palacios G. et al N. Engl. J. Med. 2006; 354: 11-22

slide-9
SLIDE 9

8

Methods

Placebo-controlled, randomized, double blind study (N=63,225)

  • Study population

31.673 vaccinees and 31.552 placebo recipients

  • Dose 1: mean age 8.2 weeks (97% ≤ 13 weeks old)
  • Dose 2: mean age 15.8 weeks
  • Case Definition

Definite IS according to Brighton Collaboration Group

  • Demonstration at surgery
  • Gas or liquid contrast enema
  • Abdominal ultrasound with specific characteristic features proven to be

reduced by hydrostatic enema

  • Autopsy criteria

Pivotal Phase III Study 023 – Safety

Ruiz-Palacios G. et al N. Engl. J. Med. 2006; 354: 11-22

slide-10
SLIDE 10

9

5 10 15 20 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 RotaShield™ RIX4414/placebo

5 10 15 20 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 V = Vaccine P = Placebo V P P P P V V V V P V P P

Dose 1 Dose 2

V P V P P P P P

IS cases IS cases

75 83 107 145

V P P P

1 Murphy TV et al, N Engl J Med, 2001.

Vesikari T et al. ESPID 2005, abstract 31

Occurrence of Definite IS Cases Compared to RotaShield™-Associated Cases1

Pivotal Phase III Study 023 – Safety

slide-11
SLIDE 11

10 10

Placebo group Vaccine group

0 31 days

6 6 7 7

Relative Risk = 0.85 (0.30 ; 2.42)

9 9 16 16

0 100 days

Relative Risk = 0.1 (0.02 ; 0.60)

Cases of IS

Ruiz-Palacios G. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006; 354: 11-22 Macias, abstract, ICAAC, 2005, Washington, USA (poster)

Safety - Intussusception Surveillance

Relative Risk = 0.28 (0.1 ; 0.81)

Safety cohort N=31,673 Safety cohort N=31,552

Efficacy cohort N=10,159 Efficacy cohort N=10,010

1 1 10 10 4 4 14 14

0 1 year

Relative Risk = 0.56 (0.25 ; 1.24)

Pivotal Phase III Study 023 – Safety

slide-12
SLIDE 12

11 11

Study 023 – Latin America

Results : 1yr Efficacy

Phase III Study 036

slide-13
SLIDE 13

12 12

Vaccine efficacy against severe RV GE

Vaccine efficacy (95% CI)

84.7

(71.7 - 92.4)

84.8

(71.1 – 92.7)

P-value < 0.001 < 0.001 Vaccinees n=9,009 Placebo n=8,858

12 11 77 71

N subjects with severe RV GE

Clinical Vesikari score ≥11

From 2 weeks post-dose 2 to 1 year of age

Ruiz-Palacios G. et al N. Engl. J. Med. 2006; 354: 11-22 ATP efficacy cohort

Pivotal Phase III Study 023 – Efficacy

slide-14
SLIDE 14

13 13

Vaccine efficacy against RV GE hospitalization

Vaccine efficacy [95% CI]

85

(69.6 - 93.5)

P-value < 0.001 Vaccinees n=9,009 Placebo n=8,858

9 59

N subjects hospitalized

Clinical

Ruiz-Palacios G. et al N. Engl. J. Med. 2006; 354: 11-22

From 2 weeks post-dose 2 to 1 year of age

Pivotal Phase III Study 023 – Efficacy

Vaccine Efficacy against any GE hospitalization 42% (95% CI 29-53)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

14 14

Efficacy against severe RV GE by main serotype

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 G1P[8] G3P[8], G4P[8], G9P[8] G2P[4]*

Clinical Vesikari scale 91.8

(74.1 - 98.4)

90.8

(70.5 - 98.2)

86.9

(62.8 - 96.6)

45.4

(-81.5 - 85.6)

87.3

(64.1 - 96.7)

41.0

(-79.2 - 82.4)

Ruiz-Palacios G. et al N. Engl. J. Med. 2006; 354: 11-22

From 2 weeks post-dose 2 to 1 year of age (95% CI)

ATP efficacy cohort

Pivotal Phase III Study 023 – Efficacy

* In a meta-analysis including the results of 023 and 2 phase II studies, the efficacy

  • f RIX4414 against the G2P[4] type was 67% (CI 95%: 15 - 87%)

Vaccine efficacy (%)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

15 15 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

D T Pertussis HBV Hib (PRP) Polio 1 Polio 2 Polio 3

Sero-positivity / protection rate of DTPw-HBV/Hib and OPV separately (post dose 2)

Placebo

RIX4414

% s e r

  • c
  • n

v e r s i

  • n

Effect On Co-administered Vaccines

Salinas B. et al, Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005, 24(9):807-816

1 ELISA, cut off at 0.1UI/mL 2 ELISA, cut off at 15 EL.U/mL 3 AUSAB, Abbott Laboratories cut off

at 10mIU/mL 4 ELISA, cut off at 0.15 µg/mL 5 Virus microneutralization cut off titer ≥8

1 1 2 3 4 5 5 5

slide-17
SLIDE 17

16 16

80

Polio 1

(ATP cohort) Virus microneutralization cut off titer ≥8

Effect On Polio 1, 2 & 3 Seroprotection After D3

85 90 95 100

Polio 2 Polio 3 Polio 1 Polio 2 Polio 3 Polio 1 Polio 2 Polio 3

Study 014 Study 013 Study 024

  • Percentage of infants

RIX4414 + IPV RIX4414 + OPV Placebo + OPV

slide-18
SLIDE 18

17 17

Phase III Efficacy Study 036 Europe

Rotarix™ - rotavirus vaccine

slide-19
SLIDE 19

18 18

Phase III Study in Europe (036)

n=3,994 infants enrolled and randomised (2:1)

RIX4414 Placebo

Month 0 Age 6-14 weeks

n=1,348

Co-administered with routine childhood vaccinations Study conducted 4Q 2004 – 2005 (Yr 1)

n=2,646

1st dose 2nd dose

Months 1–2 Age 10–24 weeks Months 7-9 Age 10-11 months

Season 1 efficacy analysis Vesikari T et al. ESPID, Basel, Switzerland May 3–5, 2006, Abstract 75

Months 19-21 Age 22-23 months

Season 2 efficacy analysis

Phase III Study 036

Trial profile

slide-20
SLIDE 20

19 19

124 sites in 6 EU countries ~4000 infants

Phase III Study 036 - Objectives

74% 7,5% 7,5% 7% 3,7% 0,6%

slide-21
SLIDE 21

20 20

Study Design

  • Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 6

European countries

  • 2646 vaccinees
  • 1348 placebo recipients
  • Dose 1: 5-18 weeks of age (mean: 11.5 wks)
  • Dose 2: 10-30 weeks of age (mean: 19.6 wks)
  • Co-administration with routine childhood vaccines
  • Surveillance period: 6 months, until end of the

1st RV season after vaccination (second year ongoing)

  • ~ 90% of infants not vaccinated before RV season
  • Peak incidence of RVGE April - May 2005

Phase III Study 036

Vesikari T et al. ESPID, Basel, Switzerland May 3–5, 2006, Abstract 75

slide-22
SLIDE 22

21 21

Methods

  • Gastroenteritis: Diarrhea with or without vomiting
  • Severe GE: Score ≥ 11 on 20-point Vesikari scale1
  • GE Stools analyzed for RV by ELISA (RotaCloneTM). RV

positive samples tested by RT-PCR followed by Reverse Hybridization assay to determine G and P types

  • Primary analysis on ATP cohort including 2572 vaccinees

and 1302 placebo recipients

1 Ruuska and Vesikari, Scand J Infect Dis, 1990

Phase III Study 036

slide-23
SLIDE 23

22 22

2,4 * 2,4,6 2,4,6 Spain 3,5 3,5,11 Italy 2,3 2,3,4 2,3,4 Germany 2,3 2,3,4 3 2,4 France 3,5 3,5,11-12 Finland 3,4 3,4,5 Czech Republic Rotarix™

Pneumococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccine 7-valent, Wyeth Meningococcal group C conjugate vaccine, Wyeth

Infanrix™ Polio Hib

(DTPa, IPV, Hib vaccine, GSK)

Infanrix hexa™

(DTPa, HBV, IPV, Hib vaccine, GSK)

Routine vaccines co-administered according to national immunisation schedules

Age of vaccine administration (months)

DTPa: diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis; HBV: hepatitis B virus; Hib: Haemophilus influenzae type B; IPV: inactivated poliovirus

* 7vPCV administered intermittently at 3, 5 and 7 months

Phase III Study 036

Vesikari T et al. ESPID, Basel, Switzerland May 3-5, 2006 Abstract 457, Tejedor JC T et al. ESPID, Basel, Switzerland May 3-5, 2006 Abstract 456 Schuster V T et al. ESPID, Basel, Switzerland May 3-5, 2006 Abstract 461

slide-24
SLIDE 24

23 23

Study 036 – Europe

Results : 1yr Efficacy

Phase III Study 036

slide-25
SLIDE 25

24 24

87%

[80;92]

96%

[90;99]

100%

[82;100]

Vaccine efficacy (%) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Any RVGE Severe RVGE RVGE hospitalizations

Vaccine efficacy against RVGE episodes

Vesikari T et al. ESPID, Basel, Switzerland May 3-5, 2006 Abstract 75

From 2 weeks post-dose 2 to end of the 1st RV season (ATP cohort) (CI 95%)

Phase III Study 036 – Efficacy

slide-26
SLIDE 26

25 25

Serotype specific efficacy against severe RVGE

95%

[78;99]

100%

[45;100]

100%

[65;100]

75%*

[-386;100]

96%

[86;100]

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 G1 G3 G4 G9 G2P[4] Vaccine efficacy %

Vesikari T et al. ESPID, Basel, Switzerland May 3-5, 2006 Abstract 75

Phase III Study 036 – Efficacy

From 2 weeks post-dose 2 to end of the 1st RV season (ATP cohort) (95% CI)

* Non statistically significant

slide-27
SLIDE 27

26 26

Efficacy against hospitalized GE due to any cause

<0.001

75 [45; 89] 22 11 Hospitalization for GE

P-value

Vaccine efficacy [95% CI] Placebo Vaccine

Phase III Study 036 – Efficacy

From 2 weeks post-dose 2 to end of the 1st RV season (ATP cohort)

Vesikari T et al. ESPID, Basel, Switzerland May 3-5, 2006 Abstract 75

slide-28
SLIDE 28

27 27

Study 036 – Europe

Results : Immunogenicity and Co-administration

Phase III Study 036

slide-29
SLIDE 29

28 28

Co-administration – Rotarix™ and Infanrix™ combinations

Vesikari T et al. ESPID, Basel, Switzerland May 3–5, 2006, Abstract 458

Infanrix™ combination vaccines – antibody responses

  • Similar between vaccinees and placebo recipients
  • Seroprotection / seropositivity rates varied between
  • 92–99% in vaccinees
  • 91–100% in placebo recipients

Phase III Study 036 – Immuno and co-admin

slide-30
SLIDE 30

29 29

Co-administration – Rotarix™ and MenC conjugate vaccine

1769

(1374-2278)

100

(96-100)

90 Placebo 1455

(1240-1708)

100

(98-100)

184 Rotarix™ GMT U/mL

(95% CI)

Seropositivity†%

(95% CI)

N

Tejedor JC et al. ESPID, Basel, Switzerland May 3–5, 2006, Abstract 456

1 month post-dose 3 Meningitec™ – ATP cohort

SBA-MenC antibody responses

9

(8-10)

100

(96-100)

91 Placebo 8

(7-9)

100

(98-100)

187 Rotarix™

GMC mcg/mL

(95% CI)

Seropositivity‡%

(95% CI)

N

Anti-PSC antibody responses

†SBA-MenC cut-off ≥1/8 dilution ‡Men C anti-PSC cut-off ≥0.3 μg/mL ELISA

Phase III Study 036 – Immuno and co-admin

slide-31
SLIDE 31

30 30 Schuster VT et al. ESPID, Basel, Switzerland May 3–5, 2006, Abstract 461

Anti-pneumococcal antibody responses

  • Varied by serotype and were between 89–100%

(1 month post-dose 3)

  • No difference in seropositivity between vaccinees

and placebo recipients

Phase III Study 036 – Immuno and co-admin

Co-administration – Rotarix™ and 7v-PCV

slide-32
SLIDE 32

31 31

Conclusions (1/2)

Two doses of Rotarix™, co-administered with specific childhood vaccines, significantly:

  • Reduce severe RVGE disease ( 85% - 96%)
  • Reduce any RVGE disease (87%)
  • Reduce RVGE-related hospitalisations (85% - 100%)
  • Protect against circulating wild-type G1, G3, G4 and G9

rotavirus strains

  • Protective trend against G2P[4]
  • Reduce GE-related hospitalisations due to any cause

(rotavirus or not) ( 42% - 75%)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

32 32

Conclusions (2/2)

Rotarix™ and co-administered childhood vaccines

  • High Rotarix™ immune responses maintained
  • No impairment of immune responses to any

co-administered vaccine antigens

  • Rotarix™ can be recommended for incorporation into childhood

immunisation schedules

  • 2, 3 months; 2, 4 months; 3, 4 months or 3, 5 months of age
  • More data to come:
  • Efficacy and Safety in Asia and Africa
  • Safety in HIV positive infants
  • Transmission in twins
  • Immuno in pre-term infants
  • Immuno for Vaccine heat stability
  • Long term efficacy (2- 3yr) in Latin-America / Eu / Asia …..
slide-34
SLIDE 34

33 33

Next registrations

  • Applications submitted in >60 countries
  • Further approvals expected during 2006 in
  • Latin America
  • Middle East
  • Africa
  • Asia Pacific Region

Universal Mass Vaccination

  • Venezuela
  • Panama
  • Brazil
  • Mexico (poorest provincies)

Licensed in 25 countries in Europe and in 41 other countries worldwide

Rotarix™ - rotavirus vaccine

slide-35
SLIDE 35

34 34

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

  • n rotavirus vaccination in Europe

Rotarix™ - rotavirus vaccine

slide-36
SLIDE 36

35 35

Progress To Date

"Guidelines for the prevention of Rotavirus disease in Europe: Expert Group Recommendations for Vaccination"

  • Draft guidelines developed by an expert group
  • specializing in epidemiology, paediatrics, infectious diseases and

public health

  • To be endorsed by European Paediatric Societies - ESPID

and ESPGHAN

  • Publication of recommendations – planned for Q406

Rotarix™ - rotavirus vaccine

slide-37
SLIDE 37

36 36

Thank you on behalf of millions of babies …..