WORKING MEMORY Lecturer: Dr. Benjamin Amponsah, Dept. of Psychology, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

working memory
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

WORKING MEMORY Lecturer: Dr. Benjamin Amponsah, Dept. of Psychology, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

WORKING MEMORY Lecturer: Dr. Benjamin Amponsah, Dept. of Psychology, UG, Legon Contact Information: bamponsah@ug.edu.gh College of Education School of Continuing and Distance Education 2014/2015 2016/2017 Session Overview Several


slide-1
SLIDE 1

College of Education School of Continuing and Distance Education

2014/2015 – 2016/2017

WORKING MEMORY

Lecturer: Dr. Benjamin Amponsah, Dept. of Psychology, UG, Legon Contact Information: bamponsah@ug.edu.gh

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Session Overview

  • Several arguments levelled against the structures of

sensory and short-term storages have convinced most researchers that the modal model may not be quite as useful as once thought. In this session we are going to consider the working memory model as an attempt to address the weaknesses in the modal

  • r stage model.

Slide 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Session Objectives

  • At the end of the session, the student will
  • Understand the rationale for the formulation of the

working memory model

  • Be able to explain the characteristics of the working

memory

  • Be able to evaluate the working memory model in

terms of its appropriateness and as a contemporary model in dealing with the weaknesses of the modal model

Slide 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Session Outline

The key topics to be covered in the session are as follows:

  • Topic One: Argument for working memory
  • Topic Two : Baddeley’s idea of working memory
  • Topic Three: Components of the Working memory
  • Topic Four: Working Memory and STM

Slide 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Reading List

  • Ashcraft, M. H. (2006). Cognition (4th edn.), London: Pearson

Education Int.

  • Galotti, K. M. (2004). Cognitive Psychology: In and out of the

laboratory (3rd Edn.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

  • Hunt, R. R. & Ellis, H. C. (1999). Fundamentals of Cognitive

Psychology (6th edn.), New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Willingham, D, B. (2001). Cognition: The thinking animal. NJ:

Prentice-Hall.

Slide 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

ARGUMENT FOR WORKING MEMORY

Topic One

Slide 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The Working Memory

  • Based on our review of the modal theory we may

conclude that: – there is little compelling reason to think of memory as occurring in stages. – memory is determined by what is done to the information, not by where the information resides.

Slide 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The Working Memory

  • The fact that people code information acoustically or

semantically does not necessarily mean that material is transferred from one location to another. Arguments like this have convinced most researchers that the stage model may not be quite as useful as once thought.  However, the stage model has contributed to theory building by focusing upon short-term retention which clearly has characteristics that must be explained.  How do we address the weaknesses in the modal model?

Slide 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Contents of Working Memory

Awareness of the contents of memory.  We are usually aware of conscious or immediate

  • experiences. Certain events occupy our thought

process at any given moment, but at the same time many other facts are also known but not thought about.  This distinction reflects active and inactive memories. Historically, active memory has been ascribed to STM and inactive memory to LTM memory.

Slide 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Limitation on Retention

Limitation on retention of recent experiences.

  • Even if there is no convincing evidence of the

different principles of forgetting, the limitations

  • n short-term retention are real enough as

evidenced by both experimental work and everyday life experiences.

  • We then need to explain how to handle short

term retention.

Slide 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

BADDELEY’S IDEA OF WORKING MEMORY

Topic Two

Slide 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Baddeley’s Concept of Working Memory

  • In the absence of STM, how do we account for

the basic facts of active and inactive memories?

  • Alan Baddeley has pushed an idea to meet

these needs. Starting with Baddeley and Hitch’s (1974) paper, Baddeley has developed the concept of Working Memory (Baddeley, 1986, 1990, 1993).

Slide 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Definitional Issues

  • Definition of Working Memory
  • Working memory refers to the processing of recent

events and also to the operations and computations based on information from the long-term memory.

  • For example, when you are multiplying 25 x 35 “in your

head”, you must retrieve rules of multiplication from your LTM, perform the computations and store the

  • answer. Whilst carrying on with the operations, partial

sums must be retained until the final solution is reached.

Slide 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Definitional Issues

  • Working memory describes the active processes involved in

retention such as rehearsal, chunking, elaboration etc.

  • In some respects, working memory shares some of the

characteristics of STM.

  • Like STM, working memory is assumed to be limited-capacity

system containing transient information.

Slide 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Definitional Issues

  • But unlike STM, the function of working memory is a

matter of being a storage way-station to LTM than of holding information used for other cognitive work.

  • The assumption is that working memory is a critical part
  • f many important activities such as problem solving,

reasoning and comprehension.

  • These analyses are consistent with the view of memory

as a single processing system with retention determined by the amount of processing resources devoted to any material.

Slide 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Working Memory Model

Slide 16

Working Memory Model – Baddeley, 1990

slide-17
SLIDE 17

COMPONENTS OF WORKING MEMORY

Topic Three

Slide 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Central Executive

  • Central Executive
  • The central Executive component is assumed to be a limited-

capacity attentional system that controls the phonological loop, episodic buffer and visuo-spatial sketch pad and relates them to long-term memory. The executive is considered more complex than any of the three slave systems.

  • It is responsible for directing the flow of information,

choosing which information will be operated on when and how.

  • It is assumed to have limited amount of resources and

capacity to carry out its tasks.

Slide 18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Phonological Loop

 Some of its capacity can be used to store information.  It is thought to function more as an attentional system (allocating cognitive resources to various tasks) than a memory store.  It also coordinates information coming from the current environment with the retrieval of information about the past, to allow people to use this information to select options or form strategies. – The other three components are concerned with the storage and temporary maintenance of information.

  • The Phonological Loop

– It holds information in a phonological (speech-based) form. It has two parts: phonological store and articulatory rehearsal system.

Slide 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Phonological Loop

 Short-term phonological loop stores auditory memory traces (Acoustic) that are subject to rapid decay.  The Articulatory rehearsal component can revive the memory trace (i.e., through rehearsal). It is involved in processing sub-vocal speech (speaking to

  • neself) or rehearsing in the head.

 In general, the loop may play a role in the acquisition

  • f vocabulary which is vital for learning second

language.

Slide 20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Visuo-Spatial Sketch Pad

  • It is used to hold information about what we see. It is also used

to temporarily store and manipulate spatial and visual information. For example, remembering shapes, colours, location and speed of

  • bjects in space.
  • It is also critical in planning spatial movements (e.g., finding
  • ne’s way in a complex building or within the environment). It is

principally represented within the right hemisphere of the brain. Episodic Buffer

  • The episodic buffer is assumed to be capable of storing

information in a multi-dimensional code. It provides a temporary interface between the two slave systems (the phonological loop and the visuospatial sketchpad) and LTM. This was added 25 years after the original model was published.

Slide 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

WORKING MEMORY AND STM COMPARED

Topic Four

Slide 22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Comparing STM and Working Memory

 As an alternative to short-term memory, working memory

does not propose separate principles for memory.  All retention is determined by the amount and type of processing devoted to the material.  New events require extensive processing and as extensive processing produces awareness, we are likely to be conscious of memory for recent events.

Slide 23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Comparing STM and Working Memory

  • Since processing capacity is limited, a limitation is imposed on

the amount of new information which can be retained.

  • The concept of working memory therefore deals effectively

with the basic facts of retention of immediate experiences and is compatible with the general view that retention is a function of processing.

Slide 24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Sample Questions

  • Examine the argument for the importance of working

memory.

  • Examine the argument that retention is a function of

type of processing done to the material and not where the information located.

  • Discuss the functions of the following concepts:

– Central Executive – Phonological loop – Visuo-spatial sketch pad

Slide 25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

References

  • Best, J. B. (1995). Cognitive Psychology (4th Edn.).
  • MN. West Publishing Company
  • Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Human memory: Theory and
  • practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Hunt, R. R. & Ellis, H. C. (1999). Fundamentals of

Cognitive Psychology (6th edn.), New York: McGraw-Hill.

Slide 26