UPDATE E BRIEFING Local Plan Skerningham Garden Village Springfield - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
update e briefing
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

UPDATE E BRIEFING Local Plan Skerningham Garden Village Springfield - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dec 29, 2023 145 likes •335 views

CONFID IDENTIA IAL L BRIEF IEFIN ING G This document was classified as: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE UPDATE E BRIEFING Local Plan Skerningham Garden Village Springfield Park Link Road CONFID IDENTIA IAL L BRIEF IEFIN ING G This document was

slide-1
SLIDE 1

This document was classified as: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

CONFID IDENTIA IAL L BRIEF IEFIN ING G

UPDATE E BRIEFING Local Plan Skerningham Garden Village Springfield Park Link Road

slide-2
SLIDE 2

This document was classified as: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

CONFID IDENTIA IAL L BRIEF IEFIN ING G

800 700

Local l Plan n Overview w and d Recap

600

  • All Party Local Plan Group formed at outset.

500

  • Members approved the housing figures at 25th January

400

2018 Council.

300

  • Confident in methodology, independently verified and

200

discussed with the Inspectorate.

100

  • No North East authority is planning to just meet its LHN
  • figures. Stockton on Tees have a much higher figure,

while the Durham and Northumberland plans are also

Net Completions LHN 5 Year Average

above the LHN figures.

Controls ls wit ithin in the e Pla lan n Perio iod

External The Market – Will react to demand. Build Rate – Will be constrained by available workforce etc. Internal 5 Year Plan Review Masterplans on Strategic sites with Phasing Plans linked to required infrastructure. Planning Conditions on permissions with trigger points linked to infrastructure requirements.

Net Completions

2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 (Projected)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

This document was classified as: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

CONFID IDENTIA IAL L BRIEF IEFIN ING G

Skerningham

THE PLAN PERIOD UPTO 2036

  • Skerningham has an allocation of UPTO 1800 houses in the Draft Plan period.
  • Increased numbers are a possibility through Garden Village Status which could increase this UPTO 2400 in the plan

period BEYOND 2036

  • The development of UPTO 4500 houses will be well beyond the Local Plan Period and be subject to all of the Controls

mentioned earlier.

Skerningham

3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500

200 920 1640 600 1500 2400

2020 2025 2030 2035

Local Plan Garden Village

slide-4
SLIDE 4

This document was classified as: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

CONFID IDENTIA IAL L BRIEF IEFIN ING G

MASTERPLAN N & & IS ISSUE E

Access through the Park and the park itself has been raised as an issue to consider

slide-5
SLIDE 5

This document was classified as: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

CONFID IDENTIA IAL L BRIEF IEFIN ING G

In Init itial l Traffic c Assessment t Fin indings s

Springfield Link Road has NOT been found to be critical at this initial stage of assessment. However, the initial findings show it is very BENEFICAL. If Springfield Link Road is not developed more detailed junction assessments will be required.. Key Findings without Springfield Park Link Road:

  • Additional traffic on existing roads requiring further mitigation to be identified.
  • Reduced public transport access points and possible service to Skerningham
  • Additional impact on the existing junctions on Whinfield Road (A1150)
  • Other access points may need to be considered.
  • Not as good Quality of Place
  • More concentrated development in early stages
  • Will make early delivery of new services and facilities in a centrally located site more difficult.
  • Impact on timeline of Local Plan and associated risks due to further traffic modelling work to

validate and identify mitigation schemes.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

This document was classified as: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

CONFID IDENTIA IAL L BRIEF IEFIN ING G

2025 – Assumes UPTO 600 Houses built

WITH Springfield Park Link Road

New Link Road 2017 2025 % Diff Daily 0 2,519 n/a Whinbush Way 2017 2025 % Diff Daily 8,609 9,783 13.6% Barmpton Lane (south) 2017 2025 % Diff Daily 3,310 3,066

  • 7.4%

Barmpton Lane (north) 2017 2025 % Diff Daily 2,061 3,030 47.0%

KEY Indicative Housing locations Indicative Road Infrastructure

WITHOUT Springfield Park Link Road

  • Development of housing likely to be more focussed towards Barmpton Lane North
  • Whinbush Way carries an extra 4094 vehicles per day above 2017 levels.
  • Barmpton Lane North an extra 2976 vehicles per day from 2017 levels
  • Additional traffic on A1150 makes access from side streets more difficult in peak times.

Leading to significant queuing at Stockton Road and Whinbush Way junctions.

  • May need to consider additional access points

Barmpton Lane (south) 2017 2025 % Diff Daily 3,310 3,103

  • 6.3%

Whinbush Way 2017 2025 % Diff Daily 8,609 12,703 47.6%

KEY Indicative Housing locations Indicative Road Infrastructure

  • Development of housing likely to be more dispersed given multiple access points.
  • More Route choices & Public Transport Loops
  • Opens Local Centre and School location
  • Whinbush Way carries an extra 1174 vehicles per day above 2017 levels.
  • Barmpton Lane North an extra 969 vehicles per day from 2017 levels

Traffic levels on A1150 increase. In both Scenarios there is a slight reduction of vehicles on Barmpton Lane South as ability to access Stockton Road is more difficult in peak hours making it less attractive and pushes traffic via Whinbush Way Traffic Signal controlled junction.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

WITHOUT Springfield Park Link Road

  • Whinbush Way carries an extra 945 vehicles per day above 2017 levels.
  • Barmpton Lane North an extra 3697 vehicles per day from 2017 levels
  • May need to consider additional access points

Whinbush Way 2017 2030 % Diff Daily 8,609 9,554 11.0% Barmpton Lane (south) 2017 2030 % Diff Daily 3,310 3,495 5.6%

KEY Indicative Housing locations Indicative Road Infrastructure This document was classified as: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

CONFID IDENTIA IAL L BRIEF IEFIN ING G

2030 – Assumes UPTO 1,500 houses built

WITH Springfield Park Link Road

  • Whinbush Way carries an extra 708 vehicles per day above 2017 levels.
  • Barmpton Lane North an extra 2675 vehicles per day from 2017 levels.

New Link Road 2017 2030 % Diff Daily 0 1,533 n/a Whinbush Way 2017 2030 % Diff Daily 8,609 9,317 8.2% Barmpton Lane (south) 2017 2030 % Diff Daily 3,310 3,249

  • 1.9%

Barmpton Lane (north) 2017 2030 % Diff Daily 2,061 4,736 129.8%

KEY Indicative Housing locations Indicative Road Infrastructure

Barmpton Lane (north) 2017 2030 % Diff Daily 2,061 5,758 179.4%

At this point it is essential that the Skerningham internal network is delivered including a bridge across the ECML to the A167. The road network built as part of the Garden Village starts to enable alternative routes and mitigates against the housing development numbers. Additional east/west movements on A1150 will lead to congestion at Stockton Road and Whinbush Way junctions.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

This document was classified as: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

CONFID IDENTIA IAL L BRIEF IEFIN ING G

The modelling has been undertaken in 5 years blocks……… The completed infrastructure at 2030 shows a supporting network and alternatives for traffic. However, between 2025 and the 2029 the traffic numbers will increase

  • n existing local roads until a full NEW road network is completed at

2030. ! 2029 scenario may look like this ……

slide-9
SLIDE 9

This document was classified as: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

CONFID IDENTIA IAL L BRIEF IEFIN ING G

2029 Scenario just before Full 2030 Infrastructure in place

WITH Springfield Park Link Road

  • Springfield Link Road carries 6,021 vehicles per day……
  • Whinbush Way carries an extra 1,832 vehicles per day above 2017 levels.
  • Barmpton Lane North an extra 1,755 vehicles per day from 2017 levels.

New Link Road 2017 2029 % Diff Daily 0 6021 n/a Whinbush Way 2017 2029 % Diff Daily 8,609 10,441 21.3% Barmpton Lane (south) 2017 2029 % Diff Daily 3,310 2,984

  • 9.8%

Barmpton Lane (north) 2017 2029 % Diff Daily 2,061 3,816 85.2%

KEY Indicative Housing locations Indicative Road Infrastructure

Link across ECML not completed

New Access 2017 2029 % Diff Daily 7919

WITHOUT Springfield Park Link Road

Whinbush Way 2017 2029 % Diff Daily 8,609 13,706 59.2% Barmpton Lane (south) 2017 2029 % Diff Daily 3,310 4,699 42% Barmpton Lane (north) 2017 2029 % Diff Daily 2,061 7,498 263.8%

KEY Indicative Housing locations Indicative Road Infrastructure

Link across ECML not completed

New Access 2017 2029 % Diff Daily 7275

  • Whinbush Way carries an extra 5,097 vehicles per day above 2017 levels.
  • Barmpton Lane North an extra 5,437 vehicles per day from 2017 levels
  • May need to consider additional access points

Traffic levels on A1150 increase. It is this scenario where the link road through Springfield Park provides an alternative to increasing traffic significantly on the exiting Local Roads The new access point to the east offers an alternative route

slide-10
SLIDE 10

This document was classified as: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

CONFID IDENTIA IAL L BRIEF IEFIN ING G

2035 – Assumes UPTO 2,400 houses built

WITH Springfield Park Link Road WITHOUT Springfield Park Link Road

  • Whinbush Way carries an extra 562 vehicles above 2017 levels.
  • Barmpton Lane North an extra 2949 vehicles from 2017 levels.
  • Whinbush Way carries an extra 489 vehicles above 2017 levels.
  • Barmpton Lane North an extra 3798 vehicles from 2017 levels
  • May need to consider additional access points

At this point it is assumed the Skerningham internal network is delivered including a bridge across the ECML to the A167. The road network built as part of the Garden Village starts to enable alternative routes and mitigates against the housing development numbers. Additional east/west movements on A1150 will lead to significant congestion at Stockton Road and Whinbush Way junctions. Motorists will start to use the development access road as a by-pass. Additional mitigation schemes required to enable further housing beyond Local Plan numbers.

New Link Road 2017 2035 % Diff Daily 0 2,163 n/a Whinbush Way 2017 2035 % Diff Daily 8,609 9,171 6.5% Barmpton Lane (north) 2017 2035 % Diff Daily 2,061 5,010 143.1% Barmpton Lane (south) 2017 2035 % Diff Daily 3,310 3,440 3.9% Whinbush Way 2017 2035 % Diff Daily 8,609 9,098 5.7% Barmpton Lane (south) 2017 2035 % Diff Daily 3,310 3,568 7.8% Barmpton Lane (north) 2017 2035 % Diff Daily 2,061 5,859 184.2%

KEY Indicative Housing locations Indicative Road Infrastructure KEY Indicative Housing locations Indicative Road Infrastructure

slide-11
SLIDE 11

This document was classified as: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

CONFID IDENTIA IAL L BRIEF IEFIN ING G

Indicative Assessment of Existing Road Network

Whinbush Way

25000 20000 12703 (+7 veh/min peak) 13706 (+9 veh/min peak) 15000 8609 10000 5000 9783 (+2 veh/min in peak) 10441 (+3 veh/min peak) 9098 (+1 veh/min peak) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 Link Capacity of Road Whinbush (With Springfield access Road) Whinbush (Without Springfield access Road)

Barmpton Lane North

15000 10000 7498 (+9 veh/min peak) 5037 (+5 veh/min peak) 5859 5000 5010 3030 (+2 veh/min peak) 3816 (+3 veh/min peak) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2061 Link Capacity of Road Barmpton Lane North (With Springfield access Road) Barmpton Lane North (Without Springfield access Road)

Barmpton Lane South

25000 20000 15000 10000 4699 (+3 veh/min peak) 3310 3103 3568 5000 2984 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 Link Capacity of Road Barmpton Lane South (With Springfield access Road) Barmpton Lane South (Without Springfield access Road)

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • This document was classified as: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

CONFID IDENTIA IAL L BRIEF IEFIN ING G

Possible Alternative Access Points

KEY Indicative Housing locations Indicative Road Infrastructure Possible alternative or additional Road Infrastructure

Access point on Whinbush Way as alternative or supplementary to Barmpton Lane if required. Local Plan Assumed Access Points

  • From A167 across ECML
  • Springfield Park
  • Whinbush Way
  • Barmpton Lane

Other access points NOT considered at this stage: Access from Sparrowhall Drive. Access Points from estate adjacent to Springfield Park

slide-13
SLIDE 13

This document was classified as: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

CONFID IDENTIA IAL L BRIEF IEFIN ING G

Conclusions

Springfield Link Road has NOT been found to be critical at this initial stage of traffic assessment. However, the findings show it is very BENEFICIAL and particularly prior to the NEW distributor road network being completed around 2030. If the Springfield Park Link Road is NOT developed both Barmpton Lane and Whinbush Way have sufficient theoretical link capacity to carry this additional traffic. However, it does add significant traffic numbers onto existing local roads. The junction capacity has not been assessed at this stage and would require further modelling work to determine whether the junctions can be improved to accommodate these levels of traffic. The Springfield Park Link Road or Alternative Access Points could yet be found to be REQUIRED if junctions cannot be improved to accommodate the traffic predictions. The traffic on the A1150 will increase and there will be junction delays where local roads meet the A1150 but this will be more significant for local residents without the Springfield Link Road.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

This document was classified as: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

CONFID IDENTIA IAL L BRIEF IEFIN ING G

Illustrative Example of the Opportunity for the Park

slide-15
SLIDE 15

This document was classified as: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

CONFID IDENTIA IAL L BRIEF IEFIN ING G

Springfield Park Possible Extension Area

slide-16
SLIDE 16

This document was classified as: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

CONFID IDENTIA IAL L BRIEF IEFIN ING G

Safe Road Crossing Points from all directions.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Option 2: Formal Civic Gateway

EidSMQ

Dovetopm•nt 21m

Ptoposed PondrSuch

21m

1782m

P()OtJStrOit'! &

CyCle Path Proposed

"''"

be retained Pedestram &

Cycle Patr1 73m

E~J$Mg

Covotopm4tltt

This document was classified as: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

CONFID IDENTIA IAL L BRIEF IEFIN ING G

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Option 2: Formal Civic Gateway

LJ

.....

178 2m

This document was classified as: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

CONFID IDENTIA IAL L BRIEF IEFIN ING G