Why Patient Centered Care Matters on the Path to Value GENA COOK - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

why patient centered care matters on the path to value
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Why Patient Centered Care Matters on the Path to Value GENA COOK - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Why Patient Centered Care Matters on the Path to Value GENA COOK CEO, NAVIGATING CANCER October 13, 2017 Institute Insti tute for r Heal ealthcar thcare e Im Improvem vement ents Tr Triple Ai Aim He Health o of a a P Popu


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Why Patient Centered Care Matters on the Path to Value

GENA COOK CEO, NAVIGATING CANCER October 13, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Insti Institute tute for r Heal ealthcar thcare e Im Improvem vement’ ent’s Tr Triple Ai Aim

Triple Aim Exp Experience ce of

  • f Ca

Care He Health o

  • f a

a P Popu pulation Pe Per Capita Cost Be Better Heal alth Be Better Car are Be Better Val alue Utilization Management Pathway compliance Reducing headcount Increase throughput Care Management programs Patient Engagement programs Benchmarking & Analytics BI Tools

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Insti Institute tute for r Heal ealthcar thcare e Im Improvem vement’ ent’s Tr Triple Ai Aim

Triple Aim Exp Experience ce of

  • f Ca

Care He Health o

  • f a

a P Popu pulation Pe Per Capita Cost Be Better Heal alth Be Better Car are Be Better Val alue

patient-centered care

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Current State of Healthcare

Pa Patient Tr Triage Nur Nurse Pr Provider St Staff

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Pa Patient

A better connection to the patient is key

Better Pa Patient Ex Expe perience Better Staf Staff Ex Experi erienc ence

Pr Provider & Care Team

Better Ph Physician Ex Expe perience

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Patient-centered care works but requires technology to scale

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Managing patient care for populations is still mostly manual

Remember to send refill script for James D. TODAY!! Call John Smith back on 3/2 re: pain follow-up

Call Cynthia L. back on 3/2 re: pain and fatigue follow-up

Level of sophistication

Outlook Excel EMR BI Tool

7

Analytic Tools & Vendors

slide-8
SLIDE 8

An extension to the EMR for patient centered care & coordination

8

CO CONNECT CTING THE HE PATIENT

Layering in an understanding of the patient experience outside your care

UN UNIFYING THE HE CAR CARE TEAM AM

A single, comprehensive view enables true care coordination

CAP CAPTUR URING THE HE INTERACT ACTION

NEW

EMR

Document in detail separate interactions between different care team members

Electronic Health Records Patient Relationship Management

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Patient Portal Status Triage, Pain, Distress, Depression all show up in the ‘Documents’ tab

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The pa patient ent’s compa pani nion to empowering their own care beyond the clinic

Pa Patient Li Link

The in integrated tools ls essential to the delivery of personalized care for every patient

Ca Care Management Pa Patient En Engagement

The di digital channel that connects providers to their patients and caregivers The au automat ation engi engine ne that scales patient-centered care from individual patients to broad populations

Po Population He Health

Pa Patient ent Rel elations nshi hip Mana nagem ement ent Personalized care for every patient

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Our National Network of Cancer Clinics

11

1. 1.6K 6K

Providers

1. 1.7M 7M

Patients

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Patient Relationship Management has proven to help

12

Better Patient Experience

1

Improved Outcomes

2

Lower Costs

3

Highest industry engagement rates with 94% approval rating Proven increase of time on therapy and survival with medication adherence Demonstrated cost savings

  • f $1M+ for the average

10-physician practice

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Helping patients engage & providers prepare for value

13

Reduce hospitalizations Increase efficiency Meet compliance requirements Improve care coordination 21st century patient tools Integrated part of the care team Comprehensive self care and support Better patient and family experience

slide-14
SLIDE 14

High adoption & engagement with tools built for patients

14

1.5M 1.5M

Patient touch points each month

94% 94%

Patient approval rating

64% 64%

Invited patients who join & use platform

5% 5%-20% 20%

INDUSTRY STANDARD

Patient Portal Adoption, KLAS Research

ü Secure messaging ü Access to labs and health information ü Cloud-based patient intake (registration, update, f/u) ü Personalized patient education ü Automated appointment reminders ü Cancer community & resources ü Family & caregiver support network ü Dedicated patient support / help line ü Remote monitoring support

slide-15
SLIDE 15

What Patients Said:

All the information and paperwork is hard to process, but the portal has everything organized for you! Everything one needs is right here. Its fantastic... Easy to use and you have all your info in one place to access at any time. My two daughters are able to get to my records - if I forget something, one of them will remember - thanks to the access to my information. It is a great tool. The service is great and easy to navigate through to find info I want or need. For me it's perfect.

90% of patients agree that

having access to their data and personalized resources im improves their ir satis isfactio ion wi with t their c care. .

15

93% of patients reported

that they are ve very y like kely to use Navigating Care to re read in informatio ion about their ir di diagn gnosis a and t d treatment.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Automated delivery of personalized patient education

DIAGNOSIS STARTING TREATMENT CHEMO TEACH 30, 60, 90 days

Patients arrive informed and prepared for session Automatic delivery

  • f cancer resources

Push content to match patient therapy regiment Deliver self-care instructions at every patient check-point

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Targeted education improves patient outcomes & survival

2017 Published Study: Lung Cancer Patients on IV therapy

+5 +50 Da Days (+2 +21%)

Patients who read the education st stayed on

  • n IV

V pe pemetrexed therapy an average of 286 286 da days vs. 236 236 da days versus those patients who did not read the education

Time on Therapy

(p<0.01)

+1 +13%

One Year Survival Rate

(p<0.01)

Patients who read the education had an average one year survival rate of 66% 66% vs. 53% 53% versus those patients who did not read the education

Patients received treatment-specific education delivered through the Navigating Cancer’s platform

  • 2014-2016 study time period
  • 944 patients across 58 oncology clinics

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Work still needed to improve the patient experience and deliver better care

18

Source: 2016 Navigating Cancer Patient Survey, 2,152 respondents

”W ”When hen ar are e yo you u getti etting ng cal called ed back ack from yo your ur office ce when hen yo you u leave eave a a messag essage?” e?”

22% 22% i in l n les ess t tha han 30 m n 30 minut nutes es 42% 42% c called ed b back b bet etween 1 een 1-2 ho 2 hour urs 17% 17% c called ed b back b bet etween 3 een 3-4 ho 4 hour urs 19% 19% c called ed b back g grea eater er t tha han 4 ho n 4 hour urs

78% 78% at

at risk fo for h r hospita talizati tions

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Hardwire Support for Patients

Phone Triage at the Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders

Patient experiencing symptom Patient calls centralized triage phone line Dedicated triage RN receives call RN launches symptom management pathway in Navigating Care RN advises patient:

  • Manage at home
  • Come to office
  • Go to ED

Patient receives follow-up and self-care instructions in their Navigating Care account

!

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Triage Dashboard

Triage prioritizes incoming patient issues so care team members can focus their attention on the patients that need it most. ü Visibility into patient interactions and ou

  • utstandin

ing is issues ü Standardized tri triage ge pa pathways enable comprehensive symptom assessment and management ü Ability to sc schedule follow-up up re reminders tied to an incident

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Symptom Management Pathways to Improve Patient Care

21

20 20

Sy Symptom m mana nagem ement ent p pathw hways

Body Aches Chest Pain Constipation Cycle One Follow-up Diarrhea Emergency Services Fatigue Fever & Chills Follow Up Nausea & Vomiting Nosebleed Oral Problems Pain Respiratory Changes Sinus & Cold Symptoms Transitional Care Management

Re Reduce ced va variability Sm Smarter er de decision-mak making Con Consi sist stent do documentation Be Better pat atient car are

+ mor

  • re in develop
  • pme

ment

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Co Costs Avoid ided* Emergency Dept. $192,985 Hospitalizations $1,588,562 Combined $1,781,547 Co Costs Avoid ided* Emergency Dept. $177,290 Hospitalizations $1,376,724 Combined $1,555,014 2 locations in Tacoma, WA area 10 medical oncologists OCM participant | 3 payer pilots 9 locations in Forth Worth, TX area 13 medical oncologists OCM participant | 3+ payer pilots

*Calculation of costs avoided based on annualized data from January – April 2017

22

Implementation of Navigating Care’s Triage & Symptom Management Pathways resulted in an annualized ~4 ~400 avoided ER visits and $3,335,561 c $3,335,561 cost s saving ngs across both mid-size practices

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Proactive Care Reactive Care

PATIENTS MANAGED COST OF CARE PROACTIVE CARE REACTIVE CARE COST OF CARE

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Health Tracker Program Patient Reported Outcomes Dashboard Triage Dashboard Symptom Mgmt. Pathways

PROACTIVE CARE REACTIVE CARE

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Te Telehealth & Remote Mo Monitoring: Manage more high risk patients with existing staff

Reported symptoms are immediately prioritized

  • n a nurse-monitored dashboard for follow-up

Patients can submit how they’re feeling at the click of a button

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Make Symptom Reporting Easier

Put the right infrastructure in place

1 2 3

Standardized Phone Triage Remote Symptom Monitoring Proactive Support

  • f High-Risk

Patients

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Patients Hesitant to Report Symptoms

Ba Barriers s to patients s reporting sy symptoms: s:

Making it difficult for programs to proactively address needs

Unaware of symptoms or don’t know which

  • nes worth reporting

Assume care team will anticipate and reach

  • ut to them about symptoms

Don’t believe care team is available to help Afraid to bother their care team Not sure who to call Of active cancer patients do not report symptoms because they do not want to bother their doctor

38% 38%

Of symptoms identified by systematic assessment are voluntarily reported to the care team by cancer patients

10% 10%

Source: Advisory Board Oncology Roundtable interviews and analysis. 27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Health Tracker Program

Pa Patients Pr Providers ü Reminds patients to take their oral therapy on schedule ü Prompts patients to report their current health status ü Keeps patients connected to their care team in between

  • ffice visits

ü Enables remote monitoring of treatment ü Collects patient feedback on health status ü Triggers risk status alerts based on patient feedback

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Proactive monitoring with patient assessments

Asra Erdem (589646) 19 March 1950 8 February 2017 10:35 pm

5

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Proven survival benefit with real-time PRO monitoring

median overall survival

+5 +5 m month ths

Patients were asked to:

  • Report in a minimum of once per week

using a tablet or computer

  • Rate a set of 12 common symptoms of

chemotherapy on a scale of 1-4 Improved quality of life (34% v. 18%) Reduced ER visits (34% v. 41%) Reduced hospitalizations (45% v. 49%) Longer time on therapy (8.2 months v. 6.3 months)

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Value-based care programs do do not pr provide de enough gh reimbu bursement for the staffing overhead the program activities require Practices need a solution that sc scal ales s high-tou touch patie ient t management t in order to deliver consistent care to all of their patients, not just the patients attributed to payer programs Viable solutions must ad address ess broad ad “p “popul ulati ation” ” need needs such as high risk patients, specific diagnoses, complex treatments...

31

Cu Customer co conce cerns as they y transit itio ion to va valu lue…

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Br Breast Cancer OC OCM Or Oral Chemo

Po Popula ulatio ion n He Health: Combine population-specific tasks into a personalized care sheet for every patient

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Pamela Jones

Dx: Breast Cancer Payer: Medicare Medication: Afinitor

Physician Triage Nurse Case Manager Pharmacist Financial Counselor OCM month 3 3 days post-refill PHQ-9 results Follow-up appt. Triage incident follow-up Reminder: refill check-in Determine payer coverage Pre-appointment summary

Appropriate te team am members rs ar are noti tifi fied of f task tasks s due, with reminders and prompts for next steps

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Reporting suite to supports Value-Based Care compliance

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Scaling care from on

  • ne…

…to ma many

To achieve the Triple Aim