Three dimensional geoacoustic inversion on the New Jersey shelf - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

three dimensional geoacoustic inversion on the new jersey
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Three dimensional geoacoustic inversion on the New Jersey shelf - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Three dimensional geoacoustic inversion on the New Jersey shelf Megan S. Ballard and Kyle M. Becker Applied Research Laboratory and Graduate Program in Acoustics The Pennsylvania State University PO Box 30, State College, PA 16804 Applied


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Three dimensional geoacoustic inversion on the New Jersey shelf

Megan S. Ballard and Kyle M. Becker

Applied Research Laboratory and Graduate Program in Acoustics The Pennsylvania State University PO Box 30, State College, PA 16804

Applied Research Laboratory

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • Methodology

– Horizontal wavenumber estimation – Perturbative inversion – Qualitative Regularization

  • The Shallow Water 2006 Experiment

– Acoustic and oceanographic measurements – Inversion results – Three dimensional model for the environment – Validation of results: comparison to core data and ability to predict the acoustic field

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Horizontal Wavenumber Estimation

The Hankel Transform Pair using the far field approximation

4

( ; , ) ( ; , ) 2

r

i ik r r r

e g k z z p r z z re dr k

π

π

∞ − −∞

=

4

( ; , ) ( ; , ) 2

r

i ik r r r r

e p r z z g k z z k e dk r

π

π

∞ − −∞

=

1

r

k r >>

The Short-Time Fourier Transform (STFT) Auto Regression (AR)

1 p n k n k k

x a x −

=

=∑

2 2 2 1

1

AR p i fkT k k

T P a e

π

σ

− =

= +∑

4

ˆ ˆ ( ; , , ) ( ; ) ( ; , ) 2

r

i ik r r L r

e g k r z z w r r p r z z re dr k

π

π

∞ − −∞

=

Hankel Transform Estimate Auto Regressive Spectrum

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Horizontal Wavenumber Estimation

Auto regressive (AR) techniques were used to estimate wave numbers from pressure field

  • data. Mode shapes aided in identifying modes. Across shelf data for 125 Hz shown here.

Window length of the AR estimator is 2000m. k5 k4 k3 k2 k1 k6 k8 k7

k1 k4 k3 k9 k8 k5 k6 k7 k2

k9

slide-5
SLIDE 5

1 2 2

1 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

n n n

c z k z Z z k z dz k c z ρ

∞ −

∆ ∆ =

Perturbative Inversion

This equation can be written in the form of a Fredholm integral of the first kind:

( ) ( )

D i i

y x z A z dz = ∫ 1,..., i N =

y = Ax

Which can be written in matrix form as: is a vector representing the data is a matrix representing the forward model is a vector representing the model parameter x A y

A relation between a perturbation to sound speed in sediment and a perturbation to horizontal wavenumbers is formulated from the depth separated normal mode equation:

slide-6
SLIDE 6

where is a discrete version of the differential operator Solve the ill-conditioned problem: by choosing the smoothest solution.

Tikhonov Regularization

y = Ax

n n

d dx

1 n = 2 n = favors the flattest solution; favors the smoothest solution. L-Curve Criterion: The Lagrange multiplier is chosen such that it both the residual and the semi-norm are minimized simultaneously.

λ

L

The Regularization solution is given by:

y A L L A A x

T T T 1 2

) ( ˆ

+ = λ

2 2 2 2 2

min Lx y Ax λ + −

2

y Ax −

2

Lx

slide-7
SLIDE 7

where the set is on orthogonal basis for .

Qualitative Regularization

where is created by the user.

q

L

1

( )

r T q i i i

I

=

= −∑ L L q q

1

{ }r

i i=

q Q

q

L

is given by: Solve the ill-conditioned problem: by choosing the solution that best fits some prior knowledge. y = Ax The Qualitative Regularization solution is given by:

y A L L A A x

T q T q T 1 2

) ( ˆ

+ = λ

2 2 2 2 2

min x L y Ax

q

λ + −

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Comparison: Tikhonov and QR

More accurate estimation of the bottom parameters can be made by allowing the solution to be a layered medium instead of a smooth profile.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Ship Tracks

Ship tracks oriented along, across, and oblique to the shelf break on radials with respect to the Shark VLA. All ship tracks are about 5km long.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The New Jersey Shelf

chirp seismic reflection data Chirp data provided by John Goff

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Layering Information from Chirp Data

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Layering Information from Chirp Data

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Water Column Sound Speed

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Inversion Results: Oblique Shelf Track

Input data to the inversion scheme: wavenumber estimates from 125 and 175 Hz data. Over lapping regions are inconsistent due to noise on the wavenumber estimates.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Inversion Results: Across Shelf Track

Wavenumber estimates could not be obtained for ranges less than 1.5 km because ship speed could not be approximated as constant along a radial with respect to the VLA.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Inversion Results: Along Shelf Track

Longer apertures were required for wavenumber estimation to account for closely spaced wavenumbers and average over the effects of the range dependent water column sound speed profile.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Simple Model

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Model Agreement: SW06 Cores

Upper Unit: 1639m/s, 1624m/s, 1657m/s Lower Unit: 1554m/s, 1652m/s (single values) Below R: 1850m/s (Upper range of very erratic measurements)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Evaluation of Results: TL Prediction 50 Hz

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Evaluation of Results: TL Prediction 125 Hz

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Evaluation of Results: Correlation

( ) ˆ( ) P r P r

min

min

1 ( ) ( )

R r

PQ P r Q r dr R r = −

* 12 * *

( ) ˆ ( ) ( ) ˆ ˆ ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) cor R P r P r P r P r P r P r =    

Calculated Field Measured Field 50 75 125 175

Incoherent Correlation

  • f the pressure fields

averaged over all tracks

0.7 0.8 0.9

  • 80
  • 70
  • 60
  • 50
  • 40
  • 30
  • 20
  • 10

Along Shelf Correlation Depth [m] 0.7 0.8 0.9

  • 80
  • 70
  • 60
  • 50
  • 40
  • 30
  • 20
  • 10

Across Shelf Correlation 0.7 0.8 0.9

  • 80
  • 70
  • 60
  • 50
  • 40
  • 30
  • 20
  • 10

Oblique Shelf Correlation

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Conclusions

  • Inversion Results

– Range Dependent Inversion Results for three distinct tracks – Creation of a 3-D model by determining for sound speed for each layer

  • Validation of Results

– Comparison shows agreement between inversion result and core data – Ability to predict the acoustic field at all depths and frequencies

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Back Up Slides

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Evaluation of Results: Correlation

50 75 125 175

0.7 0.8 0.9

  • 80
  • 70
  • 60
  • 50
  • 40
  • 30
  • 20
  • 10

Along Shelf Correlation Depth [m] 0.7 0.8 0.9

  • 80
  • 70
  • 60
  • 50
  • 40
  • 30
  • 20
  • 10

Across Shelf Correlation 0.7 0.8 0.9

  • 80
  • 70
  • 60
  • 50
  • 40
  • 30
  • 20
  • 10

Oblique Shelf Correlation 0.7 0.8 0.9

  • 80
  • 70
  • 60
  • 50
  • 40
  • 30
  • 20
  • 10

Along Shelf Correlation 0.7 0.8 0.9

  • 80
  • 70
  • 60
  • 50
  • 40
  • 30
  • 20
  • 10

Across Shelf Correlation 0.7 0.8 0.9

  • 80
  • 70
  • 60
  • 50
  • 40
  • 30
  • 20
  • 10

Oblique Shelf Correlation

Model to Data Correlation Data to Data Correlation

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Monte Carlo Error Estimates

The complete solution of the inverse problem requires not only the estimates

  • f the model parameter values, but also a measure of the uncertainty of the

estimates.

Monte Carlo Error Propagation:

T

N = D D Cov

T T i i

− D = x x 1,2,...., i N = where The empirical estimate of the covariance matrix

i i

Ax n y = + ( ) ( )

m z

diag σ = Cov

Error bars: standard deviation of the model estimates

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Inversion Results: Error Bars

For the Oblique Shelf Track

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Calculated Error Bars

2 1 2

( )

M ij j ii

R rl i R

=

= ∑

T

  • 1
  • 1

T m v m v

R = (G C G + C ) G C G d + v = Gm

  • T
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1

m v m

C = (G C G + C )

For the nonlinear problem examined here, the solution is arrived at iteratively. Assuming the final solution to the problem is linear, it is valid to use linear theory to obtain the resolution and covariance matrices. Beginning with the linear problem: The resolution matrix is given by: The posterior model covariance matrix is given by:

v

C

m

C

Data covariance matrix; Model covariance matrix Resolution length is given by:

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Calculated Error Bars

For the Oblique Shelf Track