Vulnerable Populations: The Role of Public Health, Primary Care - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

vulnerable populations the role of public
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Vulnerable Populations: The Role of Public Health, Primary Care - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PHSSR Research-In-Progress Series: Bridging Health and Health Care Thursday, June 18, 2015 1-2 pm ET/ 12noon-1pmCT Injury-Related Infant Mortality among Vulnerable Populations: The Role of Public Health, Primary Care & Policy To download


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Bridging Health and Health Care Thursday, June 18, 2015 1-2 pm ET/ 12noon-1pmCT

Injury-Related Infant Mortality among Vulnerable Populations: The Role of Public Health, Primary Care & Policy

To download today’s presentation & speaker bios, see the ‘Resources’ box in the top right corner of the screen.

PHSSR NATIONAL COORDINATING CENTER AT THE UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF PUBLIC HEALTH

PHSSR Research-In-Progress Series:

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

Welcome: Angie Carman, DrPH, Assistant Professor, Health Management & Policy,

University of Kentucky College of Public Health

“Injury-Related Infant Mortality among Vulnerable Populations: The Role of Public Health, Primary Care & Policy” Presenter: Sharla Smith, MPH, PhD, Dep’t. of Preventive Medicine and Public

Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita

Commentary: Mary E. Aitken, MD, MPH, Dep’t. of Pediatrics, UAMS College of

Medicine and Director, Injury Prevention Center, Arkansas Children’s Hospital Xi Zhu, MS, PhD, Dep’t. of Health Management and Policy University of Iowa College of Public Health Zenobia Harris, BSN, MPH, DNP, Central Region Director, Arkansas Dep’t. of Health

Questions and Discussion

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Presenter

Sharla Smith, MPH, PhD Assistant Professor Preventive Medicine and Public Health Department University of Kansas School of MedicineWichita

Post-doctoral Scholar in Public Health Delivery, 2014 PHSSR Award

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Sharla Smith, PhD, MPH Preventive Medicine and Public Health University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita

PRIMARY CARE POLICY PUBLIC HEALTH INJURY

PREVENTION

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Outline

 Significance  Public health delivery systems  The role of primary care and policy  Frameworks  Social network analysis  Methods  Preliminary findings  Conclusions  Next steps

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Significance

 Unintentional injury- 5th leading cause of infant mortality  In 2010, the US unintentional injuries mortality rate for

infants was 3.1 per 1,000 live births

 The most common cause of injury-related infant mortality

include:

 suffocation  motor vehicle crashes  drowning  fire/burns  poisoning

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Public Health –Primary Care Delivery Systems

  • local health department
  • physician practices
  • hospitals
  • community health

centers

› The public health system: government and some of its potential partners SOURCE: The Future of the Public’s Health (IOM, 2002)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

 The integration of public health and primary care

increases public health awareness.

 Injury prevention efforts work best when supported by

well-informed policy solutions.

 Policy makers benefit from public health research and the

support of primary care providers.

The role of primary care and policy

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Fundamental empirical questions

  • Which programs, intervention, and policies (mechanisms)
  • Work best (outcomes)
  • In which community settings (contexts)
  • And Why (causal pathways, interactions)?
  • Pawson and Tilley, 1997
slide-10
SLIDE 10

 Social network analysis:

 nodes (represent organizations)  ties (represent relationships between organizations)

 Two key measures of SNA:

 Density  Centralization

Social Network Analysis

slide-11
SLIDE 11

 The integration of primary care and public health may:

 enhance the capacity of both sectors to carry out their

respective missions

 create links with other stakeholders, policy makers and

  • rganizations

Approach

Rowan, 2007

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Injury Related Infant Mortality in the United States and Arkansas

slide-13
SLIDE 13

2013 Sudden Unexpected Infant Death

CDC/NCHS, National Vital Statistics System, Compressed Mortality File

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), 45% Unknown Causes, 31% Accidental Suffocation and Strangulation, 24%

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Sudden Unexpected Infant Death, 2008-2012

CDC/NCHS, National Vital Statistics System, Period Linked Birth/Infant

50 100 150 200 250 AI/AN NHB NHW Hispanic A/PI

Mortality Rate per 100,000 Live Births

Race/Ethnicity

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Racial Disparities in Infant Mortality in Arkansas

12.9 5.9 6.9 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 NH Black Latino NH White Infant Mortality

*Rates are per 1,000 live births Source: Arkansas Department of Health

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Leading Causes of Infant Mortality in Arkansas

12.8% 3% 5% 4% 15% 5% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% SIDS A/UI NH Black Hispanic NH White

SIDS=Sudden Infant Death Syndrome A/UI=Accidents/Unintentional

2001-2010

slide-17
SLIDE 17

 To provide a more in-depth understanding of public health,

primary care, and policy partnerships.

 To provide an understanding of how such partnerships are

associated with injury-related infant mortality among vulnerable populations.

Goals

slide-18
SLIDE 18

 National Longitudinal Study of Public Health Agencies

(NLSPHA) survey data (2006 and 2012) coupled with NACCHO national public health agency profile (2008 and 2013), and Area Resource File (2006 and 2013).

 Interview data from the 2014 Arkansas Injury Prevention

Partnerships study.

Data

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Findings from the NLSPHA

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Public Health-Primary Care Delivery Systems

Type of Organization 2006(232) Difference (2006-2012) 2012(239) Mean Mean Community Health Clinics 0.29

  • 2

0.27 Hospital 0.41

  • 2

0.39 Physician Agency 0.24

  • 5

0.19

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Public Health and Primary Care

0.22 0.16 0.16 0.13

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25

2006 2012

Density Centralization

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Public Health and Primary Care Activities Performed

64% 64% 74% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Assurance Assessment Policy Activities

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Preventive Services for Injuries

42% 4% 22% 2% 72% 8% 31% 7%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Injury Prevention Provided Injury Prevention Contracted Violence Provided Violence Contracted Tobacco Provided Tobacco Contracted Prenatal Care Provided Prenatal Care Contracted

2008 2010 2013

slide-24
SLIDE 24

2014 Injury Prevention Partnership Study Policy Perspective

slide-25
SLIDE 25

 The study population includes 12 organizations.  Participating organizations indicated whether or not they work

with organizations such as:

 community health clinics  policy organizations  public health agencies

 Partnership is defined in this study as an informal long or

short-term relationship between two organizations.

The Role of Policy: Findings from Arkansas

slide-26
SLIDE 26

 A cross sectional survey was administered to identify policy

makers’ awareness of injury-related infant deaths and their collaborative efforts with public health and primary care agencies to address injury related infant mortality.

 Interview data were coded to identify themes and assess

patterns of variation between clusters.

 Network analysis is conducted to discover the relationships

between a set of policy, public health, and primary care.

Methods

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Findings from the Interview

slide-28
SLIDE 28

46% 23% 16% 15% African- Americans Non-White Hispanic Asian Other

Characterizing the Populations Represented

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Advocacy and Policy Network

blue line= reciprocal relationship

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Frequency of Interactions

Frequency of Interaction Pink= < once a year Green= one a year Black=every few months Blue= every few weeks

slide-31
SLIDE 31

 Activities for injury related infant mortality are:

 reporting and monitoring data  lobbying for legislation  providing resources to community health clinics

 Advocate for increasing access to health coverage and care and health

behavior work for pregnant women.

 The most effective services are those provided to immigrant families.  The populations at greater risk for are African Americans and single

parent households.

 The most effective preventive strategies are increased education and

awareness.

Policy Organizations: Additional Findings

slide-32
SLIDE 32

 LHDs provide a limit number of injury prevention

services highlighting the importance of collaborative efforts.

 Policy organizations are very instrumental in supporting

legislation to improve maternal and infant health.

 Policy organizations distribute and share resources with

many organizations to strengthen efforts to improve population health.

Conclusions

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Limitations

 Many participating organizations have experienced a

change in leadership

 New Initiatives are underway  All interviews have not been completed  Additional data analysis are required

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Policy and Practice Implications

Policy Implications

 More effort may also be needed to maximize the collaborative

potential for the partnerships

 Establish mechanism to overcome challenges faced in sustaining

effective partnerships.

Practice Implications

 It is critical to establish a shared understanding of the nature,

scope, and context of injury related infant mortality within each community.

 It is vital to develop partnerships with primary care agencies and

policy organizations to address injury related infant mortality.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

 Complete Interviews (in progress) and Include data from

all interviews

 Expand on quantitative visualization of public health,

primary care, and policy networks.

 Examine the association of public health, primary care,

and policy and injury-related infant mortality.

Next Steps

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Commentary Questions and Discussion

Mary E. Aitken, MD, MPH Professor, Pediatrics, UAMS College of Medicine Director, Injury Prevention Center at the Arkansas Children’s Hospital Xi Zhu, MS, PhD Assistant Professor, Health Management & Policy University of Iowa College of Public Health Zenobia Harris, BSN, MPH, DNP Central Region Director, Arkansas Department of Health Arkansas State Coordinator, Birthing Project USA

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Future Webinars & Archives available at:

http://www.publichealthsystems.org/phssr-research-progress-webinars

Upcoming Webinars – July 2015

Wednesday, July 1 (12-1pm ET)

THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT AND CHILDHOOD IMMUNIZATION DELIVERY IN RURAL COMMUNITIES

Van Do-Reynoso, MPH, PhD Candidate, U. California-Merced

(PPS-PHD Award)

Wednesday, July 8 (12-1pm ET)

NATIONAL EVALUATION OF LEADERSHIP STYLES AND OUTCOMES IN LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS

Laura Cassidy, MS, PhD, Medical College of Wisconsin

(RWJF PHS3 award)

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Upcoming Webinars – August 2015

Wednesday, August 5 (12-1pm ET)

APPLYING FAILURE MODES & EFFECTS ANALYSIS TO PUBLIC HEALTH: BREATHE EASY AT HOME PROGRAMS

Megan Sandel, MD, MPH, FAAP, Boston Medical Center Margaret Reid, RN, MPA, Director, Healthy Homes and Community Supports, Boston Public Health Commission

(RWJF PHS3 award)

Wednesday, August 12 (12-1pm ET)

BUILDING ACCESS & UNDERSTANDING OF LAW IN PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE IN NEBRASKA

Jennifer K. Ibrahim, PhD, MPH, Associate Dean for Academic Affairs College of Public Health, Temple University

(RWJF PHS3 award)

Thursday, August 20 (1-2pm ET) PUBLIC HEALTH AND PRIMARY CARE INTEGRATION THROUGH ENHANCED PUBLIC HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (PHIT) MATURITY: A CASE FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH Ritu Agarwal, PhD, and Kenyon Crowley, MBA, MSIS, Ctr. for Health Information & Decision Systems, School of Business, U. of Maryland

(RWJF PHS3 award)

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Thank you for participating in today’s webinar!

For more information: Ann Kelly, Project Manager Ann.Kelly@uky.edu 111 Washington Avenue #212 Lexington, KY 40536 859.218.2317 www.publichealthsystems.org