water quality standards regulation
play

Water Quality Standards Regulation (9 VAC 25-260) Rulemaking: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Water Quality Standards Regulation (9 VAC 25-260) Rulemaking: Bacteria, Ammonia, Cadmium, Human Health Criteria Agenda: Roll Call Status of Selenium Criteria Summary & discussion of Issues, Opinions and Options: Bacteria


  1. Water Quality Standards Regulation (9 VAC 25-260) Rulemaking: Bacteria, Ammonia, Cadmium, Human Health Criteria

  2. Agenda: • Roll Call • Status of Selenium Criteria • Summary & discussion of Issues, Opinions and Options:  Bacteria Criteria  Ammonia Criteria  Cadmium Criteria  Human Health Criteria • Wrap up and future rulemaking actions

  3. Selenium Criteria: • Naturally occurring element in sedimentary rocks, shale, coal, phosphate deposits and soil • Essential micro-nutrient in small amounts; toxic impacts at higher concentrations • June 2016 – EPA issued revised water quality criterion for Selenium in freshwater • Reflects latest scientific knowledge • Aquatic life toxicity based primarily on consuming contaminated food rather than exposure to Se dissolved in water

  4. Recommended Selenium Criteria Short- Chronic Term Criterion Egg-Ovary Whole Body Muscle Water Lentic Water Lotic Water Version (mg/kg dw) (mg/kg dw) (mg/kg dw) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) Acute Equation 5 5 based on Current VA N/A N/A N/A (4-day) (4-day) water Criterion column conc. Intermittent 1.5 3.1 EPA 2016 15.1 8.5 11.3 exposure (30-day) (30-day) equation

  5. Selenium Criteria Recommendation: • With recent release, insufficient time to discuss with RAP • Still awaiting EPA’s implementation guidance; timing unknown  Address EPA’s new recommended Selenium criteria in next Triennial Review

  6. Bacteria Criteria Theoretical Illness Criteria Theoretical Illness EPA Rate (STV) Alternate EPA Rate (STV) Elements Recommendation 1 (36/1000 illness rate) Recommendation 2 (32/1000 illness rate) Statistical Statistical Indicator Geometric Mean Threshold Value Geometric Mean Threshold Value (freshwater) (cfu/100 ml) (cfu/100 ml) (cfu/100 ml) (cfu/100 ml) 10% exceedence 10% exceedence Current VA 126 235 Criterion E. coli EPA 2012 126 410 100 320 E. coli Statistical Statistical Indicator Geometric Mean Threshold Value Geometric Mean Threshold Value (marine water) (cfu/100 ml) (cfu/100 ml) (cfu/100 ml) (cfu/100 ml) 10% exceedence 10% exceedence Current VA 35 104 Criterion Enterococci EPA 2012 35 130 30 110 Enterococci

  7. Bacteria Criteria Issue Opinions Options • Recommend criteria based • Consider both illness on 36/1,000 illness rate; rates; EPA criteria Assumed illness rate consistent with current documentation states policy and existing TMDLs (36 or 32/1,000) both are protective and • Recommend more acceptable conservative lower rate • Include in Regulation • If not in Regulation, BEACH Action Value • EPA recommends not ( notification threshold provide reference to for grant-funded States ) including in Standards VDH authority • EPA recommendations • Define “Coastal Rec. applicable to “ Coastal Waters” and limit Geographic Recreation Waters” amendments to them • All State surface waters • Provide same level of application designated for primary protection to all State contact recreation waters

  8. Ammonia Criteria Issue Opinions Options • VAMWA’s report has representative order-of- • DEQ cost info provided magnitude estimates Capital and operating to DPB • DEQ analysis of # and • VAMWA engineer’s costs for compliance type of affected report dischargers • State can’t lobby for $ • Keep 5 year limit • VAMWA suggested • Limit to permit term • Allow for schedule beyond draft regulatory permit term, in accord amendments Compliance schedule • DEQ Draft “Strawman” with Federal requirements • “As soon as possible” revisions to WQ Stds • “As soon as practicable” Regulation section for ammonia

  9. “Strawman” Amendments for Ammonia Compliance Schedule • Compliance schedule not limited to permit term by Federal regulations; “as soon as possible” • State preference to match Federal requirement • Amend WQ Standards Reg now (eventually revise VDPES Permit Regulation also): • Specific to ammonia criteria implementation • Factors to consider on a case-by-case basis • Interim milestones and reporting requirements

  10. EPA’s Updated Water Quality Criteria for Cadmium Freshwater Acute Chronic Criterion ug/L at hardness 100 ug/L at hardness 100 Virginia (1984) 3.9 1.1 EPA (2001) 2.0 0.25 EPA (2016) 1.8 0.72

  11. Updated Criteria for Cadmium: with and without extra protection for rainbow trout Criterion Acute Chronic ug/L at hardness 100 ug/L at hardness 100 EPA (2016) ; criterion lowered to protect rainbow 1.8 0.72 trout EPA (2016) ; criterion NOT lowered to protect rainbow 2.7 0.72 trout (no change to chronic)

  12. EPA’s Updated Water Quality Criteria for Cadmium (Estuarine) Estuarine Criterion Acute (ug/L) Chronic (ug/L) Virginia 40 8.8 EPA 2016 33 7.9

  13. Cadmium Criteria Issue Opinions Options • If included, only apply more stringent concs. to listed trout waters • Include “R. Trout • Following past policy, Include F.W. criterion Absent” criteria propose only EPA calculated by DEQ for • Don’t include “R. Trout recommended “Trout Absent”? Absent” criteria criterion; provides add’l protection for non- tested species that may be more sensitive

  14. Human Health Criteria Issue Opinions Options • Either don’t apply RSC or use 80% only when data • Further consider the supports it 20% “Relative Source • Propose EPA’s criteria; matter Contribution” is • Accept that RSC is have gone through peer arbitrary established EPA policy review, public comment, and no add’l data will be developed by DEQ • Can’t adopt a range as • Exclude Benzene from a WQ Standard proposal until EPA Benzene criteria • Use drinking water provides specific criteria shown as a range • Propose stringent criteria MCL (5 ug/L) as a guide on basis of MCL

  15. Future rulemaking actions • Staff to consider all RAP input and develop proposed amendments for agency management • Target Dec. 2016 SWCB presentation to request approval to go to Public Comment stage; if approved, followed by: • Executive Review (no time limit) • Notification in Virginia Register • 60-day public comment period • Public Hearing(s) scheduled • Review/respond to comment, draft final proposal for SWCB Fall 2017 meeting

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend