School Results and 2018-19 School Development Plan
- Welcome
- Agenda
- Presentation
- Q & A
- Gather feedback
- Meeting evaluation
2018-19 School Development Plan Welcome Agenda Presentation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
School Results and 2018-19 School Development Plan Welcome Agenda Presentation Q & A Gather feedback Meeting evaluation School Results and School Development Plan 101 What are school results? How
SLA results beginning grade 3 students reading comprehension multiple choice test
Key understandings from these findings indicated that students: In the English program, 84% of students met the expectations at the beginning of grade 3 in reading comprehension, which is higher than the percentage obtained in Sept 2017 by 11%. In the French Immersion program, the percentage of students meeting the expectations at a beginning grade 3 level in reading in French (76%) was lower than last year’s (85%). It was noted that more students scored in the proficient range but more students than last year placed in limited range. For the 2018-19 school year, teachers will be focusing on the high impact reading strategies at the surface, deep and transfer levels to increase students’ reading comprehension to reduce the percentage of students who scored in the limited range in both French and English.
English Program: reading Excellent 5 Proficient 4 Adequate 3 Limited 2 Insufficient 1 Total 3-4-5
4% 18% 51% 16% 4% 73%
4% 20% 60% 12% 4% 84% French Immersion Program: reading Excellent Proficient Adequate Limited Insufficient
10% 12,5% 62.5 % 7.5% 7.5% 85% Sept 2018 6% 19% 51% 19% 5% 76%
Report card results June 2018 (grades 1-4) Language Arts In 2017-18, our theory of action was: If teachers are explicit in their instruction of high impact reading comprehension strategies then students will increase their achievement in reading comprehension. The results for report 1 and report 2 for both programs are presented in the graphs below. English Language Arts comparison of results report 1 Jan 2018 and report 2 June 2018
10 20 30 40 50 60 Rpt 1 Rpt 2 Rpt 1 Rpt 2 Rpt 1 Rpt 2 Rpt 1 Rpt 2 Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Rpt 1 Rpt 2 Rpt 1 Rpt 2 Rpt 1 Rpt 2 Rpt 1 Rpt 2 Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
Goal 1: Students Measure of goal achievement: Decrease in the number of 2s and an increase in the number of 3s and 4s by 2% on the report card in the Language Arts outcome: Reads to explore, construct and extend understanding. For students in the English program, goal 1 was achieved in all grades. In grades 1, 2 and 4 the percentage of students achieving at level 2 decreased by more than 2 % while at the same time the percentage of students achieving at level 3 increased by more than 2% except in grade 3. In grade 3 the goal is considered as being achieved because even though the percentage of students achieving at level 3 decreased the level of students achieving at level 4 consequently increased by 13%. For students in the French Immersion program a 2% decrease in the percentage of students achieving at level 2 was evident in grades 2, 3, and 4. In grade 1 French Immersion the increase in the percentage of students achieving a 1 decreased by 5% directly related to the increase in the percentage of 2s . The decrease in the percentage of students achieving at level 3 was lower than the previous year but this decrease was directly related to the percentage increase at level 4. In grade 3, the decrease in the percentage to students achieving at level 3 is directly related to the significant increase in the percentage of students achieving at level 4. Given these explanations, all grades in the French Immersion program were assessed as having achieved goal 1.
Reading levels SLA % of students Sept 2017 % of students Sept 2018 Reading levels report card % of students June 2017 % of students June 2018 1/2 21% 24% 1 8.5 % 6% 3/4/5 75% 76% 2/3/4 91.5% 94% Reading levels SLA % of students Sept 2017 % of students Sept 2018 Reading levels Report card % of students June 2017 % of students June 2018 1/2 15% 12% 1 0 % 12% 3/4/5 85% 88% 2/3/4 100% 88%
and report cards, posed a challenge in comparing the results obtained. However, some degree of correlation can be observed when comparing grouped levels. The descriptors for achieving at a level 1 in the report card corresponds to levels 1 and 2 combined for SLAs. The levels 3/4/5 combined have their equivalence in the report card levels 2/3/4 combined.
English program is 81% and for the French Immersion program is 100%.
attributed to the fact that the SLA is a one time measure and would be expected to be lower while the report card is a summative evaluation of a few months of learning which are assessed in a number of different ways.
grade 3 when compared with the report card results at the end of grade 2 was not achieved in the English program but showed 100% correlation in the French Immersion program.
both programs were very consistent when comparing the 2016-17 year and the 2017- 18 year results.
CBE Student survey 94 grade 4 students surveyed
Subject % Strongly agree/agree Reading I understand what I read 90% Reading helps me learn 96% Reading at school help me read when I am not at school 92% I like to read 82% Reading summary 90.5% Writing summary Ability to share ideas through writing 82% Math summary Confidence in their ability to learn and use math 88% Art summary Ability to work with different materials and share ideas through art 89% Music summary Understand sounds and rhythm and can be creative through music 86% Science summary Good at describing things and am curious about science 86%
Accountability Pillar Overall Summary 3-Year Plan May 2018 Janet Johnstone School
School-based parent survey-May 2018 based on 23 responses Kindergarten to grade 4 parents
Categories Strongly agree and agree 2014-15 Strongly agree and agree 2015-16 Strongly agree and agree 2016-17 Strongly agree and agree 2017-18 Communication Communication between school and community is
97% 92% 90% 90% The school should continue to provide agendas for students in grades 1 to 4 86% 92% 89% 94% Parents feel that access to administrators is timely and supportive and parents feel welcome at the school 90% 91% 87% 95% Learning and teaching My child is presented with a variety of meaningful learning opportunities 97% 97% 93% 100% Parents are informed about their child's progress at school 89% 92% 93% 95% Overall, I am satisfied with my child's education at Janet Johnstone School 95% 97% 93% 95% Character and citizenship My child feels safe while at school 99% 97% 96% 95% The school has clear behaviour expectations for students 98% 97% 89% 95% My child is able to voice concerns regarding peer relationships 91% 97% 93% 98%
From the school survey results we can conclude that:
maintained since last year but seek to continue to improve how we communicate with parents so that we can reach a higher degree of satisfaction in that area.
place at the school even though the percentages have fluctuated over the last four
parameter in the Accountability Pillar Survey above.
These results have been maintained over the past 4 years and correlate directly with the results from the From the Accountability Pillar Survey as presented above.
to improve and relates directly to the area identified in the Accountability Pillar survey in which we noted that preparation for work was an area of concern. The strategy to communicate to parents how the teaching and learning taking place in the school is preparing students for the world of work as well as providing parents with information that will keep them informed about the events and activities at the school including the rationale for choosing those activities and events.