Trash, Trash, Trash: Community-Driven Kristen Misage Solutions to - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

trash trash trash community driven
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Trash, Trash, Trash: Community-Driven Kristen Misage Solutions to - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Trash, Trash, Trash: Community-Driven Kristen Misage Solutions to a Morgan State University ASCEND Conference West Baltimore Baltimore, MD June 21, 2019 Neighborhoods Trash Issue Franklin Square Historic neighborhood Vibrant


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Trash, Trash, Trash: Community-Driven Solutions to a West Baltimore Neighborhood’s Trash Issue

Kristen Misage Morgan State University ASCEND Conference Baltimore, MD June 21, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Franklin Square

Historic neighborhood Vibrant community association Engaged community partner

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Purpose Objectives

  • Utilize the research process

as a community engagement tool

  • Develop strategy to address

neighborhood trash Improve neighborhood health

  • utcomes and

quality of life of residents.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Demographics

Southwest Baltimore: Race

Source: Baltimore Neighborhood Indicators Alliance, 2016 Vital Signs

2010 Census Franklin Square Baltimore City % Renter 74.7% 52.3% Median Household Income $21,550 $39,386 % over 25 with a BA or higher 4.2% 25.2% % in poverty 38.3% 21.3% Median Home Value (based on a sample) $95,000 $160,400

Source: Baltimore City Department of Planning (2014); Baltimore Neighborhood Profiles: data from the 2000 census, 2010 census, and 2006-2010 American Community Survey.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

A Significant Challenge

  • Vacant houses crumble into

debris

  • Vacant lots provide sites for

illegal dumping

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Consequences of Trash

  • Health impacts: rats, mosquitos, disease, stress
  • Environmental impacts: trash and pollutants potentially flow

into the Bay

  • Crime impacts: disorder, may increase more serious crime
  • Cost to city: larger piles require Bobcats and dumpsters,

cameras, extra enforcement

  • Cost to residents: lower home values, disinvestment
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Community-based Participatory Research

  • Community-led agenda
  • Residents introduced us to the issue, recruited focus group participants
  • Residents heard of the project and called to join
  • Surveyed residents, connected us to participants, ambassadors to the

neighborhood

  • Residents will aid in disseminating the results
  • Empowerment /education for the community
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Building Community Capacity

  • How to build community capacity?
  • Appeal to principles and altruism
  • Motivate with a targeted campaign
  • Build social infrastructure
  • Involve the community in investigating/combatting challenges

(CBPR)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Methods

A mixed methods design

Qualitative: three focus groups Quantitative: survey questionnaire of 102 households or 5.5% of all households

Community-based participatory research project

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Focus Group Demographics

n Percent Gender: Female Male 9 9 50.0 50.0 Age Group: 35-50 year olds 51-69 year olds 70 and older 4 9 5 22.2 50.0 27.8 Race/Ethnicity Black or African American White or Caucasian 15 3 83.3 16.7 Income: Less than $20,000 $20,000 – 49,999 $50,000 – 74,999 $75,000 or more 5 4 2 6 27.8 22.2 11.1 33.3 Housing tenure Rent Own 4 12 22.2 66.7 Ever called 311 Yes No 14 3 77.8 16.7 Total sample 18 100.0

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Focus Group Findings

Major themes:

  • 1. Root causes of trash issue
  • 2. Individual/Community

efforts towards clean up

  • 3. Top down solutions to trash

issue

  • 4. Bottom up solutions to trash

issue

  • 5. Health implications of trash

“...THE GARBAGE IS A SERIOUS PROBLEM AND IT MIGHT RUN ME OUT OF HERE”

  • COMMUNITY MEMBER

THERE IS WAY TO MUCH TRASH ON THE GROUND. I REMEMBER MY 4-YEAR OLD MENTIONED IT. HE SAID, “HOW COME IT’S SO DIRTY? HOW COME IT’S NOT DIRTY WHEN WE GO OTHER PLACES?”

  • Community Member
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Verifying community effort

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Survey Demographics

n Percent Gender: Female Male 61 37 62.24 37.76 Age Group: 18–34 year olds 35–50 year olds 51–69 year olds 70 and older 16 19 53 10 16.33 19.39 54.08 10.20 Race/Ethnicity Black or African American White or Caucasian Other Race 94 4 1 94.9 4.04 1.01 Income: Less than $20,000 $20,000 – 49,999 $50,000 – 74,999 $75,000 or more 46 28 7 3 54.8 33.3 8.33 3.57 Housing tenure Rent Own 59 35 62.8 37.2 Ever called 311 Yes No 50 48 51.0 49.0 Total sample 99 100.0

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Survey:

Root causes

  • f trash
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Survey:

Health effects

How do you feel about the presence of trash in your neighborhood?

Frustrated 63% Angry 38% Overwhelmed 36% Defeated 22%

Low incidence of exposure to rats/ailments associated with rat exposure. 18 respondents indicated asthma.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Survey:

Evidence

  • f effort

(and future effort)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Survey:

Evidence

  • f effort

(and future effort)

40%

increase

400%

increase

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Survey:

What can be done?

Percent of Respondents Community-based DPW or City-based 71-90% Teach young people not to litter, work with neighbors, host block and neighborhood clean up days, call 311 at first sight of trash Trash pick-up twice per week; have schools teach kids not to litter; employ young people, homeless, residents to pick up trash; get the Mayor involved 60-70% Meet with Councilman Bullock Use inmates to pick up trash; run commercials about not littering; more bulk trash days; more public trash cans 59% or less Take overflow trash to dumpsters Consistent recycling pick up Who is responsible for trash clean up?

86%

said “Everyone”

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Survey:

Prevention

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Summary

  • Trash is a clear detriment to this

community, with some geographic variation

  • Evidence of community effort
  • Preliminary evidence that

education is valuable

  • Still systemic issues: vacant units,

illegal dumping

  • Need more investigation into

top-down effectiveness

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Next steps

  • Explore barriers for small haulers
  • Utilize survey results to develop

with the community a tool to address the trash issue at the neighborhood level

  • Disseminate findings to Franklin

Square, Mayor’s Office, DPW, and The Baltimore Sun

  • Further research: photovoice to

engage youth on trash?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Possibilities for community tool

detail context connection

Neighborhood Identification Educate residents Health/ environmental effects Ways to respond Illuminate systemic issues Equitable services / fair policies

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Questions & Feedback

Tonya Sanders-Thach, PhD. Associate Professor City and Regional Planning School of Architecture & Planning Tonya.Sanders@morgan.edu Kristen Misage Masters Student City and Regional Planning School of Architecture & Planning krmis2@morgan.edu