Top Physics in WHIZARD (+ NLO/QCD Status) Jrgen R. Reuter, DESY - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

top physics in whizard nlo qcd status
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Top Physics in WHIZARD (+ NLO/QCD Status) Jrgen R. Reuter, DESY - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Top Physics in WHIZARD (+ NLO/QCD Status) Jrgen R. Reuter, DESY J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15 WHIZARD @ WHISTLER J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15 Jürgen R. Reuter, DESY

Top Physics in WHIZARD (+ NLO/QCD Status)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

WHIZARD @ WHISTLER

slide-3
SLIDE 3

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

My tribute to Canada …

slide-4
SLIDE 4

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

My tribute to Canada …

✦ in memoriam ✦

slide-5
SLIDE 5

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

My tribute to Canada …

✦ in memoriam ✦

Jon Vickers, 29.10.1926 - 10.7.2015

“Vergeh’ die Welt meiner jauchzenden Eil’! Die Leuchte verlischt, zu ihr! Isolde!”

slide-6
SLIDE 6

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

WHIZARD: Overview

WHIZARD Team: Wolfgang Kilian, Thorsten Ohl, JRR Simon Braß/Bijan Chokoufé/Marco Sekulla/Christian Weiss/Soyoung Shim/Florian Staub/Zhijie Zhao + 2 Master (some losses: C. Speckner [software engineering], F. Bach [European Commission], S. Schmidt [Philosophy])

Publication: EPJ C71 (2011) 1742 (and others for O’Mega, Interfaces, color flow formalism)

WHIZARD v2.2.7 (11.08.2015) http://whizard.hepforge.org

<whizard@desy.de>

slide-7
SLIDE 7

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

WHIZARD: Overview

WHIZARD Team: Wolfgang Kilian, Thorsten Ohl, JRR Simon Braß/Bijan Chokoufé/Marco Sekulla/Christian Weiss/Soyoung Shim/Florian Staub/Zhijie Zhao + 2 Master (some losses: C. Speckner [software engineering], F. Bach [European Commission], S. Schmidt [Philosophy])

Publication: EPJ C71 (2011) 1742 (and others for O’Mega, Interfaces, color flow formalism)

WHIZARD v2.2.7 (11.08.2015) http://whizard.hepforge.org

<whizard@desy.de>

2nd WHIZARD Workshop Würzburg, 03/2015

  • K. Desch, DESY Th-WS ‘15

LHC

slide-8
SLIDE 8

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

WHIZARD Parton Shower

Two independent implementations: kT

  • ordered QCD and Analytic QCD shower

Analytic shower: no shower veto ⇒ exact shower history known, allows reweighting Technical overhaul of the shower / merging part Plans: implement GKS matching, QED shower (also interleaved, infrastructure ready)

Kilian/JRR/Schmidt/Wiesler, JHEP 1204 013 (2012)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

Tuning of the WHIZARD Parton Shower

First tunes of both kT

  • ordered QCD and Analytic QCD shower Chokoufe/Englert/JRR, 2015

Di- and Multijet data from LEP as given in RIVET analysis Usage of the PROFESSOR tool for determining the best fit Buckley et al., 2009

slide-10
SLIDE 10

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

NLO Development in WHIZARD

Need for precision predictions that match (sub-) percent experimental accuracy mainly NLO corrections, but also QED and electroweak (ee) Binoth Les Houches Interface (BLHA): Workflow

  • 1. Process definition in SINDARIN (contract to One-Loop Program [OLP])
  • 2. OLP generates code (Born/virtual interference), WHIZARD reads contract
  • 3. NLO matrix element library loaded into WHIZARD
slide-11
SLIDE 11

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

NLO Development in WHIZARD

Need for precision predictions that match (sub-) percent experimental accuracy mainly NLO corrections, but also QED and electroweak (ee) Binoth Les Houches Interface (BLHA): Workflow

  • 1. Process definition in SINDARIN (contract to One-Loop Program [OLP])
  • 2. OLP generates code (Born/virtual interference), WHIZARD reads contract
  • 3. NLO matrix element library loaded into WHIZARD

Working NLO interfaces to:

GoSam [G. Cullen et al.] OpenLoops [F. Cascioli et al.]

(first focus on QCD corrections)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

NLO Development in WHIZARD

Need for precision predictions that match (sub-) percent experimental accuracy mainly NLO corrections, but also QED and electroweak (ee) Binoth Les Houches Interface (BLHA): Workflow

  • 1. Process definition in SINDARIN (contract to One-Loop Program [OLP])
  • 2. OLP generates code (Born/virtual interference), WHIZARD reads contract
  • 3. NLO matrix element library loaded into WHIZARD

Working NLO interfaces to:

GoSam [G. Cullen et al.] OpenLoops [F. Cascioli et al.]

(first focus on QCD corrections) WHIZARD v2.2.6 contains alpha version QCD corrections (massless and massive emitters)

alpha_power = 2 alphas_power = 0 process eett = e1,E1 => t, tbar { nlo_calculation = “full” }

slide-13
SLIDE 13

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

NLO Development in WHIZARD

Need for precision predictions that match (sub-) percent experimental accuracy mainly NLO corrections, but also QED and electroweak (ee) Binoth Les Houches Interface (BLHA): Workflow

  • 1. Process definition in SINDARIN (contract to One-Loop Program [OLP])
  • 2. OLP generates code (Born/virtual interference), WHIZARD reads contract
  • 3. NLO matrix element library loaded into WHIZARD

Working NLO interfaces to:

GoSam [G. Cullen et al.] OpenLoops [F. Cascioli et al.]

(first focus on QCD corrections) WHIZARD v2.2.6 contains alpha version QCD corrections (massless and massive emitters)

alpha_power = 2 alphas_power = 0 process eett = e1,E1 => t, tbar { nlo_calculation = “full” }

slide-14
SLIDE 14

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

NLO Development in WHIZARD

Need for precision predictions that match (sub-) percent experimental accuracy mainly NLO corrections, but also QED and electroweak (ee) Binoth Les Houches Interface (BLHA): Workflow

  • 1. Process definition in SINDARIN (contract to One-Loop Program [OLP])
  • 2. OLP generates code (Born/virtual interference), WHIZARD reads contract
  • 3. NLO matrix element library loaded into WHIZARD

Working NLO interfaces to:

GoSam [G. Cullen et al.] OpenLoops [F. Cascioli et al.]

(first focus on QCD corrections) WHIZARD v2.2.6 contains alpha version QCD corrections (massless and massive emitters)

alpha_power = 2 alphas_power = 0 process eett = e1,E1 => t, tbar { nlo_calculation = “full” }

350 400 450 500 550 600 √s [GeV] 200 400 600 800 1000 σ [fb]

  • nshell, LO
  • nshell, NLO
  • ffshell, LO
  • ffshell, NLO

fixedorder

slide-15
SLIDE 15

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

FKS Subtraction (Frixione/Kunszt/Signer)

Subtraction formalism to make real and virtual contributions separately finite

dσNLO = Z

n+1

  • dσR − dσS

| {z }

finite

+ Z

n+1

dσS + Z

n

dσV | {z }

finite

slide-16
SLIDE 16

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

FKS Subtraction (Frixione/Kunszt/Signer)

Subtraction formalism to make real and virtual contributions separately finite

dσNLO = Z

n+1

  • dσR − dσS

| {z }

finite

+ Z

n+1

dσS + Z

n

dσV | {z }

finite

✴ Find all singular pairs ✴ Partition phase space according to singular regions ✴ Generate subtraction terms for singular regions

I = {(1, 5), (1, 6), (2, 5), (2, 6), (5, 6)}

1 = X

α∈I

Sα(Φ)

Automated subtraction terms in WHIZARD, algorithm:

slide-17
SLIDE 17

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

FKS Subtraction (Frixione/Kunszt/Signer)

Subtraction formalism to make real and virtual contributions separately finite

dσNLO = Z

n+1

  • dσR − dσS

| {z }

finite

+ Z

n+1

dσS + Z

n

dσV | {z }

finite

✴ Find all singular pairs ✴ Partition phase space according to singular regions ✴ Generate subtraction terms for singular regions

I = {(1, 5), (1, 6), (2, 5), (2, 6), (5, 6)}

1 = X

α∈I

Sα(Φ)

Automated subtraction terms in WHIZARD, algorithm:

slide-18
SLIDE 18

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

Examples and Validation

Simplest benchmark process:

e+e− → q¯ q with

  • σNLO − σLO

/σLO = αs/π

Plot for total cross section for fixed strong coupling constant List of validated QCD NLO processes

  • Cross-checks with MG5_aMC@NLO
  • Phase space integration for virtuals performs great
  • e+e− → q¯

q

  • e+e− → q¯

qg

  • e+e− → `+`−q¯

q

  • e+e− → `+⌫`q¯

q

  • e+e− → t¯

t

  • e+e− → tW −b
  • e+e− → W +W −b¯

b

  • e+e− → t¯

tH

slide-19
SLIDE 19

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

Examples and Validation

Simplest benchmark process:

e+e− → q¯ q with

  • σNLO − σLO

/σLO = αs/π

Plot for total cross section for fixed strong coupling constant List of validated QCD NLO processes

  • Cross-checks with MG5_aMC@NLO
  • Phase space integration for virtuals performs great

✦ QCD NLO infrastructure in pp complete ✦ First attempts on electroweak corrections,

interfacing the RECOLA code [Denner et al.]

  • e+e− → q¯

q

  • e+e− → q¯

qg

  • e+e− → `+`−q¯

q

  • e+e− → `+⌫`q¯

q

  • e+e− → t¯

t

  • e+e− → tW −b
  • e+e− → W +W −b¯

b

  • e+e− → t¯

tH

slide-20
SLIDE 20

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

NLO Fixed-Order Events

Add weights of real emission events to weight of Born kinematics using the FKS mapping Output weighted events in WHIZARD (e.g. using HepMC), then analysis with Rivet Example process: e+e− → W +W −b¯

b

slide-21
SLIDE 21

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

NLO Fixed-Order Events

Add weights of real emission events to weight of Born kinematics using the FKS mapping Output weighted events in WHIZARD (e.g. using HepMC), then analysis with Rivet Example process: e+e− → W +W −b¯

b

slide-22
SLIDE 22

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

NLO Fixed-Order Events

Add weights of real emission events to weight of Born kinematics using the FKS mapping Output weighted events in WHIZARD (e.g. using HepMC), then analysis with Rivet Example process: e+e− → W +W −b¯

b

Completed: polarized NLO results (remember: ILC will always run with polarization) Produce also plots including complete ISR photon radiation and beamstrahlung NLO decays also available (Initial state Jacobian, important for consistent widths) Investigate the full 2 ➝ 6 process: e+e- ➝ bbeμνν [Chokoufé/Kilian/Lindert/JRR/Pozzorini/Weiss]

slide-23
SLIDE 23

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

Automated POWHEG Matching in WHIZARD

Soft gluon emissions before hard emission generate large logs Perturbative αs : Consistent matching of NLO matrix element with shower POWHEG method: hardest emission first [Nason et al.]

|Msoft|2 ∼ 1 k2

T

→ log kmax

T

kmin

T

slide-24
SLIDE 24

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

Automated POWHEG Matching in WHIZARD

Soft gluon emissions before hard emission generate large logs Perturbative αs : Consistent matching of NLO matrix element with shower POWHEG method: hardest emission first [Nason et al.]

|Msoft|2 ∼ 1 k2

T

→ log kmax

T

kmin

T

  • Complete NLO events
  • POWHEG generate events according to the formula:
  • Uses the modified Sudakov form factor:

B(Φn) = B(Φn) + V (Φn) + Z dΦradR(Φn+1)

dσ = B(Φn)  ∆NLO

R

(kmin

T

) + ∆NLO

R

(kT )R(Φn+1) B(Φn) dΦrad

  • ∆NLO

R

(kT ) = exp  − Z dΦrad R(Φn+1) B(Φn) θ(kT (Φn+1) − kT )

slide-25
SLIDE 25

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

Automated POWHEG Matching in WHIZARD

Soft gluon emissions before hard emission generate large logs Perturbative αs : Consistent matching of NLO matrix element with shower POWHEG method: hardest emission first [Nason et al.]

|Msoft|2 ∼ 1 k2

T

→ log kmax

T

kmin

T

  • Complete NLO events
  • POWHEG generate events according to the formula:
  • Uses the modified Sudakov form factor:

B(Φn) = B(Φn) + V (Φn) + Z dΦradR(Φn+1)

dσ = B(Φn)  ∆NLO

R

(kmin

T

) + ∆NLO

R

(kT )R(Φn+1) B(Φn) dΦrad

  • ∆NLO

R

(kT ) = exp  − Z dΦrad R(Φn+1) B(Φn) θ(kT (Φn+1) − kT )

  • Hardest emission: ; shower with imposing a veto

if virtual and real terms larger than Born: shouldn’t happen in perturbative regions Reweighting such that for all events POWHEG: Positive Weight Hardest Emission Generator own implementation in WHIZARD

kmax

T

B < 0 B > 0

slide-26
SLIDE 26

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

POWHEG Matching, example: e+e- to dijets

slide-27
SLIDE 27

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

Examples: Top pairs and tth production

slide-28
SLIDE 28

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

Top Threshold at lepton colliders

ILC top threshold scan best-known method to measure top quark mass, ΔΜ ~ 30-50 MeV Heavy quark production at lepton colliders, qualitatively: Threshold region: top velocity v ~ αs ⪡ 1

ν = r√s − 2mt + iΓt m

slide-29
SLIDE 29

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

Top Threshold Resummation in (p)NRQCD

NRQCD is EFT for non-relativistic quark-antiquark systems: separate M·v and M·v Integrate out hard quark and gluon d.o.f. Resummation of singular terms close to threshold (v = 0) Hoang et al. ’99-‘01; Beneke et al., ’13-‘14

2

R ≡ σt¯

t

σµµ = v X

k

⇣αs v ⌘k X

i

(αs ln v)i × ×

  • 1 (LL); αs, v (NLL); α2

s, αsv, v2 (NNLL)

Phase space of two massive particles (p/v)NRQCD EFT w/ RG improvement

slide-30
SLIDE 30

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

Top Threshold Resummation in (p)NRQCD

NRQCD is EFT for non-relativistic quark-antiquark systems: separate M·v and M·v Integrate out hard quark and gluon d.o.f. Resummation of singular terms close to threshold (v = 0) Hoang et al. ’99-‘01; Beneke et al., ’13-‘14

2

R ≡ σt¯

t

σµµ = v X

k

⇣αs v ⌘k X

i

(αs ln v)i × ×

  • 1 (LL); αs, v (NLL); α2

s, αsv, v2 (NNLL)

Phase space of two massive particles

Rγ,Z(s) = F v(s)Rv(s) | {z }

s-wave: LL+NLL

+ F a(s)Ra(s) | {z }

p-wave∼v2:NNLL

but contributes at NLL differentially! (p/v)NRQCD EFT w/ RG improvement

slide-31
SLIDE 31

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

Top Threshold Resummation in (p)NRQCD

NRQCD is EFT for non-relativistic quark-antiquark systems: separate M·v and M·v Integrate out hard quark and gluon d.o.f. Resummation of singular terms close to threshold (v = 0) Hoang et al. ’99-‘01; Beneke et al., ’13-‘14

2

R ≡ σt¯

t

σµµ = v X

k

⇣αs v ⌘k X

i

(αs ln v)i × ×

  • 1 (LL); αs, v (NLL); α2

s, αsv, v2 (NNLL)

Phase space of two massive particles Coulomb potential gluon ladder resumption

Rγ,Z(s) = F v(s)Rv(s) | {z }

s-wave: LL+NLL

+ F a(s)Ra(s) | {z }

p-wave∼v2:NNLL

but contributes at NLL differentially! (p/v)NRQCD EFT w/ RG improvement

slide-32
SLIDE 32

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

Top Threshold Resummation in (p)NRQCD

NRQCD is EFT for non-relativistic quark-antiquark systems: separate M·v and M·v Integrate out hard quark and gluon d.o.f. Resummation of singular terms close to threshold (v = 0) Hoang et al. ’99-‘01; Beneke et al., ’13-‘14

2

R ≡ σt¯

t

σµµ = v X

k

⇣αs v ⌘k X

i

(αs ln v)i × ×

  • 1 (LL); αs, v (NLL); α2

s, αsv, v2 (NNLL)

Phase space of two massive particles Coulomb potential gluon ladder resumption

Rγ,Z(s) = F v(s)Rv(s) | {z }

s-wave: LL+NLL

+ F a(s)Ra(s) | {z }

p-wave∼v2:NNLL

but contributes at NLL differentially!

| {z }

can be mapped onto effective ttV vertex

C 3 Gv/a

(N)LL = Gv/a (N)LL(↵s, M pole t

, ps, |~ pt| , Γt)

differential in off-shell tt phase space far away from threshold (p/v)NRQCD EFT w/ RG improvement

slide-33
SLIDE 33

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

with F. Bach/B. Chokoufe/A. Hoang/M. Stahlhofen/C. Weiss

Top Threshold in WHIZARD

Implement resummed threshold effects as effective vertex [form factor] in WHIZARD from TOPPIK code [Jezabek/Teubner], included in WHIZARD Gv,a(0, pt, E + iΓt, ν)

M 1S = M pole

t

(1 − ∆LL/NLL

(Coul.) )

Default parameters:

M 1S = 172 GeV, ΓNLO

t

= 1.409 GeV αs(MZ) = 0.118

[P . Marquard’s talk]

slide-34
SLIDE 34

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

with F. Bach/B. Chokoufe/A. Hoang/M. Stahlhofen/C. Weiss

Top Threshold in WHIZARD

Implement resummed threshold effects as effective vertex [form factor] in WHIZARD from TOPPIK code [Jezabek/Teubner], included in WHIZARD Gv,a(0, pt, E + iΓt, ν)

M 1S = M pole

t

(1 − ∆LL/NLL

(Coul.) )

Default parameters:

M 1S = 172 GeV, ΓNLO

t

= 1.409 GeV αs(MZ) = 0.118

[P . Marquard’s talk]

slide-35
SLIDE 35

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

with F. Bach/B. Chokoufe/A. Hoang/M. Stahlhofen/C. Weiss

Top Threshold in WHIZARD

Implement resummed threshold effects as effective vertex [form factor] in WHIZARD from TOPPIK code [Jezabek/Teubner], included in WHIZARD Gv,a(0, pt, E + iΓt, ν)

M 1S = M pole

t

(1 − ∆LL/NLL

(Coul.) )

Theory uncertainties from scale variations: hard and soft scale

µh = h · mt µs = f · mtv

Default parameters:

M 1S = 172 GeV, ΓNLO

t

= 1.409 GeV αs(MZ) = 0.118

[P . Marquard’s talk]

slide-36
SLIDE 36

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15 Sanity checks: correct limit for αs ⟶ 0, stable against variation of cutoff ΔM [15-30 GeV] Why include LL/NLL in a Monte Carlo event generator? Important effects: beamstrahlung; ISR; LO electroweak terms More exclusive observables accessible

slide-37
SLIDE 37

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15 Sanity checks: correct limit for αs ⟶ 0, stable against variation of cutoff ΔM [15-30 GeV] Why include LL/NLL in a Monte Carlo event generator? Important effects: beamstrahlung; ISR; LO electroweak terms More exclusive observables accessible

slide-38
SLIDE 38

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15 Sanity checks: correct limit for αs ⟶ 0, stable against variation of cutoff ΔM [15-30 GeV] Why include LL/NLL in a Monte Carlo event generator? Important effects: beamstrahlung; ISR; LO electroweak terms More exclusive observables accessible Forward-backward asymmetry (norm. ⇒ good shape stability)

Afb := σ(pt

z > 0) − σ(pt z) < 0)

σ(pt

z > 0) + σ(pt z < 0)

slide-39
SLIDE 39

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

Matching to continuum at LO and NLO

  • Transition region between relativistic and

resummation effects

  • CLIC benchmark energies:

0.38 TeV, 1.4 TeV, 3.0 TeV

  • Remove double-counting NLO / (N)LL

340 350 360 370 380 390 400 √s [GeV] 200 400 600 800 1000 σ [fb]

  • nshell, NLO

expanded FF, onshell, mpole = m1S expanded FF, onshell, mpole = m1S, nopwave AnalyticOneloop, mpole = m1S, onshell analytic+whizard-onshell

slide-40
SLIDE 40

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

Matching to continuum at LO and NLO

  • Transition region between relativistic and

resummation effects

  • CLIC benchmark energies:

0.38 TeV, 1.4 TeV, 3.0 TeV

  • Remove double-counting NLO / (N)LL

340 350 360 370 380 390 400 √s [GeV] 200 400 600 800 1000 σ [fb]

  • nshell, NLO

expanded FF, onshell, mpole = m1S expanded FF, onshell, mpole = m1S, nopwave AnalyticOneloop, mpole = m1S, onshell analytic+whizard-onshell 344.0 344.5 345.0 345.5 346.0 √s [GeV] 200 400 600 800 1000 σ [fb]

  • nshell, NLO

expanded FF, onshell, mpole = m1S expanded FF, onshell, mpole = m1S, nopwave AnalyticOneloop, mpole = m1S, onshell analytic+whizard-onshell

Resummed formfactor, expanded to O(αs)

⌫ = r√s − 2mt + iΓt m p = |~ p| p0 = Et − mt

slide-41
SLIDE 41

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

Matching to continuum at LO and NLO

  • Transition region between relativistic and

resummation effects

  • CLIC benchmark energies:

0.38 TeV, 1.4 TeV, 3.0 TeV

  • Remove double-counting NLO / (N)LL

340 350 360 370 380 390 400 √s [GeV] 200 400 600 800 1000 σ [fb]

  • nshell, NLO

expanded FF, onshell, mpole = m1S expanded FF, onshell, mpole = m1S, nopwave AnalyticOneloop, mpole = m1S, onshell analytic+whizard-onshell 344.0 344.5 345.0 345.5 346.0 √s [GeV] 200 400 600 800 1000 σ [fb]

  • nshell, NLO

expanded FF, onshell, mpole = m1S expanded FF, onshell, mpole = m1S, nopwave AnalyticOneloop, mpole = m1S, onshell analytic+whizard-onshell

Resummed formfactor, expanded to O(αs)

⌫ = r√s − 2mt + iΓt m p = |~ p| p0 = Et − mt

Matching formula

slide-42
SLIDE 42

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

Matching to continuum at LO and NLO

  • Transition region between relativistic and

resummation effects

  • CLIC benchmark energies:

0.38 TeV, 1.4 TeV, 3.0 TeV

  • Remove double-counting NLO / (N)LL

340 350 360 370 380 390 400 √s [GeV] 200 400 600 800 1000 σ [fb]

  • nshell, NLO

expanded FF, onshell, mpole = m1S expanded FF, onshell, mpole = m1S, nopwave AnalyticOneloop, mpole = m1S, onshell analytic+whizard-onshell 344.0 344.5 345.0 345.5 346.0 √s [GeV] 200 400 600 800 1000 σ [fb]

  • nshell, NLO

expanded FF, onshell, mpole = m1S expanded FF, onshell, mpole = m1S, nopwave AnalyticOneloop, mpole = m1S, onshell analytic+whizard-onshell

Resummed formfactor, expanded to O(αs)

⌫ = r√s − 2mt + iΓt m p = |~ p| p0 = Et − mt

Matching formula Switch-off function

slide-43
SLIDE 43

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

Threshold-continuum matching

slide-44
SLIDE 44

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

Conclusions & Outlook

WHIZARD 2.2 event generator for collider physics (ee, pp, ep) Focus here on top physics at ee colliders (QCD) NLO automation: reals and subtraction terms (FKS) [+ virtuals externally] ➝ WHIZARD 3.0 Automated POWHEG matching (other schemes in progress) Polarized results and decays available at NLO (QCD) Top threshold in e+e-: NLL NRQCD threshold / NLO continuum matching

slide-45
SLIDE 45

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

Conclusions & Outlook

WHIZARD 2.2 event generator for collider physics (ee, pp, ep) Focus here on top physics at ee colliders (QCD) NLO automation: reals and subtraction terms (FKS) [+ virtuals externally] ➝ WHIZARD 3.0 Automated POWHEG matching (other schemes in progress) Polarized results and decays available at NLO (QCD) Top threshold in e+e-: NLL NRQCD threshold / NLO continuum matching Future projects: inclusion of tth threshold Long term: QED/EW NLO, QED Shower, NNLO QCD

slide-46
SLIDE 46

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

Conclusions & Outlook

WHIZARD 2.2 event generator for collider physics (ee, pp, ep) Focus here on top physics at ee colliders (QCD) NLO automation: reals and subtraction terms (FKS) [+ virtuals externally] ➝ WHIZARD 3.0 Automated POWHEG matching (other schemes in progress) Polarized results and decays available at NLO (QCD) Top threshold in e+e-: NLL NRQCD threshold / NLO continuum matching Future projects: inclusion of tth threshold Long term: QED/EW NLO, QED Shower, NNLO QCD

Experimentalists present !?!?

slide-47
SLIDE 47

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15

Conclusions & Outlook

WHIZARD 2.2 event generator for collider physics (ee, pp, ep) Focus here on top physics at ee colliders (QCD) NLO automation: reals and subtraction terms (FKS) [+ virtuals externally] ➝ WHIZARD 3.0 Automated POWHEG matching (other schemes in progress) Polarized results and decays available at NLO (QCD) Top threshold in e+e-: NLL NRQCD threshold / NLO continuum matching Future projects: inclusion of tth threshold Long term: QED/EW NLO, QED Shower, NNLO QCD

Experimentalists present !?!?

Time for the: Experimentalists’ ILC/CLIC NLO Wishlist

slide-48
SLIDE 48

J.R.Reuter Top Physics in WHIZARD (+NLO/QCD) LCWS 2015, Whistler, 4.11.15