Troubled Families Christine Pryor Divisional Director, Targeted - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

troubled families
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Troubled Families Christine Pryor Divisional Director, Targeted - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Troubled Families Christine Pryor Divisional Director, Targeted Family Support Troubled Families Programme 120,000 most troubled families in England to be targeted 3 year programme with 100k per annum Funding received on a


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Troubled Families

Christine Pryor

Divisional Director, Targeted Family Support

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Troubled Families Programme

  • 120,000 most troubled families in England to be targeted
  • 3 year programme with £100k per annum
  • Funding received on a payments by results basis
  • 645 families identified in Barking and Dagenham
  • Estimated cost to tax payer of £48.375m
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Definition of Troubled Family

  • Children not attending school
  • Involvement in crime and/or anti-social behaviour
  • Not in work
  • High cost to public purse
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Criteria for Identifying Families

Criteria 1 – Crime/anti-social behaviour Criteria 2 – Education Criteria 3 – Work Criteria 4 – Local Discretion

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Criteria 1 – Crime/Anti-social Behaviour

  • Under 18 year olds with a proven offence in last 12

months and/or

  • Members with anti-social behaviour order, injunction,

contract or housing related intervention in last 12 month

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Criteria 2 – Education

  • Child with permanent or 3 more fixed term school

exclusions in last 3 terms

  • Child in Pupil Referral Unit or alternative provision

because they have been excluded

  • Child not on a school roll
  • Has 15% unauthorised absence or more from school in

last 3 terms

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Criteria 3 – Work

  • An adult on Department for Work and Pensions “out of

work” benefits

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Criteria 4 – Local Discretion

  • Vulnerable 2 year olds
  • Children experiencing chronic neglect
  • Children who are Children in Need or have Child

Protection plan

  • Teenage parents
  • Teenage parents
  • At risk of eviction, with rent arrears
  • Member in custody
  • All exclusions and at risk of exclusion
  • Known to Targeted Services
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Success Criteria (Result)

  • Each child family has had fewer than 3 fixed exclusions and

less than 15% unauthorised absence in last 3 terms

  • 60% reduction in anti-social behaviour across the family in

last 6 months

  • Offending rate by all minors in the family reduced by 33% in

last 6 months

  • At least 1 adult in family has moved off out of work benefits

into continuous employment in last 6 months

  • r

One adult in family has volunteered for Work Programme or attached to European Social Fund provision in last 6 months.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Financial Implications

  • Average unit cost of intensive interventions is approximately

£10,000.

  • DCLG is making available up to £4,000 for each troubled family.
  • Council and partners are expected to make up the rest of the £6,000

investment.

  • A proportion of the £4,000 will be paid upfront as an ‘attachment fee’

for the number of families with whom council starts working.

  • LBBD has committed to working with 215 families in each year of

the programme.

  • DCLG will provide attachment fee funding for every 5 out of 6

families.

  • LBBD will therefore receive attachment feed funding for 179

families.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Income 2012 - 2015

2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 Total Income Income Up front attachment fee 179 families @ £3,200 179 families @ £2,400 179 families @ £1,600 Payment by result (Note 1) £0 £0 £0 Total Income £572,800 £429,600 £286,400 £1,288,800

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Turning the Families Around

  • Use of the Family Common Assessment
  • A multi-agency approach
  • Clear, focused action plans with measurable outcomes
  • Small case loads enabling targeted work
  • Use of voluntary sector
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Profiles of 242 Identified Families

  • 78 – Crime and anti-social behaviour
  • 183 – Poor school attendance
  • 216 – In receipt of out of work benefits
  • 5 – Vulnerable 2 year olds
  • 83 – Child protection plan or child in need
  • 17 – Teenage parent
  • 8 – Adult in prison
  • 36 – At risk of eviction
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Profiles of 242 Identified Families continued

  • 20 – In rent arrears
  • 44 – Excluded from school
  • 91 – Social care
  • 70 – Common assessment (previous)
  • 30 – Open Common assessment
  • 30 – Open Common assessment
  • 103 – Known to multi-agency locality teams
  • 14 - Family Intervention Project
  • 59 – No assessment by Social Care, Common

Assessment or Youth Offending Service

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Interim Outcomes Framework (examples)

  • Parent expresses interest in accessing the job market

and developing work based experience/improving training skills

  • Number of families of excluded children engaging with

the Parent Advocacy Project

  • Reduction in number of days lost through fixed term

exclusions

  • Number of families engaged with Family Common

Assessment Framework and attending review meetings

  • Number of sessions absent each half term
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Progress with Programme

  • Identification of 242 families
  • Training programme on Family CAF
  • Lead professional for every family to initiate Family CAF
  • Review of all social care assessments and action plans
  • Contract with School/Home Support, Parent Support Advisors
  • Contract with Carers of Barking and Dagenham, advocacy to

families with excluded children

  • Merging of Family Intervention Project and Crisis Intervention

Teams to form Troubled Families Team

  • Recruitment of 4 Targeted Family Support Workers, 2 Targeted

Youth Workers and 2 Family Intervention Project Workers to strengthen Troubled Families Team

  • Intensive support from Reed Employment