To St andardize or Not t o St andardize? Choices made when a Dist - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

to st andardize or not t o st andardize
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

To St andardize or Not t o St andardize? Choices made when a Dist - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

To St andardize or Not t o St andardize? Choices made when a Dist rict revises t heir St andards CCFC September 15, 2015 St andards Design What are Design St andards? Building Needs Assessment 1 Programming, Utilization 2 Design


slide-1
SLIDE 1

To St andardize or Not t o St andardize?

Choices made when a Dist rict revises t heir St andards

CCFC September 15, 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Design St andards

slide-3
SLIDE 3

What are Design St andards?

Building Needs Assessment Programming, Utilization Design Criteria, Campus Vocabulary

2 3 4

Classroom & Office Standards; FF&E

1 5

Different people call it different things!

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Why are Dist rict St andards import ant ?

Uniformity across the district and campuses Consistency among A/E teams Standardization of M&O after project completion

2 3 4

Guidance to campus for cost and decision-making

1 5

Don’t have to ‘re-invent the wheel’ each time!

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Ernie Y Ernie Yamane mane

Principal-in-Charge

Mani A. Mani A. Farhadi Farhadi

  • Sr. Project Manager

Tom Nakamura

  • m Nakamura

Project Architect ZFA ZFA Structural Engineering CSW CSW/Stuber- Str Stroeh eh Civil Engineering RHAA RHAA Landscape Architecture Shannon- annon-Leigh Asso Associa ciates es Signage ABBAE ABBAE Roofing & Waterproofing Re:Vision :Vision Ar Architectu chitecture Sustainability HKA HKA Consul ulti ting ng Elevator TEECOM TEECOM Security, Acoustic, IT Alfa T Alfa Tech ch Consul ulti ting ng MEP/FP Engineering Mod Modulus Consul ulti ting ng BIM Color W lor Works rks Studi Studio Interior Design

The Design Team

STEINBERG

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The Client Team

Jose Jose Nunez Nunez

Vice Chancellor Facilities, Planning, & Operations/Safety

Kar Karen P n Powe well

  • Exec. Director

Facilities, Planning, & Operations

Kar Karen P n Pinkham nkham

  • Sr. Project Manager

Facilities Planning John C John Cuevas evas CAN Lead Groundskeeper Joe Fuller Joe Fullerton Energy & Sustainability Manager Eric Razn Eric Raznick ick Chief Technology Officer Dar Darrel ell L l Lee Network Infrastructure Mike Mike Celes Celeste Director Public Safety Mar Marina P Pelo losi Schneider- Electric Juan L Juan Lopez pez SKY Chief Engineer Yoseph seph Demissie missie Director Technology Jozsef V Jozsef Veres CAN Chief Engineer Paul Phil F ul Phil Fong ng CSM Chief Engineer ZachT ZachTraywick ck SKY Lead Groundskeeper

SAN MATEO COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

Chris ris Strugar Strugar- Frit Fritsch sch Director Capital Projects Mar Mario Galea Galeano Program Manager Consultant Ro Robert G Gutierrez Facilities Systems Manager Ju Justin stin Ei Eichner hner CSM Lead Groundskeeper Gusta Gustav Deus Deuss GRD/Energy Consultant John John Has Hashiz izume CAN Facilities Manager Mi Michele chele Rudo Rudovsky CSM Facilities Manager John D John Doctor

  • r

SKY Facilities Manager Carin rina W Warn rne Executive Assistant Cus Custodial Super Superviso isors CAN, CSM, SKY

slide-7
SLIDE 7

WHY UPDATE?

Why Update? 1

Code Revisions Product Changes Lessons Learned

slide-8
SLIDE 8

2014-15

2007-2009 previous Standards CIP 1, CIP 2 Building Code updates; CALGreen LEED Gold Products discontinued Industry trends Lessons learned Staff training/expertise

Attic Stock

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Interface: Mission Zero

slide-10
SLIDE 10

SCHEDULE

Canada College College of San Mateo Skyline College

GOAL / PURPOSE

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Facilities

GOAL / PURPOSE

slide-12
SLIDE 12

CIP 3 / Measure H Ready for A/E teams Regardless of delivery method Canada College College of San Mateo Skyline College

$481M

EXPECTED OUTCOME

slide-13
SLIDE 13

BIM: How much informat ion is t oo much?

What’s the right balance? Benefit vs. Cost To what extent will staff really use it?

2 3 4

Identify equipment and finishes only

1

slide-14
SLIDE 14

STANDARDS PROCESS

Standards Process 2

Phase 1 Phase 2 Participatory Governance

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Phase 1: Homework & site walks Phase 2: Feedback & edits Upload & Implement Facility Planning Facilities Managers Chief Engineers Lead Groundskeepers Consultants

SEQUENCE

slide-16
SLIDE 16

SCHEDULE

Canada College College of San Mateo Skyline College

slide-17
SLIDE 17

SCHEDULE

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Meetings & Site walks Disciplines

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • 14. Mechanical
  • 15. BMS/Energy
  • 16. Electrical
  • 17. Communications
  • 18. Security
  • 19. Civil
  • 20. Landscape

Disciplines

  • 1. Sustainability
  • 2. Acoustical
  • 3. BIM
  • 4. Structural
  • 5. Waterproofing
  • 6. Roofing
  • 7. Architectural
  • 8. Interiors
  • 9. Signage
  • 10. Furniture
  • 11. Elevator
  • 12. Fire Protection
  • 13. Plumbing
slide-20
SLIDE 20

SCHEDULE

Canada College College of San Mateo Skyline College

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Months Participants

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Lessons Learned (from A/ E side)

Time/Schedule management Consultants: Whom to include? A to Z Feedback loops; Version Control

2 3 4

It’s going to take longer than you think!

1

slide-23
SLIDE 23

WORK PRODUCT

Work Product 3

Design Standard Construction Specification Format

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Design St andard vs. Const ruct ion Specificat ion

Is it performance-based or prescriptive? 100 vs. 32 Format: Word with Track Changes Identify proprietary/sole source items (Board approval)

2 3 4

What about deviations?

1

slide-25
SLIDE 25

SCHEDULE

slide-26
SLIDE 26

“The doors ar “The doors are e falling falling off!”

  • ff!”

MAXIMIZE INPUT St aff feedback

slide-27
SLIDE 27

FINAL DOCUMENT

Final Document 4

Examples Hardcopy District Website

slide-28
SLIDE 28

SCHEDULE

Canada College Canada College College of San Mateo Skyline College

slide-29
SLIDE 29

FINAL DOCUMENT Hardcopy

slide-30
SLIDE 30

FINAL DOCUMENT Dist rict Websit e

http://smccd.edu/facilities/designstandards.php

slide-31
SLIDE 31

RETROSPECTIVE

Retrospective 5

Facilities

Success & Challenges How is it being used? What would we do differently?

slide-32
SLIDE 32

RETROSPECTIVE Success & Challenges

We got it done! The right hand-picked team By including everyone, it raised awareness & created ownership It’s nev It’s never done! Living document r done! Living document

2 3 1

slide-33
SLIDE 33

RETROSPECTIVE How is it being used?

LOG to keep track Compliance Chart Accountability

2 3 1

slide-34
SLIDE 34

RETROSPECTIVE What would we do different ly?

Formatting: Numbers not Bullets Exchange: What process to use? Reminders: Speak now or forever hold your peace!

2 3 1

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Engage your crew: The good, the bad and the ugly! Begin with the end in mind: Who is the audience? Everyone is accountable: Pick the right team!

2 3 4

Manage expectations: How much control do you want to have?

1 5

Plan for the future: Leave in some flexibility!

=

SETS UP YOUR DISTRICT FOR SUCCESS!

RETROSPECTIVE

slide-36
SLIDE 36

SCHEDULE

Canada College College of San Mateo Skyline College

Quest ions?