Your School the data 2015/16 Your schools context Were a larger - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Your School – the data – 2015/16

Your school’s context

We’re a larger than average primary school

Contextual information:

Schools are grouped in percentiles according to their context e.g. if a school’s number

• f pupils was banded in the 5Oth percentile they would broadly have the national

average for number of pupils on roll e.g. The 50th percentile for pupils is 269, Lowther has 405 pupils which puts us in the 60th-80th percentile of schools. Pupil Stability Lowther has low pupil stability. This is the number of pupils that join and leave the school

• utside of the normal starting point (Reception) and finishing point (Year 6)

Your School’s Context

Pupils from ethnic minority backgrounds

Lowther Richmond National

67.6%

(80th – 100 percentile)

36%

31.6%

English as an Additional Language

Lowther Richmond National

38.3%

(80th – 100th percentile)

20.4% 20.1%

FSM

Lowther Richmond National

25%

(60th – 80th percentile)

8.9% 25.2%

67.6% of our current cohort are from Minority Ethnic backgrounds. This is

• ver double the national picture and

significantly higher than the local and wider Borough picture. 38.3% of the children at Lowther have English as an additional language – this is nearly double the national picture and significantly higher than our neighbouring schools. The percentage of children currently entitled to Free School Meals is 25% - inline with the national picture – but significantly different to most other schools in the Borough.

Your School’s Context

Not including children with statemented needs, Lowther currently has 19.5% of pupils who receive SEN support. The graph opposite highlights Lowther and shows how we compare with the schools in Richmond and Kingston. We have the 3rd highest numbers of children receiving SEN support out of 78 schools Lowther

What Data will we be looking at? National Assessment Data in

• Foundation Stage – Good level of development
• Year 1 – Phonics
• Year 2 – Attainment in Reading, Writing, Maths and Science
• Year 6 – Attainment and Progress in Reading, Writing, Maths and Science

Then we will review

• Parent feedback on school life
• Pupil Feedback on school life
• School Improvement Partner Feedback on School life
• School Improvement Plans

Reception Good level of development

2014 2015 2016

3 year average Kingston LA

65 72 75

71

Richmond LA

64 71 77

71

National

60 66 69

65

Lowther

58 58 75 64

Foundation Stage

This table illustrates the number of Lowther children attaining the Good Level of Development by the end of the Foundation Stage.

Foundation Stage

This graph illustrates the position of Lowther within Richmond and Kingston for the number

• f children attaining the

Good Level of Development by the end of the Foundation Stage. The black horizontal line is the national average, the purple is Kingston and the green is Richmond. Lowther

Y1

Phonics

School 2013 School 2014 School 2015

SCHOOL 2016 National 2016 Richmond And Kingston 2016

All pupils 72 76 70 87 81 88

Year1

Y1 Phonics

2013 2014 2015 2016

Kingston LA 72 79 77 87 Richmond LA 79 82 87 89 National 69 74 77 81 Lowther 72 76 70 87

These tables illustrate the number of Lowther children attaining the expected phonics standard by the end of the Year 1.

Lowther average score 36 National average score 34

Key Stage 1 Phonics

Year 2 Phonics Lowther 100% National 91%

Year1

This graph illustrates the position of Lowther within Richmond and Kingston for the number

• f children attaining the

expected phonics standard by the end of the Year 1. The black horizontal line is the national average, the purple is Kingston and the green is Richmond. Lowther This graph illustrates the position of Lowther within Richmond and Kingston for the number

• f children attaining the

expected phonics standard by the end of the Year 1. The black horizontal line is the national average, the purple is Kingston and the green is Richmond.

The Historical picture – KS1

KS1 Overall Average Point Score KS1 Maths Average Point Score KS1 Writing Average Point Score KS1 Reading Average Point Score

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Cohort 25 46 49 58 55 School 15.9 16.6 17.1 17.5 16.7 National 15.3 15.5 15.8 15.9 16.1

Cohort 25 46 49 58 55 School 16.7 16.8 17.3 17.7 17.3 National 15.8 16.0 16.3 16.5 16.6

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Cohort 25 46 49 58 55

Cohort 25 46 49 58 55 School 14.3 15.7 t 16.7 17.0 16.0 National 14.4 14.7 14.9 15.1 15.3

Cohort 25 46 49 58 55 School 16.8 17.3 17.4 17.7 17.0 National 15.7 15.9 16.1 16.2 16.4

Year 2 Summary

KS1 2016 - Attainment

Lowther National Richmond Maths 70% 73% 79% Lowther National Richmond Writing 50% 65% 68% Lowther National Richmond Reading 57% 74% 79% Lowther National Richmond Maths 25% 18% 28% Lowther National Richmond Writing 11% 13% 19% Lowther National Richmond Reading 27% 24% 36%

Percentage of pupils attaining the national expected level Percentage of pupils working at a greater depth

Lowther National Richmond Science 88% 82% 89%

KS1 Pupil Attainment – 3 year trend

Year 2

2014 2015

2C+ 2B+ 2A+ 3 2B+ 2A+ 3

R

95% 93% 68% 47% R 82% 64% 47%

Wr

93% 84% 60% 37% W 75% 55% 35%

M

95% 93% 68% 42% M 84% 56% 40%

Sc

97% 95% 70% 40% S 100% 97% 36%

Year 2

2016

Expected Greater Depth

R

57% 27%

Wr 50%

11%

M

70% 25%

Sc

88% n/a

KS1 Attainment - The Local context

65 Primary Schools in Richmond and Kingston

KS1 Reading, Writing and Maths attainment combined Expected Greater depth

A snapshot of the Historical picture in Key stage 2

SCIENCE Attainment

Level 4 Level 5

% of children making better than expected progress

2007 100% 64% 100% 2011 100%* 77%* 91%* 2015

91% 47% n/a

ENGLISH Attainment

Level 4 Level 5

% of children making better than expected progress

2007 91% 23% 92% 2011 91% 27% 86%

From 2013 English scores were no longer given and schools were given a break down of the 3 core components

2015 Reading 91% 50% 96% 2015 Writing 78%

34% 96%

2015 SPAG 81%

72% n/a

MATHS Attainment

Level 4 Level 5

% of children making expected or better than expected progress

2007 86% 55% 92% 2011 91% 50% 91% 2015 88% 47% 86%

Key Stage 2 - Summary

Key Stage 2 - Summary

Key Stage 2 Reading Score + 2.74 Rank n/a Writing Score

• 2.18

Rank n/a Maths Score + 5.39 Rank 3

Progress of pupils in KS2 in the context of the national picture

Reading progress Reading attainment

Cohort Score Cohort National comparator type Scaled score 100+ Sch % Nat % High scaled score Sch % Nat % Average score Sch Nat 37 2.74 46 all 87 66 13 19 104.5 102.6

Key Stage 2 - Reading

Writing progress Writing attainment

Cohort Score Cohort

National comparator type

Expected standard +

School % National%

Greater depth

School% National%

37

• 2.18

46 all 61 74 9 15

Key Stage 2 - Writing

Mathematics progress Mathematics attainment

Cohort Score Cohort National comparator type Scaled score 100+ Sch % Nat % High scaled score Sch % Nat % Average score Sch Nat

37 5.39 46

all

87 70 37 17 107.3 103.0

Key Stage 2 - Maths

Key Stage 2 – SPAG and Science

English grammar, punctuation and spelling Average spelling mark Sch Nat Spelling mark Scaled score 100+ School National % % High scaled score School National % % Average score School National 5+ Sch Nat % % 10+ Sch Nat % % 15+ Sch Nat % % 20 Sch Nat % % 80 72 28 22 105.8 104.0 15 15 96 95 83 85 65 64 13 11 Expected standard School % National % 83 81

KS2 data summary with the local and National context. Measure Kingston Richmond National LOWTHER RWM Expected Standard 59% 67% 53%

60%

Reading Expected Standard 74% 81% 66%

87%

Reading Average Scaled Score 104.8 106.6 103

104.4

Writing Expected Standard (TA) 71% 77% 74%

62%

GPS Expected Standard 79% 85% 72%

80%

GPS Average Scaled Score 105.8 107.3 104

105.8

Maths Expected Standard 78% 81% 70%

87%

Maths Average Scaled Score 105.1 105.9 103

107.3

Science Expected Standard (TA) 86% 87% 81%

84%

KS1- KS2 Value Added Reading KS1- KS2 Value Added Writing

KS2 - The Local context

The purple horizontal line is Kingston and the green is Richmond.

65 Primary Schools in Richmond and Kingston

Ks1- KS2 Value Added Maths RWM KS1- KS2 Value Added Maths KS2 % Expected RWM

KS2 - The Local context

The black line is the national average, the purple horizontal line is Kingston and the green is Richmond.

65 Primary Schools in Richmond and Kingston

KS2 Expected Standard Reading KS2 Expected Writing

KS2 - The Local context

The black line is the national average, the purple horizontal line is Kingston and the green is Richmond.

65 Primary Schools in Richmond and Kingston

KS2 Expected Standard Maths KS2 Expected GPS

KS2 - The Local context

The black line is the national average, the purple horizontal line is Kingston and the green is Richmond.

65 Primary Schools in Richmond and Kingston

External Evaluation

COMMENT ON THE SCHOOL’S SELF-EVALUATION OF OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS AND CAPACITY TO IMPROVE: The school’s judgement that its overall effectiveness in good remains appropriate. Leadership and management are good, with an effective headship partnership, developing middle leadership and strong, experienced governance. Outcomes have improved in Early Years and particularly in phonics and progress across KS2 in reading and mathematics is strong. However, in 2016 outcomes at KS1 were low and progress in writing across KS2 was below the national average. It will be important for the school to be able to demonstrate that progress of pupils currently in the school is good. Personal Development, Behaviour and Welfare remain strengths of the school, as do Spiritual, Moral, Social and Cultural Development. Teaching and Learning has been further strengthened by the appointment of a new leader. The school has good capacity to improve further.

Judgement at last Ofsted Self-evaluation by school Effectiveness of early years provision Not Applicable Good Judgement at last Ofsted Self-evaluation by school Outcomes for pupils Good Good Judgement at last Ofsted Self-evaluation by school Personal development, behaviour and welfare Outstanding Outstanding Judgement at last Ofsted Self-evaluation by school Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good Good Judgement at last Ofsted Self-evaluation by school Effectiveness of leadership and management Good Good Judgement at the last Ofsted inspection on 24 April 2013 Good School self-evaluation of overall effectiveness 2016 Good

Pupil Satisfaction – School life

Pupil Satisfaction – by subject

Art Enjoy loads 87% Enjoy 9% It’s ok 3.5% Don’t enjoy0.5% PE Enjoy loads 75% Enjoy 14% It’s ok 10% Don’t enjoy 1% ICT Enjoy loads 87% Enjoy 10% It’s ok 3% Don’t enjoy 0% Music Enjoy loads 61% Enjoy 27% It’s ok 10% Don’t enjoy 2% Cooking Enjoy loads 96% Enjoy 2% It’s ok 1% Don’t enjoy 1% Topic Enjoy loads 65% Enjoy 24% It’s ok 9% Don’t enjoy 2% Drama Enjoy loads 82% Enjoy 10% It’s ok 6% Don’t enjoy 2% Reading Enjoy loads 60% Enjoy 28% It’s ok 10% Don’t enjoy 2% Writing Enjoy loads 53% Enjoy 34% It’s ok 9% Don’t enjoy 4% Maths Enjoy loads70% Enjoy 21% It’s ok 7% Don’t enjoy 2% Science Enjoy loads 68% Enjoy 17% It’s ok 11% Don’t enjoy3%

My child is happy at Lowther

Summary of views of Parents

(based on Parent View survey –as of January 2017, 83responses)

My child is making good progress at Lowther My child is well taught at Lowther

Key to results Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree Don't know

Lowther SIP 2016/17

(SEF Section 2) Top 4 Priorities for School Improvement 2016-17

ESTABLISH = something new DEVELOP = something we’ve already started and needs further work EMBED – something that is already well establish

5 A

Further develop our focus on high quality teaching

• Continue to promote and develop excellent teaching through peer to peer support, team teaching, observing

colleagues, networking, learning walks, staff training and sharing best practice.

• 100% of observed practice to be good or better
• Utilise CPD opportunities both internally, within the locality and the local authority that focus on developing

pedagogy, Increase opportunities for collaborative working with our locality schools and the Afc premium service to support great teaching

Action Plan

Teaching and learning (AR) Headship (MT/DB)

4 C

Raise standards of communication, both oral and written, across the school

• Improve number of pupils across the school attaining the expected standard in Writing to be in line with National
• Continue to drive improvement in Phonics (ensure 80% of each FS and KS1 class is at an expected or above level.)
• Promote high standards of spoken language through combining strengths in drama and reading with writing and the wider

curriculum

• Reduce the gap in attainment between Reading and Writing
• Target PPG children in KS2 in Writing

Action Plan English (PN) Phonics (MB)

Lowther SIP 2016/17

(SEF Section 2) Top 4 Priorities for School Improvement 2016-17

7 B

Support and develop the strategic role and accountability of Phase and Faculty leaders within the leadership structure

• Phase leaders to take an active role in driving improvement through checking the quality of teaching and

learning and analysing data

• Faculty/Phase leaders to drive improvement in specific elements for their phase e.g. English in KS1
• Introduce further level of school improvement planning through the establishment of Action Planning

Action Plan

Headship (MT/DB)

5 D

Ensure the developing assessment system supports focused feedback and excellent pupil progress

• Provide clear and regular communication of assessment to pupils and parents, including a specific focus on

pupil progress and next steps

• Give pupils improved opportunities to reflect on and respond to written and oral feedback about their learning

and progress in class

• Embed the HKP target system for children (and parents) so pupils know what they need to do to improve

further

• Further develop and refine our Target Tracker assessment system and how teachers use it

Action Plan

Assessment (HM) Headship (DB)

ESTABLISH = something new DEVELOP = something we’ve already started and needs further work EMBED – something that is already well establish