2017 Fall Convocation Program Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m. L-105 Master of Ceremonies: Steve Quis
2017 ‐ 2018 • The Year of San Diego Miramar College 2
Our Mission 3
4
5
6
Enrollment Growth 7
8 Enrollment Growth
Since July 1, 2013 to June, 30, 2017 New Faculty : Total 53 GFU : Teaching faculty: 42 • • GFR : Non ‐ teaching faculty: 11 New Classified Staff: Total 55 • GFU : 33 • GFR : 22 New Managers : 3 • GFU : 1 • GFU : 2 9
10
11
12
Delivery REAFFIRMED ACCREDITATION FOR SEVEN YEARS ON THE BASIS OF A COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION ‐ One of the Four Colleges during the Spring, 2017 Accreditation Cycle . 13
Rewarded by Students Jack Kent Cooke Foundation recipients Christopher Patrick Mehrdad Yazdanibiouki Colin Skinner Thaimae Le Ishak Mahamoud 2013 JKC Recipient Trinh Nguyen 2015 JKC Recipient 2016 JKC Recipient 2017 JKC Recipient 2014 JKC Recipients 14
Rewarded by National Organizations 15
Rewarded by National Organizations 16
Rewarded by National Organizations 17
Rewarded by National Organizations 18
Rewarded by the State 19
Rewarded by the State 20
Starting Fall 2018… San Diego Miramar College Women’s Volleyball Team 21
Rewarded by the State 22
23 Completed Mission
24
Ongoing, Non-stopping, Demanding yet Rewarding 25
Milestone: Mid-Size College 2017-2018 Passion Service-Oriented Quality 26 A New Page for San Diego Miramar College
27 Thank You
Culture of Action: Progress on Institutional Effectiveness F A L L 2 0 17 CO N V O C A T I O N
Drum roll Miramar College has been reaffirmed for 7 years
Miramar College Planning Framework Student Success Framework for Long-term Integrated Planning
Eight Principles of Redesign
Addressing the ACCJC Recommendations Eight recommendations for improvement- Why are these important? What action plans were already in place that address the recommendations? What new action plans were developed? How can you get involved?
Recommendation 1 In order to increase effectiveness and better determine whether its mission directs institutional priorities, the ACCJC team recommends that the College engage Administrative, Instructional Support, and Student Services programs in program review to address how well program missions align with the College mission. (Student Services, Administrative Services, Instructional Support Services)
External Evaluation Team Report Instructional Services served as a best practice for using prompts in program review to analyze data on enrollment, course success, course retention, and learning outcomes assessment as the basis for creating goals and supporting requests for additional resources as it relates to the college’s mission statement The following divisions/ areas need to incorporate program review prompts to demonstrate how their respective mission supports the institutional mission: Student Services Administrative Services Instructional Support Services
Student Services Where are we now? Student Services Leaders have mapped their respective program mission statements to the campus statement Incorporated mission statements into program review – will be using to guide and inform activities to achieve outcomes based on the scorecard and 6 Factors of Student Success Leads: Student Services Leaders – check with your department for new mission statement Review program review
Administrative Services Where are we now? Administrative Services Program Review Committee met on 4/ 7/ 17 and: Decomposed College Mission Statement Decomposed Unit Mission Statements Performed Gap Analysis Revised Unit Mission Statements to align with College Mission Statement Leads: Denise Kapitzke, Elaine Vega, Stephen Um, Josh Beall, Virgil Afan, Anna Liza Soriano, Brett Bell
Instructional Support Services Where are we now? Instructional support units include Library, AV, ICS, Academic Support Center, and ILC Plans to have all instructional support units meet in the 2017-18 academic year to develop prompts in Taskstream for implementation in the 2018-19 academic year (next full program review) Leads: Daniel Miramontez, Lou Ascione, Donnie Tran, Francine McCorkell, Glenn Magpuri, Kurt Hill
Recommendation 2 In order to increase effectiveness, the ACCJC team recommends that the College analyze learning outcomes assessment results by meaningful disaggregation of data by subpopulations of students, instructional and tutorial delivery methods, learning support services, and locations to enhance dialogue and prompt appropriate action. (Instructional Services and Student Services)
Instructional Services Where are we now? Pilot project for course SLO disaggregation in progress Investigating purchase and implementation of improved tutorial tracking systems Leads: Laura Murphy, Alex Sanchez, Wai-Ling Rubic, Laura Pecenco, Mary Kjartanson, IPR/ SLOAC Committee Members, Xi Zhang, Paulette Hopkins, Donnie Tran, Reylyn Cabrera, & Lou Ascione
Student Services Where are we now? Continue to address Student Equity/ monthly SSSP data African American American Indian Latino Pacific Islander DSPS Using RFP Proposals PR/ SLOAC for Student Services has met with Research Analyst and looking to bring discussion to larger Student Services Leaders meeting for further discussion on meaningful disaggregation Academic Success Center - Tutor Trac Leads: Adela Jacobson, MaryAnn Guevarra, Kandice Brandt, Dana Stack, Donnie Tran
Recommendation 3 In order to increase effectiveness, the ACCJC team recommends that the College develop a procedure for evaluating its program review processes for student services, administrative services, and instructional services to assure their effectiveness in supporting academic quality and accomplishment of the mission. (Instructional Services, Student Services, Administrative Services)
Instructional Services Where are we now? IPR/ SLOAC Committee to assist in evaluation of PRs by providing feedback “ as option ” to programs & departments Approved by Academic Affairs (April 2017) Approved by Academic Senate (May 2017) Deans participated in Taskstream PR training Leads: IPR/ SLOAC Committee Members (Julia McMenamin, Laura Murphy, John Salinsky, Dan Wilke, Patricia Manley, Alex Sanchez, Cheryl Vallejo, Xi Zhang, Paulette Hopkins, & Margarita Sanchez), Instructional Deans
Student Services Where are we now? Evaluation form to review Program Review has been developed and reviewed by the Student Services Leaders (including, but not limited to the following examples) Improve program planning Improve services to students Results are thoroughly reviewed and discussed Evaluation to be incorporated on an annual basis to make informed changes (serve as a mid-cycle review) Summary report to be provided at end of 3-year cycle Leads: Adela Jacobson, MaryAnn Guevarra, Kandice Brandt, Dana Stack, Donnie Tran
Administrative Services Where are we now? Administrative Services Program Review Committee is currently defining how each unit in the division supports academic quality Administrative Services will align its service goals with this definition of academic quality where appropriate Administrative Services will assess its Program Review process on a regular cycle to ensure its effectiveness in supporting this definition of academic quality Leads: Denise Kapitzke, Elaine Vega, Stephen Um, Josh Beall, Virgil Afan, Anna Liza Soriano, Brett Bell
Recommendation 4 In order to increase effectiveness, the ACCJC team recommends that the College identifies and regularly assesses learning outcomes for all courses, programs, certificates and degrees using established institutional procedures. (Instructional Services)
Instructional Services Where are we now? Outcomes Assessment Coordinator provides leadership to SLOAC process Increased reassigned time for department chairs “SLOlapalooza” FLEX activity IPR/ SLOAC Committee faculty members provide assistance to other faculty Degree & Certificate achievement reports analyzed and discussed Leads: Laura Murphy, Department Chairs, IPR/ SLOAC Committee Members
Recommendation 5 In order to increase effectiveness, the ACCJC team recommends the College publish two-year course sequence charts in the College catalog. (Instructional Services)
Instructional Services Where are we now? Two-Year Course Sequences for all degrees & certificates posted to college website. Leads: Department Chairs, Counselors, Deans, Mara Palma-Sanft, & Margarita Sanchez
Recommendation 6 In order to increase effectiveness, the team recommends that the College improve assessment for all Student Support Services and implement annual assessment tools in addition to the three-year student feedback surveys to document support of student learning for demonstrating continuous quality improvement. (Student Services)
Recommend
More recommend
