y l
play

Y L NATIONAL ACTION PLAN FOR N O DISASTER RISK REDUCTION W IN - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Y L NATIONAL ACTION PLAN FOR N O DISASTER RISK REDUCTION W IN INDONESIA T I R Ruswandi Tahrir Tahrir ( (ruswandi@bakornaspb.go.id ruswandi@bakornaspb.go.id) ) Ruswandi O F Director of Prevention Director of Prevention National


  1. Y L NATIONAL ACTION PLAN FOR N O DISASTER RISK REDUCTION W IN INDONESIA T I R Ruswandi Tahrir Tahrir ( (ruswandi@bakornaspb.go.id ruswandi@bakornaspb.go.id) ) Ruswandi O F Director of Prevention Director of Prevention National Coordinating Agency for Disaster Managment National Coordinating Agency for Disaster Managment ( (Bakornas Bakornas PB) PB) INDONESIA INDONESIA Future Directions in Indonesian Disaster Risk Management Future Directions in Indonesian Disaster Risk Management th 2007 , May 9 th Taipeh, May 9 Taipeh 2007

  2. GENERAL CONDITION GENERAL CONDITION • Indonesia is situated at a juncture of four major world tectonic plates; the Asian Plate, Indian Ocean Plate, Australian Plate and Y Pacific Ocean Flat L Located on crossing three mountain systems: Alpine Sundae, • N Circum Pacific and Circum Australia O More than 500 volcanoes in which 128 volcanoes are still • eruptions W • Consist of about 220 million inhabitants, unevenly distribution with made up of a mix ethnicities, community groups, religious T denominations, customs and traditions I 383 out of 440 districts/cities considered as prone areas, which • R contributing from: high number of population, high density O areas with unevenly population distribution, high income F disparity, decrease of building coverage • Most of river banks are used as low-income squatter area with high population density 2

  3. GENERAL CONDITION GENERAL CONDITION Indonesia is the 7 th rank of the countries most hits by natural • disaster in 2005 (the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction Y 2006 – 2009, World Disaster Reduction Campaign, UNESCO) L Within the last 3 years, Indonesia has experienced various • N significant disasters: O Disaster Event Date Number Killed/ Damage & W Losses (US $ ) House destroyed T Tsunami Aceh December 2004 165,708 people killed 4,450 Million I Earthquake May 2006 5,716 people killed / 3,134 Million R Yogya – Central 156,662 housings O Java Tsunami F July 2006 645 people killed / 138.7 Million Pangandaran – 1,908 housings West Java Flood Jakarta February 2007 145,742 housings 967 Million damaged (incl. indirect economic losses) 3

  4. MAJOR ISSUES AND PROBLEMS MAJOR ISSUES AND PROBLEMS LACK OF MANAGEMENT AND PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION • Delay in the management of emergency response Y Lack of coordination in planning and programming for post- • L disaster recovery N • Institutional framework is more focus on emergency O response, rather than post-disaster recovery • Funding more emphasizes on emergency response W T LACK OF UNDERSTANDING IN DISASTER RISK REDUCTION LACK OF UNDERSTANDING IN DISASTER RISK REDUCTION I • Lack of understanding in the preparation of disaster R preparedness and risk reduction O • Lack of institutional performance in the management of risk reduction F • Lack of planning and programming for risk reduction • Lack of incorporating risk disaster mitigation into spatial plans 4

  5. NEW PARADIGM IN DISASTER MANAGEMENT NEW PARADIGM 1. Recognizing the right for dignified life and Y livelihood and that the government responsible L to ensure the protection from disaster, which is N essence is avoidable, with no risks creation in O recovery process W 2.Reducing disaster risk factors from T unsustainable development practices that are I worsened by the impact of climate changes R 3.Being accountable to the risk community and/or O disaster-affected community and sensitivity to F gender, participatory, equity and justice perspectives 5

  6. NEW PARADIGM IN DISASTER MANAGEMENT NEW PARADIGM Reactive Proactive Y L N O Emergency Risk Reduction Response W T I R Centralize Local Autonomy O F Government Participatory 6

  7. NATIONAL ACTION PLAN FOR DPRR NATIONAL ACTION PLAN FOR DPRR (2006 – – 2009) 2009) (2006 • National Action Plan (NAP) for Disaster Preparedness and Risk Reduction (DPRR) has been launched early 2007 Y L N NAP specifies platforms, priorities, action plans and • mechanisms pertaining to the implementation and O institutional basis of disaster management in Indonesia W NAP elaborates interests and responsibilities of all T • stakeholders where identified through a participatory I coordination process and in line with the Hyogo Framework R for Action O F NAP provides guidelines and information that will facilitate • decision makers to pledge commitment to cross-sector and jurisdictional priority programs based on a strong and systematic foundations 7

  8. PLATFORM FOR DISASTER RISK REDUCTION PLATFORM FOR DISASTER RISK REDUCTION 1. UN Resolutions ; (a) raising community awareness, (b) ensuring the government’s commitment, (c) engaging Y community participation, and (d) reducing economic and L social losses N 2. Yokohama Strategy . It focuses on (a) systematic efforts to incorporate DRR into sustainable development, and (b) 1 O efforts to increase community resilience through capacity building for managing and reducing disaster risks Global W 3. The Hyogo Framework for Action. Adopts strategic goals; Platform T (a) sustainable development policies, planning, and programming at all levels with emphasis on disaster I prevention, mitigation, preparedness and vulnerability R reduction, (b) development and strengthening of institutions, O mechanism, and capacities at all levels, particularly F community level, and (c) systematic incorporation of risk reduction approach into the design and implementation of emergency preparedness, response and recovery programme. 8

  9. PLATFORM FOR DISASTER RISK REDUCTION PLATFORM FOR DISASTER RISK REDUCTION 1. The Beijing Action Plan ; (a) all Asian countries agree to 2 make a disaster risk reduction plan as an immediate priority, Y Regional (b) Regional cooperation in DRR in Asia supported by L existing regional and sub-regional agencies and institutions Platform N 1. The National Middle-term Development Plan (RPJM) ; O programme and activities related to DRR are generally developed independently by different sectors W 2. The Government’s Work Plan (RKP). 3 T In Law No 13/2005 on State Revenue and Expenditure I Budget for fiscal year 2006 allocates budget for implementing National R Natural Disaster Management Policy through (a) Platform enhancement of natural disaster mitigation and climate O forecasting, (b) spatial planning and natural resource F protection zoning, including disaster-prone areas in coastal and sea areas, and (c) development of a natural disaster management system and early warning system (EWS) In RKP for 2007 (through Presidential Regulation No.19/2006) two key targets; (a) continue and completion post-disaster in Aceh, Nias etc, and (b) completion of emergency response, rehabilitation and reconstruction affected by disasters in other 9 regions

  10. 5 PRIORITY ACTIVITIES 5 PRIORITY ACTIVITIES IN NAP - - DRR 2006 DRR 2006- -2009 2009 IN NAP 1. Ensure that DRR is a national and local priority with a strong institutional Y basis for L implementation N O 2. Identify, assess and monitor disaster risks and enhance early warning system W T 3. Use knowledge, innovation and education to I build a culture of safety and resilience at all R level; O F 4. Reduce underlying risk factors; and 5. Strengthen disaster preparedness for effective response at all level 10

  11. IMPLEMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION 1. Mechanism Y L Regulation or N Relevant line ministries and Presidential local governments O Instruction W T I Medium-term Annual R Programs Annual Gov’t Work O (stipulated in NAP) Activities Plan F 11

  12. IMPLEMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION 2. Institutional Arrangement Y L - Build a network among government institutions, N local governments, private sectors, civil society O and other relevant stakeholders W - Civil society will be involved in the institutional T arrangement and disaster risk reduction I mechanism at all levels of the government R O 3. Funding F - State budget - Local budget - Private sectors and/or community - Regional and international donors 12

  13. IMPLEMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION 4. Indicators - Number of survivors in the event of disaster Y - Lower number of injured victims L - Significant decrease of percentage communities 1 N affected by a disaster General O - Percentage of affected population counted after a certain span time after a disaster W - The availability of building and land codes - Capacity of emergency response T - Distribution of income levels I - Level of education R 2 - Level of use of medical services O Resilience - Level of employment against F - Availability and resilience of housing Disaster - Birth of mortality rate of social groups - Quality of life - Survival - Environmental resilience - Local economic resilience 13

  14. IMPLEMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION 4. Indicators a. The National Disaster Risk Index measures a country’s Y 3 level of disaster risks by looking into disaster indicators, L Geographical physical indicators and society’s social economic resilience N Aspects b.The National Disaster Resilience Index, measures O capacities for disaster risk management (DRM), institutional capacities, attention to disaster risks, funding availability W and emergency response preparedness 4 T DRR Policy Implementation and the implementation of DRR Policy and I activities support the success of disaster risk reduction R Implementation initiatives O F 14

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend