wayne mitic july 26 2012 some
play

Wayne Mitic July 26, 2012 Some day................. How do you - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Wayne Mitic July 26, 2012 Some day................. How do you gather information, organize your thoughts & create new ideas? Link Build Get to the point, facts and Tell the whole story, possibilities details, files, initiate and


  1. Wayne Mitic July 26, 2012

  2. Some day.................

  3. How do you gather information, organize your thoughts & create new ideas? Link Build Get to the point, facts and Tell the whole story, possibilities details, files, initiate and finish & big picture, piles, initiate and improve

  4. Purpose of my presentation …to share with you what I’ve experienced in assisting organizations in developing their evaluation frameworks – the bouquets, landmines, and mutinees.

  5. I. What it is Why it’s important II. III. What it looks like IV. Lessons learned IV. Take home message

  6. Program Evaluation is not a new phenomenon Evaluator Program Evaluation? 7

  7. Definitions Evaluation is the systematic assessment of the merit (quality) or worth (value) of some object or activity (from Scriven, 1994). Differs from research. Research looks at what CAN HAPPEN by studying controlled conditions (prove). Evaluation looks at WHAT DOES HAPPEN in the real world (improve). We go through life in a constant state of evaluating 8

  8. There are at least 35 different types of evaluation, such as:  Formative  Needs assessments  Accreditation  Summative  Cost/benefit analysis  Goal-based  Effectiveness  Process  Efficacy  Outcome  Efficiency  Etc. No wonder there is lot’s of confusion and apprehension around evaluation 9

  9.  does not occur in a  should serve a useful vacuum; rather, it is purpose, be conducted influenced by real- in an ethical manner, world constraints. and produce accurate  should be practical and findings. feasible and must be  findings should be used conducted within the both to make decisions confines of resources, about program time, and political implementation and to context. improve program effectiveness.

  10. “Decision -making, of course, is a euphemism for the allocation of resources - money, position, authority, etc. Thus, to the extent that information is an instrument, basis, or excuse for changing power relationships within or among institutions, doing research and evaluation is a political activity” -Cohen et.al. 11

  11.  What will be investigated?  Questions phrased?  Information collected?  Analyzed?  Conclusions?  Dissemination? 12

  12.  Decide whether to change or continue a program or activity  Assess the outcomes of the program  Help funding sources know that their money is being used efficiently and effectively 13

  13. What gets measured gets done.

  14.  They don't know how. They lack the necessary knowledge, expertise and techniques.  They can't evaluate. In their working environment, there is no time, no budget, etc., for evaluation.  They don't want to evaluate or are reluctant to. They may have a negative view of evaluation. 15

  15. Evaluation is a double edged sword…most of us would really like to know whether our programs are making a difference… we also fear that they may not. 16

  16. 17

  17. • “We’ll collect all the measures we can and figure out what to do with them later.” • “Let’s just jot down some questions, and send them around for people to answer.” • “It took me six months to evaluate this project, using an elegant factorial design, and they simply do what they want.” • “First they ask me for an evaluation; now they tell me to skip the detail.” • “I don’t care how the program works, just if it produced changes in outcomes.” • “I worked for two years on that evaluation, and no one even read the report”. 18

  18. Three lessons I’ve learned... 20

  19. Lesson 1. Keep it simple

  20. Health Promotion

  21.  What exactly is it that we want to accomplish?  What’s the best way to go about doing it?  How will we know if we have been successful? 23

  22. “Simplicity as a virtue means we seek clarity, not complexity” Michael Patton (2007) Utilization-Focused Evaluation

  23. In communication, brevity is everything. Confucius 25

  24. 26

  25. 27

  26. “Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.” Albert Einstein

  27. 29

  28. Outcome Are we doing the right things? Are we doing things right? 30

  29. Evaluators may need and use sophisticated and complex statistical techniques to enhance analytic power or uncover nuances in data, but simple and straightforward presentations are needed to give decision makers and intended users access to evaluation findings. 31

  30. Lesson number 2: Have a plan

  31. Problem/ Future Situation state of affairs Resources available

  32. Planning Evaluation Plan 34

  33. Frameworks help us make order out of chaos….they help us to make sense of our environments… and focus our actions. Mitic, 2010

  34. Inputs Outputs Outcomes Short Medium Long Situation External Influences, Environmental, Related Programs

  35. Let’s take a look at three examples 37

  36. a Figure 1. CommunityLINK Logic Model Vision: Improved life chances for vulnerable students Mission: Supportive school communities provide effective programs which directly support vulnerable students Goals: Improve the educational performance, including the academic achievement and social functioning of vulnerable students Activities & Outputs Inputs Components Outcomes Short Medium Long Boards, schools & community Defining, understanding & partners identify vulnerable $51M+ in Identifying vulnerable students funding to 60 students • % of students who are Boards of vulnerable Nutrition Education • general demographics Providing healthy Interventions breakfasts, lunches & Provincial snacks # of nutrition programs Improved (formal and informal) -Brown bag nutrition Advisory Academic -School meal programs intake among Committee Interventions # of vulnerable students -chit to cafeteria vulnerable Increased accessing school meal -snack cupboard students school programs Supports and Behavioural attendance Resources Providing academic and Social # and type of academic Improved supports: Improved Interactions support programs concentration Improved Community • Early intervention programs life -within school time & learning academic • Specific academic programs Coordinators chances -out of school time ability of achievement • homework and reading clubs -in partnership with vulnerable & • mentorship programs Partners community • family literacy programs students advancement • community programs # of students accessing Website academic support programs Improved Improved Providing Behavioural and social connectedness Social supports: # and type of behavioural and functioning Principles among • community agency referrals social support programs vulnerable -within school Respect • after school sports, arts, students to -within community recreation , cooking and adults, school friendship clubs/programs # of vulnerable students Partnerships peers & • Mentorship programs accessing behavioural and Context and • access to Child, youth and community social support programs family workers, school based External Cost-Effectiveness support workers, mental # of positive social interactions Factors health workers for vulnerable students (peers, Evidence-based staff, family) a Note: not all schools/school districts are expected to participate in all of the activities and outputs

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend