Transient Solidarities Charles Heckscher January, 2014 Shared - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

transient solidarities
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Transient Solidarities Charles Heckscher January, 2014 Shared - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transient Solidarities Charles Heckscher January, 2014 Shared sense of obligation Solidarity to participate in collective action for social change RAWA Solidarity Scotland - rawascotland.org.uk Strikes 4 Theory Solidarity = Relations +


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Transient Solidarities

Charles Heckscher January, 2014

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Solidarity

RAWA Solidarity Scotland - rawascotland.org.uk

Shared sense of obligation to participate in collective action for social change

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Strikes

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Theory

Solidarity =

Relations

+

Ideology (moral appeal)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Types of solidarity

Relations Ideology Organization / collective action Craft Industrial

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Craft solidarity

Relations

  • Strong self-governing occupational communities
  • Internally established status hierarchies

Ideology

  • Universalization of way of life (artisanal, independent,

communal, local self governance)

Collective action / organization

  • Participative, continuous
  • Status-dominated organization
  • Small scale
  • Multiple tactics, flexible
  • Not essentially conflictual
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Industrial solidarity

9

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/14/chicago-teachers-strike-n_0_n_1883626.html

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Industrial solidarity

Relations

  • Similar jobs in large groups (factories)
  • Constant friction with management

Ideology

  • Extension of equal rights
  • Balance of power
  • Dualism / battle

Collective action / organization

  • Centralized organization, large scale
  • Focused demands
  • Mass actions
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Industrial solidarity: organization

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Types of solidarity

Relations Ideology Collective action Craft Traditional, self- governing communities Way of life; utopian decentralized community Continuous, decentralized Industrial The factory: mass,

  • ppositional

Extension of rights Confrontation Centralized episodic,

  • ppositional,

simple focus ?? New relations? Attractive ideological appeals? Types of action?

slide-13
SLIDE 13

What’s happening with relations?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Transient relations

At work

  • Decentralization
  • Instability / fluidity

In society

  • Personal entertainment
  • Self-enhancement
  • Weakened loyalties

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

1 5 Small world

slide-16
SLIDE 16

But …

1 6

1.3 billion

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Transient relations: “Friending”

 Deliberate (conditional)  Complex

  • Diverse, multiple intersections
  • Wide scope
  • Many levels of intensity

 Seeking understanding

Developing since (at least) 1960s

slide-19
SLIDE 19

1 9 Small world Cohesive small world

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Who are these “frienders”?

 1/3 – 1/2 of (US) population

  • 44% say they join diverse groups to learn about

themselves

  • 40% say they are active in web discussions

 Not heavily young or educated  Embrace classic ethic of hard work and

individual responsibility

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Social media users (research)

 Equally or more engaged in community and

politics

  • Maintain “real world” friendships and relations
  • Act on political messages, transmit them to wider

circles

 Have diverse extended circles  Not limited to those with high social confidence

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Cohesive small world

Solidarity?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Ideology (vision of desirable society)

23

 Diversity  Openness  Sharing  Mutualism  Learning  Contribution

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Collaborative solidarity: the Mozilla mission

We’re building a better Internet Our mission is to promote openness, innovation &

  • pportunity on the Web.

At Mozilla, we’re a global community of technologists, thinkers and builders working together to keep the Internet alive and accessible, so people worldwide can be informed contributors and creators of the Web. We believe this act of human collaboration across an open platform is essential to individual growth and our collective future.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

I

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Collaborative solidarity: MozFest

“more hack less yack” “more hammer less yammer”

slide-27
SLIDE 27

2 7 Philppines Malaysia Holland London

slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • rchestrator

Organizing a cohesive small world

2 8

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Orchestrating the new relations

1.

Purpose

2.

Platform

3.

Process

Image of a desirable shared future Tools Data Connections Celebrating successes Enforcing norms Focusing campaigns

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Focused (conflictual) action: Swarming

“systems in which autonomy, emergence and distributedness replace control, preprogramming and centralization”

(not a mass)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Swarming: examples

 Disabilities movement (US)  Zapatistas  Anti-SOPA mobilization  Wal-Mart campaign?  Banking campaign?

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

3 2 Relations Ideology Collective action Craft Traditional, self- governing communities Way of life; utopian decentralized community Sustained self- protective

  • rganization

Millennialism Industrial The factory: mass,

  • ppositional

Extension of rights Manichean

  • pposition

Episodic,

  • ppositional

uprisings, simple focus Collaborative Networked “friending” (Cohesive small world) Openness, diversity, understanding Orchestrated “projects”, swarms

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Collaborative solidarity

 Multiplex  Coordinated projects  Reflexive (connection to purpose)  Not essentially conflictual

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Workers of the world: hack! network! swarm!

slide-35
SLIDE 35