Whistleblower Program Update Review of Activities and Initiatives - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

whistleblower program update
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Whistleblower Program Update Review of Activities and Initiatives - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

City & County of San Francisco Office of the Controller Whistleblower Program Update Review of Activities and Initiatives Presentation to Citizens General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee May 25, 2017 Whistleblower Program Authority


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Whistleblower Program Update

Review of Activities and Initiatives

Presentation to Citizens’ General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee May 25, 2017 City & County of San Francisco Office of the Controller

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Whistleblower Program Authority

The authority for Whistleblower Program investigations is derived from state and city law:

– California Government Code, Section 53087.6 – San Francisco Charter, Appendix F – San Francisco Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code, Article IV

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Matters Appropriate for Investigation

The Whistleblower Program shall investigate or

  • therwise attempt to resolve complaints concerning:

– Misuse of city funds – Improper activities by city officers and employees – Deficiencies in the quality and delivery of government services – Wasteful and inefficient government practices

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Referral of Certain Complaints

The Whistleblower Program shall refer complaints that: – Another city department is required by federal, state, or local law to adjudicate – May be resolved through a grievance mechanism established by bargaining unit or contract – Involve violations of criminal law – Are subject to an existing investigation – Allege violations of governmental ethics laws

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Whistleblower Program Importance and Benefits

  • A fraud hotline is a critical internal control that is often

noted as an operating and credit-rating strength when well-implemented by a municipality

  • The Whistleblower Program allows complaints to be

submitted anonymously and confidentially

  • Whistleblower Program investigations:

– Stop improper conduct and prevent further violations – Reveal relevant facts so that management can make a fully informed decision on how best to proceed

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Complaint Activity Fiscal Year 2016-17 Through Q3

69

  • Complaints Open at July 1, 2016

325

  • Complaints Received in Fiscal Year 2016-17

334

  • Complaints Closed in Fiscal Year 2016-17

60

  • Complaints Open at March 31, 2017

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Complaints Received By Quarter July 2012-March 2017

7

79 73 80 77 103 63 51 73 72 128 72 79 68 75 94 77 89 95 101 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY15-16 FY16-17

Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1

292 316 325 325a 291

a Year-to-date

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Investigated and Closed by Department Fiscal Year 2016-17 Through Q3

8

Department Complaints Investigated and Closed As a % of Total Year-to-Date Investigated and Closed Budgeted FTE Positions as a %

  • f Total Workforce

Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Public Health 14 6 11 15.35% 21.19% Municipal Transportation 14 6 12 15.84% 17.41% Police

  • 14

2 7.92% 8.97% Public Utilities 1 1 7 4.46% 6.95% Human Services 8 9 6 11.39% 6.69% Fire 1 2

  • 1.49%

5.29% Airport 4

  • 1

2.48% 4.98% Public Works 7 3 4 6.93% 4.40% Sheriff 5 2 2 4.46% 3.12% Recreation and Park 2 4 2 3.96% 3.05% City Administrator 1 4 4 4.46% 2.46% Library 1 1 1 1.49% 2.01% Building Inspection

  • 2

0.99% 0.95% City Attorney 1 3

  • 1.98%

0.93% District Attorney

  • 1
  • 0.50%

0.85% Controller 1

  • 0.50%

0.82% Juvenile Probation 2 1

  • 1.49%

0.80% Emergency Management 1 1

  • 0.99%

0.79% Port

  • 0.79%

Technology

  • 1

2 1.49% 0.78% Treasurer/Tax Collector 1

  • 1

0.99% 0.71% Planning

  • 1
  • 0.50%

0.64% Human Resources 1 1

  • 0.99%

0.57% All Other Departments* 8 5 6 9.41% 4.86% Total 73 66 63 100.00% 100.00%

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Age of Complaints Closed Fiscal Year 2016-17 Through Q3

9

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

30 Days or Less 31-90 Days 91-180 Days 181-270 Days 271-360 Days More Than 360 Days Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3

119 39 12 4 2 158

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Complaint Dispositions Fiscal Year 2016-17 Through Q3

  • Of the 202 complaints investigated and closed, 35

percent led to a corrective or preventive action

  • Whistleblower Program investigations resulted in

departments taking action against employees who:

– Lived with a subordinate employee, creating the appearance of favoritism in the workplace – Received leave pay when they were ineligible for it – Excessively used a work phone for personal business

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Age of 60 Complaints Open At March 31, 2017

11

22 22 10 3 3 5 10 15 20 25 30 Days or Less 31-90 Days 91-180 Days 181-270 Days 271-360 Days

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Initiatives Fiscal Year 2016-17

The Whistleblower Program published bulletins to make employees aware of the red flags associated with the costly occupational frauds of split purchasing and mischaracterized expenses:

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Initiatives Fiscal Year 2016-17

To ensure that department investigations are impartial and prompt, the Whistleblower Program developed an on-demand training video. The video is available on YouTube. The Whistleblower Program will distribute the video to department liaisons.

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Initiatives Fiscal Year 2016-17

The Whistleblower Program has hosted the following webinars this fiscal year: – Califorensics (Computer Forensics and eDiscovery in Fraud Cases) – Arizona Auditor General (Fraud in the Governmental Sector) – U.S. Postal Service – Office of Inspector General (Conducting Investigations and Triaging Complaints) – Florida Department of Transportation (Investigative Planning and Proof Analysis)

14