88 library .uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id REFERENCES Altas, B. - - PDF document

library.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id 88 REFERENCES Altas, B. (2014). A Case Study of Multimodal Presentation of Selected Stage Play Literature in a Multimedia Environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1726–1734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.463 Apperson, J. M., Laws, E. L., & Scepansky, J. A. (2008). An assessment of student preferences for PowerPoint presentation structure in undergraduate courses, 50, 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.04.003 Appleton, 1, Christenson, J. J., Kim, S. L., & Reschly, D. (2006). 5-Point Scale Student Engagement Instrument (SEI) Administration Standardization

• Procedures. Journal of School Psychology, 44(2006), 427–445.

Aryadoust, V. (2017). Understanding the Role of Likeability in the Peer Assessments of University Students ’ Oral Presentation Skills : A Latent Variable Approach Understanding the Role of Likeability in the Peer Assessments of. Language Assessment Quarterly, 14(4), 398–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2017.1393820 Barrett, N. E. (2016). Global Trends and Research Aims for English Academic Oral Presentations : Changes , Challenges , and Opportunities for Learning Technology, 1–45. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316628296 Campbell, T. (1997). Technology, multimedia, and qualitative research in

• education. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(2), 122–132.

https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1997.10782219 Chou, P. N., Chang, C. C., & Lu, P. F. (2015). Prezi versus PowerPoint: The effects

• f varied digital presentation tools on students’ learning performance.

Computers and Education, 91, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.020 Cornwell, L. (2014). What is the Impact of PowerPoint Lectures on Learning? 1, (2012), 1–5. Dubois, M., & Vial, I. (2001). Multimedia design: the effects of relating multimodal

• information. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(2), 157–165.

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2729.2000.00127.x Fassinger, P. A. (1995). Professors’ and students’ perception of why students participate in class. Teaching Sociology. 24, 25-33. Fassinger, P. A. (2000). How classes influence students’ participation in college

• classrooms. Journal of Classroom Interaction. 35, 38-47

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059 Garner, J., Gaudelli, A., Zappe, S., & Alley, M. (2009). AC 2009-1855 : Application Of Multimedia Theory To Powerpoint Slides Created By Engineering Educators. Ghavifekr, S., Ahmad Zabidi Abd Razak Muhammad Faizal A. Ghani, Ng Yan Ran, Yao Meixi, & Zhang Tengyue. (2014). ICT Integration In Education: Incorporation for Teaching & Learning Improvement. Malaysian Online Journal

• f

Educational Technology, 2(2), 24–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00453.x

library.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id 89 Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russel, J.D., & Smaldino, S.E. (2002). Instructional media and technologies for learning: 7th edition. Englewoods, NJ: Prentice Hall Hertz, B., & Kerkhof, P. (2016). PowerPoint Slides as Speaking Notes : The Influence of Speaking Anxiety on the Use of Text on Slides. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490615620416 Huang, D., & Chiou, W. (2010). The E ffect of U sing V isual I nformation A ids

• n L earning P erformance D uring L arger S cale P rocedural T ask, 295–299.

Krippel, G., Mckee, A. J., & Moody, J. (2010). Multimedia use in higher education : promises and pitfalls, 1–8. Lawson, M. A., & Lawson, H. A. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83, 432–479. doi:10.3102/0034654313480891 Lee, Y. H., Hsiao, C., & Ho, C. H. (2014). The effects of various multimedia instructional materials on students’ learning responses and outcomes: A comparative experimental study. Computers in Human Behavior, 40, 119–

• 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.041

Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715-726. Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypotHesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 484-490. Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. W. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 444-452. Mayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86,289-401. Mayer, R. E., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R., & Tapangco, L. (1996). When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal sum- maries of science textbook lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 64-73. Mayer, R.E., (1997). Multimedia Learning: Are we asking the right questions?. Educational Psychologist, 32 (1), 1-19 Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013184611077 Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-47520200016-6 Mazer, J. P. (2013). Associations Among Teacher Communication Behaviors, Student Interest, and Engagement: A Validity Test. Communication Education, 62(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2012.731513 Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students â€TM Goal Orientations and Cognitive Engagement in Classroom Activities, 80(4), 514– 523.

library.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id 90 Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2 Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2 Mercer, N., Hennessy, S., & Warwick, P. (2017). Dialogue , thinking together and digital technology in the classroom : Some educational implications of a continuing line of inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research, (March), 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.007 Ogochukwu, N. V. (2010). Enhancing students interest in mathematics via multimedia presentation, 3(July), 107–113. Oommen, A. (2012). Teaching english as a global language in smart classrooms with powerpoint presentation. English Language Teaching, 5(12), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n12p54 Paas, F., & Renkl, A. (2003). Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design : Recent Developments, 38(1), 1–4. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press Parkin, H. J., Hepplestone, S., Holden, G., Irwin, B., & Thorpe, L. (2012). A role for technology in enhancing students’ engagement with feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(8), 963–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.592934 Pasternak, D. L., Hallman, H. L., & Rush, L. S. (2016). Learning and Teaching Technology in English Teacher Education : Findings From a National Study, 16, 373–387. Ploetzner, R., Fillisch, B., Gewald, P. A., & Ruf, T. (2016). The role of student- generated externalizations in strategic multimedia learning and how current (web-)technology fails to support learner engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(7), 1610–1628. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1041401 Price, K., & Baker, S. N. (2012). Measuring Students’ Engagement on College Campuses: Is the NSSE an Appropriate Measure of Adult Students’ Engagement? Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 60(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2012.649127 Reiber, L. P. (1990). Animation in computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38,7746 Roby, W. B. (2000). Technology in the Service of Foreign Language Learning : the Case of the Language Laboratory, 523–542. García-rodicio, H. (2014). Support for learning from multimedia explanations . A comparison of prompting , signaling , and questioning, 50(1), 29–43. Salomon, G. (197911994). Interaction in media. cognition, and learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc Shepherd, M. (2006). How to give an effective presentation using power point. Eur Diabetes Nursing, 3(3), 154–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2012.09.013

library.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id 91 Shoffner, M. (2013). Editorial : Approaching Technology in English Education from a Different Perspective, 13, 99–104. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the Classroom: Reciprocal Effects of Teacher Behavior and Student Engagement Across the School Year. Journal

• f

Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571 Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J., & Connell, J. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I’ve got it: The role of perceived control in children’s engagement and school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(February), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.82.1.22 Surjono, H. D., & Yogyakarta, U. N. (2015). Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, (March). Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4 Titsworth, B. S. (2001b). Immediate and delayed effects of interest cues and engagement cues on students’ affective learning. Communication Studies, 52, 169?180. doi:10.1080/1051 0970109388552 Virtanen, T. E., Lerkkanen, M. K., Poikkeus, A. M., & Kuorelahti, M. (2015). The relationship between classroom quality and students’ engagement in secondary school. Educational Psychology, 35(8), 963–983. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.822961 White, N. L. (2011). Prezi v. PowerPoint: Finding the right tool for the job. Wylie, C. (2009). Introduction. J. Morton (Ed.), Engaging young people in learning: Why does it matter and what can we do?: Conference proceedings (pp. 1–3) . Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research. Zolna, J. S. (2007). Does multimodal presentation encourage integration of multimedia materials? a pilot study. 51st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2007, 1, 141–145.