Water Quality Monitoring Program Collect water quality information - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

water quality monitoring program
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Water Quality Monitoring Program Collect water quality information - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Water Quality Monitoring Program Collect water quality information from tributaries to the Huron River to evaluate sources of problems and measure the degree of management success David Kraepel, Ron Fadoir, & Karen Kraepel at Silver Creek


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Water Quality Monitoring Program

Collect water quality information from tributaries to the Huron River to evaluate sources of problems and measure the degree of management success

Supported by:

  • Middle Huron Partners and Stormwater Advisory Group
  • Alliance of Downriver Watersheds – Lower Huron, Ecorse Creek, Combined Downriver
  • Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

David Kraepel, Ron Fadoir, & Karen Kraepel at Silver Creek

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • What was measured
  • Where
  • Important results
  • How are the results being used
  • What’s next

David Kraepel & Ron Fadoir at Silver Creek

slide-3
SLIDE 3

What was measured in 2016?

  • 29 volunteers; 319 hours – THANKS!
  • 155 sample sets collected
  • Nutrients (Phosphorus)
  • Sediments (Total Suspended Solids)
  • Bacteria (E. coli)
  • Other (Dissolved Oxygen, pH, Temperature,

Conductivity)

  • 40 flow measures
  • 48 investigative samples
  • 1 storm sample
slide-4
SLIDE 4

2016 ADW Monitoring

  • Wayne County
  • 12 sites
  • 8 creeks, 1 river site
  • 4 investigative sites
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Phosphorus (TP) in Wayne County

(by Year)

Target Trend

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Phosphorus (TP) in Wayne County

(by Site)

2012-2016

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2016 Investigative Differences – TP

  • S. Branch Ecorse Creek
  • 7%

Frank & Poet +16%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Silver Creek

  • 8%

2016 Investigative Differences – TP

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Huron River in Rockwood – TP

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • E. coli in Wayne County

(by Year)

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • E. coli in Wayne County

(by Site)

2012-2016

1 10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 Frank & Poet Blakely Brownstown

  • S. Ecorse
  • N. Ecorse

Woods Silver Smith

  • E. coli (#/100 ml)
slide-12
SLIDE 12

2016 Investigative Differences – E. coli

  • S. Branch Ecorse Creek
  • 6%

Frank & Poet +46%

slide-13
SLIDE 13

2016 Investigative Differences – E. coli

Silver Creek +52%

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Huron River in Rockwood – E. coli

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Conductivity in Wayne County

(by Year)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Conductivity in Wayne County

(by Site)

2012-2016

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Other Parameters

  • TSS: High (>80 mg/l) erosion events in Blakely, N. Ecorse, and

Brownstown Creeks in 2016

  • DO: Low (< 5 mg/l) events in Blakely (twice), N. Ecorse (5x), S.

Ecorse (3x), Brownstown (5x), and Silver (5x) Creeks.

  • Temperature: All sites within normal range for warm water

streams (< 29°C / 84°F)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Summary of Results

  • Nutrient runoff high (for P) and not improving. Some erosion

issues.

  • Bacteria high and not improving, except at Woods Creek
  • Runoff from Southland Center and Silver Creek (upstream) in

need of further investigation for source ID

  • Conductivity also high, except for Woods Creek
  • Low DO at 5 creek sites suggests the need for greater

stormwater treatment and restoration. Consistent with insect results?

slide-19
SLIDE 19

How does our sampling get used?

Raw sampling data analyzed and reported out

  • Share results and analysis with municipalities
  • Follow up on key findings, actions prioritized
  • Implementation of ideas to address problems

Kimberly Lapworth, Selvan Thamilselvan & Viji Thamilselvan