a characterization of lie incidence geometries of
play

A characterization of Lie incidence geometries of exceptional type E - PDF document

A characterization of Lie incidence geometries of exceptional type E 7 , 4 and E 8 , 4 Silvia Onofrei Mathematics Department, Kansas State University 137 Cardwell Hall, Manhattan KS 66506 email: onofrei@math.ksu.edu 1 2 Let D be one of the


  1. A characterization of Lie incidence geometries of exceptional type E 7 , 4 and E 8 , 4 Silvia Onofrei Mathematics Department, Kansas State University 137 Cardwell Hall, Manhattan KS 66506 email: onofrei@math.ksu.edu 1

  2. 2 Let D be one of the following Dynkin diagrams: ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ 1 2 3 5 6 7 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 ◦ ◦ 4 4 Label the node 4 by P , points, and the node 3 by L , lines. We get in this way the Lie incidence geometries (Cooperstein, [8]) of exceptional type E 7 , 4 and E 8 , 4 . The object of this paper is the following: The Main Theorem. Let ∆ be a parapolar space with thick lines which is locally A n, 3 , n = 6 , 7 . Then ∆ is the homo- morphic image of a building of type E 7 or E 8 . We start with a point-line geometry, ∆ = ( P , L ). Our approach is based on the local assumption that the residue of a point in ∆ is a ge- ometry of Grassmann type A n, 3 , n = 6 , 7 and on the global assumption that ∆ is a parapolar space. Cooperstein theory provides us with two classes of maximal singular subspaces, which will be denoted ¯ A and ¯ B and with a class of symplecta S , nondegenerate polar spaces of type D 4 . First, we prove that there is a class of 2-convex subspaces, D , each one isomorphic to D 5 , 5 ( K ), for some division ring K , and such that each symplecton S ∈ S is contained in a unique member D ( S ) ∈ D . ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ � � � � � ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ B L A B L A D ◦ ◦ P P Now, let Γ be a locally D -truncated geometry over K = ( P , L , ¯ A , ¯ B , D ). A residually connected sheaf over all nonempty flags of Γ is constructed. Then ∆ is the homomorphic image of a building geometry belonging to the diagram D and whose truncation to K is isomorphic to Γ.

  3. 3 1. Preliminaries and definitions A geometry Γ is residually connected if and only if: (i) every flag of corank one lies in a maximal flag; (ii) any flag of corank at least two has a connected residue. Let f : ¯ Γ → Γ be an epimorphism of geometries over I . Then f is said to be a full epimorphism if whenever x ∼ y in Γ, there exists some y in ¯ x ∈ f − 1 ( x ) and some ¯ y ∈ f − 1 ( y ) with ¯ ¯ x ∼ ¯ Γ. ( G ) A point-line geometry Γ = ( P , L ) is a Gamma space if for x ∈ P and L ∈ L with | x ⊥ ∩ L | > 1 then x ∈ L ⊥ . A parapolar space is a point-line geometry Γ = ( P , L ) which is defined by the following axioms: 1. Γ is a connected gamma space. 2. For any L ∈ L , L ⊥ is not a clique in the point-collinearity graph. 3. For any pair x, y ∈ P , d ( x, y ) = 2, x ⊥ ∩ y ⊥ is empty, a point or a nondegenerate polar space of rank at least 2. If | x ⊥ ∩ y ⊥ | = 1 then ( x, y ) is called a special pair , if | x ⊥ ∩ y ⊥ | > 1 then ( x, y ) is a polar pair . If no special pairs exist, Γ is called a strong parapolar space . It was proved by Cooperstein [9] that whenever ( x, y ) is a polar pair, i.e. x ⊥ ∩ y ⊥ is a nondegenerate polar space of rank k , the convex clo- sure of x and y , denoted by < x, y > , is a non-degenerate polar space of rank k + 1, which is called a symplecton . We write S = < x, y > . The family of all symplecta in Γ will be denoted by S . The parapolar spaces are partial linear spaces whose singular subspaces are all projec- tive. Every singular subspace of rank at most 2 lies in a symplecton. Given S ∈ S , x ∈ P \ S then x ⊥ ∩ S is a singular, possibly emtpy, subspace of S .

  4. 4 2. Some properties of A n, 3 Let V be a n + 1-dimensional vector space over some division ring K . Define a point-line geometry Γ = ( P , L ) as follows: the points of Γ are the 3-dimensional subspaces of V , the lines are the (2 , 4)-flags of V . Then Γ is a Grassmann space of type A n, 3 . In the sequel we restrict ourselves to the case n = 6 , 7. There are two classes of maximal singular subspaces: (1) The class A , which are PG (3)’s; (2) The class B , which are PG ( n − 2)’s. Let M = A ∪ B be the collection of all maximal singular subspaces of Γ. If A ∈ A , B ∈ B then A ∩ B is empty or a projective line. If A, A ′ ∈ A ( B, B ′ ∈ B ) then A ∩ A ′ ( B ∩ B ′ ) is empty or a point. The Grassmann spaces are strong parapolar spaces. Their symplecta are polar spaces of rank 3 and type D 3 , they are (1 , 5)-flags of V . The point-collinearity graph has diameter 3. (1) If x ∈ P , S ∈ S , x �∈ S then x ⊥ ∩ S is empty, a point or a plane. (2) If S 1 , S 2 ∈ S then S 1 ∩ S 2 can be empty, a point, a line or a common maximal singular subspace of the two symplecta. (3) If S ∈ S and M ∈ M then S ∩ M is empty, a point or a plane. In [13] Shult gave a characterization in terms of points and maximal singular subspaces, of certain parapolar spaces, including some Grass- manianns. We will use his results here, in order to formulate the fol- lowing property of the Grassmann spaces A 6 , 3 and A 7 , 3 : ( D ) For any maximal singular subspace M ∈ M and point p ∈ P \ M , x ⊥ ∩ M is empty or a line.

  5. 5 3. The class D of subspaces In what follows Γ = ( P , L ) will be a parapolar space which is locally A n, 3 ( K ) for n = 6 , 7 and some division ring K (i.e. the residue of every point x ∈ P is a geometry of type A n, 3 , n = 6 , 7). (L.1) There are two classes of maximal singular subspaces ¯ A (which are PG (4)’s) and ¯ B (which are PG ( n − 1)’s, n = 6 , 7). Two maximal singular subspaces from the same class meet at the empty set or a line. Two maximal singular subspaces which belong to different classes meet at the empty set, a point or a plane. (L.2) Let ¯ A i ∈ ¯ A , ¯ B i ∈ B , i = 1 , 2, S ∈ S and denote by A i = ¯ A i ∩ S , B i = ¯ B i ∩ S . Then A i ∩ B i can be a point or a plane and A 1 ∩ A 2 (or B 1 ∩ B 2 ) can be empty, a line or they are equal. In [13] Shult gave a characterization in terms of points and maximal singular subspaces, of certain parapolar spaces, including some Grass- manianns. We will use his results here, in order to formulate: M then x ⊥ ∩ ¯ (L.3) Given ¯ M ∈ ¯ M and x ∈ P \ ¯ M is empty, a point or a plane. (L.4) Given S ∈ S , x ∈ P \ S then x ⊥ ∩ S is empty, a point, a line or a maximal singular subspace of S . Let S ∈ S . The two classes of maximal singular subspaces are: M 4 ( S ) = { A | A = ¯ A ∩ S for ¯ A ∈ ¯ A} M n − 1 ( S ) = { B | B = ¯ B ∩ S for ¯ B ∈ ¯ B} , n = 6 , 7 Then, we define: N 4 ( S ) = { x ∈ P | x ⊥ ∩ S ∈ M 4 ( S ) } D ( S ) := S ∪ N 4 ( S )

  6. 6 Theorem. Let Γ = ( P , L ) be a parapolar space which is locally A n, 3 , n = 6 , 7 . There is a collection D of geodesically closed subspaces, each one isomorphic to D 5 , 5 ( K ) , for some division ring K such that if S ∈ S then there is a unique member D ( S ) ∈ D containing S . In what follows, we will use the following notations: for S ∈ S and a point p ∈ N 4 ( S ) we will denote by A p = p ⊥ ∩ S ∈ M 4 ( S ) and by A p = < p, A p > ∈ ¯ ¯ A . Proposition 1. Let S ∈ S , then D ( S ) is a subspace of Γ . Proof. Let x, y ∈ D ( S ) be two collinear points. If x, y ∈ S we are done since S is a geodesically closed subspace of Γ. If x ∈ N 4 ( S ) and y ∈ S then the line L 1 = xy ⊂ ¯ A x ⊂ D ( S ). Thus we may assume that the line L 1 = xy is such that L 1 ∩ S = ∅ . A x , A y are maximal singular subspaces of S belonging to the same class. Thus there are three possi- ble relations among them: A x = A y , A x ∩ A y = L a line or A x ∩ A y = ∅ . a) Assume first that A x = A y . Let z ∈ L 1 \ { x, y } . Since A x = A y ⊂ A x ∩ ¯ ¯ A y , by (L.2) it follows that ¯ A x = ¯ A y . This means that L 1 ⊂ ¯ A x and thus z ∈ D ( S ). b) Assume now that A x ∩ A y = L ∈ L ( S ) and let z ∈ L 1 \ { x, y } . As L ⊂ z ⊥ ∩ S we can have z ⊥ ∩ S is a line or a Then L ⊂ z ⊥ . maximal singular subspace of S . Let w ∈ A y \ z ⊥ . Let π = w ⊥ ∩ A x . Now B = < w, π > ∈ M n − 1 ( S ). This is true since B ∩ A x = π and B ∩ A y = < w, L > , both planes in S . Therefore, B and A x , A y belong to different classes of maximal singular subspaces of S . Let R = < w, x > . Note that y ∈ R thus z ∈ R . Also B is a maximal singular subspace of R . In R , z ⊥ ∩ B = π z (a plane) and therefore, by ( L. 4), z ⊥ ∩ S = A z a maximal singular subspace of S . Thus, we have proved that if z ⊥ ∩ S ⊃ L then z ⊥ ∩ S must be a maximal sin- gular subspace of S . It remains to show that A z ∈ M 4 ( S ). Claim :

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend