[PPT] - Writing for Survival, Reading the Signs Christopher Rose Rutgers PowerPoint Presentation

SLIDE 1

Writing for Survival, Reading the Signs

Christopher Rose

Rutgers University, WINLAB

Communication Theory Workshop June 24, 2013

SLIDE 2

1

Physics Envy

PHYSICIST

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 3

2

Physics Envy

Communication Engineer/Theorist

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 4

3

Ego Emerges

But EVERYTHING Communicates!

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 5

3

Ego Emerges

But EVERYTHING Communicates! Particles Atoms Cells Organisms People Ecologies Economies Universe

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 6

3

Ego Emerges

But EVERYTHING Communicates! Particles Atoms Cells Organisms People Ecologies Economies Universe Comm Theory is central to BIG questions! AND ...

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 7

3

Ego Emerges

But EVERYTHING Communicates! Particles Atoms Cells Organisms People Ecologies Economies Universe Comm Theory is central to BIG questions! AND ...

Comm Theory built wireless and the Internet!!

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 8

4

Society Batters Ego

Popular Culture

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 9

5

Family/Friends Batter Ego

Tricia Rose

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 10

6

Family/Friends Batter Ego

Stephanie Bell-Rose

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 11

7

Family/Friends Batter Ego

S. James Gates

National Medal of Science 2011 (awarded 2013)

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 12

8

Not to Be Outdone

Down the Rabbit Hole

A truck filled with storage media, driven across town, is a very reliable high bit rate channel.

– Communication Theory Zeitgeist

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 13

9

Write or Radiate?

A Little Analytic Rigor

R

2

π D apertures

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 14

9

Write or Radiate?

A Little Analytic Rigor

R

2

π D apertures D r

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 15

9

Write or Radiate?

A Little Analytic Rigor

R

2

π D apertures D r

τ =D/c+T T

radiated message

D/c

Mass Transport Radiation

mass delivered

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 16

10

Write or Radiate?

Radiation Energy Requirements

Shannon Capacity: C = B/T = W log2
P

N0W + 1

Rutgers WINLAB

CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 17

10

Write or Radiate?

Radiation Energy Requirements

Shannon Capacity: C = B/T = W log2
P

N0W + 1

Power capture fraction: ν(D) =

AG 4πD2 Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 18

10

Write or Radiate?

Radiation Energy Requirements

Shannon Capacity: C = B/T = W log2
P

N0W + 1

Power capture fraction: ν(D) =

AG 4πD2

Er = P T = BN04πD2

AG T W B

2

B T W − 1

Rutgers WINLAB

CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 19

10

Write or Radiate?

Radiation Energy Requirements

Shannon Capacity: C = B/T = W log2
P

N0W + 1

Power capture fraction: ν(D) =

AG 4πD2

Er = P T = BN04πD2

AG T W B

2

B T W − 1

Large TW:

Er ≥ BN0

4πD2

AG

ln 2

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 20

11

Write or Radiate?

Writing Energy Requirements (ROCKET SCIENCE!)

E∗ = min

trajectory max

t

E(t) Jensen’s Inequality Leads To

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 21

11

Write or Radiate?

Writing Energy Requirements (ROCKET SCIENCE!)

E∗ = min

trajectory max

t

E(t) Jensen’s Inequality Leads To E∗ = 1 2m¯ v2

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 22

12

Write or Radiate?

Inscribed Matter Energy Requirements

Message size B bits, mass information density ˜ ρ bits/kg

Ew = 1

2 B ˜ ρ ¯

v2 = 1

2 B ˜ ρ

c

δ 2

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 23

12

Write or Radiate?

Inscribed Matter Energy Requirements

Message size B bits, mass information density ˜ ρ bits/kg

Ew = 1

2 B ˜ ρ ¯

v2 = 1

2 B ˜ ρ

c

δ 2

10 10 10 10 100 1

10 8 6 4

solar escape earth escape milky way escape jetliner brisk walk light speed

δ

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 24

12

Write or Radiate?

Inscribed Matter Energy Requirements

Message size B bits, mass information density ˜ ρ bits/kg

Ew = 1

2 B ˜ ρ ¯

v2 = 1

2 B ˜ ρ

c

δ 2

10 10 10 10 100 1

10 8 6 4

solar escape earth escape milky way escape jetliner brisk walk light speed

δ

Artillery: adds a factor of 2 to energy Escape: small penalty if ¯ v > 2 × escape velocity

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 25

13

Write or Radiate?

Radiation to Transport Energy Ratio

Ω ≡ Er

Ew

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 26

13

Write or Radiate?

Radiation to Transport Energy Ratio

Ω ≡ Er

Ew Receiver Noise ≡ N0 Joules/Hz Mass Information Density ≡ ˜ ρ bits/kg Velocity Ratio ≡ δ = c

v

Normalized Aperture ≡ A = 2R

λ

Normalized Distance ≡ D = D

2R

⇒ Ω ≥

˜

ρN0 c2 8 π2

D

A

2

(2 ln 2)δ2 ⇐

Equal Receiver/Transmitter Apertures Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 27

14

Write or Radiate?

Empirical Mass Information Densities I

Voyager Spacecraft: 106 bits/kg

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 28

15

Write or Radiate?

Empirical Mass Information Densities II

DVD: 3 × 1012 bits/kg
Magnetic Storage with FeO2: 2 × 1017 bits/kg
Optical Lithography with SiO2: 3.85 × 1018 bits/kg
E-beam Lithography with SiO2: 1.54 × 1021 bits/kg
STM with Xe on Ni: 1.74 × 1022 bits/kg
RNA: 3.6 × 1024 bits/kg
Li + Be: 7.5 × 1025 bits/kg

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 29

16

Write or Radiate?

Radiation vs. Inscribed Matter

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 30

17

Write or Radiate?

Voyager Existence Proof

109 bit payload
900 kg mass
Catapult launch: about 800 joules/bit

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 31

17

Write or Radiate?

Voyager Existence Proof

109 bit payload
900 kg mass
Catapult launch: about 800 joules/bit

Breakeven Distance: ≈ 2000 light years

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 32

17

Write or Radiate?

Voyager Existence Proof

109 bit payload
900 kg mass
Catapult launch: about 800 joules/bit

Breakeven Distance: ≈ 2000 light years

Asides:

– ETA nearest star: ≈ 100 kilo-years – Rocket Launch: distance up ×9. – Use 3 DVDs (instead of gold disc): distance down ×10 – Use 1 gram of “RNA”: distance down ×106

(≈ 1/4000 distance to nearest star)

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 33

18

Write or Radiate?

General Interstellar

(˜ ρ = 1022, δ = 103, Temperature 3K) Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 34

18

Write or Radiate?

General Interstellar

(˜ ρ = 1022, δ = 103, Temperature 3K)

102 104 106 108 1010 1012 1014 1016 1018 1020 1022

D (normalized distance)

100 104 108 1012 1016 1020

A (normalized aperture)

Arecibo@10GHz 10m Optical (500nm) 1m Xray (0.1nm) Earth@10GHz

Ω

1

10

6

10

6

10

12

10

18

10

24

10

30

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 35

18

Write or Radiate?

General Interstellar

(˜ ρ = 1022, δ = 103, Temperature 3K)

102 104 106 108 1010 1012 1014 1016 1018 1020 1022

D (normalized distance)

100 104 108 1012 1016 1020

A (normalized aperture)

Arecibo@10GHz 10m Optical (500nm) 1m Xray (0.1nm) Earth@10GHz

Ω

1

10

6

10

6

10

12

10

18

10

24

10

30

Matter Radiation: Shelve a 5 lb sugar bag 24 Megaton blast

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 36

19

Write or Radiate?

Communications Theory Has Spoken

If delay can be tolerated, inscribed matter is stunningly more energy-efficient than radiation

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 37

20

Write or Radiate?

Sluggish Data vs. ADSL

Annals of Improbable Research 11(4), 2005 Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 38

21

Write or Radiate?

hey, Hey HEY!!!!! What About ... ?

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 39

21

Write or Radiate?

hey, Hey HEY!!!!! What About ... ?

Radiation Penalty

– Impermanence and Repetition

Matter Penalties

– Broadcast – Preservation – Inscription Energy – Deceleration @Target – Navigation – Advertisement

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 40

22

Write or Radiate?

Is Radiation Better for Broadcast?

Milky Way stellar density 2.8 × 10−2 stars (LY)−3
(T = 3oK, ˜

ρ = 1022, δ =

c v = 103) spherical galaxy, omnidirectional

transmission, Arecibo receiver

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 41

22

Write or Radiate?

Is Radiation Better for Broadcast?

Milky Way stellar density 2.8 × 10−2 stars (LY)−3
(T = 3oK, ˜

ρ = 1022, δ =

c v = 103) spherical galaxy, omnidirectional

transmission, Arecibo receiver – D = 104 LY: 1.17 × 1011 stars (but Ω > 1025)

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 42

22

Write or Radiate?

Is Radiation Better for Broadcast?

Milky Way stellar density 2.8 × 10−2 stars (LY)−3
(T = 3oK, ˜

ρ = 1022, δ =

c v = 103) spherical galaxy, omnidirectional

transmission, Arecibo receiver – D = 104 LY: 1.17 × 1011 stars (but Ω > 1025) – D = 106 LY: 1.17 × 1017 stars (but Ω > 1029)

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 43

22

Write or Radiate?

Is Radiation Better for Broadcast?

Milky Way stellar density 2.8 × 10−2 stars (LY)−3
(T = 3oK, ˜

ρ = 1022, δ =

c v = 103) spherical galaxy, omnidirectional

transmission, Arecibo receiver – D = 104 LY: 1.17 × 1011 stars (but Ω > 1025) – D = 106 LY: 1.17 × 1017 stars (but Ω > 1029) – D = 1010 LY: 1.17 × 1029 stars (but Ω > 1037)

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 44

22

Write or Radiate?

Is Radiation Better for Broadcast?

Milky Way stellar density 2.8 × 10−2 stars (LY)−3
(T = 3oK, ˜

ρ = 1022, δ =

c v = 103) spherical galaxy, omnidirectional

transmission, Arecibo receiver – D = 104 LY: 1.17 × 1011 stars (but Ω > 1025) – D = 106 LY: 1.17 × 1017 stars (but Ω > 1029) – D = 1010 LY: 1.17 × 1029 stars (but Ω > 1037)

Visible Universe: D = 1.37 × 1010 LY

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 45

23

Write or Radiate?

Semaphored and Summarized In ...

Nature 431, pp.47–49, September 2, 2004 (C. Rose & G. Wright) Web Site: http://www.winlab.rutgers.edu/∼crose/cgi-bin/cosmicP .html

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 46

24

Nature Perqs

Really Chill Perqs!

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 47

24

Nature Perqs

Really Chill Perqs!

NPR & BBC radio interviews
NY Times article by Overbye!
NY Times Editorial!!
Cocktail party banter!!!

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 48

25

Nature Perqs

Not So Chill Perqs

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 49

25

Nature Perqs

Not So Chill Perqs

Counsel: Dr. Rose, what term of address would you prefer? Rose: “Chris” is fine. Counsel: These are formal proceedings, so I’ll use “Dr. Rose,” okay? Rose: OK. Counsel: Are you a professor of E&CE at Rutgers University? Rose: Yes. Counsel: Did you receive all your degrees from M.I.T.? Rose: Yes. Counsel: Are you an expert in wireless communications? Rose: For this trial’s subject matter, yes.

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 50

25

Nature Perqs

Not So Chill Perqs

Counsel: Dr. Rose, what term of address would you prefer? Rose: “Chris” is fine. Counsel: These are formal proceedings, so I’ll use “Dr. Rose,” okay? Rose: OK. Counsel: Are you a professor of E&CE at Rutgers University? Rose: Yes. Counsel: Did you receive all your degrees from M.I.T.? Rose: Yes. Counsel: Are you an expert in wireless communications? Rose: For this trial’s subject matter, yes. Counsel: Dr. Rose, do you talk to space aliens? Rose: (WTH?!?!?!?!)....

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 51

26

Big Question Question

Do I READ alien letters?

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 53

26

Big Question Question

Do I READ alien letters?

Why communicate AT ALL?

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 54

27

Howdy Neighbor!

Alien Psychology 101

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 55

27

Howdy Neighbor!

Alien Psychology 101

Sociability?

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 56

28

Howdy Neighbor!

Hello Exoplanet-ling! IF U CN C THS, join the party! Turn left at Alpha Centauri ...

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 57

29

Howdy Neighbor!

Let Us Help You!

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 58

30

Howdy Neighbor!

Hello Universe!

Bring technology!

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 59

30

Howdy Neighbor!

Hello Universe!

Bring technology!

(but, please don’t eat us)

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 60

31

Survival

Universal (well, galactic) Truth

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 61

31

Survival

Universal (well, galactic) Truth

Survival?

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 62

32

Survival

OOPS!

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 63

33

Survival

OUCH!

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 64

34

Survival

RAPTURE!

(sorry, I couldn’t resist)

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 65

35

Writing to Survive

Interstellar “Evolution”

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 66

35

Writing to Survive

Interstellar “Evolution”

SURVIVORS: Those Who Write

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 67

35

Writing to Survive

Interstellar “Evolution”

SURVIVORS: Those Who Write GAME OVER: Those Who Don’t

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 68

35

Writing to Survive

Interstellar “Evolution”

SURVIVORS: Those Who Write GAME OVER: Those Who Don’t Is Biological Info Transmission SOP?

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 69

36

Incursion HOWTO

Seeded Comet?

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 70

37

Incursion HOWTO

Micro Ark?

Are we THERE YET!?!?

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 71

38

Incursion HOWTO

Sorry, (your) Game Over!

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 72

39

Detection

Detection Pipe Dream? (50+ Years of SETI)

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 73

39

Detection

Detection Pipe Dream? (50+ Years of SETI)

Could be, but ... let’s play anyway

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 74

40

Detection

Incursion or Evolution?

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 75

40

Detection

Incursion or Evolution?

Cambrian explosion – which?

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 76

41

Detection

Killjoy Biologists

“It’s all one show”

–Gerald Joyce

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 77

41

Detection

Killjoy Biologists

“It’s all one show”

–Gerald Joyce

“X→ Y? Evolution!”

–Biological Dogma

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 78

42

Detection

Can We Detect Ancient Biological Incursions?

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 79

42

Detection

Can We Detect Ancient Biological Incursions?

I DO NOT KNOW!

I might never know!

(Plenary talk sales final – Absolutely No Refunds!)

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 80

43

Detection

Can We Detect Future Biological Incursions?

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 81

43

Detection

Can We Detect Future Biological Incursions?

ET!

r EGAD!

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 82

44

Detection

Three Fundamental Questions

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 83

44

Detection

Three Fundamental Questions

(A:) How many packages?

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 84

44

Detection

Three Fundamental Questions

(A:) How many packages? (B:) What’s here today?

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 85

44

Detection

Three Fundamental Questions

(A:) How many packages? (B:) What’s here today? (C:) How easily/quickly from X → Y?

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 86

45

Detection

(A): Package Density: the fake equation

Np = Pfefℓfifcλpτp

(After Drake – Fermilicious and equally fake)

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 87

45

Detection

(A): Package Density: the fake equation

Np = Pfefℓfifcλpτp

(After Drake – Fermilicious and equally fake) Np : number of parcels floating around P : number of planets fe: fraction potential life-supporting planets fℓ: fraction that come to life fi : fraction with“intelligent” life fc : fraction with loquacious intelligent life λp: parcels/year τp: years parcel survival

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 88

45

Detection

(A): Package Density: the fake equation

Np = Pfefℓfifcλpτp

(After Drake – Fermilicious and equally fake) Np : number of parcels floating around P : number of planets fe: fraction potential life-supporting planets fℓ: fraction that come to life fi : fraction with“intelligent” life fc : fraction with loquacious intelligent life λp: parcels/year τp: years parcel survival

P ≈ 1011 (John Johnson, CalTech, now Harvard) τp = 108 (“geologic” design, galaxy-spanning @ c/1000) λpfefℓfifc ≈ 1 (loquacity balancing pessimism)

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 89

45

Detection

(A): Package Density: the fake equation

Np = Pfefℓfifcλpτp

(After Drake – Fermilicious and equally fake) Np : number of parcels floating around P : number of planets fe: fraction potential life-supporting planets fℓ: fraction that come to life fi : fraction with“intelligent” life fc : fraction with loquacious intelligent life λp: parcels/year τp: years parcel survival

P ≈ 1011 (John Johnson, CalTech, now Harvard) τp = 108 (“geologic” design, galaxy-spanning @ c/1000) λpfefℓfifc ≈ 1 (loquacity balancing pessimism)

Parcels per star: 3.33 × 107

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 90

46

Detection

(B): Biome Survey/Monitor

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 91

46

Detection

(B): Biome Survey/Monitor

Aviation: 2% yearly global CO2
Aircraft: 111 kg CO2/km
Yearly global CO2: 35.6 × 1012 kg

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 92

46

Detection

(B): Biome Survey/Monitor

Aviation: 2% yearly global CO2
Aircraft: 111 kg CO2/km
Yearly global CO2: 35.6 × 1012 kg
Planes Travel: 6.4 × 109 km/year

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 93

46

Detection

(B): Biome Survey/Monitor

Aviation: 2% yearly global CO2
Aircraft: 111 kg CO2/km
Yearly global CO2: 35.6 × 1012 kg
Planes Travel: 6.4 × 109 km/year

Search Area: (1m scoop): 6.4 × 106km2/year Earth surface: 5.1 × 108 km2

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 94

46

Detection

(B): Biome Survey/Monitor

Aviation: 2% yearly global CO2
Aircraft: 111 kg CO2/km
Yearly global CO2: 35.6 × 1012 kg
Planes Travel: 6.4 × 109 km/year

Search Area: (1m scoop): 6.4 × 106km2/year Earth surface: 5.1 × 108 km2

Not a (too) ridiculous detection problem

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 95

47

Detection

(C): Quantitative Evolution

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 96

47

Detection

(C): Quantitative Evolution

Setup:

String (“gene”) set G = {gn}, n = 1, · · · , N
gn = [bn1, · · · , bnK], bi ∈ {A, T, G, C}
Target string T
Evolution (mutation/crossover) operators {Mq}

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 97

47

Detection

(C): Quantitative Evolution

Setup:

String (“gene”) set G = {gn}, n = 1, · · · , N
gn = [bn1, · · · , bnK], bi ∈ {A, T, G, C}
Target string T
Evolution (mutation/crossover) operators {Mq}

Questions:

Coverage: ∃ sequence {M1, M2, · · · MQ} s.t. T ∈ MQ · · · M1 [G]?

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 98

47

Detection

(C): Quantitative Evolution

Setup:

String (“gene”) set G = {gn}, n = 1, · · · , N
gn = [bn1, · · · , bnK], bi ∈ {A, T, G, C}
Target string T
Evolution (mutation/crossover) operators {Mq}

Questions:

Coverage: ∃ sequence {M1, M2, · · · MQ} s.t. T ∈ MQ · · · M1 [G]?
Likelihood: what G → T paths are preferred? How long/short?

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 99

48

Detection

Is This Communication Theory?

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 100

48

Detection

Is This Communication Theory?

Information Delivery and Control

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 101

48

Detection

Is This Communication Theory?

Information Delivery and Control Genome Measurment: Sampling/Detection

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 102

48

Detection

Is This Communication Theory?

Information Delivery and Control Genome Measurment: Sampling/Detection Genome Representation: “Signal” Space

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 103

48

Detection

Is This Communication Theory?

Information Delivery and Control Genome Measurment: Sampling/Detection Genome Representation: “Signal” Space Mutation/Mating Trellis: hey, it’s a TRELLIS!

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose

SLIDE 104

49

Comm PWNage!

Communication Theorists

PWN theBIG questions!

Rutgers WINLAB CTW’13

C. Rose