a flavour of
play

...a flavour of ... Themis Bowcock 2 About our Liverpool group ... - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

...a flavour of ... Themis Bowcock 2 About our Liverpool group ... Built the LHCb Vertex Detector Core enabler of the LHCb B-measurements Our primary interest has been EW (W,Z production in forward region) Top (first results due in note next


  1. ...a flavour of ... Themis Bowcock

  2. 2 About our Liverpool group ... Built the LHCb Vertex Detector Core enabler of the LHCb B-measurements Our primary interest has been EW (W,Z production in forward region) Top (first results due in note next few weeks) Single Top Gateway Higgs Exotics 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  3. 3 NP in Quark Flavour (LHCb) Going ¡to ¡talk ¡about ¡B’s... You; balance against other topics and choices of where to do physics... 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  4. 4 Status of Searches No significant sign of NP at the LHC beyond the Higgs SUSY > 1TeV Increaseing (slowly) with luminosity and energy Before LHC, expectations were that “naturally” ¡the ¡masses ¡of ¡the ¡new ¡ particles would have to be light in order to reduce the “fine ¡tuning” ¡of ¡ the EW energy scale. naturalness->anthropic 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  5. 5 Existing Facilities Generally Lepton colliders (known cm). Elegant for neutrals and missing components Hadron colliders (large cross-sections) 1/fb at 7TeV at LHCb is equivalent to (1-5)/ab at the B-factories before tagging 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  6. 6 Indirect Search Method Discovery ¡through ¡“loops” Quantum interferometry smoking guns (rare decays) Part of long standing programme of precision measurement of FCNC 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  7. 7 CKM What accuracy do we need to know these numbers? CP phases A=0.81 ± 0.02 λ= ¡0.225 ± 0.001 Wolfenstein Parameterization 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  8. 8 Processes CKM Order in λ elements Decay Modes 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  9. 9 CP Violation/Angles In the limit theory as well as measurement limit NPdiscovery Trees Loops 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  10. Trees and Loops 10/29/2012 T. Bowcock - SPCS2011 10

  11. Trees and Loops 10/29/2012 T. Bowcock - SPCS2011 11

  12. Trees and Loops 10/29/2012 T. Bowcock - SPCS2011 12

  13. 13 � F=1, Trees (amplitudes) V ub at B-factories using inclusive or exclusive methods show a discrepancy at the 2-3 σ level: V ub (incl.)~1.3V ub (excl.). BR(B→ � ν) BaBar, Belle ( � , D*) NA62 has measured (2011) the ratio K → ¡ eν /K → ¡ μν =2.487 ± 0.013 in agreement with SM: 2.477 ± 0.001 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  14. 15 � F=1, Trees(phases) A ¡precise ¡determination ¡of ¡γ(O(1 ° )) is one of the highest priorities to be able to decide if there is new physics in B-> DK(*) Simplest analysis count B+/B- ratios 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  15. 16 � F=1 QCD Weak Higgs 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  16. 17 � F=1, QCD No significant discrepancy between b→ccs and s-penguin 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  17. 18 � F=1, EW EW Penguins Kaon Decays, NA62, KOTO, ORKA s>d (|V ts V td | α λ 5 ) Very rare decays Br ratios at the 10 -11 level. 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  18. 19 � F=1, EW b → s (|V tb V ts | ∝ λ 2 ) LHCb B → K* μμ is the golden mode to test new vector(-axial) couplings 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  19. 20 � F=1, Higgs Golden Modes: Rare Decay 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  20. 21 � F=1, Higgs FCNC family of measurements SM prediction B(K S0 → ¡μ + μ − ) = (5.0 ± 1.5) × 10 −12 μμ ¡ hypothesis Normalisation: ππ ¡ hypothesis We measure with 1.0 fb -1 : arXiv:1209.4029v2 0 → ¡μ + μ − ) < 11(9) × B(K S 10 −9 This limit is a factor 30 below the previous measurement ! 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  21. 22 � F=2, Box Diagrams B->u B->s c->u Need ¡“percent” ¡precision ¡to ¡disentangle ¡new ¡CP ¡phases ¡in ¡ Bd and Bs mixing, Bs->J/Psiphi etc 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  22. 23 � F=2 Also charm 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  23. 24 Mass Scales NP arXiv:1002.0900 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  24. 25 Reference ONLY 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  25. 26 LHCb Experiment Key Components A few recent results Upgrade Proposal (2018) Issues 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  26. Forward Physics @ LHC B decay vertices: � < 0.3rad Primary vertex: a few tracks many tracks ~50 Flavour 10 12 B /year � + Electro-weak B 0 b +... p p � - µ - � b B - D 0 � µ K/π ¡separation ¡ 10/29/2012 T. Bowcock - SPCS2011 27

  27. LHCb 1m long detector 21disks p p 10/29/2012 T. Bowcock - SPCS2011 28

  28. LHCb 10/29/2012 T. Bowcock - SPCS2011 29

  29. Key Requirements Vertexing & Tracking Trigger Specialized for B physics Adaptable Particle ID K/ π for P <100 GeV/c Tagging Get flavour of B at production 10/29/2012 T. Bowcock - SPCS2011 30

  30. 31 Performance 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  31. 32 Performance 32 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  32. 33 Efficiencies 99.94 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.98 98.71 99.72 100.00 99.27 80.00 82.00 84.00 86.00 88.00 90.00 92.00 94.00 96.00 98.00 100.00 % 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  33. 34 >2.2 fb -1 1380 bunches pA 770 pb -1 1380 bunches TS2 543 pb -1 10 days restart Luminosity in 2012 TS1 34 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  34. 35 35 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  35. 36 LHCb Trigger Scheme L0 H/W trigger 4 μs latency in FE electronics HLT S/W trigger Implemented in CPU farm Luminosity upgrade Event yields saturate Need full event information at L0 4.5 KHz 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  36. B Lifetimes(2011) B + → J/ ψ ¡ B 0 → J/ ψ K* 0 K + B s → J/ ψφ Λ b → J/ ψ ¡Λ 10/29/2012 T. Bowcock - SPCS2011 37

  37. B Lifetimes 10/29/2012

  38. 39 J/ψ, ¡ϒ(1S), ¡ϒ(2S) ¡and ¡ϒ(3S) ¡@ ¡8 ¡TeV Was 47 MeV/c 2 in 2011 Measure ¡the ¡J/ψ ¡from ¡ b quarks : 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  39. Example: Z Decay � �� Z Clean! 10/29/2012

  40. 41 Z → ¡ττ cross section LHCB-PAPER-2012-029 • Signal topologies and channels Observed : 124 o Bkg : 42 o Signal : 82 ATLAS : ATLAS-CONF-2012-006 ATLAS : Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 1 CMS : JHEP 08 (2011) 117 41 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  41. Measurement of CP observables in B0→DK ∗ 0 with ¡D→K + K − 42 Two color suppressed decay modes � Interference � Sensitivity ¡to ¡γ ¡ LHCb-CONF-2012-024 B 0 B s B 0 B s 42 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  42. 43 � F =1, EW Differential Flavour Changing branching Neutral Current fraction of NP SM B+→K+μ+ (FCNC) μ− ¡ Measure the differential branching fraction : arXiv:1209.4284 Event yield 1232 ± 40 of B + → K + μ + μ in 1.0 fb -1 and normalise to B + → ¡J/ψ ¡K + 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  43. 44 DF=1, EW F H and the FB asymetry A FB are expected to be null in the SM arXiv:1209.4284 If muons were massless, F H would be proportional to the contributions from (pseudo- )scalar ¡and ¡tensor ¡operators ¡to ¡the ¡partial ¡width, ¡Γ. 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  44. 45 � F=1, EW AFB(B 0 →K* 0 μ+μ– ) : An extraordinarily complex but beautiful analysis First measurement of the zero-crossing point of the forward-backward asymmetry q 2 = (4.9+1.1−1.3) ¡GeV 2 (SM predictions in the range 4.0 – 4.3 GeV2) 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  45. 46 � F=1, Higgs Standard Model expectation, e.g. ¡(3.2 ¡― ¡0.3) ¡x ¡10 -9 ATLAS ¡B(Bs→μ+μ– ) < 2.2 (1.9) × 10 −8 @ 95% (90%) CL CMS ¡B(Bs→μ+μ– ) < 7.7 (6.4) × 10 −9 @ 95% (90%) CL 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  46. 47 � F=2, Semileptonic asymmetries The observables : LHCb-CONF-2012-022 How we measure it : Yields 190 k B s0 candidates in 1.0 fb -1 : D s- D s+ 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  47. Semileptonic asymmetries 48 Delicate systematic treatement is needed : • Obtain any corrections from data/control samples. • Pay ¡attention ¡to ¡the ¡π ¡and ¡μ ¡detection ¡asymmetries. ¡ • Swap magnetic field to help cancel effects. 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  48. 49 Semileptonic asymmetries We measure : a sl s = (-0.24 ± 0.54 ± 0.33 ) % Most precise measurement ! LHCb-CONF-2012-022 And also in agreement with SM as quoted in arXiv:1205.1444 a sl s = (0.0019 ± 0.0003 ) % and a sl d = (-0.0041 ± 0.0006 ) % • Dominant systematic is from limited statistics in control sample. • 3 tension with SM in the D0 result, not confirmed or excluded by LHCb. • More decay modes, data are needed. But also the B 0 mode! 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  49. 50 B s → KK effective lifetime • B s → K + K - is a CP even eigenstate : • Dominantly a penguin decay. • Doubly Cabibbo suppressed tree decay. • Analysis uses minimal lifetime biasing selection : • No selection on variables biasing the lifetime. • Trigger and event selection based on NN using • Primiarly particle identification. � Independent of previous measurement using 40 pb -1 of data using a complementary technique in Phys.Lett. B 707 (2012) 349 This independent analysis is currently being updated with 1.0 fb -1 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  50. 51 B s → KK effective lifetime τ KK = 1.455 ± 0.046 (stat) ± 0.006 (syst) ps arXiv:1207.5993 HFAG Combinations (ICHEP 2012*) 51 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  51. 52 LHCb Near Future Highlights LHCb ¡will ¡dramatically ¡improve ¡the ¡precision ¡of ¡γ ¡measurements ¡ from 11º to ~2º in the next years B s0 mixing. Study of the theoretically clean CP-violating phase � s will be extended to reach SM level precision, stringently constraining new physics models such as B s0 → �� decays B 0d →K* ���� B s,d → �� γ To complete the programme (e.g. % resolution on angles) need more data. Originally 5fb -1 now 50fb -1 ... (why?) 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  52. 53 LHCb Upgrade 17/10/2012 Birmingham

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend