A FACTOR MODEL FOR WORLD TRADE GROWTH Elena Rusticelli and Stphanie - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a factor model for world trade growth
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A FACTOR MODEL FOR WORLD TRADE GROWTH Elena Rusticelli and Stphanie - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A FACTOR MODEL FOR WORLD TRADE GROWTH Elena Rusticelli and Stphanie Guichard OECD Economics Department 6 th Colloquium on Modern Tools for Business Cycle Analysis Luxembourg 26-29 September 2010 Outline of the presentation 1. World trade


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A FACTOR MODEL FOR WORLD TRADE GROWTH

Elena Rusticelli and Stéphanie Guichard

OECD Economics Department

6th Colloquium on Modern Tools for Business Cycle Analysis Luxembourg 26-29 September 2010

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline of the presentation

1. World trade growth forecasting:

  • verview and motivation of the study

2. Key indicators 3. Short-term forecasting methods 4. Methods comparison and empirical results 5. Concluding remarks

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Two different approaches to forecast world trade

The world trade growth is traditionally forecasted using a bottom-up approach where import and export volumes are forecasted on a country basis and the forecast for world trade is simply the aggregation of country-specific forecasts (OECD, IMF, WTO, World Bank). Short-term forecasting methods, corresponding to the direct approach, are normally considered as a useful benchmark which can point to possible up-downside risks to the current projections. Some studies (e.g. Burgert and Dées 2008) show the superior performance of direct forecasting methods where global factors play a fundamental role to explain world trade beside the traditional country-specific determinants.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The OECD uses the bridge model as a complement to the bottom approach

12 13 14 15 16 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Trillions of 2005 US dollars Current world trade series EO87 projections (bottom-up approach) Bridge models projection (direct approach)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Motivation of the study

The main OECD tool for short-term forecasting of world trade growth - the bridge equation model - has been complemented with a new dynamic factor model which allows to extend the dataset

  • to include a larger number of monthly series on world and

country level or different levels of aggregation without the risk of multicollinearity , losses of degrees of freedom and the increase in the computational burden

  • to include relevant indicators for explaining world trade which

are available only with a shorter history

  • to evaluate the contribution that different indicators have in the

final forecasts, as well as their lagging or leading properties.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The key variables to forecast world trade

A large unbalanced dataset of 35 monthly indicators of different nature - hard, soft and financial indicators. Different levels of aggregation – global and country level, aggregate or disaggregate components. Stationarity achieved by means of monthly growth rates for all hard indicators ( except the Baltic Dry index) and the world share prices. Among survey indicators only the world stock level index has been transformed with first order differences.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Starting date Publication lags Source

ECONOMIC ACTIVITY World industrial production index 1991 2 CPB USA industrial production index 1991 2 CPB Japan industrial production index 1991 2 CPB Euro area industrial production index 1991 2 CPB Advanced economies industrial production index 1991 2 CPB Emerging economies industrial production index 1991 2 CPB Asia industrial production index 1991

2

CPB Latin Ameria industrial production index 1991 2 CPB Central and Eastern Europe industrial production index 1991 2 CPB Africa and Middle East industrial production index 1991 2 CPB Largest countries industrial production index 1990 2

OECD calculations

OECD retail sales 2000 3

OECD

World steel production 1980 1

IISI

SHIPPING AND FREIGHT ACTIVITY Baltic dry index 1985 1

The Baltic Exchange

Harpex shipping index 1996 1

Harper Petersen & Co.

International air traffic 1996 2

IATA

GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY CYCLE Tech pulse index 1971 1

CSIP

World semiconductor billings 1976 2

SIA

TRANSPORT COSTS Brent oil prices 1957 1

UK Dept. of Energy

EXPORT ORDERS G7 export orders 1962 1

OECD calculations

World export orders 1998 1

ISM

PURCHASING MANAGERS'INDEX Global PMI index 1998 1

ISM

PMI stock level index 1998 1

ISM

OECD + BRICS CLI 1960 2

OECD

World stock market prices index 1973 1

Datastream

US high yield spread 1984 1

OECD calculations

US loan officer survey (quarterly) 1990 1

FED

Monthly Indicators

HARD INDICATORS SOFT INDICATORS FINANCIAL INDICATORS

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Ranking of indicators – including contemporaneous

max lag

  • Adj. R2

SIC value Ranking max lag

  • Adj. R2

SIC value Ranking World industrial production (CPB) 0.91

  • 7.35

1 0.80

  • 7.60

1 World export orders 4 0.91

  • 6.61

2 2 0.69

  • 6.67

3 Largest countries industrial production 0.86

  • 6.94

3 0.62

  • 6.98

6 Global PMI index 2 0.84

  • 6.22

4 2 0.69

  • 6.68

2 Air freight volume 0.80

  • 6.26

5 0.66

  • 6.83

5 OECD+BRICS CLI 1 0.79

  • 6.51

6 1 0.67

  • 7.07

4 G7 export orders 2 0.75

  • 6.27

7 1 0.49

  • 6.64

8 US high yield spread 4 0.74

  • 6.14

8 0.39

  • 6.50

14 World stock market price 1 0.69

  • 6.11

9

  • 1

0.49

  • 6.63

9 Baltic Dry Index 2 0.65

  • 5.96

10 0.33

  • 6.41

18 OECD retail sales 2 0.65

  • 5.94

11 2 0.44

  • 6.50

11 World steel production 1 0.61

  • 5.87

12 0.34

  • 6.42

16 Semi computers billings 0.57

  • 5.83

13 0.46

  • 6.62

10 PMI stock level index 0.54

  • 5.30

14 1 0.51

  • 6.29

7 US loan officer survey 2 0.53

  • 5.65

15 0.41

  • 6.53

13 US tech pulse index 0.52

  • 5.72

16 0.43

  • 6.57

12 Oil prices 0.52

  • 5.71

17 0.37

  • 6.47

15 Harpex index 0.42

  • 5.52

18 0.34

  • 6.41

17 Whole sample Sample ending in 2008 Q2 Max lag is based on the Schwarz criterion value, but ranking were not affected by changing the lag selection criteria

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Ranking of indicators – excluding contemporaneous

max lag

  • Adj. R2

SIC value Ranking max lag

  • Adj. R2

SIC value Ranking OECD+BRICS CLI 4 0.81

  • 6.47

1 2 0.58

  • 6.76

1 World stock market price 1 0.61

  • 5.91

2 1 0.49

  • 6.67

2 Baltic Dry Index 2 0.61

  • 5.87

3 1 0.33

  • 6.41

17 US high yield spread 3 0.60

  • 5.81

4 2 0.41

  • 6.48

7 Global PMI index 2 0.59

  • 5.33

5 2 0.46

  • 6.18

3 World export orders 2 0.58

  • 5.31

6 2 0.44

  • 6.15

5 Air freight volume 1 0.57

  • 5.48

7 1 0.41

  • 6.27

6 World industrial production (CPB) 1 0.56

  • 5.76

8 1 0.38

  • 6.45

10 OECD retail sales 2 0.55

  • 5.73

9 2 0.39

  • 6.45

9 G7 export orders 2 0.54

  • 5.70

10 2 0.40

  • 6.47

8 US loan officer survey 2 0.49

  • 5.59

11 1 0.37

  • 6.48

11 PMI stock level index 1 0.46

  • 5.03

12 1 0.44

  • 6.22

4 Largest countries industrial production 2 0.46

  • 5.54

13 1 0.35

  • 6.43

14 World steel production 1 0.45

  • 5.58

14 1 0.33

  • 6.41

18 Oil prices 2 0.44

  • 5.50

15 1 0.33

  • 6.41

16 US tech pulse index 2 0.42

  • 5.47

16 1 0.35

  • 6.44

13 Harpex index 1 0.36

  • 5.42

17 1 0.33

  • 6.41

15 Semi computers billings 1 0.35

  • 5.42

18 1 0.37

  • 6.46

12 Max lag is based on the Schwarz criterion value, but ranking were not affected by changing the lag selection criteria Whole sample Sample ending in 2008 Q2

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Best coincident indicators

World industrial production index World exports orders Largest countries industrial production index Global PMI index

  • .08
  • .06
  • .04
  • .02

.00 .02 .04 .06

  • .10
  • .08
  • .06
  • .04
  • .02

.00 .02 .04 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08

  • .08
  • .06
  • .04
  • .02

.00 .02 .04 .06

  • .10
  • .08
  • .06
  • .04
  • .02

.00 .02 .04 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60

  • .10
  • .08
  • .06
  • .04
  • .02

.00 .02 .04 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64

  • .10
  • .08
  • .06
  • .04
  • .02

.00 .02 .04 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Best leading indicators

OECD+BRICS CLI World stock market price index Baltic Dry index US high yield spread

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

  • .10
  • .08
  • .06
  • .04
  • .02

.00 .02 .04 .06 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000

  • .10
  • .08
  • .06
  • .04
  • .02

.00 .02 .04 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08

  • .4
  • .3
  • .2
  • .1

.0 .1 .2 .3

  • .10
  • .08
  • .06
  • .04
  • .02

.00 .02 .04 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104

  • .10
  • .08
  • .06
  • .04
  • .02

.00 .02 .04 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Short-term forecasting methods applied on macroeconomic aggregates

Random walks and autoregressive models Quarterly VARs (Sédillot and Pain 2003, 2005) Bridge equations models (Sédillot and Pain 2003; Baffigi et al. 2004) Diffusion indices (Stock and Watson 2002) Dynamic factor models (Forni et al. 2007; Bańbura and Rünstler 2007)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Overview of the OECD bridge equation model

Monthly indicators dataset includes:

  • world IP index
  • G7 countries export orders
  • the two technology indicators (semiconductor billings

and tech pulse index)

  • oil prices
  • Baltic dry index

Quarterly indicators dataset includes:

  • US loan officer survey
  • OECD world trade growth of goods and services

Four quarterly forecasts for world trade growth

produced: backcast, nowcast and one-two quarters ahead forecasts.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Overview of the OECD bridge equation model

Bayesian conditional VAR to forecast monthly indicators Quarterly bridge equation, i.e. ADL(p,q) to forecast world trade growth ฀ ฀

฀ ฀= ฀

฀ + ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ =0

฀ ฀

฀ ฀ −฀ ฀+ ฀

฀ ฀

where ฀ ฀

฀ ฀= ฀

1,฀ ฀

, … , ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ,฀ ฀

is a (฀ ฀× 1) vector of monthly indicators and Bs a (฀ ฀× ฀ ฀ ) matrix of coefficients. where ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

and ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

represents the quarterly world trade growth rate and all aggregated monthly indicators expressed in growth rates, except for export orders. ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀= ฀

฀+ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀ −฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ =1

+ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ,฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ,฀ ฀ −฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀ =0 ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ =1

+ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Overview of the new OECD dynamic factor model

Monthly indicators dataset includes:

  • all indicators of the bridge equation
  • 16 global level indicators
  • 9 country or macro-regional level indicators

Quarterly indicators dataset includes:

  • OECD world trade growth of goods and services

Four quarterly forecasts for world trade growth

produced: backcast, nowcast and one-two quarters ahead forecasts.

A set of cumulative smoother weights for each

indicator (or group of indicators) together with their relative contributions are evaluated

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Overview of the new OECD dynamic factor model

The dynamic factor model is To combine the monthly factor model with the quarterly world trade growth, the latent monthly world trade growth variable is ฀ ฀

฀ ฀= ฀

฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀+ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

~ℕ0, Σ฀

฀ ฀= ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ =1

฀ ฀

฀ ฀ −฀ ฀+ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀= ฀

฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

~ℕ0, ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀= ฀

′฀

฀ ฀+ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

~ℕ(0, ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ 2)

where the (฀ ฀× 1) vector of monthly indicators ฀ ฀

฀ ฀= ฀

1,฀ ฀

, . . , ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ,฀ ฀

  • is a linear combination of r common latent factors ฀

฀ ฀= ฀

1,฀ ฀

, . , ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ,฀ ฀

  • and an idiosyncratic error component ฀

฀ ฀= ฀

1,฀ ฀

, . . , ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ,฀ ฀

driven by q variable-specific shocks ฀ ฀

฀ ฀= ฀

1,฀ ฀

, . . , ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ,฀ ฀

, with ฀ ฀≤ ฀ ฀ . ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀= 1

3 (฀ ฀

฀ ฀+ ฀

฀ ฀ −1 + ฀

฀ ฀ −2)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Overview of the new OECD dynamic factor model

In the a monthly state space representation are estimated

the observation equation and the transition equation Harvey and Koopman (2003) algorithm enables to estimate the set of forecast weights

฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

= Λ 1 ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀

+ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

  • Ι฀

−฀ ฀

1 − 1 3 1 ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ +1

฀ ฀

฀ ฀ +1

฀ ฀ ฀

฀ _1 ฀ ฀ =

A฀

฀ 1

Ξ฀

฀ +1

฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀

+ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ +1

฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀ +ℎ|฀ ฀= ฀

฀ ฀

(฀ ฀ , ℎ)฀ ฀

฀ ฀ −฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ −1 ฀ ฀ =0

where ฀ ฀

฀ ฀= ฀

฀ ฀

, ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

and the dataset downloaded at time t is equal to ℤ฀

฀= ฀

฀ ฀

฀ =0 ฀ ฀ , with ฀

฀ ฀

(฀ ฀ , ℎ) = ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

(฀ ฀ + ฀ ฀ , ℎ) with p>0 and t large enough, hence ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

(฀ ฀ , ℎ) = ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

(ℎ).

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Forecasting models comparison

Five forecasting models compared on an unbalanced dataset starting from January 1990 to July 2010:

  • AR: autoregressive model or order 2
  • BM: bridge equation model (BM)
  • DFM1: dynamic factor model with the same 6 world level indicators

as the bridge model

  • DFM2: dynamic factor model with the same 6 world level indicators

as the bridge model plus 9 more IP indicators on a country /macro- regional level

  • DFM3: dynamic factor model with the same indicators as the

dynamic factor model DFM2 plus 10 more indicators on a world level

A set of four quarterly forecasts for world trade growth: 2010 Q2 (backcast), 2010 Q3 (nowcast), 2010 Q4 (one-quarter ahead forecast), 2011 Q1 (two-quarters ahead forecast). Three different measures of out-of-sample forecasting errors over the period 2003 Q1 to 2007 Q4.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Forecasting performance evaluation

Forecasting error measures over the period 2003 Q1 - 2007 Q4

QUARTERS AR BM DFM1 DFM2 DFM3 MAE Previous 0.84 0.64 0.46 0.39 0.34 Current 0.71 0.80 0.73 0.77 0.59 One-quarter-ahead 0.96 0.83 0.67 0.75 0.69 Two-quarters-ahead 1.03 0.98 0.78 0.80 0.77 Average 0.89 0.81 0.66 0.68 0.60 MAPE Previous 0.71 0.72 0.50 0.35 0.35 Current 0.60 0.91 0.85 0.77 0.74 One-quarter-ahead 1.00 0.80 0.93 0.89 0.83 Two-quarters-ahead 1.50 0.95 0.88 0.90 0.85 Average 0.95 0.85 0.79 0.73 0.69 RMSE Previous 1.03 0.74 0.51 0.46 0.40 Current 0.92 0.93 0.87 0.86 0.76 One-quarter-ahead 1.25 0.98 0.81 0.88 0.85 Two-quarters-ahead 1.32 1.11 0.91 0.93 0.92 Average 1.13 0.94 0.78 0.78 0.73 FORECASTING MODELS

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Direction of the forecasts

World trade growth rates forecasts over the period 2010 Q2 - 2011 Q1, with OECD world trade series of goods and services and monthly indicators published by the end of July 2010.

1 2 3 4 5 Previous Current One-quarter-ahead Two-quarters-ahead DFM3 DFM2 DFM1 BM

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Evolution of forecast weights

Cumulative forecast weights of different indicators over the sequence of 4 forecasts for the new dynamic factor model

  • 1

1 2 3

Previous Current One-quarter-ahead Two-quarters-ahead PMIs Industrial production Technology indicators US high yield spread Shipping rates and freight World share prices Other

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Conclusions and further developments

Dynamic factor models can be a useful tool to forecast short- term world trade growth The forecasting accuracy of these models is higher than the bridge equation models. They enable to include relevant monthly indicators with a more recent starting point. Different contributions of aggregate and disaggregate components and country versus world level data can be assessed. The dataset will be extended to include country breakdowns for more monthly indicators: PMIs, retail sales, etc. Inclusion of quarterly indicators as US loan officers survey.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

THANKS FOR THE ATTENTION