Value of Transgenics: Weed Management Culpepper and Steckel Survey - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

value of transgenics weed management
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Value of Transgenics: Weed Management Culpepper and Steckel Survey - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Value of Transgenics: Weed Management Culpepper and Steckel Survey Participants Jamshid Asigh Mike Marshall Tom Barber Donnie Miller Tom Baughman Mike Patterson Jason Bond Ken Smith Stanley Culpepper Larry Steckel Peter Dotray Daniel


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Value of Transgenics: Weed Management

Culpepper and Steckel

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Mike Marshall Donnie Miller Mike Patterson Ken Smith Larry Steckel Daniel Stephenson Alan York Jamshid Asigh Tom Barber Tom Baughman Jason Bond Stanley Culpepper Peter Dotray Wayne Keeling

Survey Participants

Individuals represent 96% of the 2009 US cotton crop!

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Adoption of Herbicide-Resistant Cotton

>99%

Source: 2009 Beltwide Weed Science Survey – Percent cotton planted to cotton with herbicide-resistant traits in 2009. USDA AM S 2009 crop estimates 94.75% transgenic.

>99% 100% 96% 100%

100%

99% 98% 91.5% 93%

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Confirmed Number of Herbicide-Resistant Weed Species in the Cotton Belt

4 5 4 8 8 3 4 5 8 2

Source: International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds (12/ 28/ 09)

12 9 4 8 18 14

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Palmer amaranth Common waterhemp Horseweed Johnsongrass Ryegrass Ragweed – common and giant

Herbicide-Resistant Weeds Challenging Cotton Growers

Resistance to glyphosate in all of the listed weeds is the primary issue as well as ALS resistance in several of the species.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2009 Cotton Acreage and Percent Acreage Infested with Herbicide-Resistant Weeds

980,000 (75%)

Source: National Cotton Council and Beltwide Weed Science S urvey

380,000 (50%) 140,000 (75%) 250,000 (30%) 340,000 (100%)

520,000 (85%)

240,000 (0%) 270,000 (75%) 4,917,000 (2%) 30,000 (0%)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2009 Cotton Acreage and Percent Acreage Infested with Herbicide-Resistant Weeds

980,000 (75%)

Source: National Cotton Council and beltwide weed survey (12/ 28/ 09)

380,000 (50%) 140,000 (75%) 250,000 (30%) 340,000 (100%)

520,000 (85%)

240,000 (0%) 270,000 (75%) 4,917,000 (2%) 30,000 (0%)

Acres in survey: 8.1 mil (96% of US) US acres infested with resistance: 27% SE and MS acres infested with resistance: 68%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

All Weeds Are Not Created Equal

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Tennessee Mississippi Georgia S Carolina N Carolina Alabama Louisiana Arkansas

Amaranthus palmeri 2009

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Significant Arkansas Georgia North Carolina South Carolina Tennessee {2,360,000}

Palmer amaranth Infestation Levels

Little to No Infestations Alabama Louisiana Mississippi New Mexico Texas {5,707,000 acres}

slide-11
SLIDE 11

20 40 60 80 100

2% of acres decreased in value

Has The Value of Glyphosate-Resistant Technology Changed for Areas With M inimal Impact by GR Palmer?

80% of acres have increased value Wider window for Flex Germplasm Improved weed control Development of glyphosate-resistant weeds $9/A increase *Results are weighted on cotton acreage in states participating in the survey.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

20 40 60 80 100

45% of acres decreased in value

Has The Value of Glyphosate-Resistant Technology Changed for Areas Impacted by GR Palmer?

0% of acres have increased value Herbicides to combat resistance Cultivating Hand weeding *Results are weighted on cotton acreage in states participating in the survey. $19.50/A decrease

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Value of Transgenics Are Changing Where GR Palmer is Present.

Glyphosate 3 times 2006

University of Georgia Ponder Farm

Glyphosate 3 times 2009

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Staple + Reflex + Direx PRE Roundup WMax + Parrlay POST Direx + MSMA Layby

Managing Severe GR Palmer Amaranth Populations in Dryland Cotton Production.

slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16

20 40 60

Before (2004) After (2008)

26 5 % acres 20 45 *Average of Macon, Taylor, Sumpter, Schley, and Dooly counties

Herbicide Incorp. Ignite systems Cultivation Hand weeding

Impact of GR Palmer amaranth in Georgia counties with severe infestations.*

slide-17
SLIDE 17

20 40 60 80 100

0% of acres decreased in value

Has The Value of Ignite-Based Programs Changed for Areas With M inimal Impact by GR Palmer?

8% of acres have increased value Improved control of: Morningglory GR weeds $5/A increase *Results are weighted on cotton acreage in states participating in the survey.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

20 40 60 80 100

0% of acres decreased in value

Has The Value of the Ignite-Based Programs Changed for Areas Impacted by GR Palmer?

53% of acres have increased value Best option for GR Palmer POST Only option for ALS+GR Palmer POST POST option for GR horseweed and ragweed Less cultivating and handweeding *Results are weighted on cotton acreage in states participating in the survey. $19.50/A increase

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Weathermax 88 oz Staple LX 10 oz

slide-20
SLIDE 20

GR Palmer Control in Dryland Conservation Tillage

Prowl + Reflex PRE Roundup + Dual POST Diuron + MSMA PD Prowl + Reflex PRE Ignite + Dual POST Diuron + MSMA PD

slide-21
SLIDE 21

PowerMax 22 oz 2 leaf PowerMax 22 oz 5 leaf Ignite 29 oz 2 leaf Ignite 29 oz 5 leaf

Giant Ragweed Control with Ignite or

  • Roundup. TN, 2009.
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Is There M ore Value with Flex Cotton Compared to Traditional RR cotton?

Focus is just on weed control and not germplasm!!

No herbicide resistance: 10 of 10 states say there is increased value ($8 to 20/A):

Topical applications easier, quicker, less expensive One sprayer to maintain Improved weed control Overtop options without crop damage

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Is There M ore Value with Flex Cotton Compared to Traditional RR cotton?

Focus is just on weed control and not germplasm!!

No herbicide resistance: 10 of 10 states say there is increased value ($8 to 20/A):

Topical applications easier, quicker, less expensive One sprayer to maintain Improved weed control Overtop options without crop damage

BUT this will promote more use and dependence on glyphosate and ALS herbicide chemistry which will exasperate the impact of herbicide resistant weeds.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Role of pollen movement and gene-flow in the spread of herbicide resistance

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Wind speed (mph)

5 10 15 20 25

Dispersal distance (ft)

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3 ft plant height 6 ft plant height

Potential Pollen M ovement

Sosnoskie, 2009

slide-26
SLIDE 26

100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 230 K 250 28 K 309 K

Giant ragweed

450 K

Number of Seed Produced per Plant. Glyphosate-Resistant Weeds in US.

Ragweed = Harrison et al. 2001; johnsongrass = Warwick and Black (1983); horseweed = Regehr and Bazzaz (1979); waterhemp = Nordby and Hartzler (2004); Palmer amaranth = Macrae et al (2009).

Johnson

  • grass

Horseweed Waterhemp Palmer amaranth

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Is There M ore Value with Flex Cotton Compared to Traditional RR cotton?

Focus is just on weed control and not germplasm!!

Herbicide resistance present: 8 of 9 say no

Paying more for technology fee with no benefits Herbicide programs extremely costly Residual herbicides at planting, during the season, and at layby Wider window for early POST application?????

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Prowl + Reflex PRE, WeatherMax + Dual POST, Direx + MSMA Layby

POST 18 DAP POST 24 DAP

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Will Growers Continue to Rely on the Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton Technology?

Areas without resistance:

Yes, as long as the technology performs Yes, but very interested in alternatives Yes, but will use other modes of action to combat resistance development

Areas WITH resistance:

No better options. As options become available, they will be evaluated. Yes, but interest building in conventional and Liberty Link systems. Moving toward Ignite-based systems. If yields were equal, growers would adopt Ignite based programs rapidly!! YIELD IS STILL THE KEY DECIDING FACTOR

slide-30
SLIDE 30

500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000

With Yield and Quality Equal, How M any Acres Would Be Planted to Conventional Cultivars?

Current acres What would happen the second year after planting all the conventional acres??? ~417,945 acres Predicted acres ~1,524,740 acres

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Future Technology: 2,4-D or Dicamba Resistant Cotton

2,4-D resistant cotton 2,4-D sensitive cotton

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Will There Be Value in 2,4-D or Dicamba Resistant Traits for Cotton Growers?

  • 1. Tool for managing GR ragweed, horseweed, Palmer,

morningglory, perennial weeds, winter annual weeds

  • 2. No preplant interval for burndown
  • 3. A new mode of action for in-crop control
  • 4. Applications overtop of cotton
  • 5. Price of herbicides are currently economical
  • 6. Option to rotate with Roundup for resistance mgmt
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Ignite Ignite + 2,4-D 0.75 lb

12 DAT

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Ignite Ignite + dicamba 0.5 lb

12 DAT

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Are You Comfortable M aking 2,4-D or Dicamba In-Crop Weed M anagement Recommendations TODAY?

  • 1. Fair
  • 2. No
  • 3. No
  • 4. No
  • 5. Comfortable with dicamba, not with 2,4-D
  • 6. No
  • 7. Absolutely not
  • 8. No
  • 9. Yes, but only in some locations
  • 10. No way, not today
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Why Are Weed Scientists So Uncomfortable?

1.Physical drift, drift, drift (10 of 10 are concerned)

slide-37
SLIDE 37
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Why Are Weed Scientists So Uncomfortable?

1.Physical drift, drift, drift (10 of 10 are concerned)

  • 2. Tank contamination
  • 3. Volatility
  • 4. Don’t provide complete pigweed control
  • 5. Concern over cost of technology
  • 6. Potential development of resistance
  • 7. Accidental application to non-resistant cultivars
  • 8. Attempting to control weeds too large
slide-39
SLIDE 39

Palmer amaranth is a game changer!

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Palmer amaranth seedbank – it is the key!

YEAR 1: 5 Palmer females escape Produce 2,000,000 seeds in cotton (50% germ) YEAR 2: Weed program = 99.9% control 1,000 plants per acre left at harvest 400 female plants/A 160,000,000 seeds produced in cotton (50% germ) YEAR 3: Weed program 99.9% control 80,000 plants per acre left at harvest 32,000 female plants/A = 1.28 X 1010 seed/A

slide-41
SLIDE 41
  • GR Palmer amaranth not present or very light:

– Value of RR technology increased avg. of $9/A on

  • ver 4.6 million acres

– Value of Ignite-based programs increased avg. of $5 on 0.46 million acres.

  • GR Palmer amaranth present:

– Value of RR technology decreased avg. of $19.50/A on over 1.1 million acres – Value of Ignite-based programs increased avg. of $19.50/A on 1.2 million acres

Value of Current Transgenics: Weeds

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Controlling GR Palmer amaranth by Developing Integrated Programs