Youth Engagement as a Protective Factor for Rural & Urban Youth - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

youth engagement as a protective factor for rural urban
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Youth Engagement as a Protective Factor for Rural & Urban Youth - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Youth Engagement as a Protective Factor for Rural & Urban Youth Suicidal Ideation Dr. Laura Lynne Armstrong Ph.D., C.Psych. (Supervised Practice) Assistant Professor, Saint Paul University School of Counselling, Psychotherapy, &


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Youth Engagement as a Protective Factor for Rural & Urban Youth Suicidal Ideation

  • Dr. Laura Lynne Armstrong

Ph.D., C.Psych. (Supervised Practice)

Assistant Professor, Saint Paul University School of Counselling, Psychotherapy, & Spirituality

Clinical Psychologist – Child, Adolescent, Family, & Adult Psychotherapy Psychoeducational & Gifted Assessments

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Youth Suicide in Canada

 Accounts for more deaths than

, , & all other natural causes of death

 4-6x more likely to die in

than regions

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Risk Factors

Suicidal Ideation

Low Perceived Social Support Low Self- Esteem Depressive Symptoms Risk Behaviours

All of these are more prevalent in Canadian rural than urban communities

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Youth Engagement

Youth Engagement

  • Fewer Depressive

Symptoms

  • Higher Self-Esteem
  • Fewer Risk Behaviours
  • Greater Social Support
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Is Youth Engagement a Protective Factor?

 Breadth, Intensity, Meaningful Engagement

Risk Factors / Rural Dwelling Youth Engagement Suicidal Ideation

FINDING = SUICIDE RISK (Frankl)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Methods

 Survey  813 rural & urban secondary school youth  Non-remote rural (1-2 hours from a city centre)  Measurement of meaningful engagement (Youth Engagement

Matrix):

Structured extracurricular activity

Based on positive psychology literature

slide-7
SLIDE 7

% Current Suicidal Ideation

5 10 15 20 25 Female Male

21.3 13.4 14.2 6.8

Rural Urban

Gender: F(1,762) = 5.40, p = .02 Rural/Urban: F(1,762) = 50.24, p = .002

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Findings: Rural Dwelling

Rural Females Youth Engagement Suicidal Ideation Rural Males Youth Engagement Suicidal Ideation

F(1, 242) = 4.74, p = .03 F(1, 214) = 6.52, p = .01

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Findings: Risk Factors

Suicidal Ideation Social Isolation Low Self- Esteem Risk Behaviours Depressive Symptoms Youth Engagement

Meaningful Engagement ฀ Breadth of Engagement ฀ Intensity of Engagement

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Research Contributions

rural suicidal ideation

 Youth engagement as a

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Implications

 prospective avenue for prevention (rural dwelling / risk factors)

 Targeted approaches  Facilitate prevention  rural females  Reach youth before suicidal concerns emerge

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Where do we go from here?

 Feasibility – Invitations to engage those at risk; creation of

rural opportunities for engagement

 Scalability  What can you do?

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Questions?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Acknowledgement