............................ - - PDF document

SLIDE 1

............................ zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

.Analysis in Support of the zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

QDR:

...........................

An Overview of U.S. Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) Analytic Activities

Presentation for zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

ISMOR

September 24,1997

• Dr. Jacqueline Henningsen

Office of the Secretary of Defense Program Analysis and Evaluation USA

SBACKGROUND :

............

i

The U.S. Congress in the “The Military Force Structure Review Act of 1996” tasked the Department of Defense to prepare a Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) at the beginning of each Presidential administration. “The review is to involve a comprehensive examination

• f defense strategy, the force structure of the active,

guard, and reserve components, force modernization plans, infrastructure, and other elements of the defense program and policies in order to determine and express the defense strategy of the United States and to establish a revised defense program through the year 2005.” zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

1

SLIDE 2

fBA&RoiiD:’ zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

sfi+ii;id i~bbiifibh:

................................ zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

C

19Ws zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

and zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA beyond

Ingagement and

I

.

Enlargement n case the strateav fails

I

So the strateov can succeed

I ,

I I Not a strategic pause, an historic strategic opportunity zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

I

SLIDE 3

.................................

L zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

I

Procurement Trends

I

DoD Budget Trends

Jin const ant zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

FY

1997

dollars\ ,

1 m

(1985

• 2003)

International Environment zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

1985: $400 billion

n

National zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

Security Strategy

f 110

h m m

• W.

1997: $250 billion z Alternative ApproacheslPostures -

• .

+ l g m . ( -

\

Force Assessments

Overseas Major Theater Technology

Presence Wars

8 Aging

PestemPo .

sma,,sule New

Contingencies

initiatives BUR Program

ForceDrawdown

2 m.

s

\

Defense Program FY 1DDE

Resource Implications

Addressing zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA OBS Infrastructure

' I

Migration Savings

V

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1997: 1.45 million I

lS leBB

lB0I

Boo

21103

• ~~~

End o f the post-Cold War dividend - modernization must rebounl

#.........................*.......

.Structuring the Review: QDR Analytic Process:

..................................

SLIDE 4

• zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

Structuringthe Review: .

. ; . .

1

SLIDE 5

....................................... zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

1

.......................................

. zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

Structuring the Review: QDR Organizational zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

Overview:

r- !'

120

la

5 100

1 M zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

B 10

10

E,

10

2 40

40 zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

6

• 20

a

U

99 00 01 02

• s

U w w

01 02

• s

5

SLIDE 6

Real Percentage Change Between 1985 and 2003 Budget Personnel Base Structure zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

L

Force zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

• 1

I cost I 6

SLIDE 7 c zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

• --- zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

\ ' - P

• .

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

mm zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

i

IW...M."t

• .

"mr*d

: zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

Inr..n*nl zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA i

I

Structuring dhe Review: lnterrrated Paths1

~ __ zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

80

.

70

.

80

.

50

.

40

• 30

.

20

• 10

r

Shape

Respond

Prepare

Smrllmr

I Analvtic-Process:,-

Inv.estmentGomDarisonl

120 110 100 00

• .

= =

5

80

e 70

E

60

e

=

50

s

&

40

'

30

20 10

. ,

120 110 Pam 2

kh

1

/ I

• ,

l n w R "

$00

7

SLIDE 8

I zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

Current Force QDRForce 1

• 1r. zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

1 1 6 zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

. ,

• zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

Surface Combaz?

I

RT /I Force Sbrr

I

I Presewes combat Dower with a leaner force 1

I

IQDR Report: EndStrennthSedudionsl

End Strength 1989

Total protection of zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA QOL programs in QDR 1 Extension of transition support programs

1

8

SLIDE 9

k D R ReDort: zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA 'Modernization Initiatives1 zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

I

I

mard Amy's Force XXI Digitization

• . Expand CW zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

I BW protedion

Secure robust but focused modemiration to implement new vision of future warfare

I

I

I

• Loglsticsmengineering
• Headquarters streamlining

I

'

• Additional outsourcing

Fundamentally reengineer for the long-term

• Defense Reform Task Force to report in fall 1997

i

• Reexamine oraanizational

structure for future

II

~ zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

I

leregulate through removal of legislative and regulatory obstacles

1

I'

_ _ _ ._

___

~- zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

9

SLIDE 10 J