4 1 a identify test cases
play

4.1 a) Identify test cases One of the tasks is to evaluate the - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

4.1 a) Identify test cases One of the tasks is to evaluate the effect of measures implemented in individual river basins. For that purpose, good and bad examples of nutrient load reduction for individual river basins are to be selected. The


  1. 4.1 a) Identify test cases One of the tasks is to evaluate the effect of measures implemented in • individual river basins. For that purpose, good and bad examples of nutrient load reduction for individual river basins are to be selected. The data compiled in the HELCOM PLC database are to be utilized to select • from two to four catchments per HELCOM country. These will be used to compare areas where measures have been particularly effective in reducing nutrient loads as well as those where significant efforts have been made to reduce nutrient inputs, but without apparent success. The main criterion is that those rivers show increases or decreases in nutrient • loads. In addition, it would be beneficial, if following information would be available: • main load sources • catchment properties • conducted water protection measures

  2. • Countries who have contibuted: – DK, EE , FI, LV, PL, RU, SE • No reply: – LT • Not willing to participate: – DE

  3. Denmark

  4. Estonia

  5. Finland

  6. Latvia Background information also included.

  7. Poland Suggested rivers Welna and Ina The Wełna is a river in west-central Poland , a right tributary of the Warta river. The Warta is a river in western-central Poland and a tributary of the Oder.

  8. Russia “

  9. Sweden Reference to the B7 report

  10. Background info for the River Råån Land use in catchment: • Lakes and watercourses <1% • Forests 5% • Open areas 10% • Wetlands <1% • Arable land 77% • Urban areas 6% • Paved surfaces 2% • • Nutrient sources: • Nitrogen [%] Phosphorus [%] • Lakes and watercourses <1 <1 • Forests <1 1 • Wetlands <1 <1 • Arable land 95 86 • Other 2 2 • Urban areas incl storm water 2 4 • Scattered dwellings 1 6 • MWWTPs <1 <1 • Industry <1 <1 • Remedial measures: • Agricultural measures 2000-2009: Constructed wetlands to increase nutrient retention • Agricultural measures 2010-2014: Eg. ploughing in spring-time, conversion of intensive arable land to extensively managed grasslands, protective zones to reduce run-off, implementation of catch- • crops Urban areas: Within the municipality of Helsingborg (situated at the river mouth) there has since 1991 been extensive constructions of wetlands, reconstruction of rivers to allow flooding (widening • or construction of a wide upper riparian zone), construction of storm water ponds Note! The MWWT of Helsingborg (110 000 pe) is a direct point-source in the Sound. •

  11. How to proceed? • Compilation of background info of all countries – Collect point source data of the selected rivers • Estimate the proportion of point sources in trends – Collect source apportionment data of the selected rivers (if not contributed by countries) • Estimate the proportion of different sources in PLC-6 • Find driving forces behind increasing/decreasing loads • What else?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend