why does uranium alpha decay
play

Why Does Uranium Alpha Decay? Consider the alpha decay shown below - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Why Does Uranium Alpha Decay? Consider the alpha decay shown below where a uranium nucleus spontaneously breaks apart into a 4 He or alpha particle and 234 90 Th . 238 4 He + 234 E ( 4 He ) = 4 . 2 MeV 92 U 90 Th To study this reaction we


  1. Why Does Uranium Alpha Decay? Consider the alpha decay shown below where a uranium nucleus spontaneously breaks apart into a 4 He or alpha particle and 234 90 Th . 238 4 He + 234 E ( 4 He ) = 4 . 2 MeV 92 U → 90 Th To study this reaction we first map out the 4 He − 234 90 Th potential energy. We reverse the decay above and use a beam of 4 He nuclei striking a 234 90 Th target. The 4 He beam comes from the radioactive decay of another nucleus 210 84 Po and E ( 4 He ) = 5 . 407 MeV . 1 What is the distance of closest approach of the 4 He to the 234 90 Th target if the Coulomb force is the only one that matters? 2 Is the Coulomb force the only one that matters? 3 What is the lifetime of the 238 92 U ? Jerry Gilfoyle Alpha Decay 1 / 32

  2. What Do We Know? 234 90 Th − α Potential The V = Z 1 Z 2 e 2 r V ( r ) ( MeV ) attractive nuclear part r ( fm ) Jerry Gilfoyle Alpha Decay 2 / 32

  3. Mapping the Potential Energy Rutherford Scattering What is the distance of closest approach of the 4 He to the 234 90 Th target if only the Coulomb force is active? Is the Coulomb force the only one active? The energy of the 4 He emitted by the 210 84 Po to make the beam is E ( 4 He ) = 5 . 407 MeV . ZnS Microscope Collimator Alpha source Scattered helium Alpha beam Thorium target 210 4 206 Po He + Pb 84 2 82 Demo Jerry Gilfoyle Alpha Decay 3 / 32

  4. Mapping the Potential Energy Rutherford Scattering What is the distance of closest approach of the 4 He to the 234 90 Th target if only the Coulomb force is active? Is the Coulomb force the only one active? The energy of the 4 He emitted by the 210 84 Po to make the beam is E ( 4 He ) = 5 . 407 MeV . ZnS Microscope Collimator Alpha source Scattered helium Alpha beam Thorium target 210 4 206 Po He + Pb 84 2 82 Demo Jerry Gilfoyle Alpha Decay 3 / 32

  5. Mapping the Potential Energy Rutherford Scattering What is the distance of closest approach of the 4 He to the 234 90 Th target if only the Coulomb force is active? Is the Coulomb force the only one active? The energy of the 4 He emitted by the 210 84 Po to make the beam is E ( 4 He ) = 5 . 407 MeV . ZnS Microscope Collimator Alpha source Scattered helium Alpha beam Thorium target 210 4 206 Po He + Pb 84 2 82 Demo Jerry Gilfoyle Alpha Decay 3 / 32

  6. Rutherford Trajectories Rutherford trajectories for different impact parameters y / b x Jerry Gilfoyle Alpha Decay 4 / 32

  7. Mapping the Potential Energy The Differential Cross Section 4 He trajectory Th target Jerry Gilfoyle Alpha Decay 5 / 32

  8. Mapping the Potential Energy The Differential Cross Section 4 He trajectory Th target � Z 1 Z 2 e 2 � 2 d σ 1 d Ω = sin 4 � θ � 4 E cm 2 Jerry Gilfoyle Alpha Decay 5 / 32

  9. The Differential Cross Section areal particle rate incident angular = dN s ∝ × target × scattered into beam detector dt density dA of detector rate size dN s dN inc ∝ × n tgt × d Ω dt dt dN s = d σ d Ω × dN inc × n tgt × d Ω dt dt I beam - beam current dN inc = ∆ N inc = I beam Z - beam charge dt ∆ t Ze ρ tgt - target density n tgt = ρ tgt 1 = ρ tgt A tgt - molar mass N A V hit N A L tgt A tgt a beam A tgt V hit - beam-target overlap L tgt - target thickness Jerry Gilfoyle Alpha Decay 6 / 32

  10. Areal or Surface Density of Nuclear Targets Jerry Gilfoyle Alpha Decay 7 / 32

  11. The Differential Cross Section areal particle rate incident angular = dN s target scattered into beam detector ∝ × × dt density dA of detector rate size dN s dN inc × n tgt d Ω ∝ × dt dt = d σ dN s d Ω × dN inc × n tgt × d Ω dt dt I beam - beam current = ∆ N inc dN inc = I beam Z - beam charge dt ∆ t Ze ρ tgt - target density n tgt = ρ tgt a beam = ρ tgt 1 A tgt - molar mass A tgt N A V hit A tgt N A L tgt V hit - beam-target overlap L tgt - target thickness d Ω = dA det = ∆ A det dA det - detector area = sin θ d θ d φ r 2 r 2 r det - target-detector distance det det Jerry Gilfoyle Alpha Decay 8 / 32

  12. Actual Rutherford Scattering Results 50 /2) θ ( 4 45 sin × Counts 40 35 30 25 20 15 H.Geiger and E.Marsden, Phil. Mag., 25, p. 604 (1913) alphas on gold 10 5 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 θ (deg) Jerry Gilfoyle Alpha Decay 9 / 32

  13. Actual Rutherford Scattering Results 50 /2) θ � 2 � Z 1 Z 2 e 2 ( d σ 1 4 45 sin d Ω = sin 4 � θ � × 4 E cm Counts 40 2 35 30 25 20 15 H.Geiger and E.Marsden, Phil. Mag., 25, p. 604 (1913) alphas on gold 10 5 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 θ (deg) Jerry Gilfoyle Alpha Decay 9 / 32

  14. Interpretation of Rutherford Scattering Results 1.2 1.0 Measured / Predicted 2 He + 234 4 90 Th → 4 2 He + 234 90 Th 0.8 � � 2 Z 1 Z 2 e 2 d σ 1 d Ω = 0.6 4 E cm sin 4 ( θ 2 ) Original decay 0.4 DOCA = 48 fm 238 92 U → 4 He + 234 90 Th E α ( U ) = 4 . 2 MeV 0.2 E α ( Po ) = 5 . 407 MeV 0.0 0 50 100 150 Scattering Angle ( deg ) What does this say about the 4 2 He − 234 90 Th potential energy? Jerry Gilfoyle Alpha Decay 10 / 32

  15. Measuring the Size of the Nucleus θ cm ( deg ) Jerry Gilfoyle Alpha Decay 11 / 32

  16. Measuring the Size of the Nucleus PRL 109 , 262701 (2012) E cm = 23 . 1 MeV E cm = 28 . 3 MeV θ cm ( deg ) Jerry Gilfoyle Alpha Decay 11 / 32

  17. The 4 He − 234 90 Th Potential 40 α - Th Potential Blue - known Red - a guess 20 V ( MeV ) 0 - 20 - 40 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 r ( fm ) Jerry Gilfoyle Alpha Decay 12 / 32

  18. The Paradox of Alpha Decay 1 We have probed the 248 90 Th potential into an internuclear distance of r DOCA = 48 fm using a 4 He beam of E ( 4 He ) = 5 . 407 MeV . 2 The data are consistent with the Coulomb force and no others. 3 The radioactive decay 238 92 U → 248 90 Th + 4 He emits an α (or 4 He ) with energy E α = 4 . 2 MeV . 4 For a classical ‘decay’ the emitted α should have an energy of at least E min = 5 . 407 MeV . 5 It appears the ‘decay’ α starts out at a distance r emit = 62 fm . 6 How do we explain this? Jerry Gilfoyle Alpha Decay 13 / 32

  19. The Paradox of Alpha Decay 1 We have probed the 248 90 Th potential into an internuclear distance of r DOCA = 48 fm using a 4 He beam of E ( 4 He ) = 5 . 407 MeV . 2 The data are consistent with the Coulomb force and no others. 3 The radioactive decay 238 92 U → 248 90 Th + 4 He emits an α (or 4 He ) with energy E α = 4 . 2 MeV . 4 For a classical ‘decay’ the emitted α should have an energy of at least E min = 5 . 407 MeV . 5 It appears the ‘decay’ α starts out at a distance r emit = 62 fm . 6 How do we explain this? Quantum Tunneling! Jerry Gilfoyle Alpha Decay 13 / 32

  20. The Paradox of Alpha Decay 1 We have probed the 248 90 Th potential into an internuclear distance of r DOCA = 48 fm using a 4 He beam of E ( 4 He ) = 5 . 407 MeV . 2 The data are consistent with the Coulomb force and no others. 3 The radioactive decay 238 92 U → 248 90 Th + 4 He emits an α (or 4 He ) with energy E α = 4 . 2 MeV . 4 For a classical ‘decay’ the emitted α should have an energy of at least E min = 5 . 407 MeV . 5 It appears the ‘decay’ α starts out at a distance r emit = 62 fm . 6 How do we explain this? Quantum Tunneling! 7 What do we measure? Jerry Gilfoyle Alpha Decay 13 / 32

  21. The Paradox of Alpha Decay 1 We have probed the 248 90 Th potential into an internuclear distance of r DOCA = 48 fm using a 4 He beam of E ( 4 He ) = 5 . 407 MeV . 2 The data are consistent with the Coulomb force and no others. 3 The radioactive decay 238 92 U → 248 90 Th + 4 He emits an α (or 4 He ) with energy E α = 4 . 2 MeV . 4 For a classical ‘decay’ the emitted α should have an energy of at least E min = 5 . 407 MeV . 5 It appears the ‘decay’ α starts out at a distance r emit = 62 fm . 6 How do we explain this? Quantum Tunneling! 7 What do we measure? t 1 / 2 ( 238 U ) = 4 . 5 × 10 9 yr Lifetimes Jerry Gilfoyle Alpha Decay 13 / 32

  22. The Plan For Calculating Nuclear Lifetimes 1 The α particle ( 4 He ) is confined by the nuclear potential and ‘bounces’ back and forth between the walls of the nucleus. Assume � 2 E α its energy is the same as the emitted nucleon so v = m . 2 Each time it ‘bounces’ off the nuclear wall it has a finite probability of tunneling through the barrier equal to the transmission coefficient T . 3 The decay rate will the product of the rate of collisions with a wall v and the probability of transmission equal to 2 R × T . vT = 2 R � m 4 The lifetime is the inverse of the decay rate 2 R 1 T . 2 E 5 The radius of a nucleus has been found to be described by r nuke = 1 . 2 A 1 / 3 where A is the mass number of the nucleus. 6 We are liberally copying the work of Gamow, Condon, and Gurney. Like them we will assume V = 0 inside the nucleus and V = 0 from the classical turning point to infinity. Jerry Gilfoyle Alpha Decay 14 / 32

  23. The 4 He − 234 90 Th Potential Gamow, Condon and Gurney 30 20 V ( MeV ) 10 4.2 MeV 0 0 20 40 60 80 r ( fm ) Jerry Gilfoyle Alpha Decay 15 / 32

  24. The Transfer-Matrix Solution 30 20 V ( MeV ) 10 4.2 MeV 0 0 20 40 60 80 r ( fm ) Jerry Gilfoyle Alpha Decay 16 / 32

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend