SLIDE 8 8/29/2018 8
Gil Gil v. Winn-Di Dixie Sto tores, s, Inc Inc.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
website in order to download coupons and refill prescriptions
- Gil alleged the site violates
the ADA
witnesses
- One week after the trial, the
Court issued a decision:
website is covered
remediate its website to comply with WCAG 2.0
“[Winn-Dixie] is a real cautionary tale for businesses that think they can sit back and not be proactive in terms of their remediation efforts. They can really get hit pretty hard and have a court fashion a remedy for them. Even though the present administration is very clearly not going to be moving forward in this space with implementation of any type of regulations that would clarify the accessibility of websites and mobile apps, that’s not going to stop private plaintiffs and nonprofit groups from moving forward and frankly, it might even embolden them to press ahead because of the lack of clarity and the conflicts in the courts right now.” – Nicole Sieb Smith, Partner, Rumberger Kirk & Caldwell
15 levelaccess.com | (800) 899-9659 | info@levelaccess.com
Sta tate te of th the Law
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
different cases, different rulings
principally fact-based
settle
“…all we have are largely fact-specific decisions by federal district courts, which are not binding on anyone else.” – Donald Brown, Partner, Manatt, Phelps, & Phillips LLP “Each time a new [case] comes out, whichever side you’re on, you’re going to point to it and say that’s good news. Ultimately, cases are still coming down different ways depending on the judge.” – Kristina Launey, Partner, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
16 levelaccess.com | (800) 899-9659 | info@levelaccess.com