you deserve better considerations for successful
play

You Deserve Better: Considerations for Successful Interoperability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

You Deserve Better: Considerations for Successful Interoperability Phil Wasson, Healthcare Industry Manager and Consultant phil.wasson@lexmark.com Larry Sitka, Founder Acuo VNA larry.sitka@lexmark.com Connecting the Dots...Healthcare


  1. You Deserve Better: Considerations for Successful Interoperability Phil Wasson, Healthcare Industry Manager and Consultant phil.wasson@lexmark.com Larry Sitka, Founder Acuo VNA larry.sitka@lexmark.com Connecting the Dots...Healthcare Technology & Interoperability March 24th, 2017 Scottsdale, AZ

  2. Agenda  What is Interoperability  Why Interoperability Matters  EHRs and Acceptance Levels  Governmental Mandates, Current State of Interoperability ▪ ONC Initiatives and Major Policy Positions ▪ MU Stage 3 ▪ Value-Based Reimbursement and Interoperability  Where are we Today?  XDS has come of age  Major IHE Exchange Functions  IHE Document Exchange  Emerging Standard: Smart on FHIR  Imaging Exchanges  Takeaways 2

  3. Federal Goals of Health Information Technology Goal #1 Goal #2 Provide better Health Information Tools, Connecting Health Information so that it such as Electronic Health Records for follows patients throughout care and can use by clinicians in providing care. be aggregated to advance care delivery. Goal #3 Goal #4 Supporting consumers with information Advancing public health, clinical trials, to help them in managing their care. and other data-intensive activities. Source: IT Interoperability and Use for Better Care and Evidence , National Academy of Science, Sept 2016 3

  4. Why Interoperability Matters Percent of Hospitals w/ Basic EHR System, The Good News: 2010 - 2015 Hospitals and Health 120% Systems are beginning to share some data 96% 100% electronically and there had been strong 76% 80% penetration of the deployment of EHR’s. 59% 60% 44% 40% 28% 16% 20% Sources: AHA Annual Survey, HIT, FY 2010-2014 ONC, for 2015 0% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 4

  5. Technology has helped improve quality and promote better care. 68% 75% Since 2008, technology has helped Since 2008, technology has helped increased healthcare quality! promote team-based care concepts! Source: Current State of Progress Towards True Interoperability, eHealth Initiative Survey, 2016 5

  6. Has Technology Impacted Cost. 32% Disagreement as to whether technology has helped to reduce Agree healthcare costs. 42% Are we really bending the cost curve? Disagree Source: Current State of Progress Towards True Interoperability, eHealth Initiative Survey, 2016 6

  7. Interoperability is needed to improve quality and promote better care. 85% 95% Strong interoperability capabilities Current interoperability capacities are are a key IT requirement to transition not meeting needs to transition to to Value-Based Care ! Value-Based Care ! Source: Current State of Progress Towards True Interoperability, eHealth Initiative Survey, 2016 7

  8. Major Challenges to Interoperability Standardized pricing Consensus-based and integration standards for data, solutions from vendors vocabulary, and transport 24% 17% (Dept vs. Enterprise) (Canonical Data Model) Cultural changes resulting in the desire or need to share eHealth data 18% (Clinical vs. IT) Technology platforms that are "plug and play" 21% (Platform vs. App) Federally mandated standards 20% (Interoperability Road Map) 2016 eHealth Initiative Poll N=135 8

  9. Current impact with healthcare interoperability Collaborative Care Enterprise Most Impacted Expedited access to externally sourced patient data Complete EHR Identify gaps and improve quality by closing care gaps during care encounters Closing Referral Loops Least Impacted Enable enhanced patient access to data to their medical records Enable patients to provide remote data Source: ehealth Initiative Survey, Dec., 2016 9

  10. Why Interoperability Matters – Key Use Cases Today  Children’s Hospital, Boston, 85 patients  The lack of interoperability shows transferred from one hospital to another up many ways every day found duplicate testing on 32% of the  Critical fields in a care summary are patients. missing when a nurse at the receiving hospital opens and reviews it.  Another study estimated that the use of  Values in a lab report incorrectly appear EHRs can result in a net benefit of $86,400 in the wrong section. per provider over five years through savings in drug expenditures, improved  Inability to share details about care utilization of testing and improved billing provided to a patient in a hospital with practices. subsequent providers, such as SNFs, IRFs, or HHAs.  Annual nationwide estimates for cost  A specialist’s report to a hospital savings through Interoperability approach somehow turns from English into $30 Billion annually. gibberish. * J Am Med Inform Assoc (2010) 17 (3): 341-344 10

  11. ONC Interoperability Roadmap Goals  2015-2017: Send, receive, find and use priority data domains to improve health care quality and outcomes.  2018-2020 : Expand data sources and users in the interoperable health IT ecosystem to improve health and lower costs.  2021-2024: Achieve nationwide interoperability to enable a learning health system, with the person at the center of a system that can continuously improve care, public health, and science through real-time data access. 11

  12. 21 st Century Healthcare Cures Act  Discovery ensures that the NIH is provided with a total of $4.8 billion in new funding  Development addresses modernizing clinical trials, utilization of biomarkers, and improving FDA flexibility  Delivery supports improved interoperability of electronic health records to insure care coordination and improve delivery. 12

  13. New Reimbursement Models – “The New Game” Area Examples Payment Bundling Medicaid demonstrations National pilot program development Now MACRA Accountable care Medicare Shared Savings Program organizations (ACOs) Pediatric ACO program Pay-for-Performance Reduced payments for health care-acquired conditions Hospital-based value purchasing Payment systems for physicians, home health care, and skilled nursing facilities Care Coordination and State option for medical homes for Medicaid enrollees w/ chronic conditions Transition Community-based care transition programs Independence at home demonstration projects 13

  14. Originally 2012 To 2013, Meaningful Use Three Stages Starts 2017 Stage 3 July 2009 to December 2011 Advancing Clinical Outcomes Stage 2 January 2009 to July 2010 Advancing Clinical Processes Stage 1 Improved Capture of Stage 3 MU Stage Hospital Final Rules Stage 3 MU Stage Provider Final Rules Clinical Information • • Same as Provider PHI, Security Risk Assessment • • => 25% discharged eRx queried to drug => 60% patient eRx queried to drug formulary and transmitted using CEHRT formulary and transmitted using CEHRT • • CDS hospital measures (=> 2) CDS provider measures (=> 5) • • Same as Provider CPOE => 60% transmitted to three • Same as Provider clinical areas (Meds, Lab, Diagnostic • Same as Provider Imaging Orders) • • Same as Provider Patient access measures (2 required) • • Same as Provider Coordination of care through active engagement of patients (3 measures) • HIE to encourage interoperability • Public health to clinical data registries Updated: Nov 2016 (5 reporting registries required) Updated: Nov 2016 14

  15. Regulatory Relief – Top Recommendations for HHS Cyber Quality: Security: Patient Interoperability: Identification: 90-day reporting Encourage Prioritize adoption requirement & investment of a single set of Support private Telemedicine: through positive postpone eCQM sector efforts! standards MIPS: incentives for Support Treat 2018 as a providers payment & MU: transition year delivery reform removing MU3 Delay Stage 3 efforts measures Public Policy Recommendations March 16, 2017 15

  16. Overall Trends in the Healthcare Industry towards interoperability  Interoperability is important to support value-based care “It is imperative for providers across the initiatives healthcare continuum to consistently send  Interoperability can have an impact on healthcare and receive accurate and meaningful organizations that can reduce costs patient data. Otherwise we will fail to realize the benefits  Value of interoperability is dependent upon the type of of interoperability: information being exchanged improvements in clinical decision- making and patient  Mixed reaction to federal intervention with interoperability, safety, operational process should reimbursement drive incentives? improvement, and support for value- based care.”  Little commentary is recognized from providers about the impact of “Provider Blocking” 16

  17. Major Challenges to Interoperability Standardized pricing Consensus-based and integration standards for data, solutions from vendors vocabulary, and transport 24% 17% (Dept vs. Enterprise) (Canonical Data Model) Cultural changes resulting in the desire or need to share eHealth data 18% (Clinical vs. IT) Technology platforms that are "plug and play" 21% (Platform vs. App) Federally mandated standards 20% (Interoperability Road Map) 2016 eHealth Initiative Poll N=135 18

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend