To St andardize or Not t o St andardize?
Choices made when a Dist rict revises t heir St andards
CCFC September 15, 2015
To St andardize or Not t o St andardize? Choices made when a Dist - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
To St andardize or Not t o St andardize? Choices made when a Dist rict revises t heir St andards CCFC September 15, 2015 St andards Design What are Design St andards? Building Needs Assessment 1 Programming, Utilization 2 Design
Choices made when a Dist rict revises t heir St andards
CCFC September 15, 2015
What are Design St andards?
Building Needs Assessment Programming, Utilization Design Criteria, Campus Vocabulary
2 3 4
Classroom & Office Standards; FF&E
1 5
Different people call it different things!
Why are Dist rict St andards import ant ?
Uniformity across the district and campuses Consistency among A/E teams Standardization of M&O after project completion
2 3 4
Guidance to campus for cost and decision-making
1 5
Don’t have to ‘re-invent the wheel’ each time!
Ernie Y Ernie Yamane mane
Principal-in-Charge
Mani A. Mani A. Farhadi Farhadi
Tom Nakamura
Project Architect ZFA ZFA Structural Engineering CSW CSW/Stuber- Str Stroeh eh Civil Engineering RHAA RHAA Landscape Architecture Shannon- annon-Leigh Asso Associa ciates es Signage ABBAE ABBAE Roofing & Waterproofing Re:Vision :Vision Ar Architectu chitecture Sustainability HKA HKA Consul ulti ting ng Elevator TEECOM TEECOM Security, Acoustic, IT Alfa T Alfa Tech ch Consul ulti ting ng MEP/FP Engineering Mod Modulus Consul ulti ting ng BIM Color W lor Works rks Studi Studio Interior Design
The Design Team
STEINBERG
The Client Team
Jose Jose Nunez Nunez
Vice Chancellor Facilities, Planning, & Operations/Safety
Kar Karen P n Powe well
Facilities, Planning, & Operations
Kar Karen P n Pinkham nkham
Facilities Planning John C John Cuevas evas CAN Lead Groundskeeper Joe Fuller Joe Fullerton Energy & Sustainability Manager Eric Razn Eric Raznick ick Chief Technology Officer Dar Darrel ell L l Lee Network Infrastructure Mike Mike Celes Celeste Director Public Safety Mar Marina P Pelo losi Schneider- Electric Juan L Juan Lopez pez SKY Chief Engineer Yoseph seph Demissie missie Director Technology Jozsef V Jozsef Veres CAN Chief Engineer Paul Phil F ul Phil Fong ng CSM Chief Engineer ZachT ZachTraywick ck SKY Lead Groundskeeper
SAN MATEO COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
Chris ris Strugar Strugar- Frit Fritsch sch Director Capital Projects Mar Mario Galea Galeano Program Manager Consultant Ro Robert G Gutierrez Facilities Systems Manager Ju Justin stin Ei Eichner hner CSM Lead Groundskeeper Gusta Gustav Deus Deuss GRD/Energy Consultant John John Has Hashiz izume CAN Facilities Manager Mi Michele chele Rudo Rudovsky CSM Facilities Manager John D John Doctor
SKY Facilities Manager Carin rina W Warn rne Executive Assistant Cus Custodial Super Superviso isors CAN, CSM, SKY
WHY UPDATE?
Why Update? 1
Code Revisions Product Changes Lessons Learned
2007-2009 previous Standards CIP 1, CIP 2 Building Code updates; CALGreen LEED Gold Products discontinued Industry trends Lessons learned Staff training/expertise
Interface: Mission Zero
SCHEDULE
Canada College College of San Mateo Skyline College
GOAL / PURPOSE
GOAL / PURPOSE
CIP 3 / Measure H Ready for A/E teams Regardless of delivery method Canada College College of San Mateo Skyline College
EXPECTED OUTCOME
BIM: How much informat ion is t oo much?
What’s the right balance? Benefit vs. Cost To what extent will staff really use it?
2 3 4
Identify equipment and finishes only
1
STANDARDS PROCESS
Standards Process 2
Phase 1 Phase 2 Participatory Governance
Phase 1: Homework & site walks Phase 2: Feedback & edits Upload & Implement Facility Planning Facilities Managers Chief Engineers Lead Groundskeepers Consultants
SEQUENCE
SCHEDULE
Canada College College of San Mateo Skyline College
SCHEDULE
Meetings & Site walks Disciplines
Disciplines
SCHEDULE
Canada College College of San Mateo Skyline College
Months Participants
Lessons Learned (from A/ E side)
Time/Schedule management Consultants: Whom to include? A to Z Feedback loops; Version Control
2 3 4
It’s going to take longer than you think!
1
WORK PRODUCT
Work Product 3
Design Standard Construction Specification Format
Design St andard vs. Const ruct ion Specificat ion
Is it performance-based or prescriptive? 100 vs. 32 Format: Word with Track Changes Identify proprietary/sole source items (Board approval)
2 3 4
What about deviations?
1
SCHEDULE
“The doors ar “The doors are e falling falling off!”
MAXIMIZE INPUT St aff feedback
FINAL DOCUMENT
Final Document 4
Examples Hardcopy District Website
SCHEDULE
Canada College Canada College College of San Mateo Skyline College
FINAL DOCUMENT Hardcopy
FINAL DOCUMENT Dist rict Websit e
http://smccd.edu/facilities/designstandards.php
RETROSPECTIVE
Retrospective 5
Facilities
Success & Challenges How is it being used? What would we do differently?
RETROSPECTIVE Success & Challenges
We got it done! The right hand-picked team By including everyone, it raised awareness & created ownership It’s nev It’s never done! Living document r done! Living document
2 3 1
RETROSPECTIVE How is it being used?
LOG to keep track Compliance Chart Accountability
2 3 1
RETROSPECTIVE What would we do different ly?
Formatting: Numbers not Bullets Exchange: What process to use? Reminders: Speak now or forever hold your peace!
2 3 1
Engage your crew: The good, the bad and the ugly! Begin with the end in mind: Who is the audience? Everyone is accountable: Pick the right team!
2 3 4
Manage expectations: How much control do you want to have?
1 5
Plan for the future: Leave in some flexibility!
=
SETS UP YOUR DISTRICT FOR SUCCESS!
RETROSPECTIVE
SCHEDULE
Canada College College of San Mateo Skyline College
Quest ions?