2 nd provider event 9 june 2016 building healthy
play

2 nd Provider Event 9 June 2016 Building Healthy Communities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Building Healthy Communities 2 nd Provider Event 9 June 2016 Building Healthy Communities Brainstorming Session 1 Q1a: Is the future model realistic? Are there any changes you would like to suggest? The model is a holistic and realistic


  1. Building Healthy Communities 2 nd Provider Event 9 June 2016

  2. Building Healthy Communities Brainstorming Session 1

  3. Q1a: Is the future model realistic? Are there any changes you would like to suggest? • The model is a holistic and realistic model and forms part of the 5 year forward view, however huge transformation required within such short timeframe • Fairly standard and deliverable but requires a level of GP development • IT Challenge • Issues of mobilisation • 2022 sounds more realistic as a timeframe • Ambitious • Lot of communication to handle • Risky for a single provider • Bringing different big services together

  4. Q1a: Is the future model realistic? Are there any changes you would like to suggest? • Responsibility where does the buck stop? • Need to define role of SPA – i.e. more details and accessibility • Model will rely on buy-in from primary care • Baseline activity required • Adult social care engagement is key in their delivery role, not just as commissioners especially for re-ablement services • Must define integration/alignment of the health and social care including TUPE arrangements

  5. Q1b: Are there any core functions not included in the draft scope that are essential to deliver integrated care? • Define the expectations around management of the interface between the GP federation and the providers • Mental Health should be integrated as part of the model this would significantly reduce cost and enable people to mange anxieties • IAPT should also feed into Primary Care • Ensure the risk stratification includes screening and referral process into Health & well- being services • Must have a lead navigator plus social workers to prioritise navigation • Maturity of organisations is key • Be clear about boundaries e.g. what is in or out & definition of IAPT, LD scope • Expectations around care navigations roles and also extended primary care

  6. Q1b: Are there any core functions not included in the draft scope that are essential to deliver integrated care? • ASC is a core part of elements delivery – pressures in that area • DoS • Demand management element • IT systems element • Future proofing • More flexibility to enable innovation from providers especially after ‘go live’ • Linking in with services commissioned by Local Authority • Impact of TST contracts across the borough

  7. Q1c: What would providers expect the CCG to facilitate in order to make this future model achievable? • Ring fence spend with provider for provision of prevention and well-being • Capitated budget model could allow lead provider to sub contract health and well being to voluntary organisations • The CCG should ensure that Prevention/Health- wellbeing includes outreach in the community • Voluntary sector access – need to engage • Provide portfolio of other organisations • Assist with engagement with GPs and voluntary organisations • Define how smaller providers connect with more than one provider • Be helpful in opening up the process of dialogue • Assist with GP integration as there maybe challenges. What is their readiness?

  8. Q1c: What would providers expect the CCG to facilitate in order to make this future model achievable? • Obtain acute trusts ‘buy in’ • Management of possible conflicts of interests • During mobilisation the CCG should retain capacity to link the providers • Social care framework and NHS outcomes framework defined • Assist with the negotiations for newer/different contracts and also allow innovation • To positively market the change to the existing workforce as a joint/CCG provider model • Engagement and links with the GP federation is key at a sessions with providers and the federation may be required as the outcome may influence the final specification • Pleased with 80k hub population size feels about right but more efficiencies possible if some services can be centralised • Electronic care navigation and SPA are people really needed and if so their role needs clarification

  9. Q1c: What would providers expect the CCG to facilitate in order to make this future model achievable? • Ensure opportunities to meet with LBN, GP federation, MH • Partnership working post contract award is essential throughout the whole contract length. Needs to be developed as part of the negotiation workshop • A few realistic KPIs are preferable compared to many • Need to discuss how services can evolve within a longer contract • Longer contract length welcomed because these contract are loss making initially, service users don’t like change and embedding change takes time • Consideration of wider context i.e. TST and other procurements to be communicated • Joint learning and development with provider initiative • Lead on a wider community & family approach to encourage third party/voluntary organisations

  10. Q1c: What would providers expect the CCG to facilitate in order to make this future model achievable? • IT recording and access • Specialist services e.g. COPD • Exclusivity contract will be a barrier for other interested providers and can the CCG facilitate this as a fair process • Provide clarity around what is in scope • Facilitating discussions on integration and support across whole health economy • Share client/patient record across all stakeholders, including voluntary and charity sectors

  11. Building Healthy Communities Brainstorming Session 2

  12. Q2a: How can CCG best support providers in ensuring the estates strategy is fit for purpose and can support the delivery of the future care model? • Share the estates strategy in its entirety although weird that its fixed • What are the hubs: who, what, where, where e.g. disposal, numbers etc • Provide information on total costs of running the buildings and facilities e.g. cost of cleaning, catering, service charges etc.- specifically East Ham Care Centre • What is planned with the LBN? Are there any joint ventures, any shared buildings • What are risks to the current providers and need to have an impact assessment • Estates vital and essential to succeed • Some see LIFT as an opportunity because it will be readily available and well maintained • Condition of GP premises would be useful to foster joint working • Facilitation required re shared premises

  13. Q2a: How can CCG best support providers in ensuring the estates strategy is fit for purpose and can support the delivery of the future care model? • Contract needs to be flexible enough to allow for radical new innovation or change over a 7 year period • CCG needs go online to support interoperability, reasonable data sharing and mobile working • Create a formal use of technology such as use of apps, alarms etc • CCG’s role should support providers to negotiate leasers/rent/service charge • Logging and capturing equipment maintenance • Ensure combined package (60:40) consideration of innovation • How can innovation be encouraged given the long contract length • Provide further information on the details of GP Hubs v/s community hubs

  14. Q2a: How can CCG best support providers in ensuring the estates strategy is fit for purpose and can support the delivery of the future care model? • Ensure the infrastructure supports the facility • Site visits welcomed • Hub model is key – need to be combine adminstrative and clinical hub • Premises must be right • Lift building, size, functionality, capacity • Ensure that contract allows flexibility and innovation • No restriction and tie-in • Allow co-location of services • Information current state, future state • Provide clarity on current plans for the future

  15. Q2b: What technology enabled services should be in scope of a transformation programme given the timelines of 5-7 years? • Near patient testing • Virtual consultations – protocols for confidentiality etc such as skype consultations • This cannot be absorbed by efficiency savings because of level change & growth which may require pump priming • Facilitation of translation services via apps/technology • Algorithms – symptom trackers • Population training in use of technology to access modern community health services • CCG’s role must include support to consent to interface • CCG’s role should include buying in new innovation • Data collection and ability to capture information across providers

  16. Q2b: What technology enabled services should be in scope of a transformation programme given the timelines of 5-7 years? • Training of new staff using new IT services • Standardisation is essential for all information • Use of apps, telemedicine • Define the outcomes and providers to explain how they will use technology to achieve these outcomes through innovative working practices e.g. via SPA • Providers to define interoperability and CCG not to prescribe • Blocks from GP practices could hinder delivery Free flow of internet provision across the hubs/GP practice s • • Consistent IT infrastructure across all services and supportive • Provider allowed to be innovative

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend