Tree Swallows as a Sentinel Species in Hamilton Harbour Pamela - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

tree swallows as a sentinel species in hamilton harbour
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Tree Swallows as a Sentinel Species in Hamilton Harbour Pamela - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Tree Swallows as a Sentinel Species in Hamilton Harbour Pamela Martin, Glenn Barrett, Kim Hughes, Kyna Intini, Kimberly OHare Ecotoxicology and Wildlife Health Division What we do: Research and monitoring of effects of toxicological and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Tree Swallows as a Sentinel Species in Hamilton Harbour

Pamela Martin, Glenn Barrett, Kim Hughes, Kyna Intini, Kimberly O’Hare

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Page 2 – November-17-15

2

What we do:

  • Research and monitoring of effects of toxicological and

ecological stressors on wildlife

  • Measurement of contaminants (PCBs, metals,

pesticides, etc) in body burdens

  • Assessment of wildlife health

Ecotoxicology and Wildlife Health Division

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Page 3 – November-17-15

3

Wildlife Species We Study

Northern Leopard Frog Double-crested Cormorant Snapping Turtle Herring Gull

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Page 4 – November-17-15

4

And…Tree Swallows

Photos: http://digitalmedia.fws.gov/

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Page 5 – November-17-15

Great Lakes Areas of Concern: Hamilton Harbour

  • Hamilton Harbour is an embayment located in the western end of

Lake Ontario and is connected to the lake only by a ship canal.

  • Historically, the economy of the region was based on the iron and

steel industries; today, Hamilton Harbour remains a major shipping centre supporting one the largest concentrations of heavy industry in Canada.

  • In 1985, Hamilton Harbour was identified as a Great Lakes Area
  • f Concern as a result of historical industrial and municipal activities

(among others) that degraded water and sediment quality.

  • Currently, industrial and municipal point sources meet provincial

standards.

  • However, due to the long retention time of water in the Harbour,

impacts on the aquatic ecosystem, fish and wildlife continue to

  • ccur.
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Page 6 – November-17-15

Hamilton Harbour-Contaminants

  • Historical sources of

contaminants from industries and municipal activities, urban and rural run-off, spills & leachate from landfills

  • Water and sediment

contaminated by pesticides, metals, PCBs & PAHs

  • There are “hotspot”

locations where these contaminants are notably high.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Page 7 – November-17-15

One Hotspot = Randle Reef

  • Randle Reef is located along the southern industrial

shore of Hamilton Harbour

  • Known for coal-tar deposits and high levels of polycyclic

aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sediment

  • Acutely toxic to fish and wildlife
  • Contain carcinogens that lead to developmental and

reproductive deformities in fish and wildlife

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Page 8 – November-17-15

Planning for the Future-Randle Reef

  • Remediation of Randle Reef sediments has been

planned for many years.

  • After a few false starts, it seems set that remediation will

be initiated in 2016.

  • One key action of the Remedial Action Plan process is

the ongoing monitoring of the Harbour after remediation has

  • ccurred to ensure environmental challenges have been

addressed successfully.

  • One component of this program is to monitor aquatic

invertebrates living in the sediments.

  • In 2012, it was decided to incorporate monitoring at a

higher trophic level and tree swallows were chosen as the sentinel wildlife species.

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Close ties to sediment

contamination

  • Can detect changes in sediment

contamination

  • Linkage between sediment and

birds via aquatic insects is short, so more easily interpreted

  • Nest boxes at areas of interest
  • Achieve adequate sample size
  • Localized feeding
  • Data available for comparison

Why study tree swallows?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Great Lakes Tree Swallow Studies

  • In Canada, similar tree swallow studies are underway at

Thunder Bay and will be initiated on the Detroit River in 2016.

http://www.umesc.usgs.gov/wildlife_toxicology/glri_project80.html_

  • In the U.S., over

40 nesting sites are currently being monitored as part of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) Project 80

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Page 11 – November-17-15

Tree Swallow Breeding Biology

  • Arrive on breeding grounds

in late-March to mid-April when courtship begins

  • Cavity nesters
  • Females lay 4-7 white eggs

which are incubated for 16 days

  • Diet of insects caught on the

wing

  • Birds fledge at 18-22 days
  • Leave breeding grounds in

late July - August

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Tree Swallows Study - Purpose

  • Study wildlife to measure effectiveness of remediation
  • f Randle Reef (data collected before and after

remediation activities)

  • Assess reproductive and physiological endpoints.
  • Measure exposure to legacy contaminants (eg, PCBs,

heavy metals and PAHs) and other newer compounds (eg, flame retardants).

  • Provide assessment of wildlife reproduction and health

in the Hamilton Harbour Area of Concern.

  • Allows comparison to other studies
  • f tree swallows on the Great Lakes

including other remediation sites.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Page 13 – November-17-15

Study Design 2013-2015

  • Install 25 nest boxes at each study location.
  • Check them regularly to determine occupancy and

reproductive parameter of nesting pairs; this includes counting the number of eggs laid, number of eggs hatched and number of young fledged per nest.

  • Collect eggs for analysis of
  • rganochlorines (e.g., PCBs), flame

retardants & metals.

  • Weigh & measure fledglings, collect

feathers for corticosterone analysis.

  • Collect blood, liver & lung tissues from

chicks for PAH analysis & gene mutation analysis.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Page 14 – November-17-15

Tree Swallow Sampling

Accessing the nestbox Day 14: Weighing and measuring the chicks Blood sampling Plucking wing feather

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Page 15 – November-17-15

General Study Locations

  • Two Hamilton Harbour locations, Randle Reef & Bayfront

Park monitored since 2013.

  • Study expanded to include three Cootes Paradise

locations in 2015.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Page 16 – November-17-15

Hamilton Harbour Study Locations 2013-2015

  • 25 nest boxes installed in 2013 in a grid on t-posts and

fences adjacent to Randle Reef.

  • In 2014, boxes were moved a few hundred metres away

to accommodate future staging of remediation project. Pier 15 West US Steel

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Page 17 – November-17-15

Hamilton Harbour Study Locations 2013-2015

  • 25 boxes were also installed at Bayfront Park at the west

end of Hamilton Harbour.

  • Located 4 km west and upwind of Randle Reef
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Page 18 – November-17-15

Cootes Paradise Study Locations 2015

  • 25 nest boxes installed in

2015 at three Cootes Paradise locations: Boathouse, Princess Point & Spencer Creek in collaboration with RBG

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Page 19 – November-17-15

Reference Site Location 2013-2015

  • Established population of tree swallows at the tip of Long

Point on Lake Erie where nest boxes had been previously installed.

  • Naturally preserved site with no industry or development.
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Page 20 – November-17-15

20

Air Monitoring in 2013-2015

  • Polyurethane foam passive air samplers (PUF-disk) were

set up at each study location to obtain measurements of PAHs in air (Air S&T, Environment Canada).

  • Samplers were deployed for 6-7 weeks in May & June
  • Reflects what swallows are exposed to in breeding season.
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Page 21 – November-17-15

21

RESULTS

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Page 22 – November-17-15

22

Nest Site Occupancy 2013-2015

  • First year we

broadcast recordings

  • f swallow calls to

attract birds to nest boxes in Randle Reef.

  • Swallows initiated

egg laying in early May at Randle Reef, Bayfront Park & Long Point with completion

  • f clutches in early-

mid June.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Page 23 – November-17-15

23

Hamilton Harbour Nest Site Occupancy 2013-2015

Location Year # Nest- boxes # Nest Boxes Occupied Percent Occupancy Randle Reef 2013 25 8 32% 2014 25 11 44% 2015 25 19 76% Bayfront P. 2013 23* 13 57% 2014 21* 7 33% 2015 24* 17 71%

* Some boxes were lost due to theft and vandalism

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Page 24 – November-17-15

24

Cootes Paradise Nest Site Occupancy 2015

Location Year # Nest- boxes # Nest Boxes Occupied Percent Occupancy Princess Point 2015 25 11 44% Boathouse 2015 21 8 38% Spencer Creek 2015 24 5 21%

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Page 25 – November-17-15

25

Hamilton Harbour Reproductive Success 2013-2015

Location Year No. Nests

  • No. Eggs /

Nest Number Fledged / Nest Fledging Success (%) Randle 2013 8 5.4 3.1 88% Reef 2014 11 4.7 2.6 65% 2015 19 5.5 4.4 84% Bayfront 2013 13 5.4 2.7 72% Park 2014 7 5.7 2.7 83% 2015 17 5.8 3.7 60% Long Pt 2013 5 5.6 2.6 90% 2014 6 6.5 2.5 75% 2015 5 6.0 5.4 100%

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Page 26 – November-17-15

26

Cootes Paradise Reproductive Success

Location Year No. Nests*

  • No. Eggs /

Nest Number Fledged / Nest Fledging Success (%) Princess Point 2015 11 5.6 4.1 89% Boathouse 2015 8 5.8 4.3 100% Spencer Creek 2015 5 5.0 3.0 100%

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Page 27 – November-17-15

27

PCBs in Eggs – 2013 & 2014

  • Higher concentrations in eggs

from two Hamilton locations compared to Long Point.

  • Concentrations also high

compared to many other Great Lakes sites.

  • But concentrations are below

levels for impacts on hatching success for many bird species.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Page 28 – November-17-15

Relative to PCBs in Eggs from other Great Lakes Sites

Randle Reef 2013 & 2014 http://www.umesc.usgs.gov/wildlife_toxicology/glri_project80_results_organic_contaminants.html

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Page 29 – November-17-15

29

PBDEs in Eggs – 2013 & 2014

  • Also higher concentrations in eggs from Hamilton locations

compared to Long Point.

  • Concentrations also high relative to many other Great Lakes sites.
  • Effect concentrations not known for PBDEs in birds.
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Page 30 – November-17-15

Relative to PBDEs in Eggs from other Great Lakes Sites

Randle Reef 2013 & 2014 http://www.umesc.usgs.gov/wildlife_toxicology/glri_project80_results_organic_contaminants.html

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Page 31 – November-17-15

31

PAHs in Air- 2013 & 2014

  • 19 parental PAHs & 24 alkylated

PAHs found in air at Randle Reef sites.

  • Higher levels of PAHs

found at Randle Reef locations compared to other study locations.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Page 32 – November-17-15

32

PAHs in Chicks - 2013 & 2014

  • Six PAHs found in liver of

chicks including: naphthalene, acenaphthene, dibenz[a,h]anthracene and

  • thers.
  • Similar concentrations of PAHs

found among study locations .

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Page 33 – November-17-15

33

Tree Swallows Hg in Eggs – 2013 & 2014

  • Mercury in eggs higher at Long Point compared to two AOC

locations in 2013 and no difference in eggs among locations in 2014.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Page 34 – November-17-15

34

Tree Swallows Other Metals in Eggs - 2013

  • 24 metals screened for of which 17 were found in at least one

sample; not found were Be, Cd, Sn, Sb, Ti, Bi & U.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Page 35 – November-17-15

35

Biomarkers of Exposure Results Pending

  • Pesticide concentrations in plasma of fledglings
  • Corticosterone in feathers as a measure of stress
  • EROD analysis in liver of chicks, gives indication of

exposure to PAHs and dioxins

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Page 36 – November-17-15

36

Future Work

  • Work to continue at Hamilton Harbour and Cootes

Paradise locations in 2016.

  • Other endpoints to align with American studies –

thyroid hormones, anti-oxidants, immune function, genomics

  • Return to sites to sample AFTER remediation is

complete.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Page 37 – November-17-15

37

Our Thanks to:

  • US Steel and Hamilton Port Authority for

collaboration and access to property

  • Tom Harner and Anita Eng of Atmospheric

Science and Technology Directorate, EC, for PUF sampling and PAH analyses.

  • Stuart Mackenzie and Bird Studies Canada for

providing data on Tree swallows at Long Point.

  • Tys Theysmeyer and staff of Royal Botanical

Gardens for collaboration and access to property.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Page 38 – November-17-15

38

QUESTIONS?