Wind Damage to Commercial Properties A Review of the Last 3 Years of - - PDF document

wind damage to commercial properties
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Wind Damage to Commercial Properties A Review of the Last 3 Years of - - PDF document

DANGODARA CONSULTING, PA Presents: Wind Damage to Commercial Properties Parthiv Dangodara, PE Risk Engineering Specialist pdangodara@gmail.com A Review of the Last 3 Years of Events Wind Damage to


slide-1
SLIDE 1

DANGODARA CONSULTING, PA Presents:

Wind Damage to Commercial Properties

Parthiv Dangodara, PE Risk Engineering Specialist pdangodara@gmail.com

A Review of the Last 3 Years of Events

Dangodara Consulting, PA

Wind Damage to Commercial Properties

A Review of the Last 3 Years of Events

2

Loss Statistics 2016 – 18 Hurricane Seasons Losses in review Lessons Learned

  • Historical loss stats
  • Insurance losses
  • Hurricane Matthew
  • Hurricane Harvey
  • Hurricane Irma
  • Hurricane Maria
  • Hurricane Michael
  • Lessons Learned and observations
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Dangodara Consulting, PA

DISASTER TYPE NUMBER OF EVENTS PERCENT FREQUENCY CPI- ADJUSTED LOSSES ($B) % OF TOTAL LOSSES AVERAGE EVENT COST ($B) DEATHS Tropical Cyclone 44 17.30% $938.20 54.70% $22.30 6,502 Drought 26 10.20% $249.10 14.50% $9.60 2,993 Severe Storm 110 43.30% $241.40 14.10% $2.20 1,640 Flooding 32 12.60% $126.20 7.40% $4.40 555 Wildfire 16 6.30% $80.40 4.70% $5.00 344 Winter Storm 17 6.70% $49.20 2.90% $2.90 1,048 Freeze 9 3.50% $30.40 1.80% $3.40 162

US Weather Catastrophe Losses 1980- 2019 (CPI Adjusted)

The Wind Hazard

Source: NOAA

Dangodara Consulting, PA

Name Disaster Type Total Cost ($B) Deaths Hurricane Katrina (August 2005) Tropical Cyclone 168.8 1833 Hurricane Harvey (August 2017) Tropical Cyclone 130.0 89 Hurricane Maria (September 2017) Tropical Cyclone 93.6 2981 Hurricane Sandy (October 2012) Tropical Cyclone 73.5 159 Hurricane Irma (September 2017) Tropical Cyclone 52.0 97 Hurricane Andrew (August 1992) Tropical Cyclone 50.2 61 U.S. Drought/Heatwave (Summer 1988) Drought 44.4 454 Midwest Flooding (Summer 1993) Flooding 37.7 48 Hurricane Ike (September 2008) Tropical Cyclone 36.6 112 U.S. Drought/Heatwave (2012) Drought 33.9 123

Top 10 US Weather Disasters 1980-2019 (CPI Adjusted for 2019)

The Wind Hazard

Source: NOAA, III

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Dangodara Consulting, PA

Tropical Storms and Hurricanes in the U.S., 1980-2018 (Insured property losses per state)

Source: NOAA, III

Dangodara Consulting, PA

Loss Events in the U.S., 1980-2018 (Number of relevant events by peril)

Source: NOAA, III

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Dangodara Consulting, PA

  • Life: 9/28 – 10/10/2016
  • First Cat 5 Atlantic hurricane since 2007
  • 2nd Hurricane to impact FL in 2016 (Hermine), after 11 yr. drought.
  • Est. $10B+ in losses in the US

Losses: Loss summaries were categorized by the following cause types:

  • Design

(Preventable)

  • Workmanship

(Preventable)

  • Materials

(Preventable)

  • Maintenance

(Preventable)

  • Normal Wind Loss

(WNLE) (Not Preventable)

2016 Matthew | 11 year drought to FL impact ends

Dangodara Consulting, PA

Description

  • Circa 1970s 36,000 sq. ft. store located in a typical strip shopping center located 1,800 ft. from

the Atlantic Ocean.

  • The eye of Matthew passed NNW about 40 miles to the east as a Category 3 hurricane.
  • Wind gust speeds (3 sec) at the site were up to 80-90 mph.
  • Roof is a modified bitumen and gravel on built-up roof over ISO insulation layer mechanically

attached to steel deck, at a rate of about one or 2.5 ft.² in the field and the perimeters. SFs: C=1.56

  • No parapet on the west side; there is a gutter on the west side supported by gutter clips about

every 44 inches.

  • The north, east and south sides have 1 to 2 ft. high parapets.

2016 Matthew FL Losses | Location 1

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Dangodara Consulting, PA

Damage

  • Damage originated from the West.
  • The gutter and/or flashing may have been loose and led to

the roof covering peeling back.

  • The result was about 7,000 sq. ft. loss of roof covering.
  • No window/door damage.
  • Proper gutter/flashing securement would have resulted in

no loss.

  • Loss estimates at this time are roughly $0.5M PD, $1.2M

S&S, total $1.7 M PD and $1.75 M TE

2016 Matthew FL Losses | Location 1

Dangodara Consulting, PA

Description

  • Circa 2000 building located in a typical strip shopping center located 5.8

miles from the Atlantic Ocean.

  • The eye of Matthew passed NNW about 48 miles to the east as a Category

2-3 hurricane. Wind gust speeds (3 sec) at the site were up to 70-80 mph.

  • The roof is a fully adhered EPDM membrane to iso. insulation that is

mechanically attached to steel deck on steel joists roof. Damages

  • Some metal coping was displaced on the east wall.
  • Some holes were created in the roofing from windborne debris.
  • The EPDM membrane reportedly detached from the insulation throughout

the roof for a total of approximately 30% of the roof area.

  • No roofing actually blew off and leaking reportedly did not occur.
  • The roof covering delaminated in 30% of the area; 100% roof cover will

need to be replaced. $1.375 M PD & $0 BI.

  • $2.5K Uplift Tests would likely have found the adhesion problem.

2016 Matthew FL Losses | Location 2

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Dangodara Consulting, PA Dangod dara ara ara ara ara

2016 Matthew FL Losses | Summary

$7.6M of the

losses were easily preventable

  • Flashing securement
  • Flood protection
  • EIFS damage
  • Rooftop equipment securement
  • Roof Drainage overflow

scuppers were roofed over

$5.9M of the losses

were preventable with thorough inspections

  • Workmanship and Maintenance

issues for windows & Doors

  • Confirm fully adhered SPMs

are well bonded; Uplift Testing

$0.8M of the losses are deemed normal

with no practical recommendations

T h e m a j o r i t y o f t h e p h y s i c a l l o s s e s we r e preventable .

Dangodara Consulting, PA

Most active season since 2005, 7th most active season on record, 5th most since 1851 Ended 12 year drought of major landfall to continental US Four Cat 4, with two reaching Cat 5, Irma and Maria Three Cat 4 landfalls in the same year – 1st time in US history Four US landfalls Jose, along with Irma, marked the first time two Atlantic hurricanes had maximum sustained winds of at least 150 mph Economic losses could be as high as USD $250-300B and total insurance industry insured damages could range from $80-130B

Courtesy of US National Weather Service 12

2017 Hurricane Season | One for the Record Books

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2017 HARVEY | More of a Flood Event

Source: NOAA

Harvey (red boundary) 100-yr FEMA (blue) High TIV exposure outside of FEMA but inside of Harvey

  • Harvey made landfall as Cat 4 near Rockport, TX.
  • 1st Cat 4 to make landfall in US since Charley in 2004.
  • Produced 51 in. of rain and 27 trillion gallons of rain in 6 days, much

more than the expected 100-yr floods in TX.

  • Many river streams experienced more than 500-yr floods.
  • FEMA maps are outdated.

– 50% of maps are over 10 years old. – 49% are less than 5 yrs old. – Several cases where updated maps failed quality control checks. – These maps were updated with old rainfall data. – Recent work by NOAA found that rainfall rates used in the Texas maps are underestimated. – NOAA is currently updating rainfall data in TX which will significantly increase rainfall rates in Houston which can lead to significant changes in the FEMA maps.

  • A study showed that half of the insurance claims in Houston were for

properties outside the mapped flood plain.

  • In some parts of Texas, the rate was as high as 80%.
  • Overall losses of about $126B.

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2017 IRMA | It Could have Been Worse

  • Life: 8/30 – 9/12/2017
  • Strongest Cat 5 hurricane ever recorded in the Atlantic Basin.
  • Irma spent 3 days as a Cat 5 – the longest known.
  • Longest period of winds more than 185 mph ever (37 hours).
  • 6.3 M people ordered to evacuate in FL, likely the largest in history.
  • After an 11 yr. drought, the 3rd hurricane to impact FL in 2 years since

2016 (Hermine, Matthew).

  • For the 1st time in 100 years, its landfall was the 2nd Cat 4 hurricane

landfall in the same year.

  • Landfall in Cudjoe Key, FL as a Cat 4 (barely) storm and again a day

later in Marco Island, FL as a Cat 3.

  • The size of the tropical storm force wind area was larger than FL.
  • 1.3 M people without power.
  • Est. $50.5B in losses in the US. The 5th costliest Atlantic hurricane

in history – but could have been worse

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2017 MARIA | Extra Factors Exacerbated Losses

Source: NOAA

  • Maria is the 2nd strongest hurricane ever to hit Puerto Rico, behind only the

1928 San Felipe Segundo hurricane. In that sense it was a ~50 year event.

  • Puerto Rico was battered by heavy rain from Irma and Maria within a span of

2 weeks, causing extensive flooding and damage to infrastructure, power and transmission lines.

  • Irma & Maria resulted in a cascade of consequences resulting in significant

increased proportions of loss.

  • Significantly increased rebuilding costs & Business Interruption (BI) was a big

surprise due to factors such as:

  • Poor infrastructure
  • Limited accessibility to the damaged areas
  • Socio-economic condition
  • Non-availability of material and labor
  • Economic demand surge – increased cost of labor and materials as demand

for repair exceeds supply

  • Claims inflation – Increased cost due to insurer’s ability to fully adjust claims
  • Cat models didn’t completely capture loss amplification for hurricanes like

Maria as the impact of large scale infrastructure damage is not included.

  • Maria’s losses are $90B with $20 – 30B in insured losses.

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2017 Hurricane Season Lessons Learned

16

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2017 Hurricane Season Lessons Learned

17 17 17 17

Dangodara Consulting, PA Dan an an an an an an n Da Dan an an a Dan an an Dan Dan an an n an n an an Dan Dan Dan Dan an an n an n an a Dan a Dan an Dan Dan D n an n a Dan Dan n an Dan Dan n a Dan an n an an Dan n Dan n an an Dan D n an n a Dan n an an n a D n a D n a Dan Dan n a Da D god

  • d
  • d

god

  • d
  • d

go god god go go go go go go god

  • d

god

  • d

god

  • d
  • d

go

  • go

go god god

  • d
  • d

god go go

  • go

god

  • d
  • d
  • d
  • d
  • d

god

  • d

d

  • d
  • d
  • d
  • d

d

  • d
  • d

go god d go

  • go
  • d

god

  • d
  • god
  • d
  • d

d

  • d
  • g d
  • go

g d

  • g d
  • go

g d

  • g d
  • go

god

  • go

g d

  • go
  • go

god

  • go
  • god
  • go

god

  • g d
  • g d
  • d
  • go

go god d

  • d
  • d
  • go

g d

  • d

d

  • d

god

  • d

d god d

  • d
  • g d
  • g d
  • d

d

  • g dara

a ra a ara ara ara ara ara ara ra ar ar ara a ra a ara ra ra ra r ara ara ra a ara r ar ara ra a ra ara a ra ra r ara ara a ara a r ara a a ara ra ra ra r ar ara ara ra ra a ra a ara a ra ra ra ara ra ra ara ara ra ara ra ara ara ara ar ar ar ra ara ara ara a ara r a a ara ra r ara r ara r ar ar ar a a r a a ra r a a r Con Con Con Con Con Con Con Con Con

  • n
  • n
  • Co

Co Co Co

  • n
  • Co

Co Con

  • Co
  • Co

Co Co Con n

  • n
  • Co
  • Co

Con

  • n

n

  • n
  • n
  • C n
  • C n
  • n

n

  • C n
  • C n
  • n
  • C n
  • C n
  • Co

Co C n

  • n

n

  • C n

Co

  • C n

Co

  • C n
  • C n
  • C n
  • C

l u su su su su su su sul sul su su u su su su sul su su u sul u su sul sul su ul ul sul ul u su sul l ul su su sul l u su s l ul l u su u su s l ul ul u s l u su su u s l u sul su su su su su su su su su s l u su s tin tin n tin tin tin tin ti in tin tin n t n tin tin tin n in i ti i tin tin n tin n i tin tin tin tin n tin n tin n tin n in tin n i tin tin tin tin tin n tin n i tin tin tin n tin tin tin ti tin tin tin tin t n tin n ti i tin tin tin tin n i tin tin n tin n t n tin tin n in i t n in i tin tin in in n t n t n tin ti ti ti ti g, g, g, g, g, g, g, g, g, g, g, g, g, , g, g, , g, g, g, g, , g, g, g, g, g, , g, g, g, g, g, g, g, g, g, g, g, , g, g, g, , g, g, g PA A PA PA A PA PA PA PA A PA PA PA PA PA PA PA A PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA A PA PA A PA PA PA PA A PA PA PA PA PA A PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA A PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA A PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA A PA PA PA PA PA PA PA

2017 Hurricane Season Lessons Learned

18

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2017 Hurricane Season Lessons Learned

19

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2017 Hurricane Season Lessons Learned

20

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2017 Hurricane Season Lessons Learned

21

Dangodara Consulting, PA

Expected:

  • The majority of the physical losses were preventable,
  • ften with simple fixes.

– Flashing/nailer securement – Building to accurate Flood levels or protection – EIFS damage – Rooftop equipment securement – Windows & Doors water infiltration continues to be a problem – Dock doors need to be secured – Confirm roofs are well bonded; Uplift Testing – Standing seam roofs poor performance – Adhered Single-ply membranes – Window breakage – Window leakage

  • Installed flood defenses after 2001 Tropical Storm Allison

performed well during Harvey

2017 Hurricane Season Lessons Learned | Summary

Not Expected:

  • Flood risks outside of known flood zones need to

be evaluate more closely as many FEMA maps are outdated. Urban flooding and smaller drainage ways not mapped by FEMA can and did flood

  • Flood Emergency Response Plans (FERP’s) need

to be consistently established at flood exposed locations

  • Better evaluation of infrastructure and electrical

grid is needed to determine contributing factors to extended power outages and what guidance should be given going forward

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Dangodara Consulting, PA

3rd most intense Atlantic hurricane to make landfall behind 1935 Labor Day and 1969 Camille. Strongest storm by wind speed since Andrew. Rapid intensification from a Cat 1 to 4 in 2 days. Landfall nearly Cat 5 (155 mph) near Mexico Beach, FL 14 ft. storm surge. Michael losses are ~$25B with ~$6.2B in insured losses.

2018 Hurricane Michael

23

Courtesy of NOAA

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2018 Hurricane Michael – Bay Medical

24

, NOAA

  • The eye of Michael passed

NNE about 7 miles to the east as a Category 3 hurricane.

  • Wind gust speeds (3 sec) at

the site were up to 125-135 mph.

  • Design wind speeds (3 sec)

at the site is 130 mph.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2018 Hurricane Michael – Bay Medical

25

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2018 Hurricane Michael – Bay Medical

26

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Dangodara Consulting, PA

Patient Tower Roof is 2010 TPO adhered to coverboard over tapered iso insulation. Uplift testing done in 2017 – PASSED. (F: 77, C: 195 psf) 4 to 5 ft. high parapets.

2018 Hurricane Michael – Bay Medical

27

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2018 Hurricane Michael – Bay Medical

28

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2018 Hurricane Michael – Bay Medical

29

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2018 Hurricane Michael – Bay Medical

30

slide-16
SLIDE 16

31 3 31

2018 Hurricane Michael – Bay Medical

Dangodara Consulting, PA

West Tower Roof is 2002 Gravel BUR adhered to a concrete roof deck. Uplift testing done in 2017 –

  • PASSED. (F: 74,

C: 187 psf) No parapets.

2018 Hurricane Michael – Bay Medical

32

slide-17
SLIDE 17

33 3 33

2018 Hurricane Michael – Bay Medical

Dangodara Consulting, PA

Materials Management Building Roof is 1987 Standing Seam Roof. Walls are Metal lath and plaster on steel framing. 1 to 5 ft. high parapets.

2018 Hurricane Michael – Bay Medical

34

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Dangodara Consulting, PA

Materials Management Building

2018 Hurricane Michael – Bay Medical

35 36 3 36

2018 Hurricane Michael – Bay Medical

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Dangodara Consulting, PA

Building 97 Roof is 1997 Gravel BUR with a base sheet mechanically attached to LWIC. Uplift testing done in 2017 – FAILED. (F: 60, C: 45 psf) No parapets.

2018 Hurricane Michael – Bay Medical

37

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2018 Hurricane Michael – Bay Medical

38

Building 97

slide-20
SLIDE 20

39 3 39

2018 Hurricane Michael – Bay Medical

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2018 Hurricane Michael – Bay Medical

40

Medical Office Building

  • Building is 1986
  • Roof is ~<10 yr. old TPO fully

adhered.

  • Walls are EIFS on steel framing.
  • 4 to 5 ft. high EIFS parapets.
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2018 Hurricane Michael – Bay Medical

41

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2018 Hurricane Michael – Bay Medical

42

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2018 Hurricane Michael – Bay Medical

43

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2018 Hurricane Michael – Bay Medical

44

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2018 Hurricane Matthew – Bay County Schools

45

N

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2018 Hurricane Matthew

46

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2018 Hurricane Matthew

47

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2018 Hurricane Matthew

48

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2018 Hurricane Matthew

49

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2018 Hurricane Matthew

50

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2018 Hurricane Matthew

51

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2018 Hurricane Matthew

52

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2018 Hurricane Matthew

53

Dangodara Consulting, PA

2018 Hurricane Matthew

54

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Dangodara Consulting, PA

Lessons (Re-)Learned: The majority of the physical losses were preventable, often with simple fixes! Flashing/nailer securement EIFS damage Rooftop equipment securement Windows & Doors water infiltration continues to be a problem Dock doors need to be reinforced/secured Confirm roofs are well bonded; Uplift Testing Adhered Single-ply membranes Standing seam roofs poor performance continues Window protection

2016-18 Hurricane Seasons | Key Takeaways

problem

Dangodara Consulting, PA

Not enough consideration for partially enclosed wind pressure Better material choice & quality control for structural connections/fasteners needed Nailer design and construction needs improvement Parapet wall and soffit wind design/construction often inadequate EIFS systems (still) prone to failures Water infiltration in buildings with many windows Pre-engineered metal buildings envelope and MWFRS continue to perform poorly Holistic design for wind forces on the building envelope needs more consideration. Any weak link in the design will likely fail and propagate to cause other failures. Wind Damage to Commercial Properties | Challenges for Industry

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Dangodara Consulting, PA

Thank You for Your Attendance and Participation!

Parthiv Dangodara, PE

Risk Engineering Specialist DANGODARA CONSULTING, PA pdangodara@gmail.com Desk: 954.424.1291 Cell: 954.668.8077