Wilderness Rim Association Water Rate and Reserve Study Board - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

wilderness rim association
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Wilderness Rim Association Water Rate and Reserve Study Board - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Wilderness Rim Association Water Rate and Reserve Study Board Meeting April 23, 2014 Presented By: Chris Gonzalez, Project Manager Agenda Overview of Utility Rate Making Discussion of Utility Financial Policies Sources & Uses


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Wilderness Rim Association

Water Rate and Reserve Study

Board Meeting April 23, 2014

Presented By: Chris Gonzalez, Project Manager

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Page 2

Agenda

 Overview of Utility Rate Making  Discussion of Utility Financial Policies

 Sources & Uses of Funds  Utility Reserve Structure  System Reinvestment (Funded by Surcharge)  Financial Performance Standards

 Summary of Financial Forecast & Rate Strategy  Questions/Discussion

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Page 3

Introduction to Utility Rate Making

 Utility rates are set to recover the cost of providing service  Utilities incur two primary types of costs:

 Operating costs (regular/ongoing)

  • Employee salaries and benefits
  • Power and chemicals
  • Asset repair and maintenance

 Capital costs (inconsistent/limited)

  • Infrastructure replacement
  • Facility expansions and upgrades

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

Operating Capital

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Page 4

General Methodology

  • 3. Define

Rate Revenue Requirement

  • 2. Forecast

Revenues

  • 2. Forecast

Expenses

  • 1. Establish Policy Framework
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Page 5

Policy Framework

Fiscal policies provide a sound basis for financial management of a utility, addressing various topics including (but not limited to):  Sources & Uses of Funds  Utility Reserves (Structure & Levels)  Rate-Funded Capital Reinvestment  Financial Performance Standards

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Page 6

Sources & Uses of Funds

 The water utility is an “enterprise”

 Water rates are set based on the cost of providing service  Water utility costs are funded by water utility revenues, without support from the General Fund or assessment revenues

 The utility maintains a separation of capital and operating resources/expenditures

 Current budget reflects an allocation of surcharge revenue to the Water Reserve (for capital)  Revenue from water sales and other operating revenues must fund the cost of system operation and maintenance

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Page 7

Utility Reserve Structure

The Association maintains a separate ‘Water Reserve’ for capital

  • expenditures. Potential purposes for this reserve include:

Potential Purpose Sample Balance Target Segregating funds designated for capital purposes

  • (No explicit minimum balance)

Protecting against capital cost overruns

  • 10% of rolling six-year capital

improvement program Providing funding for emergency infrastructure replacement

  • 2% of fixed asset cost (≈ $8,500)
  • r
  • Cost of most expensive asset (could be ≈

$250,000 for original water system) Providing funding for a long-term asset management program

  • Linked to water system replacement cost

(could be ≈ $1 million based on current system valuation)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Page 8

Considerations for Sizing Water Reserve

 Potential exposure to financial liability

 Regulatory changes (e.g. water quality or fire flow standards)  Other capital investment needs identified in Water System Management Plan  Accumulating infrastructure replacement liability

 Availability of other funding sources

 Limited access to external funding can justify a larger fund balance

 Potential impacts to ratepayers

 Reserve funding comes from monthly surcharges imposed on customers (currently $8.00 per bimonthly billing period per customer)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Page 9

Other Utility Reserves

Other common reserves not currently in place for the Water Utility:  Operating Reserve

 Intent: Manage short-term fluctuations in revenue and expense cycles  Benchmark: 30 – 45 days (8 – 12%) of budgeted operating expenses

  • 2013-14 Budget  Target balance of $19,500 – $29,250

 Rate Stabilization Reserve (Not Funded In This Study)

 Intent: Protect against revenue loss during low-sales years  Benchmark: 20 – 25% of annual rate revenue

  • Goal: Cover a 10% revenue shortfall for up to 2.5 years
  • 2013-14 Budget  Target balance of $42,300 – $52,900

Jul-Aug Sep-Oct Nov-Dec Jan-Feb Mar-Apr May-Jun Water Sales Revenue Expenses

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Page 10

System Reinvestment

 The Association’s water rates are set to cover the cost of system operation and maintenance  Funding for asset replacement is an important part of a long- term rate-management strategy

 Infrastructure replacement can be costly  Deferred maintenance also has costs

 Potential benchmarks for annual system reinvestment funding

 Depreciation expense (based on original cost)  Depreciation expense (based on replacement cost)  Sinking fund (based on anticipated needs)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Page 11

System Reinvestment: WRA Example

 Assumptions:

 Cost of original water system (1986): $247,061

  • 50-year useful life  replace original water system in 2036
  • 3% annual cost inflation  estimated 2036 replacement cost = $1.3 million

 1% investment interest rate  2013 Reserve Balance: $502,937  Projected 2014 – 2019 capital expenditures: $75,510

 Potential benchmarks for annual system reinvestment funding:

 Original-Cost Depreciation: $247,061  50 years = $4,941  Replacement-Cost Depreciation: $4,941 × (1.03)Asset Age  Sinking Fund: $27,382

Annual transfer needed to fully cover projected replacement cost in projected year of replacement, given other projected expenses Annual transfers escalate with inflation, ranging from $10,983 – $21,677 per year

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Page 12

System Reinvestment: WRA Example

$- $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,400,000

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 Asset Replacement Cost Original-Cost Depreciation Replacement-Cost Depreciation Sinking Fund

Cash Accumulated for Replacement of Original Water System

Replacement-cost basis funds ≈ 81% of replacement liability Original-cost basis funds ≈ 52% of replacement liability Replacement Cost in 2036: $1.3 Million System reinvestment policies intend to generate a reasonable level of cash funding, considering near- term financial impacts.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Page 13

WRA Surcharge for System Reinvestment

 The Association currently charges its customers a bimonthly surcharge of $8.00 per account

 Projected to generate ≈ $31,000 per year  2013-2014 Budget: Revenue goes to reserve for capital

 Annual transfer of ≈ $36,000 would be needed to cash-fund replacement of all current water system assets

 Based on projected infrastructure replacement needs, assuming that assets need to be replaced 50 years from their acquisition date  Relies on available water system asset records and assumptions (see previous WRA system reinvestment example)  Would equate to a bimonthly surcharge of ≈ $9.30 per account

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Page 14

Financial Performance Standards

 Goal: Water utility generally maintains non-negative cash flow

 Water revenues are adequate to cover the water utility’s expenses  Short-term deficits may be allowed as part of a multi-year rate strategy

 Goal: Maintain reserves at or above targeted levels

 Rate studies should plan to meet reserve targets  If a reserve’s balance falls below its target level, the Association should plan to replenish it over several years

 Goal: Comply with financial performance requirements established by debt agreements

 Not currently (or expected to be) an issue for the Association  May become an issue if the Association needs to secure external financing (e.g. bank loan) to fund capital projects

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Page 15

Revenue Forecasting

Water Sales $222,467 81%

Surcharges $37,062 14% Other $13,500 5%

2013-2014 Revenue

Water Sales:

  • Based on estimated FY-

2013-14 sales revenue and prevailing water rates

  • Assumes no growth

Surcharges:

  • Estimated based on

customer statistics and prevailing surcharges ‒ Water surcharge ($8.00 per billing period) – ongoing ‒ Reserve study surcharge ($1.34 per billing period; expires in mid-2016) Other Operating Revenues:

  • Based on FY 2013-14

Budget (with no growth) ‒ Late Fees: $10,500 ‒ Transfer Fees: $2,000 ‒ Lock/Reconnect Fees: $1,000

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Page 16

Expense Forecasting

Sallal Water Purchases $119,137 44%

Sallal O&M Contract $42,772 16%

Other Water Operations $5,200 2%

Water Reserve Transfers $37,062 13% Administrative Costs $69,296 25%

2013-2014 Revenue

Sallal O&M Contract:

  • Based FY-2013-14 Budget,

reduced to reflect WRA’s assumption of billing responsibilities as of Jan 2014

  • 4% increase for FY 2014-15

negotiated with Sallal

  • Assumed to increase by 3%

per year beyond FY 2014-15 Administrative Costs:

  • Water utility’s allocation

based on FY 2013-14 Budget

  • Increased to reflect WRA’s

assumption of billing responsibilities as of Jan 2014

  • Labor costs increase by 2.5 –

4.0% per year; other costs increase with inflation (1.7 – 2.5% per year). Sallal Water Purchases:

  • Based on FY 2013-14

Budget

  • 4% increase for FY 2014-15

negotiated with Sallal

  • Assumed to increase by 3%

per year beyond FY 2014-15 Water Reserve Transfers:

  • Reflects transfer of

surcharge revenues to reserve Other Water Operations:

  • Based on FY 2013-14 Budget
  • Assumed to increase with

inflation (1.7 – 2.5% per year)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Page 17

Capital Needs Forecast

10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Cash $84,913 100%

 Capital Costs Through 2019*:

 Sampling Stations: $37,250  Hydrant Modifications: $9,403  Meter Replacements: $5,321  Water System Plan Update: $32,939  Total: $84,913

 Planned Funding Strategy:

 $84,913 in cash funding from existing Water Reserve resources and surcharge revenue *Reflects adjustments for future cost inflation at ≈ 3.2% per year

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Page 18

Water Revenue Requirement Analysis

 Revenue at existing rates is insufficient to fully cover costs

 Partially due to increase in allocation of admin costs to water utility

  • Driven by assumption of meter reading/billing duties by WRA

 Operating deficit is expected to grow as costs increase over time

 Recommended financial policies also have an impact…

 Water utility does not currently have an operating reserve

  • General Fund operating reserve can be used in emergencies
  • Goal is for the water utility to be self-sustaining

 Assumed $71,000 interfund loan from the Water Reserve

  • Funds water utility operating reserve and enables the phasing of rate

increases over several years

  • Balances recommended “sources and uses” and “financial performance”

policies with near-term financial reality

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Page 19

Water Utility Financial Forecast

Forecast Summary Current FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Annual Rate Increase 9.0% 9.0% 9.0% 8.0% 8.0% Bimonthly Bill @ 1,100 CF $54.12 $58.99 $64.30 $70.09 $75.70 $81.76 Plus: Surcharges 9.34 9.34 9.34 8.00 8.00 8.00 Total Bimonthly Bill $63.46 $68.33 $73.64 $78.09 $83.70 $89.76 Change From Prior Year $4.87 $5.31 $4.45 $5.61 $6.06 % Change From Prior Year +7.7% +7.8% +6.0% +7.2% +7.2%

$- $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Interfund Loan Repayment Cash Operating Expenses Revenue @ Existing Rates Revenue @ Proposed/Projected Rates Existing Operating Deficit 17% Future Operating Cost Increases 40% Funding Operating Reserve 12% Phasing In Rate Increases 31%

Breakdown of Cumulative Increase

Alternative: Upfront rate increase of ≈ 28%

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Page 20

Recommendations

 Establish a separate operating reserve for the water utility

 Consider establishing a rate stabilization reserve as resources allow

 Provides protection against revenue risk resulting from low-sales years

 Maintain surcharge of $8.00 per month per account

 Continue to allocate surcharge revenue to the Water Reserve  System reinvestment is an ongoing need  consider integrating into the “basic” water rate (rather than as a separate “surcharge”)

 Increase water rates by 9% for FY 2015  Review utility rates annually