1
xperience to Date Paul van den Noord Economics Department OECD 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
xperience to Date Paul van den Noord Economics Department OECD 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
xperience to Date Paul van den Noord Economics Department OECD 1 Monetary union in Europe: progress and headwinds Exchange risk disappeared, financial markets deepened, interest rates converged, competition strengthened The euro
2
Monetary union in Europe: progress and headwinds
Exchange risk disappeared, financial markets
deepened, interest rates converged, competition strengthened
The euro system weathered major stress tests (911,
the introduction of the cash euro)
But growth has been sluggish, fiscal policies fared
less well, the Stability and Growth Pact lost credibility
3
The beauty contest
Inflation must be close to best performers Fiscal house in order (deficit 3% of GDP, debt 60% of
GDP)
Long term interest rates must be low (close to best
inflation performers)
Two years in ERMII But convergence stalled when the euro was created
....
4
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
- A. Standard deviation of inflation
Euro area (1) United states (2)
- 1.0
- 0.5
0.0 0.5 1.0
- B. Inflation differential against the aggregate rate (3)
United States
West urban Northeast urban Midwest urban South urban
- 1.0
- 0.5
0.0 0.5 1.0
Smalls Italy France Germany
Euro area
- 2
2 4 6 1 2 3 4
Inflation (1)
- C. Correlation between inflation and activity (3)
Output gap (4)
R2 = 0.26 DEU FRA ITA AUT BEL FIN GRC IRL NLD PRT ESP LUX
2 4 6 8 1 2 3 4
Inflation (1) Real GDP growth
R2 = 0.42 DEU FRA ITA AUT BEL FIN GRC IRL NLD PRT ESP LUX
5
“Start-up shocks” worked out favourably for the smaller countries
Interest rate shocks (monetary union meant sharply
lower interest rates in some countries with high inflation histories)
Exchange rate shocks (initial misallignments, sharp
drop in the euro exchange rate in the first two years)
These shocks produced inflation, low real interest
rates and housing booms in small economies.
6
7
8
Macroeconomic management more challenging in euro area if ...
Countries are frequently hit by “asymmetric shocks” Countries differ in their responses to common shocks Market adjustment to shocks is slo and automatic
fiscal stabilsiers weak
9
monetary union will reduce asymmetries
Greater integration of product markets means dilution
- f shocks
Greater integration of financial markets and
diversification of portfolios means dilution of shocks
Risk of asymmetric policy shocks diminishes, risk of
asymmetric exchange rate shocks vanishes
10
Fiscal co-ordination is essential
Spillovers result in high interest rates elsewhere Automatic stabilisers are sorely needed in the face of
asymmetric shocks
Fiscal sustainability must be safeguarded
11
The longer term: integration will lead to three possible scenarios
Concentration (US model, mobile labour and capital
and stong agglomeration effects); implies strong growth but regional disparity of activity (not income)
Dispersion (Mobile capital, immobile labour, flexible
real wages); implies weaker growth but even distribution of activity and income
Polarisation (Mobile capital, immobile labour, rigid
real wages); implies strong growth but uneven distribution of activity and income (motivates structural funds)
12
13
14
The Irish miracle
Impressive employment and productivity growth Massive foreign direct investment inflows helped by
strategic location
EU membership gave US businesses easy access to
European markets
EU aid cleverly used Wage moderation, pruden fiscal strategy An ICT front runner
15
16
Decomposing potential output growth in Ireland Annual average, percentage points
1983- 1993 1993- 2003 Potential GDP growth 5.4 7.2 Potential labour productivity growth 4.8 4.5 Potential labour input growth 0.5 2.6 Contributions from Working age population 1.1 1.8 Trend participation rate 0.1 1.0 Change in structural unemployment
- 0.1
0.9 Hours worked per person
- 0.7
- 0.9
17
18
To sum up
Start up shocks worked out favourable for the smalls Loss of policy sovereignity may be offset by greater
flexibility and integration
Investment opportunities open up in a credible low
inflation environment
Integration may carry social adjustment cost due to
specialisation
Benefits will be higher if policy settings are right