v anier b anting t imeline 2015 2016 o utmoded
play

V ANIER -B ANTING T IMELINE (2015/2016 O UTMODED !) June 5, 2015 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A PPLYING FOR A B ANTING F ELLOWSHIP A RECENT P H D S PERSPECTIVE Dr. Emma Rosalind Peacocke English Department, Queens University October 11, 2017 O VERVIEW How does the Vanier- Banting differ from other applications?


  1. A PPLYING FOR A B ANTING F ELLOWSHIP – A RECENT P H D’ S PERSPECTIVE Dr. Emma Rosalind Peacocke English Department, Queen’s University October 11, 2017

  2. O VERVIEW  How does the Vanier- Banting differ from other applications?  Timeline  Documents  How to present content  How is it the same? Titian’s Danae (1544-1545), courtesy of the Capodimonte Museum, Naples, and the National Gallery of Art, Washington. Bring on the deluge of gold!

  3. V ANIER -B ANTING T IMELINE (2015/2016 – O UTMODED !)  June 5, 2015 – email inviting me to apply for a Banting fellowship  June 15 – Queen’s internal deadline for one-page letter of intent, CV, supervisor’s supporting statement  Aug. 24 – Queen’s internal deadline for all materials  Sept. 23 – Banting’s own deadline  Feb. 4, 2016 – advised of the decision  May 30 – can officially tell people Courtesy of http://www.fitzmuseum.cam.  For this year’s dates and requirements: ac.uk/collections/furniture/20 http://www.queensu.ca/postdoc/pr 0549, by Raymond ospective-scholars/external- Champenois, 1670 funding-sources-funding-and- fellowships/banting-post-doctoral

  4. V ANIER -B ANTING D OCUMENTS : W HERE Y OU D O P APERWORK Fairly standard Tri-Council web CV form  Signed form from Dean of Graduate  Studies confirming PhD the weirdest!  Supervisor Biography and Institutional  Synergy Most postdoc applications ask you to  explain why your research and institution fit well together The Banting gives a lot more room for  detail I was lucky, in that already at Queen’s  with Bader Postdoc So my supervisor already knew me  Institutional Letter of Endorsement  Picking research keywords, research title  (actual and lay) Bibliography  New this year: “Arm’s-length reference”  Maybe ask external examiner from  Courtesy of http://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/ PhD? O17810/trompe-loeil-with-writing-materials-oil- painting-colyer-edwaert/ 1702

  5. V ANIER -B ANTING D OCUMENTS : W HERE Y OU W RITE M EANINGFULLY  Significance of Research Contributions 1 page  3 top contributions  Quite useful to quote anonymous  reader/reviewer of article Where you published  Something easily identified as  unique (e.g., sole essay in major collection dealing with poet’s comic work)  Significance of Leadership Contributions One page  Includes teaching  Running speaker series, etc.  Courtesy of http://collections. If you’ve done any reviewing . . .  vam.ac.uk/item/O85757/man-writing-  Research proposal on-lanterns-painting-unknown/ , The major one!  China, c. 1790 4 pages 

  6. R ESEARCH P ROPOSAL : H OW TO P RESENT C ONTENT  Unsuccessful SSHRC postdoc application  Successful Banting postdoc application  What changed?  Included more Canadian Courtesy of http://www.historymuseum.ca/ content, contemporary event/grand-hall/ , Morning Star by Alex Janvier affairs  E.g., from early 19 th -c university to an Arctic University

  7. The more work you do on the application, the more tickets you’ve bought in the application lottery Courtesy of http://collections.va m.ac.uk/item/O1274 964/aylesbury- festival-lottery- poster-unknown/

  8. T HE B ANTING A PPLICATION : HOW IT ’ S SIMILAR TO OTHER APPLICATIONS  Well-defined structure of proposal  Perpetual to-and-fro between delineating what’s happening  in your field, and how your contribution is  original  Insightful advice (with general application): http://www.queensu.ca/post doc/prospective- scholars/external-funding- sources-funding-and- Courtesy of http://collections.vam.ac.uk/ fellowships/tips-applying- item/O56347/francis-williams-the-scholar-of-oil- banting-post painting-unknown/ (Francis Williams, poet and E.g., examples are terrific scholar, oil painting, 1745, anonymous painter. The  large head may be “to emphasise his intellectual rather than physical stature.”)

  9. F AMILIAR S TRUCTURE TO R ESEARCH P ROPOSAL Introduction  Overall picture and why we care  Title, what it’s about  Something eye-catching  Statement of relevance  Includes one sentence on each chapter  Good place to say where you’ll publish  Relationship between previous work and current project  Vital extension that is too big to do within PhD?  New project, with continuity with old project?  Also a good place to say where you’ll publish  Paragraph on what kinds of scholarship you’ll draw on,  methodology Chapter-by-chapter summary  Each mini-summary gives the state of scholarship in this  area, and then how you will change it Specific examples are revitalizing  A quotation from a primary source is like a breath of fresh  air Detailed plan and timeline for how you will complete this  project A detailed, plausible plan of campaign  Courtesy of http://collections.vam.ac.uk/ E.g., I will write and submit a book proposal with 2 sample  chapters item/O64092/lucia-di-lammermoor-costume Talk about resources where you’ll hold your fellowship  -design-stone-alix/ Any archival trips you will undertake  Schedule  Ends with what the fellowship will do for you and what  you will do for it

  10. B REAK A L EG ! By Pietro Antonio Rotari, c. 1755, courtesy of the Norton Simon Museum, California emma.peacocke@queensu.ca , happy to share my application materials

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend