01 TABLE OF CONTENTS H I S T O R I C A L D I S T R I C T M A P P - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING

May 9, 2017

01

02 TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 H I S T O R I C A L D I S T R I C T M A P P A G E 3  T I M E L I N E S U M M A R Y ( 2 0 1 5 & 2 0 1 6 ) P A G E 4 - 5  C O M P A R I S O N O F D I F F E R E N T S C H E M E S P A G E 6 - 8  D E S C R I P T I V E C O M P A R I S O N O F O L D D E S I G N T O C U R R E N T P A G E 9  I N S P I R A T I O N – D E S I G N E L E M E N T S P A G E 1 0 - 1 2  M A T E R I A L S U S E D I N D E S I G N P A G E 1 3  S E T - B A C K D I A G R A M P A G E 1 4  C O M P A R I S O N O F P R O P O S E D D E S I G N T O R O O S E V E L T T E R R A C E P A G E 1 5  N E W S C H E M A T I C D E S I G N P A G E 1 6  C A D B U I L D I N G E L E V A T I O N S O F P R O P O S E D D E S I G N P A G E 1 7 - 1 8  A D J A C E N T B U I L D I N G A N D O P E N S P A C E D I A G R A M P A G E 1 9  V A R I O U S S E C T I O N S A N D D E T A I L P A G E 2 0 - 2 4  S U M M A R Y O F R E S P O N S E T O L P C C O M M E N T S P A G E 2 5

03 JACKSON HEIGHTS HISTORIC DISTRICT MAP DESIGNATED IN 1993

04 TIMELINE SUMMARY OF 2015

TIMELINE SUMMARY (2015)

BASED ON AUGUST 11, 2015 SUBMISSION:

• EXAMPLE OF END TREATMENT WITH GLASS WRAPPING AROUND. IT’S A

LOT OF GLASS.

• TRI-PORTITE CONFIGURATION WITHIN THE MASONRY OPENING IS NOT

TYPICALLY IN JACKSON HEIGHT’S AREA. RESPONSE TO THE LPC HEARING PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 11, 2015:  REMOVED FULL HEIGHT CORNER ROUND GLASS WRAP AROUND.  ADJUSTED ELEVATIONS & ELIMINATED WINDOWS WITH 3 WINDOWS/ SASHES IN A ROW WITHIN MASONRY OPENING.  SET BACK NEW STREET WALL BELOW MANDATORY MIN. BASE HEIGHT TO 10’-0” FROM STREET LINE ALONG 85TH STREET.

05 TIMELINE SUMMARY OF 2016

TIMELINE SUMMARY (2016)

BASED ON AUGUST 2, 2016 SUBMISSION:

• THE FRONT FACADES OF 85TH STREET AND 37TH AVENUE DID NOT

DEMONSTRATED ANY PROJECTIONS, EXTRUDINGS OR RECESSED SO THE DESIGN WAS PLAIN AND SIMPLE.

• WINDOWS AROUND THIS DESIGN WERE NOT HIGH ENOUGH.
• THERE WERE ABUNDANCE OF HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS AND LACK OF

VERTICAL ELEMENTS.

• THE ELEMENTS OF STREAMLINE MODERNE STYLE WAS NOT SHOWN

ACCORDING TO THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

• LACK OF SCALE ON THE BRICKS AND HEADERS.
• THE 4-STORY DESIGN RESEMBLES MORE LIKE A COMMERICAL BUILDING,

NOT LIKE A RESIDENTAL BUILDING. RESPONSE TO THE LPC HEARING PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 2, 2016:  A SLIGHT RECESS ON THE CURVED WINDOW CORNER ADDED TO ADDRESS PROJECTION ON THE FRONT FACADES OF 85TH STREET AND 37TH AVENUE.  WINDOW NOW SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN PREVIOUS DESIGN.  ADDED A VERTICAL COMPONENT AT THE CENTER OF THE TWO FRONT FACADES TO MINIMIZE SOME HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS AND ASPECT.  SCALE OF BRICKS AND HEADERS ARE SHOWN.  ADDED DESIGN FEATURES OF MODERNE STYLE ARE SHOWN.  THE BUILDING BALCONY DESIGN RESEMBLE THE ROOSEVELT TERRACE BALCONIES.  GREATER DETAIL EXPRESSED ACCORDING IN CURRENT LATEST DESIGN.

PROPOSED 4-STORY ADDITION TO EXISTING 1-STORY COMMERICAL BUILDING AT 84-11 37TH AVENUE 06

EXISTING 1-STORY COMMERCIAL BUILDING PROPOSED 4-STORY ADDITION PRESENTED TO LPC ON AUG 11, 2015

COMPARSION OF THE SCHEME FROM 2015 TO 2016 07

EXISTING 1-STORY COMMERCIAL BUILDING PROPOSED 4-STORY ADDITION PRESENTED TO LPC ON AUG 11, 2015 SCHEME PRESENTED TO LPC PUBLIC HEARING ON AUG 2, 2016

COMPARISON OF NEW SCHEME TO PREVIOUS SCHEME 08

SCHEME PRESENTED TO LPC PUBLIC HEARING ON AUG 2, 2016 NEW PROPOSED SCHEME

COMPARISON FROM THE 2016 DESIGN TO PROPOSED DESIGN CURVED CORNER DESIGN OLD (2016) PROPOSED OLD DESIGN:

• DOES NOT SHOW RECESSED CURVED CORNER, SO PROJECTED FACADES ON

37TH AVENUE AND 85TH STREET WAS NOT APPARENT.

• THE CURVED WINDOW HAD TWO HORIZONTAL MULLION DESIGN.
• CAST STONE BAND WRAP AROUND TOP AND BOTTOM ON THE CURVED

WINDOW. 85TH STREET FAÇADE (37TH AVENUE SIMILAR) OLD (2016) PROPOSED OLD DESIGN:

• BOTH ELEVATIONS ON 85TH STREET AND 37TH AVENUE DOES

NOT SHOW ANY BALCONY .

• NO SIGN OF PROJECTED FACADES, SHOWN FLAT DESIGN.
• LEVELED PARAPET PLANE.
• SHOWN (8) WINDOWS PER FLOOR ON BOTH SIDES.

DESCRIPTIVE COMPARISON OF THE 2016 DESIGN TO CURRENT

09

INSPIRATION – DESIGN ELEMENTS 10

NEW PROPOSED SCHEME DESIGN DETAILS

INSPIRATION – DESIGN ELEMENTS 11

888 GRAND CONCOURSE, NEW YORK HISTORIC DISTRIC BUILDINGS: CURVED CORNERS, PROJECTED FACADES

• CURVATURE CORNER WITH PROJECTED FACADES

INSPIRATION – DESIGN ELEMENTS 12

1142 GRAND CONCOURSE, NEW YORK HISTORIC DISTRIC BUILDINGS: CURVED CORNERS WITH CURVED WINDOWS

• EXEMPLIFY CURVATURE CORNER WITH CURVE WINDOW
• LOCATED AT STREET CORNERS

MATERIAL TO BE APPLIED ON THE NEW 4-STORY ADDITION 13

NEW PROPOSED SCHEME

• EXISTING BRICK WORK ON 1-STORY TO BE APPLIED TO NEWLY

PROPOSED 4-STORY BUILDING BY REDLAND INC. MODEL #303 HARTFORD RED (MATCH EXISTING 1-STORY STORE FRONT BUILDING)

• CRYSTAL WINDOW SERIES 6000 HEAVY

COMMERICAL/ ARCHITECTURAL ALUMINUM THERMAL-BREAK TILT WINDOWS

• GAMCO CORPORATION SERIES

FG-451T THERMAL-BREAK WITH 1” INSULATED GLASS

• EXISTING BLACONY

TO MATCH ROOSEVELT TERRACE

SET-BACK DIAGRAM 14

SCHEMATC DESIGN AERIAL VIEW OF EXISTING 1-STORY BUILDING, ADJACENT BUILDING AND ROOSEVELT TEERACE

• THE ADJACENT BUILDING ON THE LEFT SHOWS A SET-BACK

ALONG 37TH AVENUE SIDE ABOVE 1-STORY STORE FRONT

• KEEP WITH THE EXISTING HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF

SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD

COMPARISON OF PROPOSED DESIGN TO INTERNATIONAL STYLE 9-STORY ROOSEVELT TERRACE BUILDING 15

COMPARISON OF PROPOSED DESIGN TO ROOSEVELT TERRACE ROOSEVELT TERRACE DESIGN:

• 9-STORY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
• BALCONIES ARE AT THE MIDDLE OF THE BUILDING ALONG

THE FRONT SIDE OF 85TH STREET, AT THE SIDES AND REAR PORTRAYING A U-SHAPED DESIGN

• DISPLAYING ONLY BRICK ELEMENTS
• WINDOWS DESIGN AROUND THE CORNERS ENDS OF THE

BUILDING ARE MORE VERTICAL DEPICTED AS TO

• HORIZONTAL. ALTHOUGH THE WINDOW DESIGN WITHIN

THE BALCONIES ARE EVENLY DESIGN ACCORDING TO HEIGHT AND WIDTH PROPOSED DESIGN:

• 4-STORY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING ABOVE 1-STORY STOREFRONT
• BALCONIES ARE AT THE MIDDLE OF THE BUILDING ALONG THE FRONT SIDE OF 37TH AVENUE

AND 85TH STREET

• ELEMENTS SUCH AS BRICK, CORBELING, AND CAST-STONE BAND ARE SHOWN
• WINDOW DESIGN ARE MORE HORIZONTAL AS TO VERTICAL. THE WINDOW DESIGN WITHIN

THE BALCONY AREA ARE FAVORED IN HEIGHT AS TO WIDTH. WHILE THE FOCUS ON THE ROUND CORNER MAKING IT WRAP AROUND WITH SLIGHT RECESSED.

NEW SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSED BUILDING BULK 16

ROOF PAVERS PARAPET ROOF GRAVEL

NEW PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATION 37TH AVENUE 17

NEW PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATION 85th STREET 18

RELATIONSHIP TO ADJACENT BUILDINGS AND PROPOSED OPEN SPACE 19 RESIDENTIAL ENTRY/EXIT COURTYARD

1. CONCRETE PAVERS 2. BUSHES 3. PLANTINGS 4. 42” MASONRY PARAPET

30FT 40FT SECTION

PARAPET 10 FT 10 FT

SECTION THRU STONE BAND 20

SECTION THRU WINDOW 21

SECTION THRU BRICK 22

SECTION THRU BALCONY 23

WINDOW DETAIL 24

25 SUMMARY OF RESPONSE TO LPC COMMENTS

SUMMARY OF RESPONSE TO LPC COMMENTS DESIGN SCHEME TIMELINE 2015 2016 PROPOSED SCHEME PROGRESSION OF THE DESIGN ELEMENTS CURVED WINDOW W I N D O W F A C A D E 85TH STREET ELEVATION CONCLUSION

 THE BUILDING DESIGN EMPHASIZE THE CORNER LOCATION WHICH DEMONSTRATED THE USE OF GEOMETRY TO ENHANCE THE DESIGN  DIFFERENT ELEMENTS USED IN STREAMLINE MODERNE STYLE TO BE APPLIED TO THE BUILDING WHILE MATCHING WITH THE EXISTING HISTORICAL NEIGHBORHOOD STYLE