Troubled Families Christine Pryor Divisional Director, Targeted - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Troubled Families Christine Pryor Divisional Director, Targeted - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Troubled Families Christine Pryor Divisional Director, Targeted Family Support Troubled Families Programme 120,000 most troubled families in England to be targeted 3 year programme with 100k per annum Funding received on a
Troubled Families Programme
- 120,000 most troubled families in England to be targeted
- 3 year programme with £100k per annum
- Funding received on a payments by results basis
- 645 families identified in Barking and Dagenham
- Estimated cost to tax payer of £48.375m
Definition of Troubled Family
- Children not attending school
- Involvement in crime and/or anti-social behaviour
- Not in work
- High cost to public purse
Criteria for Identifying Families
Criteria 1 – Crime/anti-social behaviour Criteria 2 – Education Criteria 3 – Work Criteria 4 – Local Discretion
Criteria 1 – Crime/Anti-social Behaviour
- Under 18 year olds with a proven offence in last 12
months and/or
- Members with anti-social behaviour order, injunction,
contract or housing related intervention in last 12 month
Criteria 2 – Education
- Child with permanent or 3 more fixed term school
exclusions in last 3 terms
- Child in Pupil Referral Unit or alternative provision
because they have been excluded
- Child not on a school roll
- Has 15% unauthorised absence or more from school in
last 3 terms
Criteria 3 – Work
- An adult on Department for Work and Pensions “out of
work” benefits
Criteria 4 – Local Discretion
- Vulnerable 2 year olds
- Children experiencing chronic neglect
- Children who are Children in Need or have Child
Protection plan
- Teenage parents
- Teenage parents
- At risk of eviction, with rent arrears
- Member in custody
- All exclusions and at risk of exclusion
- Known to Targeted Services
Success Criteria (Result)
- Each child family has had fewer than 3 fixed exclusions and
less than 15% unauthorised absence in last 3 terms
- 60% reduction in anti-social behaviour across the family in
last 6 months
- Offending rate by all minors in the family reduced by 33% in
last 6 months
- At least 1 adult in family has moved off out of work benefits
into continuous employment in last 6 months
- r
One adult in family has volunteered for Work Programme or attached to European Social Fund provision in last 6 months.
Financial Implications
- Average unit cost of intensive interventions is approximately
£10,000.
- DCLG is making available up to £4,000 for each troubled family.
- Council and partners are expected to make up the rest of the £6,000
investment.
- A proportion of the £4,000 will be paid upfront as an ‘attachment fee’
for the number of families with whom council starts working.
- LBBD has committed to working with 215 families in each year of
the programme.
- DCLG will provide attachment fee funding for every 5 out of 6
families.
- LBBD will therefore receive attachment feed funding for 179
families.
Income 2012 - 2015
2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 Total Income Income Up front attachment fee 179 families @ £3,200 179 families @ £2,400 179 families @ £1,600 Payment by result (Note 1) £0 £0 £0 Total Income £572,800 £429,600 £286,400 £1,288,800
Turning the Families Around
- Use of the Family Common Assessment
- A multi-agency approach
- Clear, focused action plans with measurable outcomes
- Small case loads enabling targeted work
- Use of voluntary sector
Profiles of 242 Identified Families
- 78 – Crime and anti-social behaviour
- 183 – Poor school attendance
- 216 – In receipt of out of work benefits
- 5 – Vulnerable 2 year olds
- 83 – Child protection plan or child in need
- 17 – Teenage parent
- 8 – Adult in prison
- 36 – At risk of eviction
Profiles of 242 Identified Families continued
- 20 – In rent arrears
- 44 – Excluded from school
- 91 – Social care
- 70 – Common assessment (previous)
- 30 – Open Common assessment
- 30 – Open Common assessment
- 103 – Known to multi-agency locality teams
- 14 - Family Intervention Project
- 59 – No assessment by Social Care, Common
Assessment or Youth Offending Service
Interim Outcomes Framework (examples)
- Parent expresses interest in accessing the job market
and developing work based experience/improving training skills
- Number of families of excluded children engaging with
the Parent Advocacy Project
- Reduction in number of days lost through fixed term
exclusions
- Number of families engaged with Family Common
Assessment Framework and attending review meetings
- Number of sessions absent each half term
Progress with Programme
- Identification of 242 families
- Training programme on Family CAF
- Lead professional for every family to initiate Family CAF
- Review of all social care assessments and action plans
- Contract with School/Home Support, Parent Support Advisors
- Contract with Carers of Barking and Dagenham, advocacy to
families with excluded children
- Merging of Family Intervention Project and Crisis Intervention
Teams to form Troubled Families Team
- Recruitment of 4 Targeted Family Support Workers, 2 Targeted
Youth Workers and 2 Family Intervention Project Workers to strengthen Troubled Families Team
- Intensive support from Reed Employment