weak ties their strength
play

Weak Ties & Their Strength Social and Economic Networks Jafar - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Weak Ties & Their Strength Social and Economic Networks Jafar Habibi MohammadAmin Fazli Social and Economic Networks 1 ToC Weak Ties & Their Strength Triadic Closure Local Bridges Strength of Weak ties Neighborhood


  1. Weak Ties & Their Strength Social and Economic Networks Jafar Habibi MohammadAmin Fazli Social and Economic Networks 1

  2. ToC • Weak Ties & Their Strength • Triadic Closure • Local Bridges • Strength of Weak ties • Neighborhood Overlap • Structural Holes • Social Capital • The Graph Partitioning Problem • Partitioning with Betweenness • Readings: • Chapter 3 from the Jackson book • Chapter 3 from the Kleinberg book Social and Economic Networks 2

  3. Weak Ties are Important • How do people find their jobs? • Granovetter: • Many people find from their social relationships • Among them, the majority has found their jobs from their acquaintances (not their close friends!). • Acquaintances have a great impact on our life. We can model their friendship with weak ties. Social and Economic Networks 3

  4. Triadic Closure • If two people in a social network have a friend in common, then there is an increased likelihood that they will become friends themselves at some point in the future Social and Economic Networks 4

  5. Triadic Closure • Triadic closure is a procedure for the evolution of links. • Clustering coefficient approximately shows how much triadic closure is used to form the networks. • Reasons: • the opportunity for B and C to meet: if A spends time with both B and C ] • the fact that each of B and C is friends with A (provided they are mutually aware of this) gives them a basis for trusting each other • the incentive A may have to bring B and C together: if A is friends with B and C , then it becomes a source of latent stress in these relationships if B and C are not friends with each other Social and Economic Networks 5

  6. Bridges & Local Bridges • Removing bridges makes the distance between two nodes A and B, infinite • Removing local bridges increase the distance between two nodes A and B, to a value more than two • A and B has not a common neighbor • Span of a local bridge is the distance between A and B if AB is deleted Social and Economic Networks 6

  7. Strong Triadic Closure Property • We say that a node A violates the Strong Triadic Closure Property if it has strong ties to two other nodes B and C, and there is no edge at all (either a strong or weak tie) between B and C. We say that a node A satisfies the Strong Triadic Closure Property if it does not violate it. Social and Economic Networks 7

  8. Strength of Weak ties • Weak ties can join you to other clusters of peoples i.e. (local) bridges are weak • Theorem: If a node A in a network satisfies the Strong Triadic Closure Property and is involved in at least two strong ties, then any local bridge it is involved in must be a weak tie. • Proof: black board • If we remove edges sequentially according to their strength • From the strongest downward • From the weakest upward , which results in smaller giant components Social and Economic Networks 8

  9. Neighborhood-overlap • Neighborhood-overlap for nodes A and B in graph 𝑕 : |𝑂 𝐵 𝑕 ∩ 𝑂 𝐶 (𝑕)| |𝑂 𝐵 𝑕 ∪ 𝑂 𝐶 𝑕 ∖ {𝐵, 𝐶}| Social and Economic Networks 9

  10. Strength of Weak Ties & Neighborhood Overlap • Neighborhood Overlap is very correlated with strength Social and Economic Networks 10

  11. Embeddedness • The embeddedness of an edge in a network to be the number of common neighbors the two endpoints have. • (Local) bridges have embeddedness of zero • Linkages with high embeddedness are more likely to form. Why? • What happens if all edges of a node have significant embeddedness? (See node A) Social and Economic Networks 11

  12. Structural Holes • A structural hole is an empty space between two sets of nodes that do not otherwise interact closely i.e. absence of connections between two groups • There is no formal definition, you can do by yourselves • Filling structural holes leads to benefits Social and Economic Networks 12

  13. Structural Holes • Advantages of B over A • B has early access to information of different non-interacting groups • Can mix different ideas and be more creative • Can be a gate-keeper i.e. a regulator of information between C and D Social and Economic Networks 13

  14. Social Capital • Social capital has not an exact definition • Has come to embody a number of different concepts related to how social relationships lead to individual of aggregate benefits in society. • Sometimes it refers to • The relationships that an individual has and the potential benefits that those relationships can bestow. • Broader social interactions (norms, sanctions, trust and ...) • And … . Social and Economic Networks 14

  15. Social Capital • Studies and theories of social capital have resulted in new conceptual understandings of social networks and their impact on behavior • E.g. Coleman emphasizes the role of closure, which roughly corresponds to high clustering, in the enforcement of social norms. Closure allows agents to coordinate sanctioning of individuals who deviate • E.g. Putnam defines bridging capital or bonding capital which shows the impact of bridging between different tightly-knit groups of people. Social and Economic Networks 15

  16. An Application: The Graph Partitioning Problem • How to break the graph structure into tightly- knit which are connected with a sparse set of links? • How to detect weaker ties which lies on the boundaries between regions? Social and Economic Networks 16

  17. Graph Partitioning General Approaches • Divisive Methods: • Find spanning links between densely-connected regions • Remove these edges sequentially and divide the graph • Top-Down approach • Agglomerative Methods: • Find nodes that may belong to a same densely-connected region • Merge them together and repeat the process until some desired criteria meet • Bottom-Up approach Social and Economic Networks 17

  18. Graph Partitioning General Approaches • Both approaches find nested structure of regions Social and Economic Networks 18

  19. Using Betweenness • Local bridges often connect weakly interacting parts of the network • Removing local bridges is a good idea but not strong enough • Which local bridge to remove? • What to do when there exists no local bridge? Social and Economic Networks 19

  20. Using Betweenness • Local bridges are important because they are usually parts of shortest paths between many pairs of nodes. Why? • Because they connect different tightly-knit groups. • Another intuition about betweenness: • Consider a 1-flow between every pair or nodes • If there exist k shortest paths between two nodes i and j, divide the 1-flow into k individual 1/k-flows along every shortest path • The total amount of flow an edge or a node carries defines its betweenness • A heuristic: Using betweenness for graph partitioning Social and Economic Networks 20

  21. Girwan-Newman Algorithm • Find the the edge with the highest betweenness and remove it • Continue this process until we are satisfied with the found groups Social and Economic Networks 21

  22. Computing Betweenness Values • Perform a BFS • Count the number of shortest paths Social and Economic Networks 22

  23. Computing Betweenness Values • Determine the amount of flows Social and Economic Networks 23

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend