Version 5 Statistical Analysis
Thomas Hearty
L2 Stats – p.1/31
Version 5 Statistical Analysis Thomas Hearty L2 Stats p.1/31 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Version 5 Statistical Analysis Thomas Hearty L2 Stats p.1/31 Outline National Aeronautics and Space
Thomas Hearty
L2 Stats – p.1/31
L2 Stats – p.2/31
−90 90 180 −90 −30 30 90
Polar Ice Cold Season Land Warm Season Land Non−Frozen Ocean
2002.09.06
Cryptic abbreviations NFO = Non-Frozen Ocean WSL = Warm Season Land
L2 Stats – p.3/31
v4.0.9NoHSB, TEMPSLAB_GLOBAL: Qual_* = 0 or 1: 324000
20 40 60 80 100 1000 100
Pressure [mbar] Percent
FD20020906 FD20020929 FD20021023 FD20021116 FD20021210 FD20030103 FD20030127 FD20030220 FD20030316 FD20030409 FD20030503 FD20030527 FD20030620 FD20030714 FD20030807 FD20030831 FD20030924 FD20031018 FD20031205 FD20040122 FD20040215 FD20040310 FD20040403 FD20040614 FD20040801 FD20040825 FD20040918 FD20041012 FD20041105 FD20041223 FD20050116 FD20050209 FD20050329 FD20050422 FD20050516 FD20050609 FD20050727 FD20050913 FD20051007 FD20051031 FD20051218
v5.0.11NoHSBbl, TEMPSLAB_GLOBAL: Qual_* = 0 or 1: 324000
20 40 60 80 100 1000 100
Pressure [mbar] Percent
FD20020906 FD20020929 FD20021116 FD20030103 FD20030220 FD20030409 FD20030527 FD20030714 FD20030831 FD20031018 FD20031205 FD20040122 FD20040310 FD20040614 FD20040801 FD20040918 FD20041105 FD20041223 FD20050209 FD20050329 FD20050516 FD20051007
The yield for temperature retrievals increased in most of the atmosphere. The yield for Surface Temperature retrievals increased (over land and ice). There may be a slight decreasing trend in the yield (over land).
L2 Stats – p.4/31
Yield v4.0.9stdNoHSBTEMP_GLOBAL
Jan-2003 Jan-2004 Jan-2005 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42
Percent
Yield v5.0.11stdNoHSBblTEMP_GLOBAL
Jan-2003 Jan-2004 Jan-2005 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
Percent
There is a decreasing trend in the temperature yield (mostly over land). But it is smaller than the seasonal variation from Version 4.
L2 Stats – p.5/31
v4.0.9NoHSB, TEMPSLAB_NFO: Qual_* = 0 or 1: 173886
20 40 60 80 100 1000 100
Pressure [mbar] Percent
FD20020906 FD20020929 FD20021023 FD20021116 FD20021210 FD20030103 FD20030127 FD20030220 FD20030316 FD20030409 FD20030503 FD20030527 FD20030620 FD20030714 FD20030807 FD20030831 FD20030924 FD20031018 FD20031205 FD20040122 FD20040215 FD20040310 FD20040403 FD20040614 FD20040801 FD20040825 FD20040918 FD20041012 FD20041105 FD20041223 FD20050116 FD20050209 FD20050329 FD20050422 FD20050516 FD20050609 FD20050727 FD20050913 FD20051007 FD20051031 FD20051218
v5.0.11NoHSBbl, TEMPSLAB_NFO: Qual_* = 0 or 1: 173884
20 40 60 80 100 1000 100
Pressure [mbar] Percent
FD20020906 FD20020929 FD20021116 FD20030103 FD20030220 FD20030409 FD20030527 FD20030714 FD20030831 FD20031018 FD20031205 FD20040122 FD20040310 FD20040614 FD20040801 FD20040918 FD20041105 FD20041223 FD20050209 FD20050329 FD20050516 FD20051007
The yield increased in the troposphere.
L2 Stats – p.6/31
v4.0.9NoHSB, TEMPSLAB_WSL: Qual_* = 0 or 1: 59436
20 40 60 80 100 1000 100
Pressure [mbar] Percent
FD20020906 FD20020929 FD20021023 FD20021116 FD20021210 FD20030103 FD20030127 FD20030220 FD20030316 FD20030409 FD20030503 FD20030527 FD20030620 FD20030714 FD20030807 FD20030831 FD20030924 FD20031018 FD20031205 FD20040122 FD20040215 FD20040310 FD20040403 FD20040614 FD20040801 FD20040825 FD20040918 FD20041012 FD20041105 FD20041223 FD20050116 FD20050209 FD20050329 FD20050422 FD20050516 FD20050609 FD20050727 FD20050913 FD20051007 FD20051031 FD20051218
v5.0.11NoHSBbl, TEMPSLAB_WSL: Qual_* = 0 or 1: 59435
20 40 60 80 100 1000 100
Pressure [mbar] Percent
FD20020906 FD20020929 FD20021116 FD20030103 FD20030220 FD20030409 FD20030527 FD20030714 FD20030831 FD20031018 FD20031205 FD20040122 FD20040310 FD20040614 FD20040801 FD20040918 FD20041105 FD20041223 FD20050209 FD20050329 FD20050516 FD20051007
There were larger increases in the yield over land. There is a decreasing trend in the yield (but it is smaller than the seasonal variation in yield from Version 4).
L2 Stats – p.7/31
v4.0.9NoHSB, TEMPSLAB_POLAR_ICE: Qual_* = 0 or 1: 60291
20 40 60 80 100 1000 100
Pressure [mbar] Percent
FD20020906 FD20020929 FD20021023 FD20021116 FD20021210 FD20030103 FD20030127 FD20030220 FD20030316 FD20030409 FD20030503 FD20030527 FD20030620 FD20030714 FD20030807 FD20030831 FD20030924 FD20031018 FD20031205 FD20040122 FD20040215 FD20040310 FD20040403 FD20040614 FD20040801 FD20040825 FD20040918 FD20041012 FD20041105 FD20041223 FD20050116 FD20050209 FD20050329 FD20050422 FD20050516 FD20050609 FD20050727 FD20050913 FD20051007 FD20051031 FD20051218
v5.0.11NoHSBbl, TEMPSLAB_POLAR_ICE: Qual_* = 0 or 1: 60291
20 40 60 80 100 1000 100
Pressure [mbar] Percent
FD20020906 FD20020929 FD20021116 FD20030103 FD20030220 FD20030409 FD20030527 FD20030714 FD20030831 FD20031018 FD20031205 FD20040122 FD20040310 FD20040614 FD20040801 FD20040918 FD20041105 FD20041223 FD20050209 FD20050329 FD20050516 FD20051007
The largest increase in yield was in polar regions.
L2 Stats – p.8/31
v4.0.9NoHSB, TEMPSLAB_NFO: Qual_* = 0 or 1
1 2 1000 100
Pressure [mbar] AIRS - ECMWF [K]
FD20020906 FD20020929 FD20021023 FD20021116 FD20021210 FD20030103 FD20030127 FD20030220 FD20030316 FD20030409 FD20030503 FD20030527 FD20030620 FD20030714 FD20030807 FD20030831 FD20030924 FD20031018 FD20031205 FD20040122 FD20040215 FD20040310 FD20040403 FD20040614 FD20040801 FD20040825 FD20040918 FD20041012 FD20041105 FD20041223 FD20050116 FD20050209 FD20050329 FD20050422 FD20050516 FD20050609 FD20050727 FD20050913 FD20051007 FD20051031 FD20051218
v5.0.11NoHSBbl, TEMPSLAB_NFO: Qual_* = 0 or 1
1 2 1000 100
Pressure [mbar] AIRS - ECMWF [K]
FD20020906 FD20020929 FD20021116 FD20030103 FD20030220 FD20030409 FD20030527 FD20030714 FD20030831 FD20031018 FD20031205 FD20040122 FD20040310 FD20040614 FD20040801 FD20040918 FD20041105 FD20041223 FD20050209 FD20050329 FD20050516 FD20051007
The increasing trend in the temperature bias is still in Version 5. There is a decreasing trend ∼ 500 mbar.
L2 Stats – p.9/31
v4.0.9.0, TEMPSLAB_NFO: P0968.54
Jan-2003 Jan-2004 Jan-2005 370 375 380 385
GLB CO2 ppmv
0.0 0.1
TAirSup - ECMWF
slope = 0.1281± 0.0142 CC = 0.70
v5.0.11.0, TEMPSLAB_NFO: P0968.54
Jan-2003 Jan-2004 Jan-2005 370 375 380 385
GLB CO2 ppmv
0.0 0.1
TAirSup - ECMWF
slope = 0.1286± 0.0261 CC = 0.85
Time Varying CO2 did not remove this trend identified by Divakarla et al. Similar trends are seen in the Microwave Only and AIRS Only Retrievals.
L2 Stats – p.10/31
v4.0.9.0, TEMPSLAB_NFO: P0544.19
Jan-2003 Jan-2004 Jan-2005 370 375 380 385
GLB CO2 ppmv
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
TAirSup - ECMWF
slope = -0.0756± 0.0136 CC = -0.39
v5.0.11.0, TEMPSLAB_NFO: P0544.19
Jan-2003 Jan-2004 Jan-2005 370 375 380 385
GLB CO2 ppmv
0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40
TAirSup - ECMWF
slope = -0.0518± 0.0150 CC = -0.27
The opposite slopes are almost identical at ∼ 500 mbar.
L2 Stats – p.11/31
v4.0.9NoHSB, TEMPSLAB_WSL: Qual_* = 0 or 1
1 2 1000 100
Pressure [mbar] AIRS - ECMWF [K]
FD20020906 FD20020929 FD20021023 FD20021116 FD20021210 FD20030103 FD20030127 FD20030220 FD20030316 FD20030409 FD20030503 FD20030527 FD20030620 FD20030714 FD20030807 FD20030831 FD20030924 FD20031018 FD20031205 FD20040122 FD20040215 FD20040310 FD20040403 FD20040614 FD20040801 FD20040825 FD20040918 FD20041012 FD20041105 FD20041223 FD20050116 FD20050209 FD20050329 FD20050422 FD20050516 FD20050609 FD20050727 FD20050913 FD20051007 FD20051031 FD20051218
v5.0.11NoHSBbl, TEMPSLAB_WSL: Qual_* = 0 or 1
1 2 1000 100
Pressure [mbar] AIRS - ECMWF [K]
FD20020906 FD20020929 FD20021116 FD20030103 FD20030220 FD20030409 FD20030527 FD20030714 FD20030831 FD20031018 FD20031205 FD20040122 FD20040310 FD20040614 FD20040801 FD20040918 FD20041105 FD20041223 FD20050209 FD20050329 FD20050516 FD20051007
significantly less bias in the troposphere. There is still a decreasing trend in the temperature bias over land. Version 5 Land Surface Temperature is warmer than Version 4.
L2 Stats – p.12/31
v4.0.9.0, TEMPSLAB_WSL: P0968.54
Jan-2003 Jan-2004 Jan-2005 370 375 380 385
GLB CO2 ppmv
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
TAirSup - ECMWF
slope = -0.0666± 0.0336 CC = 0.08
v5.0.11.0, TEMPSLAB_WSL: P0968.54
Jan-2003 Jan-2004 Jan-2005 370 375 380 385
GLB CO2 ppmv
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6
TAirSup - ECMWF
slope = -0.1076± 0.0521 CC = 0.08
The trend temperature bias trend over land has a negative slope?!
L2 Stats – p.13/31
v4.0.9.0, TEMPSLAB_WSL: P0544.19
Jan-2003 Jan-2004 Jan-2005 370 375 380 385
GLB CO2 ppmv
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3
TAirSup - ECMWF
slope = -0.1268± 0.0160 CC = -0.66
v5.0.11.0, TEMPSLAB_WSL: P0544.19
Jan-2003 Jan-2004 Jan-2005 370 375 380 385
GLB CO2 ppmv
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3
TAirSup - ECMWF
slope = -0.1098± 0.0259 CC = -0.50
Same slope as seen over water.
L2 Stats – p.14/31
v4.0.9NoHSB, TEMPSLAB_POLAR_ICE: Qual_* = 0 or 1
1 2 1000 100
Pressure [mbar] AIRS - ECMWF [K]
FD20020906 FD20020929 FD20021023 FD20021116 FD20021210 FD20030103 FD20030127 FD20030220 FD20030316 FD20030409 FD20030503 FD20030527 FD20030620 FD20030714 FD20030807 FD20030831 FD20030924 FD20031018 FD20031205 FD20040122 FD20040215 FD20040310 FD20040403 FD20040614 FD20040801 FD20040825 FD20040918 FD20041012 FD20041105 FD20041223 FD20050116 FD20050209 FD20050329 FD20050422 FD20050516 FD20050609 FD20050727 FD20050913 FD20051007 FD20051031 FD20051218
v5.0.11NoHSBbl, TEMPSLAB_POLAR_ICE: Qual_* = 0 or 1
1 2 1000 100
Pressure [mbar] AIRS - ECMWF [K]
FD20020906 FD20020929 FD20021116 FD20030103 FD20030220 FD20030409 FD20030527 FD20030714 FD20030831 FD20031018 FD20031205 FD20040122 FD20040310 FD20040614 FD20040801 FD20040918 FD20041105 FD20041223 FD20050209 FD20050329 FD20050516 FD20051007
Version 5 has a larger bias and RMS over the pole (but the yield is ∼ 90%)
L2 Stats – p.15/31
Chi2 v4.0.9stdNoHSB, TEMP_NFO: Qual_* = 0 or 1: 173886
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 1000 100
Pressure [mbar] Chi2
FD20020906 FD20020929 FD20021023 FD20021116 FD20021210 FD20030103 FD20030127 FD20030220 FD20030316 FD20030409 FD20030503 FD20030527 FD20030620 FD20030714 FD20030807 FD20030831 FD20030924 FD20031018 FD20031205 FD20040122 FD20040215 FD20040310 FD20040403 FD20040427 FD20040614 FD20040801 FD20040825 FD20040918 FD20041012 FD20041105 FD20041129 FD20041223 FD20050116 FD20050209 FD20050305 FD20050329 FD20050422 FD20050516 FD20050609 FD20050727 FD20050913 FD20051007 FD20051031 FD20051218
Chi2 v5.0.11stdNoHSBbl, TEMP_NFO: Qual_* = 0 or 1: 173884
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 1000 100
Pressure [mbar] Chi2
FD20020906 FD20020929 FD20021116 FD20030103 FD20030220 FD20030409 FD20030527 FD20030831 FD20031018 FD20031205 FD20040310 FD20040427 FD20040614 FD20040801 FD20040918 FD20041105 FD20041223 FD20050209 FD20050329 FD20050516 FD20051007
The Version 4 error estimates are significantly better than those in version 4. The errors are evaluated by calculating the reduced χ2 where, χ2 = Σ( TAIRS−TECMW F
Terr
)2.
L2 Stats – p.16/31
v4.0.9stdNoHSBTEMP_NFO Surface Temperature
5 10
AIRS - ECMWF
1000 2000 3000
Number
FD20020906: -0.72± 1.38 FD20020929: -0.67± 1.27 FD20021023: -0.71± 1.30 FD20021116: -0.98± 1.73 FD20021210: -1.01± 2.09 FD20030103: -0.95± 2.17 FD20030127: -0.71± 1.84 FD20030220: -0.60± 1.54 FD20030316: -0.54± 1.21 FD20030409: -0.63± 1.19 FD20030503: -0.65± 1.29 FD20030527: -1.00± 1.89 FD20030620: -1.15± 1.83 FD20030714: -1.01± 1.77 FD20030807: -0.93± 1.83 FD20030831: -0.72± 1.45 FD20030924: -0.66± 1.33 FD20031018: -0.55± 1.22 FD20031205: -0.89± 1.88 FD20040122: -0.74± 1.85 FD20040215: -0.51± 1.35 FD20040310: -0.58± 1.18 FD20040403: -0.74± 1.16 FD20040427: -0.70± 1.17 FD20040614: -1.27± 2.08 FD20040801: -1.10± 1.91 FD20040825: -0.82± 1.52 FD20040918: -0.75± 1.31 FD20041012: -0.61± 1.31 FD20041105: -0.66± 1.32 FD20041129: -0.85± 1.90 FD20041223: -0.80± 1.96 FD20050116: -0.70± 1.65 FD20050209: -0.72± 1.77 FD20050305: -0.49± 1.19 FD20050329: -0.71± 1.15 FD20050422: -0.63± 1.17 FD20050516: -0.69± 1.46 FD20050609: -1.36± 2.05 FD20050727: -0.82± 1.64 FD20050913: -0.70± 1.28 FD20051007: -0.72± 1.35 FD20051031: -0.82± 1.46 FD20051218: -0.80± 1.81
v5.0.11stdNoHSBblTEMP_NFO Surface Temperature
5 10
AIRS - ECMWF
1000 2000 3000 4000
Number
FD20020906: -0.75± 1.82 FD20020929: -0.67± 1.87 FD20021116: -1.41± 2.66 FD20030103: -1.52± 3.30 FD20030220: -0.78± 1.91 FD20030409: -0.64± 1.45 FD20030527: -1.19± 2.24 FD20030831: -0.82± 2.10 FD20031018: -0.68± 1.86 FD20031205: -1.68± 3.28 FD20040310: -0.62± 1.64 FD20040427: -0.77± 1.42 FD20040614: -1.91± 2.86 FD20040801: -1.37± 2.36 FD20040918: -0.88± 1.98 FD20041105: -1.04± 2.29 FD20041223: -1.64± 3.48 FD20050209: -0.99± 2.40 FD20050329: -0.72± 1.48 FD20050516: -0.82± 1.81 FD20051007: -0.86± 1.97
Version 5 SST is colder than Version 4.
L2 Stats – p.17/31
Chi2 v4.0.9stdNoHSBTEMP_NFO Surface Temperature
5 10
(AIRS - ECMWF) / Err
1000 2000 3000 4000
Number
FD20020906: 2.16 FD20020929: 1.82 FD20021023: 1.98 FD20021116: 3.56 FD20021210: 4.30 FD20030103: 4.88 FD20030127: 3.65 FD20030220: 2.69 FD20030316: 1.54 FD20030409: 1.60 FD20030503: 1.98 FD20030527: 4.54 FD20030620: 4.59 FD20030714: 4.01 FD20030807: 3.72 FD20030831: 2.36 FD20030924: 1.96 FD20031018: 1.54 FD20031205: 3.67 FD20040122: 3.38 FD20040215: 1.80 FD20040310: 1.52 FD20040403: 1.69 FD20040427: 1.65 FD20040614: 6.15 FD20040801: 4.93 FD20040825: 2.84 FD20040918: 2.01 FD20041012: 1.79 FD20041105: 1.82 FD20041129: 3.65 FD20041223: 3.99 FD20050116: 2.99 FD20050209: 3.53 FD20050305: 1.41 FD20050329: 1.62 FD20050422: 1.53 FD20050516: 2.29 FD20050609: 6.22 FD20050727: 3.35 FD20050913: 1.85 FD20051007: 2.07 FD20051031: 2.50 FD20051218: 3.19
Chi2 v5.0.11stdNoHSBblTEMP_NFO Surface Temperature
5 10
(AIRS - ECMWF) / Err
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Number
FD20020906: 2.32 FD20020929: 2.30 FD20021116: 2.63 FD20030103: 2.34 FD20030220: 2.33 FD20030409: 2.34 FD20030527: 2.56 FD20030831: 2.16 FD20031018: 2.16 FD20031205: 2.35 FD20040310: 2.10 FD20040427: 2.48 FD20040614: 2.07 FD20040801: 2.23 FD20040918: 2.29 FD20041105: 2.45 FD20041223: 2.44 FD20050209: 2.14 FD20050329: 2.15 FD20050516: 2.32 FD20051007: 2.14
The outliers got correspondingly larger error estimates.
L2 Stats – p.18/31
Outliers v4.0.9stdNoHSBTEMP_GLOBAL
Jan-2003 Jan-2004 Jan-2005 1 2 3 4
Percent
Outliers v5.0.11stdNoHSBblTEMP_GLOBAL
Jan-2003 Jan-2004 Jan-2005 1 2 3 4 5 6
Percent
Version 5 has more mild outliers (black line). Both version have about the same amount of extreme outliers (red line).
L2 Stats – p.19/31
TSurfStd QS01 Outliers dayv4.0.9.0stdstdNoHSB_2003.07.14
90 180
30 90
3 6 10
TSurfStd QS01 Outliers dayv5.0.11.0stdstdNoHSBbl_2003.07.14
90 180
30 90
3 6 10
TSurfStd QS01 Outliers dayv4.0.9.0stdstdNoHSB_2004.01.22
90 180
30 90
3 6 10
TSurfStd QS01 Outliers dayv5.0.11.0stdstdNoHSBbl_2004.01.22
90 180
30 90
3 6 10
The outliers over land tend to be warm. The outliers over ocean tend to be cold.
L2 Stats – p.20/31
Dome C TSurfAir v4.0.9
Apr-2005 Jul-2005 Oct-2005 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 Temperature [K]
Dome C TSurfAir v5.0.11
Apr-2005 Jul-2005 Oct-2005 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 Temperature [K]
Dome C TSurfAir v4.0.9
Apr-2005 Jul-2005 Oct-2005
10 20 (AIRS - Truth) [K]
Dome C TSurfAir v5.0.11
Apr-2005 Jul-2005 Oct-2005
10 20 (AIRS - Truth) [K]
Black symbols are the 3 meter high temperature at Dome C. Filled red circles are TSurfAir with Qual_Surf = 0 or 1. Open circles are TSurfAir with Qual_Surf = 2.
L2 Stats – p.21/31
blendv4.0.9.0_20030714 CldFrcStd gran 127
4 12 16 24 32 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0
blendv5.0.11.0_20030714 CldFrcStd gran 127
4 12 16 24 32 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0
Fewer spurious clouds over the desert. Could the spurious clouds be dust storms?
L2 Stats – p.22/31
blendv4.0.9.0_20030714 CldFrcStd gran 126
8 16
4 12 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0
blendv5.0.11.0_20030714 CldFrcStd gran 126
8 16
4 12 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0
We are detecting more thin clouds over vegetated areas. But fewer thick low clouds over ocean.
L2 Stats – p.23/31
blendv4.0.9.0_20030714 CldFrcStd gran 191
0.0 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0
blendv5.0.11.0_20030714 CldFrcStd gran 191
0.0 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0
blendv4.0.9.0_20030714 TSurfStd-ECMWF gran 191with Qual_Surf
3 6 10
blendv5.0.11.0_20030714 TSurfStd-ECMWF gran 191with Qual_Surf
3 6 10
blendv4.0.9.0_20030714191
4 6 8 10 12 14 Wavelength [µm] 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 Brightness Temperature [K]
Spec 1 Spec 2 Spec 3 Spec 4
L2 Stats – p.24/31
v4.0.9NoHSB, H2OSLAB_GLOBAL: Qual_H2O = 0 or 1
50 100
100 × (Retrieved - ECMWF)/ECMWF
1000 100
Pressure [mbar]
FD20020906 FD20020929 FD20021023 FD20021116 FD20021210 FD20030103 FD20030127 FD20030220 FD20030316 FD20030409 FD20030503 FD20030527 FD20030620 FD20030714 FD20030807 FD20030831 FD20030924 FD20031018 FD20031205 FD20040122 FD20040215 FD20040310 FD20040403 FD20040614 FD20040801 FD20040825 FD20040918 FD20041012 FD20041105 FD20041223 FD20050116 FD20050209 FD20050329 FD20050422 FD20050516 FD20050609 FD20050727 FD20050913 FD20051007 FD20051031 FD20051218
v5.0.11NoHSBbl, H2OSLAB_GLOBAL: Qual_H2O = 0 or 1
50 100
100 × (Retrieved - ECMWF)/ECMWF
1000 100
Pressure [mbar]
FD20020906 FD20020929 FD20021116 FD20030103 FD20030220 FD20030409 FD20030527 FD20030714 FD20030831 FD20031018 FD20031205 FD20040122 FD20040310 FD20040614 FD20040801 FD20040918 FD20041105 FD20041223 FD20050209 FD20050329 FD20050516 FD20051007
Yield for Qual_H2O in version 5 reduced from ∼ 82% → ∼ 78% Upper tropospheric dry bias improved lower tropospheric wet bias improved.
L2 Stats – p.25/31
v4.0.9.0 H2OCDSup, H2OSLAB_GLOBAL: P0262.80
Jan-2003 Jan-2004 Jan-2005
5 10 15 100 × (AIRS - ECMWF)/ECMWF
v5.0.11.0 H2OCDSup, H2OSLAB_GLOBAL: P0262.80
Jan-2003 Jan-2004 Jan-2005 5 10 15 20 100 × (AIRS - ECMWF)/ECMWF
There is a decreasing trend in the H2O bias. Needs more investigation.
L2 Stats – p.26/31
Chi2 v4.0.9stdNoHSBH2O0_GLOBAL totH2OStd
5 10
(AIRS - ECMWF) / Err
2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
Number
FD20020906: 18.79 FD20020929:15.60 FD20021023:16.82 FD20021116:17.40 FD20021210:19.25 FD20030103:20.70 FD20030127:17.93 FD20030220:17.47 FD20030316:24.88 FD20030409:23.20 FD20030503:26.13 FD20030527:20.55 FD20030620:20.28 FD20030714:21.04 FD20030807:15.49 FD20030831:24.17 FD20030924:17.86 FD20031018:16.97 FD20031205:17.68 FD20040122:18.44 FD20040215:20.00 FD20040310:22.01 FD20040403:19.31 FD20040427:17.43 FD20040614:20.50 FD20040801:16.54 FD20040825:20.85 FD20040918:18.49 FD20041012:17.38 FD20041105:17.48 FD20041129:17.07 FD20041223:17.74 FD20050116:17.44 FD20050209:16.85 FD20050305:16.49 FD20050329:23.18 FD20050422:16.58 FD20050516:22.10 FD20050609:19.99 FD20050727:19.31 FD20050913:19.02 FD20051007:15.14 FD20051031:15.76 FD20051218:19.96
Chi2 v5.0.11stdNoHSBblH2O0_GLOBAL totH2OStd
5 10
(AIRS - ECMWF) / Err
2.0•103 4.0•103 6.0•103 8.0•103 1.0•104 1.2•104
Number (AIRS - ECMWF) / Err
FD20020906: 2.22 FD20020929: 2.05 FD20021116: 2.23 FD20030103: 3.44 FD20030220: 2.01 FD20030409: 2.09 FD20030527: 1.85 FD20030831: 1.89 FD20031018: 2.28 FD20031205: 2.23 FD20040310: 2.54 FD20040427: 2.21 FD20040614: 1.87 FD20040801: 2.01 FD20040918: 2.21 FD20041105: 2.25 FD20041223: 2.34 FD20050209: 2.29 FD20050329: 2.62 FD20050516: 2.41 FD20051007: 2.13
The improved χ distribution suggests improved error estimates.
L2 Stats – p.27/31
L2 Stats – p.28/31
L2 Stats – p.29/31
blendv4.0.9.0_20030714 totH2OStd gran 128with Qual_H2O
4 12 36 44 52 10 25 40 55 70 85 100
blendv5.0.11.0_20030714 totH2OStd gran 128with Qual_H2O
4 12 36 44 52 10 25 40 55 70 85 100
Fewer high H2O retrievals over warm scenes.
L2 Stats – p.30/31
blendv4.0.9.0_20030714 TSurfStd gran 128
4 12 36 44 52 287 293 299 305 311 317 324
blendv5.0.11.0_20030714 TSurfStd gran 128
4 12 36 44 52 287 293 299 305 311 317 324
blendv4.0.9.0_20030714 TSurfStdErr gran 128with Qual_Surf
4 12 36 44 52 0.0 1.7 3.3 5.0 6.7 8.3 10.0
blendv5.0.11.0_20030714 TSurfStdErr gran 128with Qual_Surf
4 12 36 44 52 0.0 1.7 3.3 5.0 6.7 8.3 10.0
blendv5.0.11.0_20030714 TSurfStd ECMWF gran 128
4 12 36 44 52 287 293 299 305 311 317 324
L2 Stats – p.31/31