3.003 Lawmaking: Legislative Update Mr. Jim Allison General Counsel - - PDF document

3 003 lawmaking legislative update
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

3.003 Lawmaking: Legislative Update Mr. Jim Allison General Counsel - - PDF document

89 TH A NNUAL W EST T EXAS C OUNTY J UDGES AND C OMMISSIONERS A SSOCIATION C ONFERENCE Friday, April 27, 2018 9:30 10:20 a.m. 3.003 Lawmaking: Legislative Update Mr. Jim Allison General Counsel County Judges and Commissioners Association


slide-1
SLIDE 1

89TH ANNUAL WEST TEXAS COUNTY JUDGES AND COMMISSIONERS ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE

Friday, April 27, 2018 9:30 – 10:20 a.m.

“3.003 Lawmaking: Legislative Update”

  • Mr. Jim Allison

General Counsel County Judges and Commissioners Association of Texas

slide-2
SLIDE 2

4/11/2018 1

DOLLARS (IN BILLIONS)

The Majority of Property Taxes Fund Public Schools

Speci Growth of the Property Tax by Taxing Unit Type al

30

Di…

25

School

County

20 15

District

17%

10

5

City

Source: Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, 2015 property Tax Levies

3

Local Decision‐Making and Property Taxes

March 2018

Prepar by: Texas Conference of Urban Counties, County Judges & Commissioners A ciation of Texas, xas A ciatio Coun Texas ssociati of School Boards and Texa unicipal ague

Texas relies on property taxes and sales taxes to fund state and local government.

Income Tax (N/A)

Property Tax (14th)

State

Sales Tax (10th)

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Special Purpose District Levy 4,952,7 5,133,8 5,392,5 4,926,0 5,543,4 5,529,4 6,370,4 6,954,1 County Levy 6,342,7 6,526,7 6,567,0 6,742,9 7,064,6 7,537,7 8,114,9 8,696,3 City Levy 6,451,0 6,593,7 6,755,4 6,810,0 7,054,9 7,324,4 7,828,5 8,380,4 School Levy 21,233, 21,780, 21,558, 22,001, 23,072, 24,854, 26,792, 28,176,

slide-3
SLIDE 3

4/11/2018 2

Higher school taxes because of property value growth benefit the State’s general revenue fund, not school districts.

  • School districts are held to a

certain amount of funding per

  • pupil. When property tax

revenue increases due to rising property values, the State does not increase per‐pupil funding. Instead, the State lowers its percentage of total school funding.

Student Funding

Local Aid per Student State Aid per Student Federal Aid per Student 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% FISCAL YEAR 5

Foundation School Program: The State Share is Falling

History 1985‐2016 (2017‐2019 estimated by LBB)

35 30 25 20 15 10 5 Fiscal Year

State FSP Spending Local FSP Spending

*Data for FY17-FY19 are estimated Source: Direct from LBB, General Appropriations Act, Texas Education Agency

6 PERCENTAGE SPLIT 200 200 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Local Aid per Student 45% 43% 46% 44% 46% 48% 49% 50% 49% 52% State Aid per Student 45% 44% 38% 40% 43% 41% 41% 39% 41% 38% Federal Aid per Student 10% 14% 16% 16% 11% 11% 10% 10% 10% 10%

The Texas Legislature’s method

  • f funding schools

and its passage of unfunded mandates increases the property tax burden

  • n local taxpayers.

Public schools are funded through:

  • State General Revenue Fund
  • Local Property Taxes
  • Federal Funds

4

Billions of Dollars

1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017* 2018* 2019*

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4/11/2018 3

If the State of Texas doesn’t assume its share, the problem will only get worse.

Student Projected Student Enrollment (2015): Enrollment (2019): 4,852,600 5,166,298

Source: General Appropriations Act FY ‘18 –FY ‘19 8

Had the State increased its share to be a 50/50 partner in funding schools for 2016 – 2019, local school property taxes could have been reduced by more than

$17 billion – an average of 15% each year.

Since 2015, the Texas Legislature increased school funding from local property taxes

$14.35 Billion

while state funding increased

$2.17 Billion

Source: Legislative Budget Board 7

General Appropriations Act FY18‐19

The legislature reduced the State’s share of public education funding. The budget that the legislature passed counts on over 14% increase in local property taxes over the FY ‘18‐’19 tax years.

9

slide-5
SLIDE 5

4/11/2018 4 More State Investment in Public Education Will Lower Property Taxes

11

Unfunded Mandate

12

General Appropriations Act FY18‐19

10

  • Surging property taxes are directly

linked to the state’s school finance system.

  • The state’s dependence on local

property taxes is enormous and clear, while school districts costs continue to increase with 60% of students who are economically disadvantaged, and 20% that are English Language Learners.

  • Two ways of reducing local

property taxes:

  • 1. Increase state investment; and
  • 2. Pass legislation so that school

districts are not penalized for lowering tax rates.

Local governments, and property taxpayers by extension, face billions of dollars of unfunded and underfunded mandates from both the federal and state governments.

An unfunded mandate is a state law or regulation that requires a local government to perform certain actions, with no money provided for fulfilling the requirements.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

4/11/2018 5

Unfunded Mandate:

Reverse Intergovernmental Aid

13

Unfunded Mandates

14

Unfunded Mandates

15

County officials rely almost exclusively on property tax revenue to efficiently fund the state’s criminal justice system, critical community health initiatives, and other statewide programs that are passed down to local counties by state officials.

  • Each year, county and city

court staff collect and transfer to the state hundreds of millions in state fees. Those fees are not used by the state to fund the state justice system.

  • Further, the state

demands all of its fees before counties and cities can keep any fines.

  • To shore up the lack of

state funding for highways, cities and counties must pay hundreds of millions of dollars each year to TxDOT as “local participation” on state highway projects.

  • To fund more than 50%
  • f the state Comptroller’s
  • ffice, cities pay a hefty

2% fee for administration

  • f local sales tax.
slide-7
SLIDE 7

4/11/2018 6

$0

Unfunded Mandates

18

Millions of Dollars

Unfunded Mandate – Indigent Defense

Texas Indigent Defense Expenditures by Fiscal Year in Millions of Dollars

Source: Texas Indigent Defense Commission

$300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $107 $118 $127 $126 $135 $144 $153 $159 $167 $165 $179 $190 $185 $208 $216 $50 $0 $91 $7 $12 $12 $14 $14 $18 $22 $28 $28 $34 $28 $27 $45 $30 $32 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Fiscal Year State Reimbursements County Unreimbursed Expenditures

16

Unfunded Mandate: State Inmates in County Jails

Convicts ready to be sent to state prison can be left in In 2017, this increased local county jails for up to 45 property taxes by more days without than $58.6 million reimC bo ur

u

se

n

m

ty

en

jt ab ily sta

hr ee state

required to hold state In 2017, this parolees awaiting increased local hearings for technical property taxes by violations – more more than $47.5 than 2100 on an million average day

17

  • The Texas Legislature since

1984 has not updated the transportation allotment, a major contributing cost factor to a school district’s local taxpayers.

  • A recently approved law for

teacher retirement requires both teachers and school districts to contribute a higher percentage into the Teacher Retirement System than the percent contributed by the state.

  • Mandatory state assessments

costs taxpayers millions as teachers’ workloads are increased and additional staff are hired to administer exams.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

4/11/2018 7

epare, Prevent, Plan, Respond and

Local Government s in Texas Lead the Way

20

What Do Local Governments Do?

COMMUNITY ELECTIONS OVERSIGHT

We ensure your voice is heard

TRANSPORTATION

Voter Registration

We connect communities

EMERGENCY

We provide essential services

Local, State, National Elections Roads, Bridges, and Highways Births, Deaths, Marriages, Divorces, Deeds,

PUBLIC MANAGEMENT

Housing, Economic Development, Land Use Planning, Tax Assessment & Collection

SCHOOLS

We are the first responders

Pr Recover

We educate the future

5.4 million students adding an additional 80,000 a year

INFRASTRUCTURE PUBLIC HEALTH

We support community growth

COURTS SAFETY

We work to strengthen

Utilities, Ports, Airports,

and protect families

Parks, and Libraries

We oversee justice

Courts, District Attorneys, Public

We keep communities secure

Public Health, Solid Waste, Medical Examiner, Immunizations, Defenders, Indigent Defense, Probation, Fire Protection, EMS Veterans Services, and Social Court Clerks, Juvenile Services Law Enforcement, Jails and Justice of the Services Peace

  • Cities, counties, and school

boards know the values of their community and are the governments closest to the people.

  • The state created cities,

counties, and school boards to permit citizens to make local decisions.

  • The locally elected leaders of

cities, counties, and school boards decide how to provide appropriate services for the people who live in their communities.

Local Decision‐Making

slide-9
SLIDE 9

4/11/2018 8 Preserve Local Decision‐ Making

22

One Size Does Not Fit All

The local government revenue controls supported by some state officials threaten to undermine community priorities. Politicians from one part of the state should not dictate priorities for communities in other parts of the state. Arbitrarily imposing a revenue cap circumvents the democratically‐elected local governments that are in the best position to determine the right policy decisions for each community. Arbitrary revenue caps don’t take into account local priorities and the unexpected services demands local governments can experience from things like significant population growth and, of course, disasters.

23

Solutions

The State should be a 50/50 partner in funding the

  • peration and maintenance of our schools.

The Texas Legislature should pass a constitutional amendment to stop unfunded mandates. The State should reimburse counties for holding state inmates in county jails, and should fully fund indigent defense costs.

Leave local decisions to local communities and their elected officials.

24

  • Preserving local decision‐

making equips Texans and their local government officials with the ability to address the unique challenges of their communities.

  • Local governments have

been the state’s partner

  • n the ground, doing the

work locally to enact the will of the state, efficiently and effectively in the ways that best fit their local communities.