6 15 2020
play

6.15.2020 ISIC Skin Image Analysis Workshop @ CVPR 2020 Project - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Agreement Between Saliency Maps and Human-Labeled Regions of Interest Applications to Skin Disease Classifjcation Nalini Singh , Kang Li, David Coz, Christof Angermueller, Aaron Loh, Susan Huang, Yuan Liu 6.15.2020 ISIC Skin Image Analysis


  1. Agreement Between Saliency Maps and Human-Labeled Regions of Interest Applications to Skin Disease Classifjcation Nalini Singh , Kang Li, David Coz, Christof Angermueller, Aaron Loh, Susan Huang, Yuan Liu 6.15.2020

  2. ISIC Skin Image Analysis Workshop @ CVPR 2020 Project Overview Goal Determine if a skin disease classifjcation model makes decisions for surprising reasons Approach Quantify agreement between model explanations and human-labeled regions of interest

  3. ISIC Skin Image Analysis Workshop @ CVPR 2020 Experiment Pipeline ROI Labeling by 3 Majority Human Graders Overlay Consensus Input Image Spearman Rank Correlation Thresholded Dice Score Saliency Saliency Map Segmentation

  4. ISIC Skin Image Analysis Workshop @ CVPR 2020 Experiment Pipeline Model Development Dataset* 19,870 de-identifjed adult dermatology cases ● 1-6 consumer-grade camera images + metadata per case ● Input Image Classes: 26 skin conditions + 'Other' ● Labels from aggregated board-ceruifjed dermatologist opinions ● Saliency Evaluation Dataset 1,309 de-identifjed adult dermatology cases sampled at random ● from model development test set *Liu, Y., Jain, A., Eng, C. et al. A deep learning system for difgerential diagnosis of skin diseases. Nat Med (2020).

  5. ISIC Skin Image Analysis Workshop @ CVPR 2020 Experiment Pipeline ROI Labeling by 3 Majority Human Graders Overlay Consensus Input Image

  6. ISIC Skin Image Analysis Workshop @ CVPR 2020 Experiment Pipeline Model Architecture* Clinical Images (1~6) 27 Classes Acne Inception-v4 Input image Alopecia Areata Average Input Image Cyst .. Eczema Inception-v4 Input image Psoriasis .. Melanoma Metadata (45) Input Feature metadata transform Age: 31 Tinea Concat Softmax .. Other Input Feature Have fever?: No Saliency Map metadata transform *Liu, Y., Jain, A., Eng, C. et al. A deep learning system for difgerential diagnosis of skin diseases. Nat Med (2020).

  7. ISIC Skin Image Analysis Workshop @ CVPR 2020 Experiment Pipeline Model Architecture Top-1 accuracy: 66% ● Saliency Map Generation* Input Image Integrated Gradients: ● Saliency Map *Sundararajan, Mukund, Ankur Taly, and Qiqi Yan. "Axiomatic aturibution for deep networks." Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70 . JMLR. org, 2017.

  8. ISIC Skin Image Analysis Workshop @ CVPR 2020 Experiment Pipeline Input Image Saliency Saliency Map Segmentation

  9. ISIC Skin Image Analysis Workshop @ CVPR 2020 Experiment Pipeline ROI Labeling by 3 Majority Human Graders Overlay Consensus Input Image Spearman Rank Correlation Thresholded Dice Score Saliency Saliency Map Segmentation

  10. ISIC Skin Image Analysis Workshop @ CVPR 2020 Experiment Pipeline Image Spearman Image Thresholded Rank Correlation Dice Score Input Case maximum maximum Case Spearman Case Thresholded Rank Correlation Dice Score

  11. ISIC Skin Image Analysis Workshop @ CVPR 2020 Examples: High Agreement Correctly Classifjed Incorrectly Classifjed 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Incorrectly Classified

  12. ISIC Skin Image Analysis Workshop @ CVPR 2020 Examples: Low Agreement Correctly Classifjed Incorrectly Classifjed 8 8 8 8 8 8 Incorrectly Classified

  13. ISIC Skin Image Analysis Workshop @ CVPR 2020 Results by Condition Spearman Rank Correlation Dice Score

  14. ISIC Skin Image Analysis Workshop @ CVPR 2020 Results by Condition Androgenetic Alopecia (5) 8 8 8 Spearman Rank Correlation 8 8 8 Acne (1) Dice Score

  15. ISIC Skin Image Analysis Workshop @ CVPR 2020 Results by Condition SK/ISK (18) Spearman Rank Correlation Melanoma (12) Dice Score

  16. ISIC Skin Image Analysis Workshop @ CVPR 2020 Results by Demographics

  17. ISIC Skin Image Analysis Workshop @ CVPR 2020 Summary & Conclusions Quantitatively compared model explanations to human-labeled ROIs: Notably, found that model explanations point to 'normal anatomy' (e.g. ● hair, nails, and lips). Insights from analysis will guide targeted data collection and data ● augmentation strategies. Workfmow could be used to identify difgerences between model ● explanations and human regions of interest for any model.

  18. ISIC Skin Image Analysis Workshop @ CVPR 2020 Related Work Eng, Clara, Y. Liu, and R. Bhatnagar. "Measuring clinician–machine ● agreement in difgerential diagnoses for dermatology." British Journal of Dermatology (2019). Liu, Yuan, et al. "A deep learning system for difgerential diagnosis of skin ● diseases." Nature Medicine (2020): 1-9. Ghorbani, Amirata, et al. "DermGAN: Synthetic Generation of Clinical Skin ● Images with Pathology." NeurIPS ML4H Workshop (2019). Singh, Nalini, et al., “Agreement Between Saliency Maps and ● Human-Labeled Regions of Interest: Applications to Skin Disease Classifjcation.”, CVPR ISIC Workshop (2020).

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend