troubled families
play

Troubled Families Christine Pryor Divisional Director, Targeted - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Troubled Families Christine Pryor Divisional Director, Targeted Family Support Troubled Families Programme 120,000 most troubled families in England to be targeted 3 year programme with 100k per annum Funding received on a


  1. Troubled Families Christine Pryor Divisional Director, Targeted Family Support

  2. Troubled Families Programme • 120,000 most troubled families in England to be targeted • 3 year programme with £100k per annum • Funding received on a payments by results basis • 645 families identified in Barking and Dagenham • Estimated cost to tax payer of £48.375m

  3. Definition of Troubled Family • Children not attending school • Involvement in crime and/or anti-social behaviour • Not in work • High cost to public purse

  4. Criteria for Identifying Families Criteria 1 – Crime/anti-social behaviour Criteria 2 – Education Criteria 3 – Work Criteria 4 – Local Discretion

  5. Criteria 1 – Crime/Anti-social Behaviour • Under 18 year olds with a proven offence in last 12 months and/or • Members with anti-social behaviour order, injunction, contract or housing related intervention in last 12 month

  6. Criteria 2 – Education • Child with permanent or 3 more fixed term school exclusions in last 3 terms • Child in Pupil Referral Unit or alternative provision because they have been excluded • Child not on a school roll • Has 15% unauthorised absence or more from school in last 3 terms

  7. Criteria 3 – Work • An adult on Department for Work and Pensions “out of work” benefits

  8. Criteria 4 – Local Discretion • Vulnerable 2 year olds • Children experiencing chronic neglect • Children who are Children in Need or have Child Protection plan • Teenage parents • Teenage parents • At risk of eviction, with rent arrears • Member in custody • All exclusions and at risk of exclusion • Known to Targeted Services

  9. Success Criteria (Result) • Each child family has had fewer than 3 fixed exclusions and less than 15% unauthorised absence in last 3 terms • 60% reduction in anti-social behaviour across the family in last 6 months • Offending rate by all minors in the family reduced by 33% in last 6 months • At least 1 adult in family has moved off out of work benefits into continuous employment in last 6 months or One adult in family has volunteered for Work Programme or attached to European Social Fund provision in last 6 months.

  10. Financial Implications • Average unit cost of intensive interventions is approximately £10,000. • DCLG is making available up to £4,000 for each troubled family. • Council and partners are expected to make up the rest of the £6,000 investment. • A proportion of the £4,000 will be paid upfront as an ‘attachment fee’ for the number of families with whom council starts working. • LBBD has committed to working with 215 families in each year of the programme. • DCLG will provide attachment fee funding for every 5 out of 6 families. • LBBD will therefore receive attachment feed funding for 179 families.

  11. Income 2012 - 2015 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 Total Income Income 179 families 179 families 179 families Up front @ £3,200 @ £2,400 @ £1,600 attachment fee Payment by £0 £0 £0 result (Note 1) Total Income £572,800 £429,600 £286,400 £1,288,800

  12. Turning the Families Around • Use of the Family Common Assessment • A multi-agency approach • Clear, focused action plans with measurable outcomes • Small case loads enabling targeted work • Use of voluntary sector

  13. Profiles of 242 Identified Families • 78 – Crime and anti-social behaviour • 183 – Poor school attendance • 216 – In receipt of out of work benefits • 5 – Vulnerable 2 year olds • 83 – Child protection plan or child in need • 17 – Teenage parent • 8 – Adult in prison • 36 – At risk of eviction

  14. Profiles of 242 Identified Families continued • 20 – In rent arrears • 44 – Excluded from school • 91 – Social care • 70 – Common assessment (previous) • • 30 – Open Common assessment 30 – Open Common assessment • 103 – Known to multi-agency locality teams • 14 - Family Intervention Project • 59 – No assessment by Social Care, Common Assessment or Youth Offending Service

  15. Interim Outcomes Framework (examples) • Parent expresses interest in accessing the job market and developing work based experience/improving training skills • Number of families of excluded children engaging with the Parent Advocacy Project • Reduction in number of days lost through fixed term exclusions • Number of families engaged with Family Common Assessment Framework and attending review meetings • Number of sessions absent each half term

  16. Progress with Programme • Identification of 242 families • Training programme on Family CAF • Lead professional for every family to initiate Family CAF • Review of all social care assessments and action plans • Contract with School/Home Support, Parent Support Advisors • Contract with Carers of Barking and Dagenham, advocacy to families with excluded children • Merging of Family Intervention Project and Crisis Intervention Teams to form Troubled Families Team • Recruitment of 4 Targeted Family Support Workers, 2 Targeted Youth Workers and 2 Family Intervention Project Workers to strengthen Troubled Families Team • Intensive support from Reed Employment

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend