what what can can we we learn learn from from present
play

What What can can we we learn learn from from present present- - PDF document

04.10.2017 What What can can we we learn learn from from present present- -day day HVCs HVCs about about cold cold- -gas gas accretion accretion of of galaxies galaxies Gerhard Hensler Gerhard Hensler Dept Dept. . of of


  1. 04.10.2017 What What can can we we learn learn from from present present- -day day HVCs HVCs about about cold cold- -gas gas accretion accretion of of galaxies galaxies Gerhard Hensler Gerhard Hensler Dept Dept. . of of Astrophysics Astrophysics, , University University of of Vienna Vienna Bastian Sander, Vienna/Magdeburg Bastian Sander, Vienna/Magdeburg Wolfgang Wolfgang Vieser Vieser, Kiel/ , Kiel/Munich Munich Sylvia Sylvia Ploeckinger Ploeckinger, Vienna/Leiden , Vienna/Leiden 1 The The Milky Milky Way Way is is bombarded bombarded by by infalling infalling High- High -velocity velocity Clouds Clouds; 20 ; 20- -40% 40% sky sky coverage coverage 2 1

  2. 04.10.2017 Properties of HVCs Properties of HVCs � HI-detection with galactocentric velocities <-200 km/s � Masses of ~10 8 …. 10 4 M � � ~50% of the sky are covered with infalling gas clouds. � Their origin is not yet solved, but obviously various: Some from the Mag. Stream and MW satellites or even of cosmological origin 3 Infalling clouds are divided according to their velocities into: � Intermediate-vel. clouds (IVC): -50 > v GSR [km/s] > -100 � High-velocity clouds (HVCs): -100 > v GSR [km/s] > -200 � Ultra-HVCs: v GSR < -200 km/s v GSR 2

  3. 04.10.2017 5 Properties of HVCs Properties of HVCs � HI-detection with galactocentric velocities <-200 km/s � Masses of ~10 8 …. 10 4 M � � ~50% of the sky are covered with infalling gas clouds. � Their origin is not yet solved, but obviously various: Some from the Mag. Stream and MW satellites � Very massive entities exist very close to the gal. plane � Full of substructures; no central mass concentration. 6 3

  4. 04.10.2017 Massive HVCs Massive HVCs H H exhibit exhibit complex complex internal internal structures structures C C Simon et al. (2006) ApJ, 640 Fox et al. 2004 Cores Cores and and Head Head- -tail tail Structures Structures Smaller HVCs (~10 4 M � ) show � core-halo structures ⇒ hydrostatic stratification ⇒ self-gravity � head-tail structures ⇒ ram-pressure stripping and seem to survive, decelerated and stretched by interactions with the hot static halo gas. Brüns et al. 2000 8 4

  5. 04.10.2017 Properties of HVCs Properties of HVCs � HI-detection with galactocentric velocities <-200 km/s � Masses of ~10 8 …. 10 4 M � � ~50% of the sky are covered with infalling gas clouds. � Their origin is not yet solved, but obviously various: Some from the Mag. Stream and MW satellites � Very massive entities exist very close to the gal.plane � Full of substructures; no central mass concentration. � Mostly, head-tail structure ⇒ drag 9 Properties of HVCs Properties of HVCs � HI-detection with galactocentric velocities <-200 km/s � Masses of ~10 8 …. 10 4 M � � ~50% of the sky are covered with infalling gas clouds. � Their origin is not yet solved, but obviously various: Some from the Mag. Stream and MW satellites � Very massive entities exist very close to the gal.plane � Full of substructures; no central mass concentration. � Mostly, head-tail structure ⇒ drag � Metal-poor � Normal ISM phases � No stellar content! heating processes prevent cooling? � B field? � Core-halo structure ⇒ self-gravitating! 10 5

  6. 04.10.2017 Are Are our our assumptions assumptions of of (2004) ApJ, 615 numerical HVC numerical HVC models models correct correct? ? Massive clouds passing through hot gas are exposed to ram pressure, Kelvin-Helmholtz and Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities HVCs are NOT homogeneous! Without self-gravity clouds are disrupted! (see also Heitsch & Putman, 2009, Apj, 698) Self-gravity is an urgent ingre-dient to be included to num. models! Motivation to care about HVCs especially? Motivation to care about HVCs especially? � Gas infall feeds galaxies! Cold streams? � SFR-gas relations? � P ext – H 2 /HI relation? � How is the gas accreted? Streams vs. clouds! HVCs? 12 6

  7. 04.10.2017 How does the “cold accretion” scenario work? How does the “cold accretion” scenario work? Dekel et al. (2009) Nature, 457: Colours refer to inflow rate per solid angle of point-like tracers at the centres of cubic-grid cells. Box side length is 320 kpc. Keres & Hernquist (2009) ApJ, 700: Example of the instability developing from an overdense filament in a hot dilute halo gas 13 leading to cloud formation. Motivation to care about HVCs especially? Motivation to care about HVCs especially? � Gas infall feeds galaxies! Cold streams? � Pext – H2/HI relation? � SFR-gas relations? � How is the gas accreted? Streams vs. clouds! HVCs? � Where do MWG HVCs come from? 3 sources: 1. Intergalactic stripped galaxy gas 2. tidally stripped satellites 3. Primordial clouds � Do they represent the link to missing Λ CDM subhalos, i.e. DM dominated? (see Poeckinger & Hensler, 2012, A&A, 547) � How do HVCs interact with the gaseous galactic halo? Deceleration? Halo Magnetic fields? (see Jelinek & Hensler, 2011, Comp. Phys. Comm., 182) � What stabilizes them against disruption by RTI & KHI? � Role of Heat conduction + Gravity? (see Vieser & Hensler, 2007, A&A, 472) � Do they reach the galactic disks? Gas replenishment? Triggered SF in gas disks? (see Izumi et al., 2014) 14 7

  8. 04.10.2017 Cresci et al. (2010) Nature, 467 Signatures as local metal deficiency in high-z galaxies are indicating low-Z/primordial gas infall. Motivation to care about HVCs especially? Motivation to care about HVCs especially? � Gas infall feeds galaxies! Cold streams? SFR-gas relations? � How is the gas accreted? Streams vs. clouds! HVCs? � Where do MWG HVCs come from? 3 sources: 1. Intergalactic stripped galaxy gas 2. tidally stripped satellites 3. Primordial clouds � Do they represent the link to missing Λ CDM subhalos, i.e. DM dominated? (see Poeckinger & Hensler, 2012, A&A, 547) � How do HVCs interact with the gaseous galactic halo? Deceleration? Halo Magnetic fields? (see Jelinek & Hensler, 2011, Comp. Phys. Comm., 182) � What stabilizes them against disruption by RTI & KHI? � Heat conduction + Gravity? (see Vieser & Hensler, 2007, A&A, 472) � Do they reach the galactic disks? Gas replenishment? Triggered SF in gas disks? (see Izumi et al., 2014) � Star formation in HVCs? Not observed! But SF in some RPS clouds! Why? Under which conditions? 16 8

  9. 04.10.2017 At ram-pressure stripped clouds star formation is possible: Under which conditions? VCC1217 NGC4569 ⇒ HVCs bridge the research fields from ISM (+ SF) to galaxy evolution and cosmology 18 9

  10. 04.10.2017 Without self-gravity, RTI grows and facilitates ram pressure to destruct the cloud: Self-gravity is an urgent ingredient to be included! BUT: Is ram pressure the only effect of the hot halo gas on HVCs? Between hot gas and warm/cold clouds thermal conduction plays a prominent role: at rest, only energy exchange leads to • evaporation or condensation. in motion: KHI is suppressed. • 19 Do HVCs survive fast motion through hot gas? Very low- mass models: 210 M � , Self-grav.+cooling+therm.cond.; KHI+ RP lead to destruction 2005, MN, 342 and many other authors (see in Vieser & Hensler, 2007, A&A, 472, 141) 10

  11. 04.10.2017 3D Cloud Models 3D Cloud Models mass (10 3 M � ) size (pc) [Z/Z � ] T c,cl /K self- heat./ thermal V rel grav. cool. conduct. [km/s] 62.4 – 87.5 41.16 – 48.42 0.1 - 1.0 230 + – + – class. 15.1 – 19.9 11.34 – 27.0 0.1 - 1.0 1150 + – + – saturated depend. ICM, Z depend. ICM, - 167, Z 250, 333 � Core-halo structure � Radiative heating-cooling balance � Thermal conduction (see Vieser & Hensler, 2007a+b, A&A, 472 + A&A, 475) � Self-gravity! Sander & Hensler (2017) in prep. 21 Big HVC in 3D Big HVC in 3D Most of the HVC remains gravitationally bound. 4 M M=8.75 M=8.75 � 10 10 4 M � , , Z=0.1 Z Z=0.1 Z � v v ICM ICM =167 km/s =167 km/s 6 K , T ICM T ICM =5.6 =5.6 � 10 10 6 K , n n ICM ICM =0.7 =0.7 � 10 10 3 3 cm cm - -3 3 for 50 Myrs 22 11

  12. 04.10.2017 Destruction Destruction vs. vs. Survival Survival: : the the mass mass dependence dependence 4 M M=8.75 M=8.75 � 10 10 4 M � , , vs. vs. 4 M M=2.0 M=2.0 � 10 10 4 M � , , Less massive HVCs are disrupted! 23 Sander & Hensler (2017) in prep. Cloud Cloud deceleration deceleration included included Deceleration leads to H-T structure. 25 12

  13. 04.10.2017 Decelerated Decelerated big big HVCs HVCs survive survive with with accretion accretion! ! 26 Sander & Hensler (2017) in prep. Velocity effect Velocity effect Higher velocity leads to: � stronger Bernoulli effect � HT structure, � higher mass loss, � stronger central concentration Jeans unstable?? Sander & Hensler (2017) in prep. 13

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend