2016 Review of Associated Transmission Reinforcements Webinar - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2016 review of associated
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

2016 Review of Associated Transmission Reinforcements Webinar - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2016 Review of Associated Transmission Reinforcements Webinar November 2016 Agenda Introduction Approach Results Next steps Introduction Commercially Sensitive Not discussing individual results Caveat While


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Webinar November 2016

2016 Review of Associated Transmission Reinforcements

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

  • Introduction
  • Approach
  • Results
  • Next steps
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

  • Commercially Sensitive

– Not discussing individual results

  • Caveat

– While all reasonable care has been taken in the preparation of this data, EirGrid and SONI are not responsible for any loss that may be attributed to the use of this

  • information. Prior to taking business decisions, interested parties are advised to

seek separate and independent opinion in relation to the matters covered in this document and should not rely solely upon data and information contained herein. – This document does not purport to contain all the information that a prospective investor or participant in the Single Electricity Market may need.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction

  • 2016 Review has been undertaken
  • Purpose :

– To review the extent to which non-firm generators contribute to constraints and drive ATRs, and – To recommend disassociation where they don’t drive constraints

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Key Concepts

  • Ref: CER decisions
  • Firm Access
  • Constraint and Curtailment
  • Gate Processing
  • Associated Transmission Reinforcements (ATRs)
  • Firm Access Quantity (FAQ)
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Firm Access – original intent and purpose

  • To achieve a balance between granting generators access to the network in

advance of transmission reinforcements and to protect the end consumer from high constraints payments

  • Generators connecting to parts of the network with ample capacity could

receive Firm Access

  • Generators in parts of the network with limited capacity could connect on a non-

firm basis, in advance of the completion of their ATRs, but would not receive compensation if they are dispatched down

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Background

  • Process for connecting generators:

– Calculation of Associated Transmission Reinforcements (ATRs) and Firm Access Quantity (FAQ) – Firm access for generators – Governed by CER directions and decisions – Technical network analysis used to identify constraints & ATRs

  • ATRs were identified in 2009 (for Gate 3)
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Review of FAQs and ATRs

  • Several types of reviews are undertaken by EirGrid:

– Quarterly ATR Status Updates available on internet – The justification for individual reinforcements is ongoing – Association Reviews

  • 2013 (rerun ITC)
  • 2016 (review of associations)
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Why review now?

  • Timely
  • Latest information

– Generator Connections and Contracts – Reinforcement Delivery – Constraints

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Scope

  • Ireland only
  • Does not include Non GPA generators which don’t have

ATRs and which are also non-firm

slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Approach

  • This is a review of existing associations

– Not seeking to identify additional associations

  • This is not a re-run of ITC
  • Introduce generator profiles, demand profiles, etc.
  • Assess impact of generators and reinforcements on constraint levels
  • Study generators in the network with and without ATRs
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Approach (2)

Commencing with existing ATRs Run updated network model using 8,760 dispatches Apply contingencies and check constraints Revise list of ATRs for generators that are not driving constraints

  • Multiple Studies

– With and without generators – With and without network reinforcements

  • Generators are added in gate order, in year they

achieve FAQ

1 2 3 4

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Approach (3)

  • Generation Profiles (wind) and Generation Dispatch (bid based and

must run)

  • 8760 hours

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%

Wind Ireland Percent - Distribution Curve

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Studies Performed

  • System Model

– Demand – Existing Network – Base Generation (up to Gate 1)

  • Multiple combinations of generation (firm and non firm) and

future reinforcements

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Existing Network Reinforcem 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 … 2027 Generation up to Gate1 X Gate 2 – firm X X X X Gate 2 – non firm X X X X X Gate 3 – firm X X Gate 3 – faq 2016 X

X

X Gate 3 – faq 2017 X X

X

X Gate 3 – faq 2018 X X X

X

X Gate 3 – faq 2019 X X X X X X Gate 3 – faq 2020 X X X X X

X

X … X X X X X X X X Gate 3 – faq 2027 X X X X X X X X

Indicative study matrix … Cumulative reinforcements Cumulative Generation

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Illustrative example

Firm Firm Reinforcement 2018 Reinforcement 2020 Gen 1 Firm 2018 Gen 2 Firm 2019 Gen 3 Firm 2020 Reinforcement 2017 Reinforcement 2019

slide-18
SLIDE 18

2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Exising Network Reinf 2017 Reinf 2018 Reinf 2019 Reinf 2020 (original ATRs and FAQ Year)

Local Constraint Levels Approach: For a given group of generation, add network reinforcements Variation in constraints used to assess Associations

Example: Generation Originally Firm in 2020

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Illustrative example

Firm Firm Reinforcement 2018 Gen 1 Firm 2018 Gen 2 Firm 2019 Gen 3 Firm 2020 Reinforcement 2017 Reinforcement 2020 Reinforcement 2019

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Observations

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Observations

  • Curtailment

– At high levels of installed generation, simulations show curtailment as well as constraint – 14,400 MW of generation for a system with an average demand of 3,000 MW

  • Uncertainty

– Generator retirements, generator connections, transitional arrangements, etc.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Observations (2)

  • Connected / Contracted / Live

– All generators in the assessment, both connected and not yet connected

  • Generation

– Bid based (oil, coal, gas, distillate, etc.) – Other (wind, wave, waste, solar, industrial, biomass, peat, hydro, etc.)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Results

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Introduction to Results

  • To make 4600 MW of generation firm, additional transmission

reinforcements are going to be required

  • The revised approach has made a difference at the margins. The

review has benefited some generators that were nearly firm already

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Results

  • No change to reinforcements required by the system
  • The majority of associations remain
  • Some generators do have ATR associations removed from their list

Non-firm prior to Review Generation whose list of associated ATRs will now reduce Capacity 4600 MW 430 MW

  • No. of generators

180 18

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Results (2)

  • Writing to generators with reduced ATR Lists
  • May have financial implications for some of these

– Other considerations (not connected yet, on temporary connection, etc.)

  • Discuss with SEMO
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Next Steps

  • Impacted Customers, Industry generally and CER have

been appraised

  • Published briefing note (14th Nov.) www.eirgridgroup.com
  • Presentation at next Generation Liaison Group
slide-28
SLIDE 28

For additional queries,

  • Please contact
  • TSO customers info@eirgrid.com
  • DSO customers DSOgenerators@esb.ie
  • Market questions for SEM-O markethelpdesk@sem-o.com
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Webinar Questions

slide-30
SLIDE 30