Viruses X-ray, EM structure function structure function - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Viruses X-ray, EM structure function structure function - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Viruses X-ray, EM structure function structure function properties thermal stability mechanics electrostatics vibrations Etc PHYSICAL VIROLOGY Single molecule techniques provide complementary information to structural
Viruses
structure function X-ray, EM
structure function properties
- thermal stability
- mechanics
- electrostatics
- vibrations
- Etc
PHYSICAL VIROLOGY
Single molecule techniques provide complementary information to structural biology
Physiol siologi
- gical
al condi diti tions
- ns
Functional protein shells Mechan anics Ma Manip ipula lati tion
- n
Re Real al time e ex experi erimen ments ts
Binnig, Quate, Gerber, PRL 1986
Atomic Force Microscopy
Atomic Force microscopy in liquids
Cantilever/virus size
Atomic Force Microscopy scanning probe
De Pablo
- et al, APL 1998
Ortega-Est Esteb eban n et al. Ultram amicr crosc
- scopy
py 2012 2012
AFM imaging of viruses
High resolution AFM of adenovirus
hexons
Single indentation assay
1 2 3
Single indentation assay
before after 2 1 3 spring constant
kv
breaking force
Self-recovery of vault particles
1 2 3
Llauró et al Biophysical Journal 2014
Capsid id 240 hexons, 12 pentons, proteins IIIa, VI, VIII, IX Fiber flexible, specific host recognition Core re 35kbp dsDNA, proteins TP, VII, μ
Human adenovirus
Greber et al. Cell 1993
Penton loss and disassembly 50% DNA + 50% histone-like proteins
Immature non infectious Mature infectious cleaved protein
Maturation changes the core
protease protein protease
Pérez-Berná et al. JMB 2009
DNA
- Does DNA modulate the mechanical properties of adenovirus particles?
- Interplay between physical properties and virus function?
disassembly DNA diffusion
Adsorption geometries
Mechanical evolution
Interpretation
kvirus=kshell+kDNA kDNA (mature) > kDNA(immature)
Crack-open the shell
Crack-opening the shell
mature inmature
Mechanics of cores
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 immature Young's Modulus (MPa) mature 20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40 50 60 mature immature Deflection (nm) Indentation (nm)
mature
E <
immature
E
Dimitriadis Biophys J. 2002
mature
k >
immature
k
Pressurization?
DNA condensate
Adding counterions to DNA induce toroidal condensates (3+) Gronbech-Jensen et al. PRL 1997
Core mechanics
mature
E <
mature spermidine
E
immature
E <
Pressure estimation
k1 = π 2 k0 τ2 − 1
1 2
arctanh 1 − τ−2
1 2
.
Vella et al. The Indentation of Pressurized Elastic Shells: From Polymeric Capsules to Yeast
- Cells. 2011, Journal of The Royal Society
Interface. p=3±1 MPa
Irrespective of the physical origin Unbranched polymer
DNA-DNA repulsion pressurizes the shell after maturation
We propose that pressure helps to pop-off pentons at the early endosoome
Biological implications
- W. Klug et al, PRL 10/2012; 109(16):168104.
Ortega-Esteban Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 14434 Pentons are the weakest capsomers Ortega-Esteban et al ACS Nano 2015
Biological implications diffusion of DNA?
Fatigue
Multiple indentation assay below the breaking force (fatigue)
Force 100 pN
Ortega-Esteban et al. Ultramicroscopy 2012
30 times less than breaking force!
Uncoating dynamics
Mat ature Immat ature
Immat ature
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 15 30 45 60 75 90
# image height (nm) time (m)
10 20 30 40 50 60
70 70 nm nm
Mat ature
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
average height (nm) time (m)
10 20 30 40 50 60
# image
Core exposure
Can an we we vi visual alize genome uncoat ating?
0.0 nm nm 86.6 nm nm
m
Mat ature Immat ature
Core exposure
Can we we vi visual alize th the genome uncoat ating?
Fluorescence
350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity (a.u.) Wavelength (nm)
YOYO-1 absorption YOYO-1 emission
YOYO-1
AFM – fluorescence combination
AFM – fluorescence combination
AFM induced unpacking of adenovirus
AFM induced unpacking of adenovirus
simultaneous single particle fluorescence with AFM
- bserve DNA release with YOYO-1
AFM forced unpacking of Adenovirus
1 2 3 4 3 6 9 12 15
Force (nN) time (s)
200 400 600
photons above background
20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40 50 60
Emission (counts) time (s) average count wt average count ts1
Quantifying DNA release
immature mature
45
Quantifying DNA release
Ortega ga-Es Esteba teban, , de Pablo, , Schaa aap et al. ACS Nano 2015
Controlled capsid disassembly
- Immature emits less photons
- Mature core spreads more the genome
47
Quantifying DNA release
Ortega ga-Es Esteba teban, , de Pablo, , Schaa aap et al. ACS Nano 2015
Immat ature Ma Matu ture
Topics today
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Mechanics of human adenovirus: capsid and core
- 3. Genome release: watching a virus undress
- 4. Mechanical role of cementing proteins: tuning particles stability with symmetrical
morphogenesis
- 5. Summing up
49
Cementing/decorative proteins
An alternative strategy to strengthen virus capsids during maturation
- 60 nm in diamter
- 420 gpE + 415 gpD.
72 capsomers
- DNA ~ 48.5 kbp ~ 14.5 µm .
C.G Lander
Lambda phage
Single indentation assay
undecorated decorated
30nm 32nm
Nature Communications 5, 4520 (2014)
5,0x10
4
1,0x10
5
1,5x10
5
2,0x10
5
2,5x10
5
# load cycles
undecorated decorated
52
Mechanical fatigue
Nature Communications 5, 4520 (2014)
Can we use cementing proteins to recover weaken protein shells?
Decorated particles are mechanically more robust that undecorated
53
54
Tuning viral capsid nanoparticle stability with simmetrycal morphogenesis
P22 phage (EX)panded P22 phage “Wiffle Ball” WB
Lian Tang et al Structure 2006 Parent et. Al Structure 2010, Biomaterials 2012
20 m 65 0C
P22 binds phage L Dec proteins at quasi-three fold locations
EX-Dec WB-Dec
55
P22 particles
WB 20 m 65 0C EX-Dec WB-Dec EX
56
Collapse of p22 particles after adsorption
- n the surface
20 nm
57
Collapse of p22 particles after adsorption
- n the surface
20 nm
58
Collapse of p22 particles after adsorption
- n the surface
EX EX+ Dec WB WB+ Dec 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57
h (nm)
0,80 0,82 0,84 0,86 0,88 0,90 0,92
h/d
20 nm
59
Which structure is more stable?
Llauró et al. ACS Nano 2016
60
Which structure is more stable?
Llauró et al. ACS Nano 2016
0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 0,12 0,14 0,16 0,18 0,20 0,22 0,24
EX+Dec
EX WB+Dec WB
K (N/m) Breaking Force (nN)
WB EX+Dec WB-Dec EX
62
How much work is used to crack the particles?
Llauró et al. ACS Nano 2016
Cementing proteins improve capsid performance
Summary
Core mechanics indicates adenovirus pressurization that helps for disassembly and genome delivery Genome condensation influences on diffusion
Immatur ure Matur ure
Cementing proteins recovers weak particles
Natalia González Francisco J. Moreno-Madrid Manuel Jiménez