type 1 diabetes
play

Type 1 Diabetes Cause and Effects of Type 1 Autoimmune destruction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presented by : Sensika Niyathapala Mentor : Rebecca Harvey Advisor : Francis J. Doyle III and Eyal Dassau Department of Chemical Engineering, UCSB EUREKA August 23, 2012 Type 1 Diabetes Cause and Effects of Type 1 Autoimmune destruction


  1. Presented by : Sensika Niyathapala Mentor : Rebecca Harvey Advisor : Francis J. Doyle III and Eyal Dassau Department of Chemical Engineering, UCSB EUREKA August 23, 2012

  2. Type 1 Diabetes  Cause and Effects of Type 1  Autoimmune destruction of pancreatic beta cells  No control of blood glucose  Exogenous insulin required http://www.cumc.columbia.edu/news-room/wp- content/uploads/2012/04/image001.jpg  Current disease therapy  Self monitoring  Multiple daily insulin injections http://www.southboromedical.com/images/fingerstick.jpg 2

  3. Future of Disease Therapy: Artificial Pancreas 3

  4. Effect of a Meal on Glucose 4

  5. Project Goals  Implementing basic meal detection algorithm  Establish metrics that represent desired qualities  Alarms faster than current controller response  Very few false alarms  True positive alarms 5

  6. Data from Clinical Trials (12 subjects)  Breakfast and dinner given with NO meal announcement 6

  7. Algorithm and System Alarming Start of Insulin Response  Slope predicted at each point  Algorithm Parameters  Threshold  Subsequent Alarms Required (SAR)  Max and min slope 7

  8. Hypotheses  Hypothesis 1 : with SAR 1, the reaction time for detecting a meal will be the fastest, however there will be more false positive alarms  Hypothesis 2 : by using SAR 3, we anticipate a longer reaction time with a greater number of false negative alarms, but less false positive alarms present 8

  9. Determining the Best Parameter Settings: SAR 100 Faster Response 90 80 From meal To alarm 1 From meal To alarm 2 70 From meal to alarm 3 60 Time From Undetected Meals Meal To Alarm 50 (min) 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Meal Number 9

  10. Results: The Better Detector Number of Alarms Required 1 2 3 True Positive Ratio 21/24 21/24 19/24 # of False Positives 1/24 1/24 1/24 Average Time Difference from Alarm to -11 ± 1 min -6 ±17 min 3 ± 14 min Insulin Delivery 10

  11. Conclusions & Future Work  Hypothesis 1 unconfirmed: SAR 1 should have had more false positive alarms  Hypothesis 2 confirmed: SAR 3 had more false negative alarms  Future Work: Using the basic algorithm as a benchmark for an advanced system 11

  12. Acknowledgements 12

  13. Questions? 13

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend