3DST acceptance without side ECAL/TPC Andriaseta Sitraka - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

3dst acceptance without side ecal tpc
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

3DST acceptance without side ECAL/TPC Andriaseta Sitraka - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

3DST acceptance without side ECAL/TPC Andriaseta Sitraka (University of Antananarivo) Dr. Guang Yang (Stony Brook University) 1 Geometry A full 3DST set contains side TPC/ECAL and a dipole Magnet Goal of the study : without side, top,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

3DST acceptance without side ECAL/TPC

Andriaseta Sitraka (University of Antananarivo)

  • Dr. Guang Yang (Stony Brook University)

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Geometry

A full 3DST set contains side TPC/ECAL and a

dipole Magnet

Goal of the study : without side, top, bottom and

upstream TPC/ECAL

  • Understand the efficiency and phase space

coverage

No side ECAL/TPC No Top and bottom TPC/ECAL

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Geometry

The total volume is 2.4 x 2.4 x 2 m and we used 2 kind

  • f Fiducial Volume is 2.2 x 2.2 x 1.8 m and 1x1x1m

The efficiency are determined by selected events

corresponding to a certain amoung of hadron or lepton energy contain in side, top, bottom and upstream veto region

3 3 If the energy deposit in this veto region greater than a certain amount, this event is rejected. 3

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Lepton Momentum Vs Angle Efficiency( FV= 2.2x2.2x1.8)

4

  • Require a detectable lepton deposit
  • Assume no side, top, bottom and upstream TPC/ECAL/Magnet
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Lepton Momentum Vs Angle Efficiency( FV= 2.2x2.2x1.8)

5

  • Require a detectable lepton and hadronic deposit
  • Assume no side, top, bottom and upstream TPC/ECAL/Magnet
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Vertex Z Vs Vertex Y Efficiency( FV= 2.2x2.2x1.8)

6

  • Require a detectable lepton deposit
  • Assume no side, top, bottom and upstream TPC/ECAL/Magnet
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Vertex Z Vs Vertex Y Efficiency( FV= 2.2x2.2x1.8)

7

  • Require a detectable lepton and hadronic deposit
  • Assume no side, top, bottom and upstream TPC/ECAL/Magnet
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Vertex Z Vs Vertex Y yearly loss( FV= 2.2x2.2x1.8)

8

  • Require a detectable lepton deposit
  • Assume no side, top, bottom and upstream TPC/ECAL/Magnet
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Lepton Momentum Vs Angle Efficiency( FV= 1x1x1)

9

  • Require a detectable lepton deposit
  • Assume no side, top, bottom and upstream TPC/ECAL/Magnet
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Lepton Momentum Vs Angle Efficiency( FV= 1x1x1)

10

  • Require a detectable lepton and hadronic deposit
  • Assume no side, top, bottom and upstream TPC/ECAL/Magnet
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Vertex Z Vs Vertex Y Efficiency( FV= 1x1x1)

11

  • Require a detectable lepton deposit
  • Assume no side, top, bottom and upstream TPC/ECAL/Magnet
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Vertex Z Vs Vertex Y Efficiency( FV= 1x1x1)

12

  • Require a detectable lepton and hadronic deposit
  • Assume no side, top, bottom and upstream TPC/ECAL/Magnet
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Vertex Z Vs Vertex Y yearly loss( FV= 1x1x1)

13

  • Require a detectable lepton deposit
  • Assume no side, top, bottom and upstream TPC/ECAL/Magnet