TSXV: MOON US OTC: BMOOF Forward Looking Statements Certain - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
TSXV: MOON US OTC: BMOOF Forward Looking Statements Certain - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
TSXV: MOON US OTC: BMOOF Forward Looking Statements Certain statements included in this presentation constitute forward- Cautionary Note to U.S. Readers Regarding Estimates of Indicated looking statements or forward-looking information under
2
Certain statements included in this presentation constitute forward- looking statements or forward-looking information under applicable securities legislation. Such forward looking statements or information are provided for the purpose of providing information about management’s current expectations and plans relating to the future. Readers are cautioned that reliance on such information may not be appropriate for
- ther purposes, such as making investment decisions. Forward-looking
statements or information typically contain statements with words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, “plan”, “intend”, “estimate”, “propose”, “project”, or similar words suggesting future outcomes or statements. Forward-looking statements or information in this presentation include, but are not limited to, statements or information with respect to: business strategy and objectives; and development and exploration plans. Forward-looking statements or information are based on a number of factors and assumptions which may prove to be incorrect. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward looking statements or information are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements because the Company can give no assurances that such expectations will prove to be correct. Forward-looking statements or information are based on current expectations, estimates and projections that involved a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by the Company and described in the forward- looking statements or information. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things: the ability of management to execute its business plan; general economic and business conditions; the risks of the mining industry and fluctuations in commodity prices; risks and uncertainties involving geology of mining deposits; the uncertainty of development and exploration activities; the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to production, costs and expenses; the uncertainty of obtaining regulatory, including environmental approvals and uncertainties as to the availability and cost of financing. The foregoing list is not exhaustive of all possible risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements or information contained in this presentation are made as of the date hereof and the Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements or information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise unless required by applicable securities laws. This presentation is for general background information purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy the securities referred to herein. Jack McClintock, P. Eng, is a qualified person as defined by NI 43-101, has reviewed the scientific and technical information that forms the basis for this presentation. Mr. McClintock is a Director of the Company. Cautionary Note to U.S. Readers Regarding Estimates of Indicated and Inferred Resources. his presentation uses the terms “measured” and “indicated” mineral resources and “inferred” mineral resources. The Company advises U.S. investors that while these terms are recognized and required by Canadian securities administrators, they are not recognized by U.S. securities administrators. The estimation
- f “measured” and “inferred” mineral resources involves greater
uncertainty as to their existence and economic feasibility than the estimation of proven and probable reserves. The estimation of “inferred” resources involves far greater uncertainty as to their existence and economic viability than the estimation of other categories of resources. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of a “measured”, “inferred” or “indicated” mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of “inferred mineral resources” may not form the basis of feasibility studies, pre-feasibility studies or other economic studies, except in prescribed cases, such as in a preliminary economic assessment under certain circumstances. U.S. securities administrators normally
- nly permit issuers to report mineralization that does not constitute
“reserves” as in-place tonnage and grade without reference to unit
- measures. Under U.S. standards, mineralization may not be
classified as a “reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of a “measured”, “indicated” or “inferred” mineral resource exists or is economically or legally mineable. Information concerning descriptions
- f mineralization and resources contained herein may not be
comparable to information made public by U.S. companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of U.S. securities
- administrators. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not
have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant
- issues. The quantity and grade of reported inferred resources in this
estimation are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define these inferred resources as an indicated or measured mineral resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in upgrading them to an indicated or measured mineral resource category. The inclusion of inferred mineral resources are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to enable them to be categorized as mineral
- reserves. The mineral resources in this presentation were reported
using CIM Standards.
Forward Looking Statements
Investment Highlights
3
100% ownership high-grade NI 43-101 polymetallic resource in California(1)
- Indicated: 2.62 Mt @ 6.01% Zn, 0.67% Cu, 0.27% Pb, 1.43 opt Ag, 0.03 opt Au
- Inferred: 2.68 Mt @ 5.98% Zn, 0.41% Cu, 0.40% Pb, 1.63 opt Ag, 0.04 opt Au
- Excellent potential to increase resource along strike and at depth as well as re-cutting the
current resource at higher metal prices
- Experienced management with knowledge of permitting
- Former CEO of Golden Queen (Lutz Klingmann) and key consultants that successfully
permitted the open-pit, heap-leach Soledad Mountain gold mine in California
- Officers and directors own 21% of the outstanding stock
1
Material resource
2
Knowhow
3
Value creation
Low-risk execution and key value drivers in the near-term
- Pathway to permitting; which would allow construction to begin 30-36 months from financing
- New NI 43-101 resource assessment at current metal prices as well as a PEA to be
published in Q1’18
Material History of the Project
1943-1945 Hecla performed small scale mining during World War II; 56,000 tons grading 12.3% zinc 1981-1984 Imperial Metals completed approximately 33,000 feet of diamond drilling 1984-1988 Boliden (Westmin), one of Europe’s largest zinc producers, completed:
- Approximately 57,000 feet of diamond drilling
- Calculated a mineral resource and commenced engineering, metallurgical, hydrological
and environment baseline studies 1989 Boliden (Westmin) obtained a conditional use permit and approval of a reclamation plan from Mariposa County for certain underground development 1991 Barrick (Lac) completed approximately 20,000 feet of drilling 2007 Blue Moon was created as a result of two corporate spinouts of advanced stage zinc assets. Yukon Zinc followed by a 2007 spinout by Selwyn Resource’s zinc assets into Blue Moon 2008 Blue Moon established the current resource via previous and well documented work programs
4
Favourable Location
5
Located in Mariposa
County, Central California.
Active mines and
exploration projects in the region
Part of California
gold rush
Foothills area
Surface Conditions
6
The property is located in
rolling grasslands
The land surface is
currently used for seasonal ranching and is sparsely populated
Restricted land use under
the Williamson Act (no residential development but mining permitted)
Tenure & Local Infrastructure
525 acres of mineral rights on patented and unpatented
claims.
Accessible by a three mile gravel road off a nearby
paved highway.
A hydroelectric power generation facility one mile north;
the main transmission line passes less than a miles away.
Elevations on the property range from 1,000 to 1,600
feet above sea level.
Sea ports, rail and trucking routes are all accessible. Labour and contractors are readily available from
population centres in the Central Valley.
7
Near Term Catalysts
Updated 43-101 resource assessment
Expected Q4 2017 Update the resource assessment utilizing more
current commodity prices (versus 2008)
Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA)
Expected Q1 2018 Maiden PEA for the Blue Moon zinc project
8
43-101 Resource Assessment (from 2008)
The cut-off grades used were calculated on the basis of all five metals based on the Gross Recoverable Value ("GRV") assumptions and the range of expected mining, processing and administrative costs based on costs associated with underground mining of known, similar sized deposits. A total of 82 drill holes were used totalling a combined 111,250 ft. (34,000 meters) with 1,540 assays. All supplied units were Imperial and these units were used in the resource calculation. Samples were assayed for Cu, Pb and Zn in percent and Au and Ag in ounces per ton. A gross recoverable value "GRV" was chosen making use of reasonable metal prices and estimated recoveries. The parameters used were as follows: Zinc - $0.75/pound 95% Recovery, Copper - $2.00/pound 93% Recovery, Lead - $0.78/pound 95% Recovery, Silver - $8.50/oz 65% Recovery, Gold - $600 /oz 70% Recovery. The equation to calculate GRV was as follows: GRV(US$) = Zn% * 14.25 + Cu % * 37.20 + Pb% * 14.82 + Ag(oz/t) * 5.525 + Au(oz/t) * 420.0. Recoveries used in the calculation are based on metallurgical testing of drill core undertaken by Lakefield Research on behalf of Westmin Resources Limited on samples of mineralization. The resource estimate reported was produced by Gary Giroux, P.Eng. MASc and Robert J. Morris, MSc.PGeo. who are Qualified Persons as defined by NI-43-101 and are responsible for the technical material related to the resource
- calculation. The NI 43-101 report is dated February 7, 2008 and was filed on SEDAR on February 21, 20o8.
9
Cutoff Tons > Grade > Cutoff Contained Metal (Millions) GRV Cutoff Zn Cu Ag Au Pb lbs lbs lbs
- zs
- zs
US$ (tons) % %
- z/t
- z/t
% Zn Cu Pb Ag Au Indicated: $85 2,620,000 6.01 0.67 1.41 0.04 0.27 315 35 14 3.7 0.1 Inferred: $85 2,680,000 5.98 0.41 1.63 0.04 0.40 320 22 22 4.4 0.1
43-101 Commodity Price Assumptions (2008)
Blue Moon will be updating the 43-101 in Q4 2017:
10
43-101 (2008) Spot Price (August 2017) Zinc per Lb $0.75 $1.40 Copper per lb $2.00 $3.00 Lead per lb $0.78 $1.00 Silver per ounce $8.50 $17.00 Gold per ounce $600 $1,300 Higher metal prices should positively impact tons and contained metals
Resource Expansive and Exploration
Expand Existing Resources
Deposit is open to South Deposit is open to depth (new deep zone) Extension of West, Main and East zones untested
Exploration targets along strike Untested trend of coincident soil and IP
anomalies within the favorable felsic volcanic rocks
11
Exploration Upside
Extent of alteration and
mineralization indicates a large mineralizing system may extend south of the resource
IP anomalies along strike VMS deposits known to exist
in clusters or pods
12
Only a few drill holes in this area
Long Section of Current Resources and Expansion/Exploration Opportunities
13
3.2’ (1.2m) @29.6% Zn, 1% Pb, 3.48% Cu, 5.15 opt Ag, 0.128 opt Au
Surface
Historical Production during WWII Existing 43-101 resource; lenses average 4-5 meters wide Drilled to 2,000 feet or 600 meters
needs follow up
Mineralization open at depth
Permitting
Lutz Klingmann, who recently permitted and achieved
commercial production (early 2016) at Golden Queen’s project in Southern California is a key technical advisor to Blue Moon.
Environmental team retained who recently assisted in
the permitting of Golden Queen’s project in Southern California.
Project will be underground with lower environmental
footprint.
Local County is key decision maker. Project was a past producer and had a conditional use
permit issued in 1989 for certain underground development.
14
Metallurgy
Metallurgy/Recovery
1998 Lakefield Research results show recovery up to
95% for Zinc and Lead, 93% for Copper, 70% for Silver and 65% for Gold.
Simple processing will produce premium
concentrates.
Coarse grained sphalerite, chalcopyrite and galena
means easy separation of the economic minerals from pyrite and therefore high recoveries.
Conventional flotation to result in multiple
concentrates.
15
Advance to Construction
16
Baseline study Infill drilling to upgrade resource classification Feasibility study Conditional Use Permit /Reclamation Plan 12 month review by County 3-9 month hearing process From Financing 30-36 Months Construction Metallurgy Engineering Expansion and Exploration drilling
Comparable Development Stage Zinc Projects
17
* Compiled to the best of the Company’s knowledge from publicly available information as of August 22, 2017
97 62 59 34 18
Blue Moon Inzinc Fireweed Constantine Zinc One
Indicated Pounds of Zinc per $1.00 of market capitalization
What is a Proven Zinc Pound Worth?
18
Trevali acquisition from Glencore (March 2017) 1.6 billion lbs Zn P&P USD $400 million
* USD $0.25 per pound is derived from the acquired proven and probable zinc in place metals divided by the US $400 million purchase price
Blue Moon’s resources would be upgraded on commencement of production 315 million lbs Zn indicated 320 million lbs Zn inferred
$0.25 lb Zinc (*)
USD $?
$0.25 lb Zinc (*)
Comparable Producing Projects
19
* Compiled to the best of the Company’s knowledge from publicly available information
Project Indicated resource at commencement
- f production
Method Recoveries Geology Mill rate Galmoy Zinc Mine (Lundin Mining) 6.0 Mt @ 11.5% Zi (1997) Underground 83% Massive sulphides 1,700 tpd Santander Zinc Mine (Trevali) 6.3 Mt @3.6% Zi (2012) Underground 89% Polymetallic high temperature carbonate 2,000 tpd
California: Active in Resource Development
Golden Queen (Soledad Mountain Mine)
- Permitted in 2012 and Commercial Production in early 2016
- Lutz Klingmann, former CEO of Golden Queen, is a key technical
advisor to Blue Moon
- Produced approximately 19,000 ounces of gold and 193,000
- unces of silver in 2016
New Gold (Mesquite Mine)
- Production commenced in 2008
- Former VP Operations who re-started Mesquite is key technical
advisor of Blue Moon
- Produced approximately 110,000 ounces in 2016
California is the US’s second most prolific
construction aggregate producing state.
California is the US’s fourth most prolific oil
producing state.
20
Deposit Geological Attributes
High-grade polymetallic Zn-Cu-Pb-Au-Ag volcanogenic
massive sulphide deposit
Classified as a Kuroko-type, polymetallic,
volcanogenic, massive sulphide (VMS) deposit hosted in rhyolite.
The ore minerals are pyrite, sphalerite, chalcopyrite,
galena, and minor tetrahedrite and bornite.
Associated sulphate minerals are barite, gypsum and
anhydrite.
To date, four lenses of mineralization have been
identified within two, possibly three, near vertical stacked horizons within a 50 - 180 foot (15 – 55 metres) stratigraphic interval.
21
Cross-Section of mineralized Zones
Cross-section 7200N, looking to the north.
Main Zone is red, East
Zone is green, and the West Zone is blue.
Grid is 200’ vertical and
500’ east-west.
Near vertical.
22
Other Zinc Assets
Yava Property, Nunavut Canada
Brascan Resources estimated the Yava main zone
contained 1.3 million tons at 4.96% zinc, 1.03% copper, 1.6% lead, 3.42 ounces per ton silver and 0.008 ounces per ton gold to a depth of 300 feet (Salaken March 1976) (*)
The Yava Lease contains four known base and precious
metal occurrences
The north end of the greenstone belt hosts the Hackett
River base metal occurrence and the south end of greenstone belt hosts the Musk base and precious metal, both held by Glencore
* This estimate predates NI 43-101 and constitute a historical estimate under that policy. However, based on the definitions of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves used in NI 43-101, Brascan’s 1976 estimate is comparable to an Inferred Mineral Resource that is inferred from geological evidence, but not confirmed because data from outcrops, trenches, pits, and widely- spaced shallow drill holes, are limited. Dr. Hodder, the NI 43-101 author, was not able to identify assumptions and parameters used in the Brascan resource estimation and neither Dr. Hodder nor Blue Moon are treating this historical estimate as current Mineral Resources under NI 43-101. Historical estimates should not be relied upon.
23
Share Structure
24
Management Team/Board
Patrick McGrath, Chief Executive Officer
- CPA-CGA with 20 years experience in financing and executive roles in junior public sector.
- Most recently CFO of Cub Energy, an international oil and gas producer with peak production
- f 2,500 boe/d. Was CFO of Anatolia Energy which raised $37 million and was acquired by
Cub Energy in 2013.
- Co-founder and former VP Finance of Adriana Resources Inc. (now Sprott Resource Holdings
Inc.) which raised $50 million in equity and debt during his tenure.
Jack McClintock, Director
- P. Eng and President and CEO of Northisle Copper and Gold Inc.
- Former Exploration Manager with BHP Billiton. Successful track record of leading and
participating in significant mineral discoveries including the Spence porphyry copper deposit in Chile.
- Recipient of the “Prospector of the Year” award in 1998.
Douglas Urch, Director
- CPA-CMA and Executive VP Finance CFO of Bankers Petroleum Ltd. since 2008 with last
reported production of 16,000 bopd.
- Bankers acquired in 2016 for $575 million.
- Former CFO of Rally Energy Corp; Rally acquired for $898 million in 2007.
Varun Prasad, Chief Financial Officer
- CPA-CGA and has held senior roles with development stage mining companies listed on the
TSX and NYSE market.
- Bachelor of Technology in Accounting from BCIT.
25
Key Consultants/Advisors
Lutz Klingmann, P. Eng
- CEO/Director of Golden Queen from 2001 too 2015. Permitted, financing and built the
Soledad Mountain project in Southern California. Commercial production in early 2016.
- Founded Minto Exploration Ltd. where he acquired, financed and worked to bring the
project to production. Minto is one of the leading operating mines in Capstone Mining Corp’s production portfolio.
California Environmental Engineering Firm/ Environmental Lawyer
- 35 years experience in environmental law and permitting in resource sector.
- Assisted in the permitting of Golden Queen’s Southern California gold project.
- Instrumental to retain right permitting team.
Mike Petrina, P. Eng
- Former COO of Probe Mines Limited where he managed permitting and preliminary
economic assessment of the Borden Gold project.
- Former VP Operations of MAG Silver where he worked with MAG’s partner on the
preliminary feasibility study for the Jaunicipio project.
- Former Manager of Mining at Pan American Silver where he managed the restart and
- ptimization of the Hauron mine.
Lawrence O’Connor, Q.P.
- Former VP Operations at Western Goldfields (now New Gold) where he restarted of the
Mesquite Mine in California.
- Former G.M. of Eldorado Gold Corp’s La Colorada Mine where he completed the
feasibility study and permitting required for expansion. 26