Tree Swallows as a Sentinel Species in Hamilton Harbour
Pamela Martin, Glenn Barrett, Kim Hughes, Kyna Intini, Kimberly O’Hare
Tree Swallows as a Sentinel Species in Hamilton Harbour Pamela - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Tree Swallows as a Sentinel Species in Hamilton Harbour Pamela Martin, Glenn Barrett, Kim Hughes, Kyna Intini, Kimberly OHare Ecotoxicology and Wildlife Health Division What we do: Research and monitoring of effects of toxicological and
Pamela Martin, Glenn Barrett, Kim Hughes, Kyna Intini, Kimberly O’Hare
Page 2 – November-17-15
2
What we do:
ecological stressors on wildlife
pesticides, etc) in body burdens
Page 3 – November-17-15
3
Northern Leopard Frog Double-crested Cormorant Snapping Turtle Herring Gull
Page 4 – November-17-15
4
Photos: http://digitalmedia.fws.gov/
Page 5 – November-17-15
Lake Ontario and is connected to the lake only by a ship canal.
steel industries; today, Hamilton Harbour remains a major shipping centre supporting one the largest concentrations of heavy industry in Canada.
(among others) that degraded water and sediment quality.
standards.
impacts on the aquatic ecosystem, fish and wildlife continue to
Page 6 – November-17-15
contaminants from industries and municipal activities, urban and rural run-off, spills & leachate from landfills
contaminated by pesticides, metals, PCBs & PAHs
locations where these contaminants are notably high.
Page 7 – November-17-15
shore of Hamilton Harbour
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sediment
reproductive deformities in fish and wildlife
Page 8 – November-17-15
planned for many years.
be initiated in 2016.
the ongoing monitoring of the Harbour after remediation has
addressed successfully.
invertebrates living in the sediments.
higher trophic level and tree swallows were chosen as the sentinel wildlife species.
contamination
contamination
birds via aquatic insects is short, so more easily interpreted
10
Thunder Bay and will be initiated on the Detroit River in 2016.
http://www.umesc.usgs.gov/wildlife_toxicology/glri_project80.html_
40 nesting sites are currently being monitored as part of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) Project 80
Page 11 – November-17-15
in late-March to mid-April when courtship begins
which are incubated for 16 days
wing
late July - August
remediation activities)
heavy metals and PAHs) and other newer compounds (eg, flame retardants).
in the Hamilton Harbour Area of Concern.
including other remediation sites.
Page 13 – November-17-15
reproductive parameter of nesting pairs; this includes counting the number of eggs laid, number of eggs hatched and number of young fledged per nest.
retardants & metals.
feathers for corticosterone analysis.
chicks for PAH analysis & gene mutation analysis.
Page 14 – November-17-15
Accessing the nestbox Day 14: Weighing and measuring the chicks Blood sampling Plucking wing feather
Page 15 – November-17-15
Park monitored since 2013.
locations in 2015.
Page 16 – November-17-15
fences adjacent to Randle Reef.
to accommodate future staging of remediation project. Pier 15 West US Steel
Page 17 – November-17-15
end of Hamilton Harbour.
Page 18 – November-17-15
2015 at three Cootes Paradise locations: Boathouse, Princess Point & Spencer Creek in collaboration with RBG
Page 19 – November-17-15
Point on Lake Erie where nest boxes had been previously installed.
Page 20 – November-17-15
20
set up at each study location to obtain measurements of PAHs in air (Air S&T, Environment Canada).
Page 21 – November-17-15
21
Page 22 – November-17-15
22
broadcast recordings
attract birds to nest boxes in Randle Reef.
egg laying in early May at Randle Reef, Bayfront Park & Long Point with completion
mid June.
Page 23 – November-17-15
23
Location Year # Nest- boxes # Nest Boxes Occupied Percent Occupancy Randle Reef 2013 25 8 32% 2014 25 11 44% 2015 25 19 76% Bayfront P. 2013 23* 13 57% 2014 21* 7 33% 2015 24* 17 71%
* Some boxes were lost due to theft and vandalism
Page 24 – November-17-15
24
Location Year # Nest- boxes # Nest Boxes Occupied Percent Occupancy Princess Point 2015 25 11 44% Boathouse 2015 21 8 38% Spencer Creek 2015 24 5 21%
Page 25 – November-17-15
25
Location Year No. Nests
Nest Number Fledged / Nest Fledging Success (%) Randle 2013 8 5.4 3.1 88% Reef 2014 11 4.7 2.6 65% 2015 19 5.5 4.4 84% Bayfront 2013 13 5.4 2.7 72% Park 2014 7 5.7 2.7 83% 2015 17 5.8 3.7 60% Long Pt 2013 5 5.6 2.6 90% 2014 6 6.5 2.5 75% 2015 5 6.0 5.4 100%
Page 26 – November-17-15
26
Location Year No. Nests*
Nest Number Fledged / Nest Fledging Success (%) Princess Point 2015 11 5.6 4.1 89% Boathouse 2015 8 5.8 4.3 100% Spencer Creek 2015 5 5.0 3.0 100%
Page 27 – November-17-15
27
from two Hamilton locations compared to Long Point.
compared to many other Great Lakes sites.
levels for impacts on hatching success for many bird species.
Page 28 – November-17-15
Randle Reef 2013 & 2014 http://www.umesc.usgs.gov/wildlife_toxicology/glri_project80_results_organic_contaminants.html
Page 29 – November-17-15
29
compared to Long Point.
Page 30 – November-17-15
Randle Reef 2013 & 2014 http://www.umesc.usgs.gov/wildlife_toxicology/glri_project80_results_organic_contaminants.html
Page 31 – November-17-15
31
PAHs found in air at Randle Reef sites.
found at Randle Reef locations compared to other study locations.
Page 32 – November-17-15
32
chicks including: naphthalene, acenaphthene, dibenz[a,h]anthracene and
found among study locations .
Page 33 – November-17-15
33
locations in 2013 and no difference in eggs among locations in 2014.
Page 34 – November-17-15
34
sample; not found were Be, Cd, Sn, Sb, Ti, Bi & U.
Page 35 – November-17-15
35
exposure to PAHs and dioxins
Page 36 – November-17-15
36
Paradise locations in 2016.
thyroid hormones, anti-oxidants, immune function, genomics
complete.
Page 37 – November-17-15
37
collaboration and access to property
Science and Technology Directorate, EC, for PUF sampling and PAH analyses.
providing data on Tree swallows at Long Point.
Gardens for collaboration and access to property.
Page 38 – November-17-15
38