2020 Lectures on Urban Economics Lecture 1: Equilibrium over Space: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2020 lectures on urban economics
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

2020 Lectures on Urban Economics Lecture 1: Equilibrium over Space: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2020 Lectures on Urban Economics Lecture 1: Equilibrium over Space: The Canonical Urban Models Edward Glaeser (Harvard University and NBER) 11 June 2020 Equilibrium over Space: The Canonical Urban Models Edward Glaeser Harvard University and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Lecture 1: Equilibrium over Space: The Canonical Urban Models Edward Glaeser (Harvard University and NBER) 11 June 2020

2020 Lectures on Urban Economics

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Equilibrium over Space: The Canonical Urban Models

Edward Glaeser Harvard University and NBER

slide-3
SLIDE 3

What is Urban Economics?

  • The study of the location of economic activity over space.
  • This is properly economic geographic, but it is subsumed in urban.
  • Urban is more fully focused on why things locate in particular cities.
  • Since proximity reduces transportation costs (for goods, people and ideas),

transportation economics is a closely related field

  • How does location impact economic activity?
  • The economics of agglomeration is one subfield.
  • Human capital externalities; spillovers and neighborhood effects
  • What determines the price that people are willing to pay for

particular places?

  • This is why real estate economics is also a close cousin of urban.
slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • .05

.05 .1 .15 Average Population Change, 2000-2010 16000 18000 20000 22000 24000 2 4 6 8 10 Population Density Per Capita Income, 2000 Population Change, 2000-2010

Source: U.S. Census

slide-7
SLIDE 7

.05 .1 .15 .2 1 2 3 4 5

Note: For MSAs with populations greater than 250,000 in 2010.

Change in FHFA, 1996-2012 by Quintile of Population Density, 2010

slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Predicted Telecommuting by Dingel and Neiman and Actual Telecommuting in the Alignable Survey

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The Two Models: Within and Across Cities

  • The Alonso-Muth-Mills model (hereafter AMM) was produced in
  • 1962. It characterizes a spatial equilibrium within cities.
  • It holds wages constant and focuses on commuting costs.
  • It is explicitly spatial in the sense that all locations are indexed by their

proximity to a downtown where everyone works.

  • The Rosen-Roback model first emerged in 1979. It characterizes a

spatial equilibrium across cities

  • It treats wages as endogenous, but does not really explain why productivity

might differ across space.

  • Models of agglomeration economies start with Krugman (1992) will come in a

later lecture.

  • It is a far less explicitly spatial model– locations are just different spots.
slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33
slide-34
SLIDE 34
slide-35
SLIDE 35
slide-36
SLIDE 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37
slide-38
SLIDE 38
slide-39
SLIDE 39
slide-40
SLIDE 40
slide-41
SLIDE 41
slide-42
SLIDE 42
slide-43
SLIDE 43
slide-44
SLIDE 44
slide-45
SLIDE 45
slide-46
SLIDE 46
slide-47
SLIDE 47
slide-48
SLIDE 48
slide-49
SLIDE 49
slide-50
SLIDE 50
slide-51
SLIDE 51
slide-52
SLIDE 52
slide-53
SLIDE 53
slide-54
SLIDE 54
slide-55
SLIDE 55
slide-56
SLIDE 56
slide-57
SLIDE 57
slide-58
SLIDE 58
slide-59
SLIDE 59
slide-60
SLIDE 60

Components of Housing Rent (Graphs are from Denise DiPasquale)

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Housing Rent Gradient in a Growing City

slide-62
SLIDE 62
slide-63
SLIDE 63
slide-64
SLIDE 64
slide-65
SLIDE 65
slide-66
SLIDE 66
slide-67
SLIDE 67
slide-68
SLIDE 68
slide-69
SLIDE 69
slide-70
SLIDE 70
slide-71
SLIDE 71
slide-72
SLIDE 72
slide-73
SLIDE 73
slide-74
SLIDE 74

Extensions to Transportation Technologies

  • You can allow multiple types of linear transportation technologies,

but for a fixed cost, you lower the variable cost.

  • For example, walking has the highest variable cost and no fixed cost,

buses have a lower variable cost and a higher fixed cost, and cars have the lowest variable cost and the highest fixed cost.

  • Or you can allow an intensive investment– total cost is k+t(k)d. This

will generate a first order condition of 1+t’(k)d=0 so that the investment rises with distance to the central business district.

  • Either of these changes the shape of the equilibrium bid rent curve

and the shape of the density gradient.

slide-75
SLIDE 75

Pascal’s Wager

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Brookline: A Streetcar Suburb (S. B. Warner)

slide-77
SLIDE 77
slide-78
SLIDE 78

Elevated Railroads (NYC)

slide-79
SLIDE 79
slide-80
SLIDE 80
slide-81
SLIDE 81

Multiple Income Groups

  • Allowing multiple income groups. With one technology, this means

that greater demand for space by the rich battles against a higher willingness to pay to save time.

  • Becker originally claimed that the tendency of the rich to sort into the

suburbs (in the US but not in Europe) reflects higher demand for land, but this requires an income elasticity of land demand (not housing demand which is slightly different) higher than the elasticity of travel costs with respect to income which seems unlikely to hold.

  • The alternative explanation is the with multiple technologies, the rich

sort into driving zones, the poor walk and take public transportation.

  • See LeRoy and Sonstelie or my paper with Kahn and Rappaport.
slide-82
SLIDE 82

An Empirical Puzzle: Manhattan House

slide-83
SLIDE 83

Manhattan House Today

slide-84
SLIDE 84
slide-85
SLIDE 85
slide-86
SLIDE 86
slide-87
SLIDE 87
slide-88
SLIDE 88
slide-89
SLIDE 89
slide-90
SLIDE 90
slide-91
SLIDE 91
slide-92
SLIDE 92
slide-93
SLIDE 93
slide-94
SLIDE 94
slide-95
SLIDE 95
slide-96
SLIDE 96
slide-97
SLIDE 97
slide-98
SLIDE 98
slide-99
SLIDE 99
slide-100
SLIDE 100
slide-101
SLIDE 101
slide-102
SLIDE 102
slide-103
SLIDE 103
slide-104
SLIDE 104
slide-105
SLIDE 105
slide-106
SLIDE 106
slide-107
SLIDE 107
slide-108
SLIDE 108
slide-109
SLIDE 109
slide-110
SLIDE 110
slide-111
SLIDE 111
slide-112
SLIDE 112
slide-113
SLIDE 113
slide-114
SLIDE 114
slide-115
SLIDE 115
slide-116
SLIDE 116
slide-117
SLIDE 117

Rosen/Roback Spatial Equilibrium

  • People choose metropolitan areas and each one delivers a bundle of

wages, amenities and prices.

  • A simple linear model would be that for identical people Wages plus

Amenities minus Prices is constant across the U.S.

  • This means that amenities can be measured as Prices – Wages.
  • If amenities attract people, then this measure should predict future

urban growth.

  • If happiness tells us something about amenities, then happiness

measures should work as well.

slide-118
SLIDE 118
slide-119
SLIDE 119
slide-120
SLIDE 120
slide-121
SLIDE 121

Quality of Life: Economic Development

  • .2
  • .1

.1 .2 controls, 2005-2010 1 2 3 4 Change in Log Population, 1950-2000