A Growing Challenge! Tim Brenneman Katherine Stevenson, Jason Brock - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a growing challenge
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A Growing Challenge! Tim Brenneman Katherine Stevenson, Jason Brock - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Managing Pecan Diseases A Growing Challenge! Tim Brenneman Katherine Stevenson, Jason Brock & Kyle Brown Department of Plant Pathology University of Georgia, Tifton New Diseases to Control Reproduce symptoms by inoculating plants


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Managing Pecan Diseases – A Growing Challenge!

Tim Brenneman Katherine Stevenson, Jason Brock & Kyle Brown Department of Plant Pathology University of Georgia, Tifton

slide-2
SLIDE 2

New Diseases to Control

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Reproduce symptoms by inoculating plants with pathogen

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Neofusicoccum sp.

  • Widespread in Georgia (some in AL and ?)
  • Increased over each of last several years
  • More prevalent on scab-susceptible cv’s
  • Can cause severe defoliation
slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Perfect Storm

(Ty Ty, GA April – Aug 2013)

2014 – 15”

slide-6
SLIDE 6

What will 2015 weather bring?

(NOAA says normal for 3 months)

  • - Whatever the weather

we have a LOT of scab inoculum out there

  • - the 2014 wood

developed early when it was wet, so lots of lesions, especially in tops of trees

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Disease Management Considerations

  • Dormant sprays to reduce inoculum
  • Use our fungicides to their strengths
  • Fungicide resistance management
  • Plan to reduce disease pressure
slide-8
SLIDE 8

What about dormant sprays?

(M.S. project for Kyle Brown)

  • Elast (48 fl oz), Lime-sulfur (5 GPA), and Sulforix

(1.5 GPA) from Miller Chemical

  • Caustic and “burns out” the overwintering inoculum

(also caustic to equipment – covering sprayers with diesel and immediate clean up is suggested!)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Applied as true dormant sprays in large, replicated blocks in grower orchards

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Dormant Spray Summary

  • Disease reductions observed in some trials in

2014, an ideal year for such treatments

  • Conclusion? May help some in years with lots
  • f inoculum. Worth the cost???
  • Suggest using Elast (48 oz) late dormant or after

bud break; need to spray then anyway

  • Trials being repeated this year with additional

products

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Disease Management Considerations

  • Dormant sprays to reduce inoculum
  • Use our fungicides to their strengths
  • Fungicide resistance management
  • Plan to reduce disease pressure
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Generalizations on Fungicides

Protectants (Tin and Elast)

  • excellent residual but do not move in plant
  • will not “cure” existing infections
  • foundation of nut scab sprays

Systemics (Tebuconazole, Abound, Absolute, Phosphites, Orbit, etc.)

  • move into leaves and some even from leaf to leaf
  • have some “post-infection” activity
  • foundation for pre-pollination sprays

(use some for nut scab and “minor” diseases)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Why use systemics early season?

  • Up to 90% of shoot

growth can occur in the first 30 days after bud break!

  • Control with protectants is

less consistent; depends

  • n timing of infection

periods and applications

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Fungicide movement into hedging regrowth?

  • In 2014 had lots of scab
  • n leaves and stems in

tops of hedged trees

  • Similar control in tops w/

systemics and protectants,

  • ie. no “whole tree”
  • movement. Need good

coverage in tree tops!

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Affects of Adjuvants on Leaf Scab Control with Absolute (5 fl oz/A)

2014 – Tifton

2 4 6 8 10 Wichita Desirable % Disease Absolute Absolute + Induce Absolute + Vintre

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Will spray adjuvants improve my disease control?

Varies with fungicide – systemics most likely to benefit (Enable, Orbit, tebuconazole, Quilt, Quadris Top, Stratego, Absolute, etc.) Any quality 80/20 or 90/10 surfactant is OK Not needed with Tin, Elast or phosphites.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Phosphites and New Products

(Brenneman, 2014, Desirable)

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Leaf Incidence Nut Severity % Disease * Rampart 2 qt Rampart 3 qt Custodia 8.6 oz Custodia 17.2 oz Azaka 12 oz Tin/Elast Ph-D, 6.2 oz Nontreated

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Phosphite Summary

(K-Phite, Reliant, Prophyt, Rampart, etc.)

  • Have activity on pecan scab and anthracnose;

stronger on leaves than nuts

  • Highly systemic both up and down in plant
  • Different mode of action, ie. resistance management
  • Delayed shuck split? Not with 5 app’s at 3 quarts/A,

and no leaf injury (applied in 100 GPA before shell hardening)

  • Potential export issue for tree nuts to Europe starting

in 2016 (very recent – more information coming!)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Disease Management Considerations

  • Dormant sprays to reduce inoculum
  • Use our fungicides to their strengths
  • Fungicide resistance management
  • Plan to reduce disease pressure
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Effect of Fungicides on Nut Scab Severity

(Wichita, Tifton, 2014; LSD = 9.6) (“Alt” programs are w/ Tin 6 oz + Elast 25 oz)

20 40 60 80 100 % Disease Absolute 5.0 oz Quadris Top 10 oz Quadris Top 14 oz Enable 8 oz Enable 5 oz + Abd 10

  • z

Tin/Elast Nontreated

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Is fungicide resistance affecting disease control?

YES, some commercial orchards having issues with scab under very good spray programs. Do we understand it completely? NO!

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Relating sensitivity profiles from UGA to fungicide use patterns

  • If high insensitivity to Topsin, do not use it.
  • If high insensitivity to Tin or triazoles, reduce

use as much as possible and use full rates (probably still getting some control)

  • Elast is a key product due to high efficacy on

nut scab and low levels of insensitivity. Scab can still become insensitive to Elast. Surround it with other chemistries.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Need other modes of action

  • Evaluating multiple new chemistries, but

registration is not quick (or cheap!)

  • Phosphites could really help (????)
  • Quadris Top – expensive, but still the best

(even at 10 oz), and works on resistant isolates

  • Looking at older products also such as coppers

and Ziram (multi-site and low resistance risk)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Tin Alternatives to Consider

(Brenneman, 2002, Tifton)

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Severity % Nut Severity Ziram 6.0 lb Ziram 8.0 lb Ziram 3 lb + Dodine Ziram 3 lb + TPTH Nontrtr

slide-25
SLIDE 25

What about Nickel?

  • There is data showing reductions in scab,
  • ther trials show no effect
  • It is NOT labeled as a fungicide
  • If you need nickel use it, and be happy with

whatever scab control it brings. Do not count on it controlling scab!

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Fungicide Efficacy Trial Data

www.timbrenneman.org Publications Field Trial Results

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Disease Management Considerations

  • Dormant sprays to reduce inoculum
  • Use our fungicides to their strengths
  • Fungicide resistance management
  • Plan to reduce disease pressure
slide-28
SLIDE 28

What does the future hold?

  • Fungicide resistance will become more of a problem!
  • New modes of action will be fewer and more expensive
  • Pecan cultivars become more susceptible to scab over

time, not less (Desirable most commonly planted cultivar in Georgia until 2014)

  • WE NEED TO BE SERIOUSLY LOOKING AT

NON-CHEMICAL ALTERNATIVES FOR SCAB!!!

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Thanks to Etheridge Brown, Mitch Bulger and Buck Paulk for on-farm trials, and the GA Pecan Commission for financial support